Workers at HeightsNCT06728566
Work at Heights Training: Conventional Approach With and Without Immersive Virtual Reality
A study testing Inmersive virtual reality and Conventional training in people with Workers at Heights, run by Universidad Autonoma de Occidente at 1 site in Colombia.
Trial summary
This study focuses on the design and evaluation of an innovative training protocol aimed at working at heights in the construction sector in the city of Cali. The main focus of this protocol lies in the use of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and the measurement of biosignals to enhance workers' safety and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Workers at Heights
- What is being tested?
- Inmersive virtual reality and Conventional training
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteColombia
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2025to Mar 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Learners from the National Learning Service (SENA).
- First time taking the work at heights training course.
Who cannot join
- Experience in working at heights.
- Health conditions that prevent performing both the IVR training and work at heights.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Colombia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universidad Autonoma de Occidente
Cali
Diana Guerrero, 573172603503, guerrero.diana@correounivalle.edu.co
About this study
This study focuses on the design and evaluation of an innovative training protocol aimed at working at heights in the construction sector in the city of Cali. The main focus of this protocol lies in the use of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and the measurement of biosignals to enhance workers' safety and preparedness. The training protocol is developed by creating virtual environments that simulate hazardous working conditions, allowing workers to practice high-risk situations safely and effectively. Additionally, the integration of biosignal measurements, such as heart rate variability and respiratory rate, is used to assess workers' stress levels and decision-making abilities during simulations.
The protocol evaluation is conducted through a pilot study with real workers in the construction field. The results are analyzed to determine whether the use of IVR and biosignal measurement improves assertiveness and, therefore, safety, reduces workplace accidents, and increases workers' confidence in high-risk environments. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of IVR and biosignal measurement as training tools in the construction sector, which could have a significant impact on reducing workplace accidents and injuries. This innovative approach has the potential to enhance occupational safety and workers' preparedness in high-risk environments, thereby contributing to a safer and more efficient working environment in the construction industry.
Read the detailed description
Safety in the construction sector is of vital importance, especially in high-risk activities such as excavations and working at heights. To improve worker training and preparation in these areas, this research proposal has been developed.
This project focuses on the use of advanced technology, such as Immersive Virtual Reality, to simulate real work situations and allow workers to practice and acquire the necessary skills to face the challenges of their daily tasks. However, what makes this project particularly interesting is the incorporation of biosignal measurement during training.
Biosignals are physiological indicators that can be measured and analyzed to assess an individual's emotional and physical state. In this context, devices will be used to capture data such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and their variability. These measurements will provide precise information about the worker's reactions to different simulated situations, which will, in turn, help identify areas for improvement and optimize the training protocol.
The main contribution of this project lies in generating new knowledge about how biosignals can be used as a complementary tool in the design and evaluation of training protocols for workers in high-risk activities. The information obtained through biosignal measurement will allow for the identification of patterns and trends that will help better understand workers' physiological and emotional reactions, as well as their performance in critical situations.
This clinical trial compares two training methods for workers at heights, one using Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) in addition to the conventional training, and the other using only the conventional training. The main questions to be answered are:
What is the impact of the IVR training protocol on the acquisition of knowledge and practical skills of workers in high-risk activities compared to traditional training?
Is there a relationship between immersive Virtual Reality training and the physiological response to stressful situations in high-risk activities, through the recording of biosignals taken during the intervention?
The researchers will compare the two forms of training and identify if there are differences in both fitness and cardiorespiratory response.
Participants in the control group will perform practical work at heights while heart rate, respiratory monitoring, and ergonomic analysis of the activity will be performed. The participants of the intervention group, in addition to the above, will be exposed to virtual reality environments as part of the training of work at heights, this will be before the actual practical part.
