Embolic Stroke of Undetermined SourcePhase 2/3EMPA-ESUSNCT06715449
EMPA-ESUS. a Randomised Control Trial to Investigate the Impact of Empagliflozin on Left Atrial Function in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
A Phase 2/3 study testing Empagliflozin 10 MG in people with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Atrial Fibrillation New Onset, run by University of East Anglia at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm problem in the adult population. There is a five-fold increase in stroke risk in patients with AF. Whilst there has been considerable advances in AF management including improvement in ablation therapy, preventing AF remains an unmet need. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source, Atrial Fibrillation New Onset
- What is being tested?
- Empagliflozin 10 MG
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 22 Nov 2024to Mar 2029
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age over 18 years
- Patient has had an embolic stroke of undetermined source, defined as:
- Ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack diagnosed clinically + supporting radiological features on CT or MRI imaging
- No clinically significant extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis found on neck imaging
- No evidence of prevalent cardioembolic source of embolism - atrial dysrhythmia, cardiac thrombus, prosthetic valve, cardiac tumours, mitral stenosis, recent MI, LVEF<35%, valvular vegetations, or infective endocarditis
- AND
Show all 9Show fewer
- No other specific stroke aetiology identified (pro-thrombotic states, arteritis, dissection, drug abuse)
- Patient has been referred for an implantable loop recorder implant to investigate possible atrial dysrhythmia
- Ability to give written, informed consent
Who cannot join
- Prevalent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Subsequent demonstration of a cardio-emoblic source
- Pre-existent indication for SGLT2i including heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction and Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Contraindication to the commencement of SGLT2i including a history of, or risk factors for diabetic ketoacidosis, such as restricted food intake or a history of alcohol abuse
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of empagliflozin
- Presence of alternate implantable cardiac devices such as a pacemaker or defibrillator, that would make ILR utilisation redundant
- Any condition that may confound the results or interfere with participation such as dementia
- An unwillingness to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ
Vassilios S. Vassiliou, PhD, 07443911905 ext. 01603592534, v.vassiliou@uea.ac.uk
About this study
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm problem in the adult population. There is a five-fold increase in stroke risk in patients with AF. Whilst there has been considerable advances in AF management including improvement in ablation therapy, preventing AF remains an unmet need.
One promising avenue is a group of medications called Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which has been studied in people with diabetes, kidney disease and weak heart muscle. These medicines were consistently found to lower the risk of developing AF. This can be promising for patients who have suffered a stroke for unclear reasons, where a significant proportion are subsequently found to have short periods of AF. Often prior to AF development, patients may have changes in the structure or function of the top chambers of their heart (the atria). This may provide a useful marker for us to understand whether SGLT2i impacts AF risk.
Read more
Aim of research study:
The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of the drug empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, prevents changes in the left atrium associated with future AF development. Using advanced imaging techniques and continuous rhyth monitoring we intend to study the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on left atrial function and arrhythmia occurence.
Study design:
Patients who are undergoing an implantable loop recorder insertion, to detect AF following a stroke, will be invited for participation. Eligible consenting patients will have a baseline assessment with echocardiography, electrocardiogram and anthropometric measures. They will then be randomised to receive either the SGLT2i alongside usual stroke care for 6 months, or usual stroke care alone. All patients will be monitored remotely via their loop recorder, and will undergo repeat electrocardiogpahic, echocardiographic and anthropometric assessment at 6 months. This way, we aim to investigate whether the SGLT2 inhibitor causes changes in atrial parameters that may be associated with future AF development.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Individuals who suffer an embolic stoke of undermined source represent 17% of all ischaemic stroke patients. When they undergo continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring with a loop recorder, a large portion of the population have been noted to develop atrial fibrillation (AF). In our own centre, 48.6% of patients have found to develop AF. This is considerably more than the proportion seen in patients undergoing ILR implantation for other reasons.
What remains unclear is whether this AF may have been responsible for the initial stroke, or is a reflection of an underlying atrial cardiopathy. Moreover, it is felt that this device detected AF is an important risk factor for stroke recurrence. Recent trials have suggested that whilst anticoagulation for device detected AF reduces future stroke, this is at the expense of a significant bleeding risk. Thus far, there have been no therapies that prevent the occurrence of AF, even in groups at high risk of AF development. Obviously such a strategy would negate the risk of bleeding associated with anticoagulation use. Such a strategy would reflect a paradigm shift in AF management.
Whilst studies have tried to explore the significance of abnormal atrial function in ESUS, generally crude assessments such as P-wave terminal force in V1 and brain natriuretic peptide had been utilised. Our group deep phenotyped over 300 ESUS patients. This work highlighted an important predictive role of left atrial strain for future device detected AF.
Left atrial strain has shown great promise as a marker of atrial dysfunction. There is growing evidence that sodium glucose 2 co-transporter inhibitors, such as empagliflozin, may prevent the development of AF. There have been over a dozen metaanalyses of the safety data from the large SGLT2i outcome trials, which have consistently shown that the SGLT2i arm was associated with lower incident AF compared to the control arm.
