AzTrials
AzTrials

PsychosisRecoVRyNCT06728241

Virtual Reality and Artificial Intelligence in Treatment for Patients With Psychosis

A study testing RecoVRy and VR Games in people with Psychosis, run by Oslo University Hospital at 2 sites in Norway.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Virtual Reality (VR) has gained momentum in the treatment of various mental health conditions. Despite its potential and emphasis on better use of technology in healthcare strategies, VR therapy for severe mental illness remains underdeveloped and understudied. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 17 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Psychosis
What is being tested?
RecoVRy and VR Games
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
150 participants
Where
2 sitesNorway
Study dates
6 Dec 2024to 31 Jul 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 17 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 17 -65 years of age
  • Receiving psychosis treatment at either clinic in the participating hospital trusts
  • A clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum psychosis according to ICD-10 (F20 - F29) or an affective diagnosis with psychotic symptoms (F31.2, F31.5, F32.3, F33.3)
  • Self-reported difficulties going outside or taking part in everyday activities
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study

Who cannot join

  • Photosensitive epilepsy
  • Substantial visual, auditory, or balance impairments
  • Insufficient comprehension of Norwegian
  • Currently receiving treatment in a forensic setting or Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit
  • Primary diagnosis of alcohol or substance use disorder or personality disorder; organic syndrome
  • Clinically significant learning disability

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jan Ivar Røssberg, Professor contact

+47 47876866

j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no

June U Lystad, PhD contact

+47 95037099

j.u.lystad@psykologi.uio.no

Norway2 sites, 1 recruiting
  • Oslo University Hospital

    Nydalen, Postboks 4959

    Active, not recruiting
  • Oslo University Hospital

    Oslo, Norway

    Jan Ivar Røssberg, Professor, +4747876866, j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no

    June U Lystad, PhD, 95037099, j.u.lystad@psykologi.uio.no

    Recruiting

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: RecoVRy - A Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effect of Artificial Intelligence Powered Virtual Reality Treatment in Psychosis

Virtual Reality (VR) has gained momentum in the treatment of various mental health conditions. Despite its potential and emphasis on better use of technology in healthcare strategies, VR therapy for severe mental illness remains underdeveloped and understudied. This will be the first randomized controlled trial to combine cognitive behavioral therapy-based VR with state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence. Reduced quality of life, social withdrawal and inactivity found in psychotic disorders may be largely explained by avoidance due to severe symptoms of anxiety, present in as many as two-thirds of patients with schizophrenia. Alleviating anxiety may thus be key to help improve functional outcomes. The aim of this study is to provide novel information about VR therapy in psychosis employing the newly developed RecoVRy application. Study objectives are to examine short- and long-term effects on real-world functioning, psychiatric symptoms, and quality of life. A total of 150 participants will be recruited from five Norwegian hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to either receive the RecoVRy intervention (N=75) alongside treatment as usual or a control intervention (N=75) in which they engage with three distinct VR games. RecoVRy will generate new and important knowledge to improve mental health services in psychosis and hopefully improve existing practise and facilitate personalized treatment. RecoVRy will fill knowledge gaps concerning anxiety in psychosis, as this is often left untreated and consequently create societal benefits by increasing social and functional participation. Finally, knowledge from RecoVRy can easily be generalized to other patient groups and health sectors.

Read the detailed description

Introduction Virtual Reality (VR) immerses people in digitally simulated environments that can provide exciting interactive experiences and is thus well established in the entertainment industry. VR is however not just about fun and games; therapeutic use of VR is becoming increasingly popular for a broad range of mental health conditions such as anxiety disorders, PTSD, phobias and chronic pain. Although the concept of VR as a treatment modality has gained momentum and (better) use of technology is an explicitly stated goal in health care strategies and guidelines, the use of VR therapy in severe mental illness is much less developed and has received less attention. The important question therefore arises whether VR therapy actually improves clinical and functional outcome in psychosis and whether it is cost-effective. The RecoVRy study will answer these questions in the first randomized controlled trial (RCT) combining virtual reality with state-of-the-art Artificial Intelligence (AI). A strong multidisciplinary team of researchers and clinicians (psychiatry, clinical psychology, health economy, digital health, and occupational therapy) will run this RCT in close collaboration with a world-renowned expert on VR therapy in psychosis.

