Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT06730399
Computer-Assisted Cryotherapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty
An observational study of Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Martini Hospital Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
The aim of this study was to investigate whether computer-assisted cryotherapy is effective in reducing postoperative pain and analgesics consumption, next to improving functional outcome and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- What is being tested?
- Computed-assisted-cryotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2019to 23 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population is recruited from one large peripheral hospital in the Netherlands, the Martini Hospital.
Who may be able to join
- Patients scheduled for a primary TKA or UKA in the Martini Hospital.
- Age ≥ 18 years
Who cannot join
- skin (or other) infections
- rheumatoid arthritis
- vascular disease
- having a strong preference for one of the two treatment options
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Role of Computer-Assisted Cryotherapy in the Postoperative Treatment After Total Knee Arthroplasty
The aim of this study was to investigate whether computer-assisted cryotherapy is effective in reducing postoperative pain and analgesics consumption, next to improving functional outcome and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis is that computer-assisted cryotherapy has positive effects on postoperative pain after TKA.
For this purpose a single-centre non-blinded trial was designed where two groups of patients were observed, a cold (cryotherapy) C-group and a regular (control) R-group. Depended on the week they were operated patients received either usual care (R-group) or computed-assesed- cryotherapy (odd or even week; week-on/week-off principle). Patients in the C-group received next to usual postoperative care computer-assisted cryotherapy for several hours a day during the first seven postoperative days (10-12 degrees Celcius).
Primary outcome was pain, monitored with the numerical rating scale for pain. Secondary outcomes were the use of opioid escape medication, function and swelling, monitored by active range of motion, timed up and go test and circumference measurements; several patient-reported outcome measures (short term 2 and 6 weeks; and longer term 6 and 12 months postoperative); and patient satisfaction, monitored by the numerical rating scale for satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
The study was conducted at the Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Martini Hospital, a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. All participants gave signed informed consent before participation. Patients with end-stage OA over the age of 18 who were scheduled for a TKA were invited to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria were rheumatoid arthritis, skin or other infections, vascular disease, other comorbidities on which cooling may have a negative effect, and strong preference for one of the treatment options. Patients were randomised into one of the two groups by a week-on/week-off principle. Patients who underwent TKA surgery in an even week received additional postoperative cryotherapy (C-group), those who had the surgery in an odd week received usual postoperative care (R-group). Surgery dates were scheduled in the usual way by the planning department of the hospital. Two weeks before surgery, patients were informed by phone as to which group they were assigned to. Both groups received the usual rapid recovery (RR) care and rehabilitation program, consisting of local infiltration analgesia during surgery, compressive bandaging for 24 h after surgery, and full weight-bearing mobilisation and active range of motion exercises starting on the day of surgery. Antibiotics were given preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients received thromboembolic prophylaxis for a period of six weeks. The Smith \& Nephew (Memphis, USA) posterior stabilized (PS) GENESIS II total knee system was used for the TKA.
For the CAC in the C-group, the ZAMAR ZHC-MG665A (ZAMAR, Vrsar, Croatia) was used during hospitalisation and the smaller CAC system ZAMAR ZT Cube (ZAMAR, Vrsar, Croatia) for the home situation. The CAC system was delivered to the patient's home before the day of the surgery. Both models had a touchscreen with pre-set programs, with parameters as shown in the cooling schedule. All patients received a personal cooling brace, the ZAMAR Wrap, which transferred cold onto the skin and deep tissue around the knee. Patients in the C-group were instructed to cool the operated knee during the first seven postoperative days. The schedule they received was based on a schedule used by Thijs et al. Patients were allowed to deviate from this schedule, but were asked to document the actual cooling time and temperature in a log.
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Being tested
- Computed-assisted-cryotherapy
- Keywords
- cryotherapy, TKA, postoperative rehabilitation, pain, recovery, opioid
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Computed-assisted-cryotherapyDevice
cryotherapy device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cryotherapy group | Postoperative treatment using computed-assisted-cryotherapy in the first week postoperative in addition to usual care Receives: Device: Computed-assisted-cryotherapy | |
| Control group | Postoperative treatment according to usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in rest
range 0-10, where a higher score indicates more pain
Measured: assessed at 6 weeks postoperative
Secondary outcomes (16)
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in rest
range 0-10, where a higher score indicates more pain
Measured: at baseline, daily during the first 7 days, after 2 weeks, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores while loading
range 0-10, where a higher score indicates more pain
Measured: at baseline, daily during the first 7 days, after 2 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Opioid use
The amount of opioid use in case of excessive pain
Measured: daily during the first week after surgery
active Range of Motion
in degrees
Measured: at baseline and at 6 weeks postoperative
Timed Up and Go
In seconds. Measure of functional mobility.