Similar results were seen in cohort studies including in Taiwan and the Food and Drug Association's adverse events reporting system. It is this finding that prompted the interest in utilising empagliflozin as the intervention in the trial.
Study aims and objectives:
The aims of this study are to assess if:
SGLT2 inhibitors can prevent adverse changes in left atrial function in patients who are felt to have an increased chance of AF development.
A nested MRI substudy will be used to try and provide mechanistic insight into how SGLT2 inhibitors may exert an antiarrhythmic effect.
Methods:
Given that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors to prevent atrial change has not been investigated before, we aim to investigate the hypotheses with an early stage randomised controlled trial.
For this, patients undergoing implantable loop recorder insertion for AF detection following an embolic stroke of undetermined source will be invited to participate. The participants will be randomised either to usual stroke care or to the intervention arm (use of SGLT2 inhibitor in addition to usual stroke care). They will be assessed at baseline and at 6-months following initiation of the medication. Both appointments will include echocardiography, electrocardiography and anthropometric assessments such as weight and grip strength.
From each arm, 10 patients will under also undergo advanced MRI imaging including MR spectroscopy, to try and investigate possible mechanisms for any effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor.
- Being tested
- Empagliflozin 10 MG
- Keywords
- Atrial strain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Empagliflozin 10 MGDrug
Participants allocated in the Intervention Group will be taking empagliflozin 10mg once a day in addition to their usual stroke care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group: Empagliflozin + usual stroke care | Experimental | Patients randomised in this group will be taking the SLGT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin 10mg OD) in addition to usual stroke care Receives: Drug: Empagliflozin 10 MG |
| Control group: Usual stroke care alone | No intervention | Patients randomised in this group will continue to have their guideline directed stroke care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in left atrial reservoir strain
The left atrial reservoir strain (LArs) (expressed in %) will be assessed from the echocardiogram at baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Difference in ILR-detected AF burden
AF will be detected via the implantable loop recorder
Measured: 6 months
Difference in time to first AF episode
Time to first AF episode will be measured from time of ILR implantation to time of first AF detection
Measured: 6 months
Change in P-wave terminal force
P-wave terminal force will be measured using the V1 lead on 12-lead ECG
Measured: 6 months
Change in P-wave axis
P-wave axis will be measured using a 12-lead ECG
Measured: 6 months
Change in LA volume
Indexed LA volume will be measured using apical 2 and apical 4 chamber views from transthoracic echocardiography
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2024
- Study start22 Nov 2024
- Primary completionJul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Embolic Stroke of Undetermined SourceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel-group prospective randomised open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of East Anglia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06715449
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRAS: 318615
- Acronym
- EMPA-ESUS
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 4 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EMPA-ESUS. a Randomised Control Trial to Investigate the Impact of Empagliflozin on Left Atrial Function in Patients with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06715449
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMPA-ESUS / IRAS: 318615
- Keywords
- Atrial strain
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of East AngliaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge
- Study start
- 22 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm problem in the adult population. There is a five-fold increase in stroke risk in patients with AF. Whilst there has been considerable advances in AF management including improvement in ablation therapy, preventing AF remains an unmet need.
One promising avenue is a group of medications called Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, which has been studied in people with diabetes, kidney disease and weak heart muscle. These medicines were consistently found to lower the risk of developing AF. This can be promising for patients who have suffered a stroke for unclear reasons, where a significant proportion are subsequently found to have short periods of AF. Often prior to AF development, patients may have changes in the structure or function of the top chambers of their heart (the atria). This may provide a useful marker for us to understand whether SGLT2i impacts AF risk.
Aim of research study:
The aim of this study is to investigate whether the use of the drug empagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, prevents changes in the left atrium associated with future AF development. Using advanced imaging techniques and continuous rhyth monitoring we intend to study the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on left atrial function and arrhythmia occurence.
Study design:
Patients who are undergoing an implantable loop recorder insertion, to detect AF following a stroke, will be invited for participation. Eligible consenting patients will have a baseline assessment with echocardiography, electrocardiogram and anthropometric measures. They will then be randomised to receive either the SGLT2i alongside usual stroke care for 6 months, or usual stroke care alone. All patients will be monitored remotely via their loop recorder, and will undergo repeat electrocardiogpahic, echocardiographic and anthropometric assessment at 6 months. This way, we aim to investigate whether the SGLT2 inhibitor causes changes in atrial parameters that may be associated with future AF development.
Detailed description
Background:
Individuals who suffer an embolic stoke of undermined source represent 17% of all ischaemic stroke patients. When they undergo continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring with a loop recorder, a large portion of the population have been noted to develop atrial fibrillation (AF). In our own centre, 48.6% of patients have found to develop AF. This is considerably more than the proportion seen in patients undergoing ILR implantation for other reasons.