Schizophrenia and psychotic disorders Psychotic disorders are rare, with a lifetime prevalence close to 1 %. Still, they impose a major burden of illness in terms of both individual suffering and societal cost. They are severe and often chronic mental disorders characterized by a heterogenic set of positive and negative psychotic symptoms, neurocognitive impairment, and functional decline. Total costs associated with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in Norway are estimated to approximately 10.2 billion NOK per year making it the 5th most expensive health condition, with indirect cost due to productivity loss accounting for as much as 30 % and only between 5 % - 10 % having paid employment. Despite increased etiological understanding and refined treatment approaches, today's standard psychosis treatment does not prevent a large proportion of individuals with schizophrenia becoming isolated and inactive, which in turn negatively affects both physical and mental health. Individuals with schizophrenia are estimated to lose 13 - 15 years of potential life years. Reduced quality of life, social withdrawal and inactivity may largely be explained by avoidance due to symptoms of anxiety. As many as two-thirds of patients with schizophrenia have levels of anxious avoidance equivalent to those in individuals with agoraphobia. Symptoms of anxiety emerge for different reasons; hallucinations, fear of rejection, harm or social humiliation, paranoia, social inexperience, and risk of stigma, and may contribute significantly to the functional impairment observed in schizophrenia. Alleviating anxiety symptoms may thus be key to help improve functional outcomes and tackle the serious issues of social withdrawal and inactivity in individuals with schizophrenia.

Whilst the effect of antipsychotic medication in reducing positive psychotic symptoms and risk of relapse is well-documented, non-response and poor adherence to antipsychotic medication is frequent. Furthermore, negative symptoms are often associated with a limited response to pharmacotherapy. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is an established psychotherapeutic intervention recommended in several international and national guidelines. Meta-analyses have reported small effects of CBTp on psychotic symptoms, and there is considerable room for improvement. It has been suggested that an increased focus on the behavioral component of CBT, using repeated behavioral experiments, behavioral activation and exposure, may increase the effect of CBTp. Virtual Reality facilitates exactly that; a greater focus on behavioural aspects of CBTp.

System-level factors also challenge the delivery of appropriate psychological treatments such as CBTp. Mental health services worldwide are faced with increased patient contact volume and clinician caseload size. Implementing CBTp requires resources often not present in the mental health system. It warrants therapists' education, a certain training volume, adherence to treatment and above all exposure and learning in real-world situations. Typically, clinicians have little to no time to accompany patients in sessions outside the clinic. This imbalance between demand and supply of mental health services underlines the need for an intervention directly addressing these issues, such as the RecoVRy study to bridge this gap.

Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) VRET is a promising approach to ensure high-quality therapy and possibly increase effects - optimizing the therapist's time in a mental health system with limited resources. VRET utilizes modern technology to enable a more refined approach to exposure therapy, also within the context of CBTp. VR refers to a computer-generated environment with different scenes and objects that appear real, making the user feel that they are immersed in and can interact with their surroundings. In a clinical setting, therapist and client may use VRET to address difficult and complex situations in a highly controlled environment, in real time, eliciting responses equivalent to those in a real situation. The objective is to habituate learned fear responses or disprove catastrophic beliefs held by the client. VR provides ample opportunity to repeatedly challenge fears and beliefs first-hand, instead of addressing them through conversation in a classic therapeutic setting (later). VRET has been found to be a well-tolerated, safe treatment method without adverse effects in individuals with psychosis. Studies examining the effect of VR therapy on social skills and VR augmented CBT in individuals with social anxiety and paranoid thoughts indicate higher motivational levels, symptom and social skills improvements and reduced social avoidance. Combined with CBT, VR also reduced social anxiety and paranoia. Another potential benefit of VRET in psychosis treatment is the possibility of easing patients into situations they would otherwise find too frightening and consequently avoid In the large UK based RCT gameChange, VR therapy led to significant reductions in distress and anxious avoidance in and of real-world situations in patients with psychosis.