Measured: at baseline and at 6 weeks postoperative
Knee circumference
in centimeters
Measured: at baseline and at 6 weeks postoperative
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire
Without the sports and recreation domain. Range 0-100, where a higher score indicates less symptoms.
Measured: preoperative and 2 and 6 weeks postoperative
Work, Osteoarthritis en joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ)
Measure of work ability (functioning). Range 0-100, where a higher score indicates less functional limitations.
Measured: preoperative and 2 and 6 weeks postoperative
EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) - 5 point Likert scale
Index score (0-1, closer to 1 indicates better health related quality of life); visual Analogue Scale scale about the self-perceived health status (0-100, higher indicates better self-perceived health status).
Measured: preoperative and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Oxford knee scores
Range 0-48, where a higher score indicates less symptoms.
Measured: preoperative and 6 and 12 months postoperative
KOOS-PS scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form)
Range 0-100, where a higher score indicates less symptoms
Measured: preoperative, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Numeric rating scale (NRS) satisfaction
patient's satisfaction with the outcome after surgery at that time point, range 0-10, where a higher score indicates more satisfaction
Measured: 2 and 6 weeks postoperative, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
anchor question: patient perceived change in pain
the degree in which a patient experiences an improvement in pain compared to baseline (7 point Likert scale: much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly better, better, much better)
Measured: 6 and 12 months postoperative
anchor question: patient perceived change in functioning
the degree in which a patient experiences an improvement in functioning compared to baseline (7 point Likert scale: much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly better, better, much better)
Measured: 6 and 12 months postoperative
Numeric rating scal (NRS) satisfaction cryotherapy
Only for the patients who used the Computer-assisted-cryotherapy device: patient's satisfaction with cryotherapy. Range 0-10, where a higher score indicates more satisfaction.
Measured: 1 week postoperative
Complications/Serious adverse events
Keep record of the complications that occurred
Measured: from baseline until 12 months postoperative
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2019
- Primary completion9 Jun 2020
- Study completion23 Mar 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteo Arthritis KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Martini Hospital Groningen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06730399
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cryotherapy in TKA patients
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 8 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Only deidentified data will be available upon reasonable written request in conjunction with appropriate data use agreement.
Publications
Thijs E, Schotanus MGM, Bemelmans YFL, Kort NP. Reduced opiate use after total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted cryotherapy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4962-y. Epub 2018 May 3.
PubMed 29725749Brouwers HFG, de Vries AJ, van Zuilen M, van Kouswijk HW, Brouwer RW. The role of computer-assisted cryotherapy in the postoperative treatment after total knee arthroplasty: positive effects on pain and opioid consumption. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2698-2706. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06568-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
PubMed 33903923
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Role of Computer-Assisted Cryotherapy in the Postoperative Treatment After Total Knee Arthroplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06730399
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cryotherapy in TKA patients
- Conditions
- Osteo Arthritis Knee
- Keywords
- cryotherapy, TKA, postoperative rehabilitation, pain, recovery, opioid
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Martini Hospital GroningenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Mar 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether computer-assisted cryotherapy is effective in reducing postoperative pain and analgesics consumption, next to improving functional outcome and patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis is that computer-assisted cryotherapy has positive effects on postoperative pain after TKA.
For this purpose a single-centre non-blinded trial was designed where two groups of patients were observed, a cold (cryotherapy) C-group and a regular (control) R-group. Depended on the week they were operated patients received either usual care (R-group) or computed-assesed- cryotherapy (odd or even week; week-on/week-off principle). Patients in the C-group received next to usual postoperative care computer-assisted cryotherapy for several hours a day during the first seven postoperative days (10-12 degrees Celcius).
Primary outcome was pain, monitored with the numerical rating scale for pain. Secondary outcomes were the use of opioid escape medication, function and swelling, monitored by active range of motion, timed up and go test and circumference measurements; several patient-reported outcome measures (short term 2 and 6 weeks; and longer term 6 and 12 months postoperative); and patient satisfaction, monitored by the numerical rating scale for satisfaction.