- Conditions
- Workers at Heights
- Being tested
- Inmersive virtual reality, Conventional training
- Keywords
- Occupational Groups, Virtual Reality, Simulation Training
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Inmersive virtual realityDevice
In addition to conventional training, IVR training aims to provide a detailed preview of the tasks and procedures required in the standard training with selected virtual scenarios:
Scenario 1: Inspection and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE):
In this scenario, the worker will inspect the equipment to ensure it is in good condition and properly used: Harness, Helmet, Lanyards, Carabiners, Lifelines, Energy Absorbers
Scenario 2: Working on an Elevated Metal Structure:
Structure Ascent: Ascent Method: Use specific ascent systems, ensuring you are always connected to an anchor point.
Positioning on the Structure: Secure Anchorage: Once the working position is reached, secure the anchor to a fixed and reliable point.
Structure Descent: Unanchoring and Reanchoring: Unanchor and re-anchor at secure points as you descend.
Additional Safety Measures: Weather Conditions, signage and delimitation:
Scenario 3: Rescue at Heights: Accessing the Person in Danger, rescue Techniques.
Conventional trainingOther
The working at heights training provided by the National Learning Service (SENA) in Colombia includes key steps to ensure safety and proper equipment use:
- Harness Use: Inspect for damage, wear it like a vest, and ensure correct orientation. Adjust shoulder and leg straps for comfort and secure the chest strap.
- Final Check: Verify D-rings are correctly positioned, and all buckles are securely fastened.
- Helmet: Inspect for damage and adjust for a secure fit.
- Lanyards: Select in good condition, connect properly, keep tension, and avoid overloading.
- Carabiners: Use certified carabiners with functioning locks, connected to proper points.
- Lifelines and Energy Absorbers: Install and tension lifelines properly; check energy absorbers before use.
- Climbing/Descending: Maintain three contact points and secure tools to avoid accidents.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inmersive virtual reality training | Experimental | Work at heights training with the addition of prior immersive virtual reality training. Receives: Device: Inmersive virtual reality; Other: Conventional training |
| Conventional training | Active comparator | Training for work at heights using conventional strategy Receives: Other: Conventional training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PRACTICAL SKILLS FOR WORKING AT HEIGHTS
Each activity is scored on an approve/disapprove system. By the end, workers must meet these standards:
- Harness Donning and Adjustment: Properly don, adjust straps, and ensure no slack. Passing requires a secure, comfortable fit and correct anchor positioning.
- Anchor Points: Select/install anchors compatible with the system and load standards. Passing requires secure installation verified by testing.
- Lifelines: Use vertical/horizontal lifelines, maintaining connection. Passing requires constant security.
- Climbing/Moving: Safely ascend/descend while connected. Passing requires proper system use and controlled movements.
- Tool Handling: Secure tools to prevent falls. Passing requires consistent adherence to safety protocols.
- Emergency Response: Simulate emergencies calmly, following protocols. Passing requires appropriate stress management.
- Equipment Inspection: Identify equipment issues. Passing requires thorough inspection and defect reporting.
Measured: The time frame for completing all practical activities, assessments, and evaluations is approximately 10 hours, distributed over 2 days.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Heart Rate Variability
Variation in the time between RR intervals on the electrocardiogram
Measured: Heart rate variability will be assessed over an approximate period of 45 minutes.
Respiratory Rate Variability
The fluctuation in time between consecutive breathing cycles.
Measured: Respiratory rate variability will be assessed over an approximate period of 45 minutes.
Ergonomic Analysis of the Activity
The REBA (Rapid Entire Body Assessment) score quantifies the ergonomic risk of musculoskeletal injury in occupational tasks by evaluating body postures, forces, and repetitive movements. It assigns values to the position of the head, torso, arms, legs, and wrists, physical effort (e.g., lifting, pushing, pulling), and task repetition. The total score ranges from 1 to 15, with scores from 1-3 indicating minimal risk, 4-7 indicating moderate risk, and 8-15 suggesting high risk. A higher REBA score indicates greater potential for musculoskeletal disorders. The REBA score helps identify ergonomic risks and prioritize interventions to reduce injury risk.
Measured: The REBA score will be assessed over an approximate period of 25 minutes during the observation of the occupational task.
