AzTrials
AzTrials

DepressionPhase 3NCT06713616

PCORI Comparative Effectiveness Study-Esketamine (Spravato) vs. Ketamine-Equivalence Study

A Phase 3 study testing Racemic ketamine and Spravato (Esketamine) in people with Depression, run by Yale University at 8 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the relative effectiveness, acceptability, and side effects of ketamine delivered through an IV (a drip into the arm) which is not currently FDA approved for use in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and Esketamine (Spravato®), taken as a nasal spray which has… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Depression
What is being tested?
Racemic ketamine and Spravato (Esketamine)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
400 participants
Where
8 sitesUnited States
Study dates
27 Jan 2025to 31 Dec 2030
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Adults ages 18 or older
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder that is refractory to two or more antidepressant trials
  • Moderate or severe depression based on an initial MADRS score ≥ 25
  • Judged appropriate for ketamine or esketamine by clinician, independent of potential study participation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • A female participant must be:
  • Not of childbearing potential*, OR b. Of childbearing potential and practicing a highly effective method of contraception (failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly) and agrees to remain on a highly effective method while receiving study intervention and until 1 week after last dose - the end of relevant systemic exposure. The investigator will evaluate the potential for contraceptive method failure (e.g., noncompliance, recently initiated) in relationship to the first dose of drug. Acceptable methods of contraception are: i. combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, transdermal, or intravaginal) ii. intrauterine device (IUD) iii. intrauterine hormone-releasing system (IUS) iv. bilateral tubal occlusion/ligation v. male partner with a bilateral vasectomy with documented aspermia or a bilateral orchiectomy vi. male or female condom with spermicide, diaphragm, or sponge with spermicide (Note: Use of condom as the sole method of contraception is not considered to be a highly effective method of contraception).
  • A female participant must agree not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) or freeze for future use for the purposes of assisted reproduction during the study * We will consider women to be of childbearing potential if they are within 2 years of menopause (within 3 years since last menstrual period) and have not had a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or other definitive surgical intervention.

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of bipolar disorder or psychotic disorder (i.e., schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder)
  • Other psychiatric comorbidities are permitted so long as depression is the predominant diagnosis
  • Active or recent (within 12 months) substance use disorder (other than nicotine)
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Intracerebral hemorrhage or aneurysmal vascular disease
  • Hypersensitivity to ketamine, esketamine or any of the excipients
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Known family history of ketamine use disorder
  • Prior known ketamine use disorder as well as subjects for whom study participations will result in more than 8 lifetime exposures to ketamine (e.g., prior exposure to ketamine, prior recreational use with ketamine). Prior esketamine exposure is also exclusionary.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, as demonstrated by a blood pressure of greater than 145 / 90 at screening visit. (Pre-treatment blood pressure will be permitted to be 150 / 95 to allow for "whitecoat" hypertension on treatment visits 1-8.)
  • Known cardiovascular and cerebrovascular conditions that are associated with an increased risk related to ketamine or esketamine administration (including space-occupying CNS lesions). This includes those prospective participants who undergo EKG and are shown to have an abnormality that would put them at increased risk related to treatment.
  • Known condition for which an acute rise in blood pressure would pose a serious risk.
  • Arteriovenous malformation
  • Positive urine toxicology at screening visit, except for substances that are prescribed (i.e., benzodiazepines, stimulants). Given the extended length of time between exposure and negative toxicology screen, a positive screen for THC will not be exclusionary unless the pattern of use and clinical evaluation are indicative of cannabis use disorder. Cannabis used within 24 hours of dosing is exclusionary.
  • Positive alcohol breathalyzer at screening or clinical signs of intoxication
  • The patient is unable to arrange for someone to drive them home after each treatment session; patients who are unwilling to refrain from driving and operating machinery on treatment days until the next day following sleep will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

8 sites in 1 country

United States8 sites, 6 recruiting
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104

    Active, not recruiting
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

    Brandon Kitay, MD, 404-712-6939

    Recruiting
  • Houston Center for Advanced Psychiatric Treatment

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

    Sandhya Prashad, MD

    Sarah Hartigan, (832) 730 - 5196, sarah@sprashadmd.com

    Recruiting
  • Mood Institute

    Milford, Connecticut, 06461

    Lisa Harding, MD, 203-701-9737, Trials@DepressionMD.com

    Lisa Harding, MD

    Recruiting
  • LifeStance Health

    Moore, Oklahoma, 73160

    Active, not recruiting
  • Athena Care

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37228

    Amanda Sparks-Bushnell, MD, 615-861-1000, interventional@athenacare.health

    Amanda Sparks-Bushnell, MD

    Recruiting
  • Yale School of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06512

    Samuel Wilkinson, MD, 203-764-9131, Samuel.Wilkinson@yale.edu

    Samuel Wilkinson, MD

    Recruiting
  • Seattle NTC

    Seattle, Washington, 98104

    Rebecca Allen, MD, 206-467-6300 ext. 5, Rebecca.Allen@seattlentc.com

    Rebecca Allen, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparative Effectiveness of Racemic Ketamine Versus Esketamine (Spravato®) for Depression

The purpose of this study is to compare the relative effectiveness, acceptability, and side effects of ketamine delivered through an IV (a drip into the arm) which is not currently FDA approved for use in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and Esketamine (Spravato®), taken as a nasal spray which has received FDA approval for use in the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in the treatment of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The study will look at the following:

  • How well the treatment helps with symptoms of depression (effectiveness),
  • How comfortable and willing people are to use the treatment (acceptability), and
  • How well people can deal with any side effects from the treatment (tolerability).