RecoVRy - a new and improved Artificial Intelligence powered VR application. Based on experiences from a pilot study and important user guidance, we have developed a Norwegian VR application, RecoVRy, for individuals with psychosis experiencing anxiety in everyday social situations. Scenarios include public transportation, a waiting room, a job interview, giving a presentation in a work/educational setting, meeting with a case manager at the welfare services (NAV) and visiting a cafe. Clients are guided through scenarios by integrated instructions (orally or written) and gamification elements introducing psychological principles and aims of the treatment throughout each session. In the different scenarios, tasks are carried out, such as ordering a coffee or interacting with other passengers on the bus. RecoVRy is designed to be easy to use, engaging for patients and clinicians and delivered with the latest consumer equipment. Additionally, RecoVRy combines VR with state of the art Artificial Intelligence (AI) to further increase immersion and potentially strengthen effects of behavioural activation and exposure. In most VR applications, including gameChange, patients cannot interact with avatars (e.g. customers in a shop or other passengers on a bus). Regardless of what the patient does or says during session, the avatars will provide standard comments and replies, not necessarily fitting the situation. Experiences from the pilot study indicated a strong need for patients to be able to interact with avatars across the scenarios. AI elements thus contribute to move the VR field forward and have been included in the RecoVRy application. No previous large studies have described or examined the combined usage of these two emerging technologies in psychosis treatment. Each scenario has several difficulty levels and is designed to activate fearful cognitions, enabling patients to explore fears and paranoid thoughts, and trying new behaviors while at the same time limit the use of defence mechanisms and avoidance. Events take place that challenge patients to drop safety-seeking behaviors they normally use, with the ultimate goal of helping them adopt new behaviors to use when feeling anxious and consequently feel more confident in everyday situations. Each session lasts approximately 30 minutes. RecoVRy entails CBT components. Consequently, it is not required for CBT trained staff to deliver the therapy. RecoVRy represents a completely new way of delivering psychosis treatment and has never been tested in Norway, that is, the new AI powered scenarios have been tested in a small clinical pilot for acceptability testing and technical verification (N = 5). In the current study, the aim is to determine the effect on real-world functioning, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life in individuals with psychosis. Further, the investigators will establish barriers and facilitators with regard to the implementation of VR therapy in clinical practice through a qualitative sub-study in patients, clinicians and health care leaders/stakeholders. A health economic evaluation of RecoVRy will also be carried out.

This study will answer whether using AI powered VR in psychosis treatment results in improved health and functional outcomes, and whether this technology increases access to augmented CBT in patients with schizophrenia by adding specific components of CBTp. RecoVRy may shorten the length of treatment, saving time and cost. Findings from this study will be relevant for public and private mental health services in Norway and internationally on the implementation of technology-based interventions in psychosis RecoVRy will create potential for improvement of existing practise and personalized treatment. CBTp, including central components such as behavioral experiments and exposure, is well-established. However, far from every mental health professional has CBT training, and behavioral experiments and exposure are often too time-consuming to be implemented in clinical practice. Consequently, many patients do not receive CBT at all, or when receiving CBT, are not given the opportunity to expose themselves to situations causing anxiety under clinical guidance. The use of RecoVRy can help overcome these challenges and may increase treatment effects by using AI to further tailor exposure. It can be used both as stand-alone treatment and as an add-on to CBTp, ensuring treatment access for more people and the ability to provide safe and effective exposure and behavioral tests under clinical guidance. RecoVRy thus touches upon the prioritized thematic area of new ways of working and several clinical groups and personnel can deliver VR treatment. Moreover, studies have shown that learning occurring through VRET transfers to the real-world, i.e. what you overcome in VR, you overcome in real life, which is not always the case with classic, dialogue-based CBTp.

