Mandibular PrognathismPhase 1/2NCT06724497
Evaluating the Accuracy of Soft Tissue Prediction in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism After Orthognathic Surgery Using Handheld Scanner Versus Optical Scanner A Prospective Clinical Trial
A Phase 1/2 study testing face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgery in people with Mandibular Prognathism and Orthognathic Surgery, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Aim of study: To evaluate the accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanners versus optical scanners. Research hypothesis (null hypothesis): there is no difference in prediction accuracy between laser scans and handheld scans. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mandibular Prognathism, Orthognathic Surgery
- What is being tested?
- face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 11 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 24 Sep 2024to 24 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- • Patients with facial mandibular prognathism that requires orthognathic surgery.
- Age (18- 50 years).
- Patients are willing for the surgical procedure and follow-up, with informed consent
Who cannot join
- • Dental malocclusion that could be treated with orthodontic treatment only.
- Patients with contraindications for general anesthesia.
- Patient on radiotherapy.
- Patients suffer from bone disease
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Aim of study: To evaluate the accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanners versus optical scanners.
Research hypothesis (null hypothesis): there is no difference in prediction accuracy between laser scans and handheld scans.
Read more
Primary objective: To evaluate The Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanner versus laser scanner
.
Secondary objective:
To evaluate scanning time, cost efficiency, and ease of use. patients will be treated from mandibular prognathism using only mandibular set back or bimaxillary surgery After six months postoperatively, 3D facial scans is obtained and exported to software to perform superimposition of the predicted and post operative results to assess the accuracy of soft tissue prediction By measuring the difference in millimeter between prespecified points
Read the detailed description
Aim of study: To evaluate The Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanner versus optical scanner.
Research hypothesis (null hypothesis) that there is no difference in prediction accuracy between laser scans and handheld scans.
Primary objective: To evaluate The Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanner versus laser scanner .
Secondary objective:
To evaluate scanning time, cost efficiency, ease of use. 8. Trial design
One group of patients will be assigned to this trial:
One group: same patient will be scanned by both devices preoperatively and post operatively.
Trial design: prospective clinical trial( diagnostic accuracy study )
III. Methods A) Participants, interventions \& outcomes 9. Study settings: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. 10. Eligibility criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with facial mandibular prognathism that requires orthognathic surgery.
- Age (18- 50years).
- Patients are willing for the surgical procedure and follow-up, with informed consent (appendix 1).
Exclusion criteria:
- Dental malocclusion that could be treated with orthodontic treatment only.
- Patients with contraindications for general anesthesia.
- Patient on radiotherapy.
- Patients suffer from bone disease. 11. Interventions Preoperative Investigations
- From the point of eligibility for general anesthesia, complete blood picture, body weight, urine albumin, blood glucose level, kidney and liver function.
- Administration of peri-operative antibiotics.
- A multi-slice CT scan will be demanded in a form of DICOM files ( Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) for proper diagnosis and confirmation of patient compatibility to the eligibility criteria and digital planning of the study group.
- For each patient soft tissue scanning will be taken using cr-scan ferret scanner (Creality,shinzen,china) file will be imported to specialized software PROPLAN CMF™ (Leuven, Belgium)
- then soft tissue scan will be done using optical scanner then the file will be imported to a specialized software PROPLAN CMF™ (Leuven, Belgium)
- for segmentation process and superimposition of the soft tissue scan and the CT dicom file and planning the osteotome and fabrication of surgical guide for accurate positioning and fixation of bone segment.
- Sterilization of the patient-specific plates and splints
- For hemostasis an Epinephrine solution in dilution of 1:200.000 with lignocaine 0.5 mg\ml injected along lines of surgical incisions 5 min before the surgery.
The surgical technique:
All surgeries will be carried out with endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.
- the planned osteotomies are performed on the upper jaw (maxilla), lower jaw (mandible), or both, depending on the treatment plan.
- Repositioning of Jaw Bones: into the planned alignment to correct the underlying skeletal discrepancies. This may involve moving the jaws forward, backward, upward, or downward as needed to achieve proper facial harmony and function.
- Stabilization: using plates and screws to stabilize the bones in their new position. This promotes proper healing and ensures long-term stability of the surgical outcome.
Postoperative Management:
- Postoperative instructions include a sleeping in a supine position semi-up righted, Strict oral hygiene measures.
