AzTrials
AzTrials

Ulcerative ColitisTRINITYNCT06717906

Comparing TRIple Rectal Ultrasound Imaging Technology in Ulcerative Colitis

A study testing Endoscopic Ultrasound in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate the correlation of rectal wall thickness and vascularity measurements using trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAS), trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Ulcerative Colitis
What is being tested?
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
142 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
27 May 2024to 31 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients (18-75 years) with Ulcerative colitis

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant
  • Lactating mother
  • Endoscopy not required
  • No consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

    Hyderabad

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Comparing Three Modalities (Trans Abdominal, Trans-perineal and Endoscopic Ultrasound) of Ultrasonography for Rectal Imaging in Ulcerative Colitis: The TRINITY Study

This study aims to evaluate the correlation of rectal wall thickness and vascularity measurements using trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAS), trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary objective is to correlate rectal total wall thickness measured by TPUS with EUS, while secondary objectives include correlating rectal wall thickness and vascularity as measured by TAS, TPUS, and EUS, with endoscopic and histologic activity. Additionally, the study will assess changes in patient management following EUS/sigmoidoscopy compared to TAS/TPUS alone. Consecutive UC patients attending an IBD clinic will undergo clinical assessment using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) followed by TAS and TPUS as point-of-care tests. If clinically indicated, patients will also undergo sigmoidoscopy and EUS during the same visit, with measurements compared and correlated to histologic inflammation and fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels when available. This cross-sectional study will include a follow-up period until biopsy results are obtained, with a recruitment duration of 6-12 months and a target sample size of 170 patients (60 patients with mid-end ultrasound machine, rest with high-end ultrasound machine for transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound).

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to assess the correlation of rectal wall thickness and vascularity measurements obtained through trans-abdominal ultrasound (TAS), trans-perineal ultrasound (TPUS), and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in adult patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary goal is to determine how well rectal total wall thickness measured via TPUS correlates with EUS findings. Secondary objectives include comparing rectal wall thickness and vascularity measured by TAS, TPUS, and EUS with endoscopic activity, histologic activity, and fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels. Additionally, the study aims to evaluate changes in patient management resulting from additional investigations, such as sigmoidoscopy and EUS, over the standard TAS and TPUS procedures. UC patients attending an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinic will undergo a clinical assessment using the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), followed by baseline TAS and TPUS, both performed as point-of-care tests. If deemed clinically necessary, patients will also undergo sigmoidoscopy and EUS during the same visit, with rectal wall thickness and vascularity measured across different rectal sections and correlated with histologic inflammation assessed via biopsy and measured by the Nancy histologic index. The study will also explore correlations with FCP levels where data are available. This cross-sectional study includes a follow-up period until biopsy results are obtained, with an estimated recruitment duration of 6-12 months and a target sample size of 50 patients.

Being tested
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Colitis, Ulcerative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endoscopic UltrasoundDiagnostic test

    If sigmoidoscopy is warranted as per clinical indication, the consenting patients shall undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) using a radial echo-endoscope during the same sitting of sigmoidoscopy without incurring any additional cost to the patient. Total rectal wall thickness in anterior and posterior wall shall be measured in upper, middle and lower rectum with assessment of vascularity (Modified Limberg scale). The maximal wall thickness including maximum mucosal and submucosal thickness shall be noted and compared to total wall thickness measured by transabdominal ultrasound (TAS) and Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). On sigmoidoscopy, rectal inflammation shall be measured by ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity (UCEIS) in rectum. Biopsy seal be taken as standard protocol to document histologic inflammation (measured by Nancy histologic index) which is known to predict future risk of relapse.

Study groups in NCT06717906
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adult patients with Ulcerative colitisOtherAdult patients (18-75 years) with Ulcerative colitis Pregnant, lactating and acute severe colitis excluded
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Endoscopic Ultrasound

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission

    Wall thickness (in mm) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission

    Wall thickness (in mm) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vascularity in predicting histologic remission

    Vascularity grades (modified Limberg scale: score 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound vascularity in predicting histologic remission

    Vascularity grades (modified Limberg score: 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by transperineal ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission

    Wall thickness (in mm) measured by transperineal ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound in predicting histlogic remission

    Wall thickness (in mm) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting histologic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound vascularity in predicting endoscopic remission

    Vascularity grades (modified Limberg score: 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission in rectum in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Compare diagnostic accuracy of transperineal ultrasound vascularity in predicting endoscopic remission

    Vascularity grades (modified Limberg score: 0-3, higher score indicates worse outcome) measured by transperineal ultrasound in predicting endoscopioc remission in ulcerative colitis

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Dec 2024
  2. Study start27 May 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2025
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
142 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06717906
Sponsor's protocol ID
AGPL/TRINITY/01; Version:01
Acronym
TRINITY
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
18 Aug 2024
Last updated
17 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endoscopic Ultrasound in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Compare diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in predicting endoscopic remission (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in