Attention and memory measurements
The Neuropsi (Neuropsychological Screening Battery) score assesses cognitive function in multiple domains, including attention, memory, executive function, and language. It consists of tasks measuring short-term memory, attention span, visuospatial abilities, and verbal fluency, among others. The total score is calculated by summing the results from each subtest, with a range from 0 to 30 points for each domain. Higher scores indicate better cognitive performance, while lower scores suggest cognitive impairment. The Neuropsi score is used to monitor cognitive changes over time and evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions. A score below 20 typically indicates significant cognitive impairment.
Measured: Before the training protocol
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2025
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Workers at HeightsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The type of experimental design will be a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, with an analyst blind, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intervention. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, the group receiving the intervention, with work-at-heights training using immersive virtual reality, before practical training in a real field, and the control group, receiving the existing standard intervention (prior theoretical training only). This allows us to compare the results between the groups and determine if the intervention is effective compared to the control.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de Occidente
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad del Valle, Colombia
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Oscar Ivan Campo, Universidad Autonoma de Occidente
- Investigators
- Oscar Campo, PhD, Study director, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06728566
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UAOccidente
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Once the research is completed, only data that are useful for obtaining results will be stored in www.figshare.com and placed under embargo until they are published in a scientific journal. No sensitive or personal data will be uploaded to this repository.
Publications
Abrahamsen EB, Selvik JT, Milazzo MF, Langdalen H, Dahl RE, Bansal S, et al. On the use of the 'Return Of Safety Investments' (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2021 Jun 1;210:107537.
Nnaji C, Okpala I, Gambatese J, Jin Z. Controlling safety and health challenges intrinsic in exoskeleton use in construction. Saf Sci. 2023 Jan 1;157:105943.
Bao L, Tran SVT, Nguyen TL, Pham HC, Lee D, Park C. Cross-platform virtual reality for real-time construction safety training using immersive web and industry foundation classes. Autom Constr. 2022 Nov 1;143:104565.
Zermane A, Mohd Tohir MZ, Baharudin MR, Mohamed Yusoff H. Risk assessment of fatal accidents due to work at heights activities using fault tree analysis: Case study in Malaysia. Saf Sci. 2022 Jul 1;151:105724.
Stefan H, Mortimer M, Horan B, Kenny G. Evaluating the preliminary effectiveness of industrial virtual reality safety training for ozone generator isolation procedure. Saf Sci. 2023 Jul 1;163:106125.
Shakerian S, Habibnezhad M, Ojha A, Lee G, Liu Y, Jebelli H, et al. Assessing occupational risk of heat stress at construction: A worker-centric wearable sensor-based approach. Saf Sci. 2021 Oct 1;142:105395.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Work at Heights Training: Conventional Approach With and Without Immersive Virtual Reality
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06728566
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UAOccidente
- Conditions
- Workers at Heights
- Keywords
- Occupational Groups, Virtual Reality, Simulation Training
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Autonoma de OccidenteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Universidad del Valle, Colombia
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study focuses on the design and evaluation of an innovative training protocol aimed at working at heights in the construction sector in the city of Cali. The main focus of this protocol lies in the use of Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and the measurement of biosignals to enhance workers' safety and preparedness. The training protocol is developed by creating virtual environments that simulate hazardous working conditions, allowing workers to practice high-risk situations safely and effectively. Additionally, the integration of biosignal measurements, such as heart rate variability and respiratory rate, is used to assess workers' stress levels and decision-making abilities during simulations.
The protocol evaluation is conducted through a pilot study with real workers in the construction field. The results are analyzed to determine whether the use of IVR and biosignal measurement improves assertiveness and, therefore, safety, reduces workplace accidents, and increases workers' confidence in high-risk environments. The findings of this study will provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of IVR and biosignal measurement as training tools in the construction sector, which could have a significant impact on reducing workplace accidents and injuries. This innovative approach has the potential to enhance occupational safety and workers' preparedness in high-risk environments, thereby contributing to a safer and more efficient working environment in the construction industry.