- Postoperative medications include prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics for 5 days' post operatively, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac.
Suture will be removed after 7 days post operative.
Accuracy measurement:
After six months post operative 3d facial scans is obtained and exported to software to perform superimposition of the predicted and post operative results to assess the accuracy of soft tissue prediction By measuring the difference in millimeter between prespecified points
1-full face 2-subnasal 3-labrale superioris 4- labrale inferioris 5-pogonion 6- corners of the mouth Then the degree of accuracy will be measured in percentage
Follow up:
All patients will undergo CT scans before the first follow-up 3 days postoperative.
Strategies to improve adherence to intervention protocol:
- The patient will be educated about the treatment protocol including a rationale for each step and an emphasis on the significance of follow-up appointments and home. Medicine.
- All patients will be given reminder phone calls at the time of the predetermined follow updates.
Criteria for discounting allocated intervention Uncooperative patients are refusing treatment and follow up.
Side effects and the degree of risk and expected to occur and how to deal with them Any temporary or permanent adverse effect will be recorded, documented, and treated including (facial asymmetry, pain trismus, paranesthesia, edema, and infection, flap dehiscence and plate exposure).
In the event of temporary side effects such as swelling or numbness, the patient will be followed up periodically and the necessary medications will be prescribed to get rid of these symptoms.
If facial asymmetry occurs after the operation, the necessary corrective measures will be taken, such as following up with the orthodontist or repeating the surgical procedure if necessary.
the event of a bacterial infection, the patient will be given the necessary medications after examination and confirmation of the source and cause of the infection and plate removal if needed
For patients equal to and less than 21 years old, a written consent should be obtained from their parents or guardian that they understand the treatment plan and agree for their children to undergo the surgical procedure and they understand the harms and side effects of this procedure and they will adhere to the follow up plans.
- Outcomes:
Outcome name Measuring Device Measuring Unit Primary
Soft tissue prediction accuracy
Computer Software Difference between prespecified measuring points in mm 1-full face 2-subnasal 3-labrale superioris 4- labrale inferioris 5-pogonion 6-corners of the mouth
Then turned into percentage Secondary scanning time Stopwatch seconds
Ease of use
scale Score from 1-10
1 very easy 10 very hard Cost efficiency Cost price pounds
- For standardization of follow up the accuracy of soft tissue prediction will be measured by superimposition the planning with the postoperative 3D scan of the patient Then, the distance between the planning and the scan will be estimated in millimeters. Then software will give a percentage
- scanning time will be estimated in seconds.
- Ease of use
- cost 13. Participant timeline Patient will be treated in (5) visits . Visit 1: case evaluation and diagnosis, request CT scan and soft tissue scan. Visit 2: patient education, anesthesiologist consultation, consent signing. Visit 3: operation day. Visit 4: one week after surgery clinically evaluation and Patient questionnaire will be filled .
Visit 5: six months postoperative clinical follow up and post operative soft tissue scanning.
Time Procedure Visit 1 Day 0 Case evaluation and diagnosis, request CT scan and soft tissue scan.
Visit 2 Week 1 Patient education, consent signing, anesthesiologist consultation.
Visit 3 Week 2 Surgical procedure. Visit 4 Week 3 First follow up, questionnaire,
Visit 5 Week 26 postoperative CT scan evaluation and soft tissue scanning and suture removal.
- Conditions
- Mandibular Prognathism, Orthognathic Surgery
- Being tested
- face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgery
- Keywords
- Prognathism, soft tissue prediction, face scanner, handheld scanner, optical scanner, orthognathic surgery, prediction accuracy
- Medical subject headings
- Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Prognathism
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgeryProcedure or surgery
patient will be scanned pre operative using both scanners and then undergo orthognathic surgery then will be rescanned again 6 montsh later
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| patient with mandibular prognathism | Other | same patient will be scanned twice using both devices the optical face scanner and the handheld optical scanner Receives: Procedure: face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
soft tissue prediction accurace
3d facial scans is obtained and exported to software to perform superimposition of the predicted and post operative results to assess the accuracy of soft tissue prediction By measuring the difference in millimeter between prespecified points
1-full face 2-subnasal 3-labrale superioris 4- labrale inferioris 5-pogonion 6- corners of the mouth Then the degree of accuracy will be measured in percentage
Measured: six months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2024
- Study start24 Sep 2024
- Primary completion24 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion24 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mandibular PrognathismStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ahmed Elsayed Fahim, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Mohamed Ahmed Farid, Professor of OMFS, Study director, Cairo UniversitySameh Tarek Mekhemar, Head of Department, Study chair, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06724497
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 337
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Accuracy of Soft Tissue Prediction in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism After Orthognathic Surgery Using Handheld Scanner Versus Optical Scanner A Prospective Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06724497
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 337
- Conditions
- Mandibular Prognathism, Orthognathic Surgery
- Keywords
- Prognathism, soft tissue prediction, face scanner, handheld scanner, optical scanner, orthognathic surgery, prediction accuracy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 11 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Apr 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 24 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of study: To evaluate the accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanners versus optical scanners.