RecoVRy will fill knowledge gaps concerning treatment of anxiety in psychosis. Recent reviews and meta-analyses call for further development and customization of CBT in terms of personalized psychotherapy. Actively entering anxiety provoking situations and practicing more adapting ways of thinking and behaving is challenging in face-to-face therapy, but relatively easy in VRET. Thus far, only a handful of studies, with promising results, have examined the impact of VRET on severe mental disorders. None has examined the effect of VRET combined with AI. Experience from the computer game industry suggests that VR-assisted therapies can be much more enjoyable than traditional treatments, ensuring good take-up and continuous "use" of the therapy. Further research is thus warranted. The current RCT aims to explore if the positive outcomes from using VRET can be repeated in individuals with psychosis using a Norwegian application and whether this treatment is cost effective. Evidence from this study will be of scientific interest nationally and internationally. RecoVRy will create societal benefits. Based on the assumption that a substantial part of the social avoidance and inactivity in schizophrenia arises from anxiety, using AI powered VR as a new medium for therapy may be a good first-step for individuals who have avoided mental health care in the past. It is well-known from the field of social anxiety disorder that appropriate treatment may produce superior results, provided the treatment is actually offered. RecoVRy may increase treatment adherence, as it might be more appealing than traditional methods, encouraging patients to continue therapy. It ensures consistency - the same treatment program is offered to all users, with the possibility of tailoring according to individual needs. RecoVRy can help shorten the length of treatment, will cost less than traditional therapy and can help therapists provide treatment to individuals at their convenience. Most importantly, social inclusion and self-governance are of high societal and individual value. Overcoming symptoms of anxiety may directly translate to greater social, educational and occupational participation - reducing costs and creating benefits.

Knowledge from RecoVRy can easily be generalized to other populations and health sectors. RecoVRy is thoroughly described and will be manualized when completed. The knowledge gained from this study, combined with already existing material based on VR for psychosis, will make it easy to generalize the knowledge and practicalities to other patient populations, age groups and health sectors. It will be particularly relevant for disorders in which social anxiety and withdrawal strongly contribute to the clinical consequences, such as phobias, mood disorders and other anxiety disorders.

  1. Hypotheses, aims and objectives The overall aim of this project is to provide novel information about Virtual Reality therapy by carrying out a randomized controlled trial of AI powered VR treatment in psychosis, the RecoVRy application.
  • The primary objective is to examine short- and long-term effects of VR therapy on anxiety and avoidance in patients with psychosis, including mediators and moderators
  • The secondary objective is to examine short- and long-term effects of VR therapy on positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depressive symptoms, worry, paranoia, insight, quality of life, social and functional activity, including mediators and moderators
  • In addition, a health economic evaluation will be conducted and a qualitative approach will answer research questions regarding experiences with receiving, providing and implementing VR therapy (patients, clinicians, health care leaders) and barriers and facilitators to implementation of VR therapy in clinical practice.

Our hypothesis is that RecoVRy combined with Treatment as Usual (TAU) is superior to VR gaming and TAU and leads to post treatment improvements in anxiety, avoidance, psychotic symptoms, depression, worry, paranoia, insight, quality of life and social/functional activity. A working hypothesis is that RecoVRy is superior to the control group in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Primary and secondary endpoints The primary endpoint will be the Cognitions and Defence Behaviours Questionnaire (CDBQ), a clinically meaningful measure assessing worries, avoidance and ability to manage different social situations. Analyses will include all participants for whom data are available and according to the group participants are randomly assigned to, regardless of any deviation from protocol. Analyses will be carried out after the last follow-up assessment is completed with no interim analyses and CDBQ will be assessed at all time points.

The secondary endpoints; i) Changes in mean scores of anxiety, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, work and social adjustment, quality of life, social functioning, depressive symptoms, worry, paranoia, insight, hope and neurocognition in both groups ii) group differences in health care utilization/health economy Safety outcomes and therapy satisfaction will be assessed using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire and The Therapy Satisfaction Scale at post assessment The RecoVRy intervention Patients will be electronically randomized to either RecoVRy + TAU or TAU. The intervention group will receive eight VR sessions of 30 minutes. Three sessions are considered minimum dose of therapy. A mental health professional (VR therapist) will be present when VR treatment is provided and will help put on the VR headset, start the program and encourage the patient to apply the learning from RecoVRy to real-world challenges by setting up homework tasks to be carried out between VR sessions. The application will run through Meta Quest 2/3®. RecoVRy is designed as a repeated behavioural procedure in which the main focus is for participants to learn that they are safer than assumed. Participants can proceed at their own pace, allowing for more or less than 8 (+/- 2) sessions of VR treatment. Scenarios and levels may be repeated if necessary.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be carried out according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The primary and secondary outcomes will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects regression to model post-test and follow-up assessments concurrently. In addition, structural equation models and linear regression will be applied to examine potential mediators and moderators with regard to VR therapy. Statistical power estimates:100 participants will be enrolled, 50 in each group. This sample size takes into consideration an attrition rate of 10% and provides 80% power to detect clinically significant differences in the CDBQ from randomization to 8 weeks at a two-sided 5% significance level.