Detailed description
Safety in the construction sector is of vital importance, especially in high-risk activities such as excavations and working at heights. To improve worker training and preparation in these areas, this research proposal has been developed.
This project focuses on the use of advanced technology, such as Immersive Virtual Reality, to simulate real work situations and allow workers to practice and acquire the necessary skills to face the challenges of their daily tasks. However, what makes this project particularly interesting is the incorporation of biosignal measurement during training.
Biosignals are physiological indicators that can be measured and analyzed to assess an individual's emotional and physical state. In this context, devices will be used to capture data such as heart rate, respiratory rate, and their variability. These measurements will provide precise information about the worker's reactions to different simulated situations, which will, in turn, help identify areas for improvement and optimize the training protocol.
The main contribution of this project lies in generating new knowledge about how biosignals can be used as a complementary tool in the design and evaluation of training protocols for workers in high-risk activities. The information obtained through biosignal measurement will allow for the identification of patterns and trends that will help better understand workers' physiological and emotional reactions, as well as their performance in critical situations.
This clinical trial compares two training methods for workers at heights, one using Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) in addition to the conventional training, and the other using only the conventional training. The main questions to be answered are:
What is the impact of the IVR training protocol on the acquisition of knowledge and practical skills of workers in high-risk activities compared to traditional training?
Is there a relationship between immersive Virtual Reality training and the physiological response to stressful situations in high-risk activities, through the recording of biosignals taken during the intervention?
The researchers will compare the two forms of training and identify if there are differences in both fitness and cardiorespiratory response.
Participants in the control group will perform practical work at heights while heart rate, respiratory monitoring, and ergonomic analysis of the activity will be performed. The participants of the intervention group, in addition to the above, will be exposed to virtual reality environments as part of the training of work at heights, this will be before the actual practical part.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The type of experimental design will be a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial, with an analyst blind, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the intervention. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups, the group receiving the intervention, with work-at-heights training using immersive virtual reality, before practical training in a real field, and the control group, receiving the existing standard intervention (prior theoretical training only). This allows us to compare the results between the groups and determine if the intervention is effective compared to the control.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inmersive virtual reality training | Experimental | Device: Inmersive virtual reality, Other: Conventional trainingWork at heights training with the addition of prior immersive virtual reality training. |
| Conventional training | Active comparator | Other: Conventional trainingTraining for work at heights using conventional strategy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Learners from the National Learning Service (SENA).
- First time taking the work at heights training course.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Experience in working at heights.
- Health conditions that prevent performing both the IVR training and work at heights.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Inmersive virtual realityIn addition to conventional training, IVR training aims to provide a detailed preview of the tasks and procedures required in the standard training with selected virtual scenarios: Scenario 1: Inspection and Use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE): In this scenario, the worker will inspect the equipment to ensure it is in good condition and properly used: Harness, Helmet, Lanyards, Carabiners, Lifelines, Energy Absorbers Scenario 2: Working on an Elevated Metal Structure: Structure Ascent: Ascent Method: Use specific ascent systems, ensuring you are always connected to an anchor point. Positioning on the Structure: Secure Anchorage: Once the working position is reached, secure the anchor to a fixed and reliable point. Structure Descent: Unanchoring and Reanchoring: Unanchor and re-anchor at secure points as you descend. Additional Safety Measures: Weather Conditions, signage and delimitation: Scenario 3: Rescue at Heights: Accessing the Person in Danger, rescue Techniques. | Device | Inmersive virtual reality training |
| Conventional trainingThe working at heights training provided by the National Learning Service (SENA) in Colombia includes key steps to ensure safety and proper equipment use: * Harness Use: Inspect for damage, wear it like a vest, and ensure correct orientation. Adjust shoulder and leg straps for comfort and secure the chest strap. * Final Check: Verify D-rings are correctly positioned, and all buckles are securely fastened. * Helmet: Inspect for damage and adjust for a secure fit. * Lanyards: Select in good condition, connect properly, keep tension, and avoid overloading. * Carabiners: Use certified carabiners with functioning locks, connected to proper points. * Lifelines and Energy Absorbers: Install and tension lifelines properly; check energy absorbers before use. * Climbing/Descending: Maintain three contact points and secure tools to avoid accidents. | Other | Conventional training, Inmersive virtual reality training |
Primary outcome
PRACTICAL SKILLS FOR WORKING AT HEIGHTS
Time frame: The time frame for completing all practical activities, assessments, and evaluations is approximately 10 hours, distributed over 2 days.