Research hypothesis (null hypothesis): there is no difference in prediction accuracy between laser scans and handheld scans.
Primary objective: To evaluate The Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanner versus laser scanner
.
Secondary objective:
To evaluate scanning time, cost efficiency, and ease of use. patients will be treated from mandibular prognathism using only mandibular set back or bimaxillary surgery After six months postoperatively, 3D facial scans is obtained and exported to software to perform superimposition of the predicted and post operative results to assess the accuracy of soft tissue prediction By measuring the difference in millimeter between prespecified points
Detailed description
Aim of study: To evaluate The Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanner versus optical scanner.
Research hypothesis (null hypothesis) that there is no difference in prediction accuracy between laser scans and handheld scans.
Primary objective: To evaluate The Accuracy of soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery using handheld scanner versus laser scanner .
Secondary objective:
To evaluate scanning time, cost efficiency, ease of use. 8. Trial design
One group of patients will be assigned to this trial:
One group: same patient will be scanned by both devices preoperatively and post operatively.
Trial design: prospective clinical trial( diagnostic accuracy study )
III. Methods A) Participants, interventions \& outcomes 9. Study settings: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University. 10. Eligibility criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with facial mandibular prognathism that requires orthognathic surgery.
- Age (18- 50years).
- Patients are willing for the surgical procedure and follow-up, with informed consent (appendix 1).
Exclusion criteria:
- Dental malocclusion that could be treated with orthodontic treatment only.
- Patients with contraindications for general anesthesia.
- Patient on radiotherapy.
- Patients suffer from bone disease. 11. Interventions Preoperative Investigations
- From the point of eligibility for general anesthesia, complete blood picture, body weight, urine albumin, blood glucose level, kidney and liver function.
- Administration of peri-operative antibiotics.
- A multi-slice CT scan will be demanded in a form of DICOM files ( Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) for proper diagnosis and confirmation of patient compatibility to the eligibility criteria and digital planning of the study group.
- For each patient soft tissue scanning will be taken using cr-scan ferret scanner (Creality,shinzen,china) file will be imported to specialized software PROPLAN CMF™ (Leuven, Belgium)
- then soft tissue scan will be done using optical scanner then the file will be imported to a specialized software PROPLAN CMF™ (Leuven, Belgium)
- for segmentation process and superimposition of the soft tissue scan and the CT dicom file and planning the osteotome and fabrication of surgical guide for accurate positioning and fixation of bone segment.
- Sterilization of the patient-specific plates and splints
- For hemostasis an Epinephrine solution in dilution of 1:200.000 with lignocaine 0.5 mg\ml injected along lines of surgical incisions 5 min before the surgery.
The surgical technique:
All surgeries will be carried out with endotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.
- the planned osteotomies are performed on the upper jaw (maxilla), lower jaw (mandible), or both, depending on the treatment plan.
- Repositioning of Jaw Bones: into the planned alignment to correct the underlying skeletal discrepancies. This may involve moving the jaws forward, backward, upward, or downward as needed to achieve proper facial harmony and function.
- Stabilization: using plates and screws to stabilize the bones in their new position. This promotes proper healing and ensures long-term stability of the surgical outcome.
Postoperative Management:
- Postoperative instructions include a sleeping in a supine position semi-up righted, Strict oral hygiene measures.
- Postoperative medications include prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics for 5 days' post operatively, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac.
Suture will be removed after 7 days post operative.