What remains unclear is whether this AF may have been responsible for the initial stroke, or is a reflection of an underlying atrial cardiopathy. Moreover, it is felt that this device detected AF is an important risk factor for stroke recurrence. Recent trials have suggested that whilst anticoagulation for device detected AF reduces future stroke, this is at the expense of a significant bleeding risk. Thus far, there have been no therapies that prevent the occurrence of AF, even in groups at high risk of AF development. Obviously such a strategy would negate the risk of bleeding associated with anticoagulation use. Such a strategy would reflect a paradigm shift in AF management.
Whilst studies have tried to explore the significance of abnormal atrial function in ESUS, generally crude assessments such as P-wave terminal force in V1 and brain natriuretic peptide had been utilised. Our group deep phenotyped over 300 ESUS patients. This work highlighted an important predictive role of left atrial strain for future device detected AF.
Left atrial strain has shown great promise as a marker of atrial dysfunction. There is growing evidence that sodium glucose 2 co-transporter inhibitors, such as empagliflozin, may prevent the development of AF. There have been over a dozen metaanalyses of the safety data from the large SGLT2i outcome trials, which have consistently shown that the SGLT2i arm was associated with lower incident AF compared to the control arm.
Similar results were seen in cohort studies including in Taiwan and the Food and Drug Association's adverse events reporting system. It is this finding that prompted the interest in utilising empagliflozin as the intervention in the trial.
Study aims and objectives:
The aims of this study are to assess if:
SGLT2 inhibitors can prevent adverse changes in left atrial function in patients who are felt to have an increased chance of AF development.
A nested MRI substudy will be used to try and provide mechanistic insight into how SGLT2 inhibitors may exert an antiarrhythmic effect.
Methods:
Given that the use of SGLT2 inhibitors to prevent atrial change has not been investigated before, we aim to investigate the hypotheses with an early stage randomised controlled trial.
For this, patients undergoing implantable loop recorder insertion for AF detection following an embolic stroke of undetermined source will be invited to participate. The participants will be randomised either to usual stroke care or to the intervention arm (use of SGLT2 inhibitor in addition to usual stroke care). They will be assessed at baseline and at 6-months following initiation of the medication. Both appointments will include echocardiography, electrocardiography and anthropometric assessments such as weight and grip strength.
From each arm, 10 patients will under also undergo advanced MRI imaging including MR spectroscopy, to try and investigate possible mechanisms for any effect of the SGLT2 inhibitor.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel-group prospective randomised open-label blinded endpoint (PROBE) controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group: Empagliflozin + usual stroke care | Experimental | Drug: Empagliflozin 10 MGPatients randomised in this group will be taking the SLGT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin 10mg OD) in addition to usual stroke care |
| Control group: Usual stroke care alone | No intervention | –Patients randomised in this group will continue to have their guideline directed stroke care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age over 18 years
- Patient has had an embolic stroke of undetermined source, defined as:
- AND
- No other specific stroke aetiology identified (pro-thrombotic states, arteritis, dissection, drug abuse)
- Patient has been referred for an implantable loop recorder implant to investigate possible atrial dysrhythmia
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Prevalent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
- Subsequent demonstration of a cardio-emoblic source
- Pre-existent indication for SGLT2i including heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction and Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Contraindication to the commencement of SGLT2i including a history of, or risk factors for diabetic ketoacidosis, such as restricted food intake or a history of alcohol abuse
- Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients of empagliflozin
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Empagliflozin 10 MGParticipants allocated in the Intervention Group will be taking empagliflozin 10mg once a day in addition to their usual stroke care. | Drug | Intervention group: Empagliflozin + usual stroke care |
Primary outcome
Change in left atrial reservoir strain
Time frame: 6 months
The left atrial reservoir strain (LArs) (expressed in %) will be assessed from the echocardiogram at baseline and at 6 months follow-up
5 secondary outcomes
Difference in ILR-detected AF burden
Time frame: 6 months
Difference in time to first AF episode
Time frame: 6 months
Change in P-wave terminal force
Time frame: 6 months
Change in P-wave axis
Time frame: 6 months
Change in LA volume
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria in ESUS & ETUS
Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
RecruitingObservational study
SENIOR: Stroke Prevention in the Elderly by Patent Foramen Ovale closuRe vs Anticoagulation
Ischemic Stroke, Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
RecruitingObservational study
High Coverage CARotid Stenting vs. Medical Management Alone to Prevent EmboliSm From symptomaTic Non-stenotic cARotid Disease (SyNC)
Carotid Artery Disease, Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
Recruiting
Atrial Fibrillation Detection Using MEMO Patch in Patients With Stroke of Unknown Cause
Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
RecruitingObservational study
AI-Based Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation in ESUS Patients With ICM
Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Empagliflozin 10 MG in people with Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and Atrial Fibrillation New Onset, run by University of East Anglia at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vassilios S Vassiliou, PhD (01603592534, V.Vassiliou@uea.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in left atrial reservoir strain (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2024.