  1. User involvement User involvement is planned according to the guidelines for user participation in research in the specialised healthcare service. User representatives have been consulted and involved from the early planning phase. One user representative, Joachim Vogt, is regularly consulted (clinic internal innovation funding) and has given feedback with regard to the program, assessments and implementation. He has also participated in the formation of the study and given feedback regarding the general structure and questions from a user point of view.
  2. Ethical considerations Patients will receive both written and oral information about the study before they are asked to give their written consent to participate. All data will be stored according to approval. The VR treatment will be conducted by trained VR therapists, and the therapies will be supervised throughout the study period. The patients who do not wish to participate in the study will receive treatment as usual at the respective sites. Participants are informed that they can withdraw from the study whenever they want to, and that this will have no consequences for their further treatment at the in- and outpatient clinics. The research coordinators will keep a protocol for collection and reporting of adverse events.
Conditions
Psychosis
Being tested
RecoVRy, VR Games
Keywords
Virtual Reality, Artificial Intelligence, Schizophrenia, Psychosis, Anxiety
Medical subject headings
Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RecoVRyBehavioural

    A mental health professional (VR therapist) will be together with the patient when VR treatment is provided. The VR therapist will help put on the VR headset, start the program and encourage the patient to apply the learning from RecoVRy to real-world challenges by setting up homework tasks to be carried out between VR sessions. The application will run through Meta Quest 2/3®. RecoVRy is designed as a repeated behavioural procedure in which the main focus is for participants to learn that they are safer than assumed. Participants can proceed at their own pace, allowing for more or less than 8 (+/- 2) sessions of VR treatment. Scenarios and levels may be repeated if necessary

  • VR GamesBehavioural

    Patients randomized to this condition will receive a total of ten sessions of VR games.

Study groups in NCT06728241
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RecoVRyActive comparatorPatients randomized to this arm will receive CBT assisted artificial intelligence driven Virtual Reality therapy for a total of ten sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: RecoVRy
VR GamesSham comparatorPatients in the control group will receive ten sessions of different virtual reality games.
Receives: Behavioral: VR Games

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oxford Cognitions and Defences Questionnaire (O-CDQ)

    The O-CDQ consists of three subscales: threat cognitions (14 items), anxious avoidance (11 items), and within-situation safety behaviours (8 items). And one total score. The range of scores goes from 0-102. Higher scores mean worse outcome

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Oxford Cognitions and Defences Questionnaire

    The O-CDQ consists of three subscales: threat cognitions (14 items), anxious avoidance (11 items), and within-situation safety behaviours (8 items). And one total score. The range of scores goes from 0-102. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  2. The Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale (O-AS)

    This questionnaire is all about anxiety in everyday situations and consists of seven items scored from 0-10. The total scale is scored from 0-70 and higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  3. The Oxford Agoraphobic Avoidance Scale (O-AS)

    This questionnaire is all about anxiety in everyday situations and consists of seven items scored from 0-10. The total scale is scored from 0-70 and higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  4. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6

    Asses positive and negative symptoms and consists of six items scored from 1-7. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  5. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale-6

    Asses positive and negative symptoms and consists of six items scored from 1-7. Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  6. General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    Measure levels of anxiety and consists of seven items scored between 0 and 3. The total scores are from 0-21 and higher scores indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  7. General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)

    Measure levels of anxiety and consists of seven items scored between 0 and 3. The total scores are from 0-21 and higher scores indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  8. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Measure symptoms of depression the last week and consists of 21 items scored between 0 and 3. The total scores are between 0 and 63 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  9. Beck Depression Inventory II