Accuracy measurement:
After six months post operative 3d facial scans is obtained and exported to software to perform superimposition of the predicted and post operative results to assess the accuracy of soft tissue prediction By measuring the difference in millimeter between prespecified points
1-full face 2-subnasal 3-labrale superioris 4- labrale inferioris 5-pogonion 6- corners of the mouth Then the degree of accuracy will be measured in percentage
Follow up:
All patients will undergo CT scans before the first follow-up 3 days postoperative.
Strategies to improve adherence to intervention protocol:
- The patient will be educated about the treatment protocol including a rationale for each step and an emphasis on the significance of follow-up appointments and home. Medicine.
- All patients will be given reminder phone calls at the time of the predetermined follow updates.
Criteria for discounting allocated intervention Uncooperative patients are refusing treatment and follow up.
Side effects and the degree of risk and expected to occur and how to deal with them Any temporary or permanent adverse effect will be recorded, documented, and treated including (facial asymmetry, pain trismus, paranesthesia, edema, and infection, flap dehiscence and plate exposure).
In the event of temporary side effects such as swelling or numbness, the patient will be followed up periodically and the necessary medications will be prescribed to get rid of these symptoms.
If facial asymmetry occurs after the operation, the necessary corrective measures will be taken, such as following up with the orthodontist or repeating the surgical procedure if necessary.
the event of a bacterial infection, the patient will be given the necessary medications after examination and confirmation of the source and cause of the infection and plate removal if needed
For patients equal to and less than 21 years old, a written consent should be obtained from their parents or guardian that they understand the treatment plan and agree for their children to undergo the surgical procedure and they understand the harms and side effects of this procedure and they will adhere to the follow up plans.
- Outcomes:
Outcome name Measuring Device Measuring Unit Primary
Soft tissue prediction accuracy
Computer Software Difference between prespecified measuring points in mm 1-full face 2-subnasal 3-labrale superioris 4- labrale inferioris 5-pogonion 6-corners of the mouth
Then turned into percentage Secondary scanning time Stopwatch seconds
Ease of use
scale Score from 1-10
1 very easy 10 very hard Cost efficiency Cost price pounds
- For standardization of follow up the accuracy of soft tissue prediction will be measured by superimposition the planning with the postoperative 3D scan of the patient Then, the distance between the planning and the scan will be estimated in millimeters. Then software will give a percentage
- scanning time will be estimated in seconds.
- Ease of use
- cost 13. Participant timeline Patient will be treated in (5) visits . Visit 1: case evaluation and diagnosis, request CT scan and soft tissue scan. Visit 2: patient education, anesthesiologist consultation, consent signing. Visit 3: operation day. Visit 4: one week after surgery clinically evaluation and Patient questionnaire will be filled .
Visit 5: six months postoperative clinical follow up and post operative soft tissue scanning.
Time Procedure Visit 1 Day 0 Case evaluation and diagnosis, request CT scan and soft tissue scan.
Visit 2 Week 1 Patient education, consent signing, anesthesiologist consultation.
Visit 3 Week 2 Surgical procedure. Visit 4 Week 3 First follow up, questionnaire,
Visit 5 Week 26 postoperative CT scan evaluation and soft tissue scanning and suture removal.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| patient with mandibular prognathism | Other | Procedure: face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgerysame patient will be scanned twice using both devices the optical face scanner and the handheld optical scanner |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- • Patients with facial mandibular prognathism that requires orthognathic surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- • Dental malocclusion that could be treated with orthodontic treatment only.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgerypatient will be scanned pre operative using both scanners and then undergo orthognathic surgery then will be rescanned again 6 montsh later | Procedure or surgery | patient with mandibular prognathism |
Primary outcome
soft tissue prediction accurace
Time frame: six months after surgery
3d facial scans is obtained and exported to software to perform superimposition of the predicted and post operative results to assess the accuracy of soft tissue prediction By measuring the difference in millimeter between prespecified points 1-full face 2-subnasal 3-labrale superioris 4- labrale inferioris 5-pogonion 6- corners of the mouth Then the degree of accuracy will be measured in percentage
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mohamed Ahmed Farid, Professor of OMFS study director
Cairo University
Sameh Tarek Mekhemar, Head of Department study chair
Cairo University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing face scanning pre and post orthognathic surgery in people with Mandibular Prognathism and Orthognathic Surgery, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
soft tissue prediction accurace (time frame: six months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2024; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.