Each activity is scored on an approve/disapprove system. By the end, workers must meet these standards: 1. Harness Donning and Adjustment: Properly don, adjust straps, and ensure no slack. Passing requires a secure, comfortable fit and correct anchor positioning. 2. Anchor Points: Select/install anchors compatible with the system and load standards. Passing requires secure installation verified by testing. 3. Lifelines: Use vertical/horizontal lifelines, maintaining connection. Passing requires constant security. 4. Climbing/Moving: Safely ascend/descend while connected. Passing requires proper system use and controlled movements. 5. Tool Handling: Secure tools to prevent falls. Passing requires consistent adherence to safety protocols. 6. Emergency Response: Simulate emergencies calmly, following protocols. Passing requires appropriate stress management. 7. Equipment Inspection: Identify equipment issues. Passing requires thorough inspection and defect reporting.
4 secondary outcomes
Heart Rate Variability
Time frame: Heart rate variability will be assessed over an approximate period of 45 minutes.
Respiratory Rate Variability
Time frame: Respiratory rate variability will be assessed over an approximate period of 45 minutes.
Ergonomic Analysis of the Activity
Time frame: The REBA score will be assessed over an approximate period of 25 minutes during the observation of the occupational task.
Attention and memory measurements
Time frame: Before the training protocol
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- BackgroundAbrahamsen EB, Selvik JT, Milazzo MF, Langdalen H, Dahl RE, Bansal S, et al. On the use of the 'Return Of Safety Investments' (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2021 Jun 1;210:107537.
- BackgroundNnaji C, Okpala I, Gambatese J, Jin Z. Controlling safety and health challenges intrinsic in exoskeleton use in construction. Saf Sci. 2023 Jan 1;157:105943.
- BackgroundBao L, Tran SVT, Nguyen TL, Pham HC, Lee D, Park C. Cross-platform virtual reality for real-time construction safety training using immersive web and industry foundation classes. Autom Constr. 2022 Nov 1;143:104565.
- BackgroundZermane A, Mohd Tohir MZ, Baharudin MR, Mohamed Yusoff H. Risk assessment of fatal accidents due to work at heights activities using fault tree analysis: Case study in Malaysia. Saf Sci. 2022 Jul 1;151:105724.
- BackgroundStefan H, Mortimer M, Horan B, Kenny G. Evaluating the preliminary effectiveness of industrial virtual reality safety training for ozone generator isolation procedure. Saf Sci. 2023 Jul 1;163:106125.
- BackgroundShakerian S, Habibnezhad M, Ojha A, Lee G, Liu Y, Jebelli H, et al. Assessing occupational risk of heat stress at construction: A worker-centric wearable sensor-based approach. Saf Sci. 2021 Oct 1;142:105395.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Once the research is completed, only data that are useful for obtaining results will be stored in www.figshare.com and placed under embargo until they are published in a scientific journal. No sensitive or personal data will be uploaded to this repository.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Oscar Campo, PhD study director
Universidad Autónoma de Occidente
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Inmersive virtual reality and Conventional training in people with Workers at Heights, run by Universidad Autonoma de Occidente at 1 site in Colombia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Diana Guerrero Jaramillo, MsC (573172603503, guerrero.diana@correounivalle.edu.co), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PRACTICAL SKILLS FOR WORKING AT HEIGHTS (time frame: The time frame for completing all practical activities, assessments, and evaluations is approximately 10 hours, distributed over 2 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06728566, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.