The study will also examine factors that may predict which treatment works better for certain patients.

Read the detailed description

This non-inferiority, multi-site, comparative effectiveness study will utilize a randomized design. Individuals with treatment resistant depression (TRD) will be randomized (1:1) to Spravato® or IV ketamine. This 5-year multisite comparative effectiveness study will enroll 400 total patients (~200 per group).

Conditions
Depression
Being tested
Racemic ketamine, Spravato (Esketamine)
Medical subject headings
Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Racemic ketamineDrug

    Ketamine will be given intravenously. Per FDA guidance, the max dose of ketamine will be 60mg per day, with a total lifetime limit of 8 doses. Ketamine will be infused over 40 minutes.

  • Spravato (Esketamine)Drug

    Spravato® (Esketamine) will be given intranasally. For esketamine, the dose will be between 56 and 84mg, according to the FDA label for the drug. Allowances will be made for patients who have difficulty tolerating these doses to be dosed at 28mg in subsequent treatment sessions.

Study groups in NCT06713616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Racemic KetamineExperimentalKetamine will be given intravenously. Per FDA guidance, the max dose of ketamine will be 60mg per day, with a total lifetime limit of 8 doses. Ketamine will be infused over 40 minutes.
Receives: Drug: Racemic ketamine
Spravato (Esketamine)ExperimentalSpravato® (Esketamine) will be given intranasally. For esketamine, the dose will be between 56 and 84mg, according to the FDA label for the drug. Allowances will be made for patients who have difficulty tolerating these doses to be dosed at 28mg in subsequent treatment sessions.
Receives: Drug: Spravato (Esketamine)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-Reported Effectiveness

    defined as the change in depression severity after 8 treatments, as assessed by the 16-item, patient-reported outcome, Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16), at the end of one-month of treatment. Scale ranges from 0 - 27 with higher scores indicating worse depression.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Clinician-Reported Effectiveness

    change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score. Scale ranges from 0-60 with higher scores indicating worse depression.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  2. Response

    defined as a ≥50% decrease from baseline to end of week 4 on the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16). The proportion and number of participants with response will be compared between groups.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  3. Remission

    defined as a total score of ≤ 5 on the Quick Inventory of Depression Symptomatology (QIDS-SR16). The proportion and number of participants with remission will be compared between groups.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  4. Suicidal Ideation and Behavior

    The Columbia-Suicide Severity Scale Rating (C-SSRS) will be collected to examine any comparative differences in suicidal ideation. Scale ranges from 0-5 (for suicidal ideation) with higher scores indicating worse ideation. Scale for behavior measures counts of suicide behaviors.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  5. Level of Disability

    The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) will be used to assess any changes in patient disability levels associated with the treatments. The SDS is a patient rated discretized analog measure of functional disability in work, social and family life. Score for each subscale ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating worse disability.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  6. Quality of Life

    defined as changes in quality of life, as assessed by the Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS). The QLDS will assess changes in the quality-of-life factors in relation to antidepressant treatments. The score ranges from 0-34, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  7. Utilization of Healthcare Resources

    Measure using the Health Resource Utilization Questionnaire to track all cause healthcare utilization by assessing patients visits to all forms of healthcare providers and settings and tracking the use of other health related resources. In specific, group comparisons on specific types of patient visits (e.g., therapy visits, hospitalizations, ED visits) will be made. The scale measures counts of healthcare visits.

    Measured: end of treatment (4 weeks)

  8. Acceptability

    The 9-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) will be used as the key secondary outcome measure. The TSQM-9 is a validated tool for assessing patient satisfaction with treatment and covers the domains of effectiveness, convenience, and global satisfaction. Each domain is scored from 0-100 with lower scores indicating lower satisfaction. Behavioral measures will be used to assess treatment acceptability by comparing dropout rates and missed visits between the two treatment options.

    Measured: end of treatment (4 weeks after baseline)

  9. Patient and Clinician Global Severity and Improvement

    Global improvement of depression will be assessed with the Clinician and Patient Global Impression-Severity/Improvement indices. These are simple measures for clinicians and patients to provide information on overall depression severity and improvement with treatment. The scale ranges from 1-7 with higher scores indicating worse depression.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

  10. Tolerability and Safety

    Tolerability will be based on group comparison of number of patients who experience adverse events of special interest. These include vomiting, dysphoric reactions, and clinically meaningful elevations in blood pressure and/or heart rate during the treatment session.

    Measured: baseline until end of treatment (4 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Dec 2024
  2. Study start27 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study is a randomized phase 3 drug treatment study. Subjects will be randomized, in randomly varying blocks of no more than 8 at each site, to receive either esketamine (Spravato®) or intravenous ketamine. This study is unblinded.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06713616
Sponsor's protocol ID
2000037121
Other IDs
23-005287
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
27 Nov 2024
Last updated
8 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Racemic ketamine and Spravato (Esketamine) in people with Depression, run by Yale University at 8 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cindy Voghell (203-737-4784, Cynthia.Voghell@yale.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-Reported Effectiveness (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT06713616 | AzTrials