    Measure symptoms of depression the last week and consists of 21 items scored between 0 and 3. The total scores are between 0 and 63 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  10. Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Assess level of functioning and work capacity the last two weeks and consists of 5 items scored between 0 and 8. The total scores are between 0 and 40 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  11. Work and Social Adjustment Scale

    Assess level of functioning and work capacity the last two weeks and consists of 5 items scored between 0 and 8. The total scores are between 0 and 40 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  12. Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)

    Assess level of insight into the patients own illness and consists of 15 items scored between 0 and 3. The total score range from 0 to 45 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  13. Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS)

    Assess level of insight into the patients own illness and consists of 15 items scored between 0 and 3. The total score range from 0 to 45 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  14. Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS)

    Measure level of problems with sleep and consists of 6 items scored between 0 and 7. They indicate how many days a sleep problem exists during the week. The total score is between 0 and 42. Higher score indicated worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  15. Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS)

    Measure level of problems with sleep and consists of 6 items scored between 0 and 7. They indicate how many days a sleep problem exists during the week. The total score is between 0 and 42. Higher score indicated worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  16. Manchester Short Assessment of quality of Life (MANSA)

    Assess the level of subjective quality of life reported by the patients. The instrument consists of 16 items scores between 1 and 7. The scores are between 16 and 112. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  17. Manchester Short Assessment of quality of Life (MANSA)

    Assess the level of subjective quality of life reported by the patients. The instrument consists of 16 items scores between 1 and 7. The scores are between 16 and 112. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  18. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Assess the patients reported level of stress and consist of 10 items scores between 0 and 4. The total score is between 0 and 40 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  19. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Assess the patients reported level of stress and consist of 10 items scores between 0 and 4. The total score is between 0 and 40 and higher score indicates worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  20. Domain Specific Hope Scale (DSHS)

    DSHS scale is designed to assess hope in specific life arenas. Each domain comprise 8 items scored from 1 and 8. Higher scores indicates better outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  21. Domain Specific Hope Scale (DSHS)

    DSHS scale is designed to assess hope in specific life arenas. Each domain comprise 8 items scored from 1 and 8. Higher scores indicates better outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  22. Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ)

    Measure depressive symptoms with an emphasis on anhedonia. It consists of two parts. 1. Part one is emotional reaction and consists of 12 items and part two which assess changes in emotional reactions here and now and also consist of 8 items. The items are scores from 0-4 and higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  23. The Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ)

    Measure depressive symptoms with an emphasis on anhedonia. It consists of two parts. 1. Part one is emotional reaction and consists of 12 items and part two which assess changes in emotional reactions here and now and also consist of 8 items. The items are scores from 0-4 and higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  24. Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)

    The QPR measure patients thought about the recovery process and consists of 22 items scored for 0-4. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  25. The Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery

    The QPR measure patients thought about the recovery process and consists of 22 items scored for 0-4. Higher scores indicate better outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  26. EQ-5D-5L

    Concise generic instrument for measuring patients' self-reported health and compises 5 items from 0-100. Higher score indicated better outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.

  27. EQ-ED-5L

    Concise generic instrument for measuring patients' self-reported health and compises 5 items from 0-100. Higher score indicated better outcome.

    Measured: From enrollment to follow-up at 26 weeks

  28. Working Alliance Inventory-12 Patient version

    Assess the alliance between therapist and patient and consists of 12 items. Higher scores indicate better alliance.

    Measured: From enrollment to week three.

  29. The Working Alliance Inventory- 12 Therapist Version

    Assess the alliance between therapist and patient and consists of 12 items. Higher scores indicate better alliance.

    Measured: From enrollment to week three.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Dec 2024
  2. Study start6 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06728241
Sponsor's protocol ID
763156
Acronym
RecoVRy
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
6 Dec 2024
Last updated
25 Mar 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: We have not decided how to share data at this point. Data will be shared anonymized on request to the PI

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing RecoVRy and VR Games in people with Psychosis, run by Oslo University Hospital at 2 sites in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jan Ivar Røssberg, Professor (+47 47876866, j.i.rossberg@medisin.uio.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oxford Cognitions and Defences Questionnaire (O-CDQ) (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at ten weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in