Detailed description
The study was conducted at the Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Martini Hospital, a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. All participants gave signed informed consent before participation. Patients with end-stage OA over the age of 18 who were scheduled for a TKA were invited to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria were rheumatoid arthritis, skin or other infections, vascular disease, other comorbidities on which cooling may have a negative effect, and strong preference for one of the treatment options. Patients were randomised into one of the two groups by a week-on/week-off principle. Patients who underwent TKA surgery in an even week received additional postoperative cryotherapy (C-group), those who had the surgery in an odd week received usual postoperative care (R-group). Surgery dates were scheduled in the usual way by the planning department of the hospital. Two weeks before surgery, patients were informed by phone as to which group they were assigned to. Both groups received the usual rapid recovery (RR) care and rehabilitation program, consisting of local infiltration analgesia during surgery, compressive bandaging for 24 h after surgery, and full weight-bearing mobilisation and active range of motion exercises starting on the day of surgery. Antibiotics were given preoperatively and postoperatively. All patients received thromboembolic prophylaxis for a period of six weeks. The Smith \& Nephew (Memphis, USA) posterior stabilized (PS) GENESIS II total knee system was used for the TKA.
For the CAC in the C-group, the ZAMAR ZHC-MG665A (ZAMAR, Vrsar, Croatia) was used during hospitalisation and the smaller CAC system ZAMAR ZT Cube (ZAMAR, Vrsar, Croatia) for the home situation. The CAC system was delivered to the patient's home before the day of the surgery. Both models had a touchscreen with pre-set programs, with parameters as shown in the cooling schedule. All patients received a personal cooling brace, the ZAMAR Wrap, which transferred cold onto the skin and deep tissue around the knee. Patients in the C-group were instructed to cool the operated knee during the first seven postoperative days. The schedule they received was based on a schedule used by Thijs et al. Patients were allowed to deviate from this schedule, but were asked to document the actual cooling time and temperature in a log.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cryotherapy group | – | Device: Computed-assisted-cryotherapyPostoperative treatment using computed-assisted-cryotherapy in the first week postoperative in addition to usual care |
| Control group | – | –Postoperative treatment according to usual care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population is recruited from one large peripheral hospital in the Netherlands, the Martini Hospital.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients scheduled for a primary TKA or UKA in the Martini Hospital.
- Age ≥ 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- skin (or other) infections
- rheumatoid arthritis
- vascular disease
- having a strong preference for one of the two treatment options
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Computed-assisted-cryotherapycryotherapy device | Device | Cryotherapy group |
Primary outcome
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in rest
Time frame: assessed at 6 weeks postoperative
range 0-10, where a higher score indicates more pain
16 secondary outcomes
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in rest
Time frame: at baseline, daily during the first 7 days, after 2 weeks, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain scores while loading
Time frame: at baseline, daily during the first 7 days, after 2 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Opioid use
Time frame: daily during the first week after surgery
active Range of Motion
Time frame: at baseline and at 6 weeks postoperative
Timed Up and Go
Time frame: at baseline and at 6 weeks postoperative
Knee circumference
Time frame: at baseline and at 6 weeks postoperative
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire
Time frame: preoperative and 2 and 6 weeks postoperative
Work, Osteoarthritis en joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ)
Time frame: preoperative and 2 and 6 weeks postoperative
EuroQol 5D (EQ5D) - 5 point Likert scale
Time frame: preoperative and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Oxford knee scores
Time frame: preoperative and 6 and 12 months postoperative
KOOS-PS scores (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - Physical Function Short Form)
Time frame: preoperative, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
Numeric rating scale (NRS) satisfaction
Time frame: 2 and 6 weeks postoperative, and 6 and 12 months postoperative
anchor question: patient perceived change in pain
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
anchor question: patient perceived change in functioning
Time frame: 6 and 12 months postoperative
Numeric rating scal (NRS) satisfaction cryotherapy
Time frame: 1 week postoperative
Complications/Serious adverse events
Time frame: from baseline until 12 months postoperative
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 29725749Thijs E, Schotanus MGM, Bemelmans YFL, Kort NP. Reduced opiate use after total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted cryotherapy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1204-1212. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4962-y. Epub 2018 May 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 33903923Brouwers HFG, de Vries AJ, van Zuilen M, van Kouswijk HW, Brouwer RW. The role of computer-assisted cryotherapy in the postoperative treatment after total knee arthroplasty: positive effects on pain and opioid consumption. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2698-2706. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06568-x. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Only deidentified data will be available upon reasonable written request in conjunction with appropriate data use agreement.
Related trials for Osteo Arthritis Knee
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of a Single Intra-Articular Injection of HL-01 in the Treatment of Pain in Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
Total Versus Robotic Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
Osteo Arthritis Knee, Arthritis Knee
Not yet recruiting
The PERK Study: Predicting and Evaluating Response to Knee RFA Using fNIRS
Osteo Arthritis of the Knee, Pain
Recruiting
Comparison of Distal IPACK and Popliteal Plexus Block Combined With Femoral Triangle Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Martini Hospital Groningen at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in rest (time frame: assessed at 6 weeks postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06730399, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2025.