Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)NCT06734286
Working Memory Training in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment
A study testing CogMed in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), run by St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test whether a special memory training program, called CogMed, can help people with early memory problems. The Investigators want to see if this training improves memory and also helps reduce stress. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
- What is being tested?
- CogMed
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 16 Sep 2024to 30 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female outpatients ages ≥ 50 years;
- Meet Mayo Clinic Criteria for MCI. (Patients with mild cognitive impairment)
- Access to the internet through computer
- A proficiency in speaking and reading English or having a family member who is proficient in reading and speaking English and is willing to serve as a translator.
- Vision and hearing must be sufficient to comply with study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score less than 19 or patients diagnosed with moderate or severe dementia by a clinician.
- In the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Barrow Neurological Institute, Division of Alzheimer's Disease
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Yonas E Geda, M.D, MSc, 833-233-3073, yonas.geda@commonspirit.org
Geetika Chahal, MBBS, 602-406-7240, Geetika.chahal@commonspirit.org
About this study
Official title: CogMed Intervention Targeting Working Memory in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment
The purpose of this study is to test whether a special memory training program, called CogMed, can help people with early memory problems. The Investigators want to see if this training improves memory and also helps reduce stress.
The Investigators also want to see if CogMed results in changes to a blood biomarker called p-Tau 217, which possibly indicate Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Read the detailed description
The goal of this study is to conduct a pilot clinical trial aimed at comparing the effects of CogMed intervention plus Treatment As Usual (TAU) versus TAU alone in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Based on our preliminary data from brain health program, the primary hypothesis is that the CogMed intervention may improve the CogMed measures and possibly working memory. This may improve sense of self-efficacy and lead to a decrease in perceived stress, thereby demonstrating possible transfer of cognitive benefits to biobehavioral construct of perceived stress. Additionally, the study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of collecting p-Tau 217, a blood based Alzheimer's Disease biomarker, from MCI patients. Though no significant changes in pTau 217 are expected due to the short duration of the study, the goal is to successfully recruit 10 MCI patients (5 in the intervention group and 5 in the control group) who are willing to undergo blood draws for p-Tau 217 level determination.
- Conditions
- Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
- Being tested
- CogMed
- Keywords
- CogMed, Mild cognitive Impairment, CogMed intervention targeting working memory, CogMed Intervention Vs Treatment as Usual, working memory training, Alzheimer's Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CogMedOther
Also called Computer based training program., CogMed Intervention.
CogMed which is a computerized working memory training program developed by Karolinska University.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | The Intervention Group (N = 5) Participants will be instructed to do CogMed intervention (computerized working memory activity carried out for 25 minutes daily for 5 days per week for a total of 10 weeks). Receives: Other: CogMed |
| Control Group | No intervention | The Control group(N = 5) follow there Treatment as usual(TAU). For ethical reasons, at the end of trial, the control group will also be offered the CogMed intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Working Memory as measured by the WAIS-IV Digit Span Forward/Backward
The Digit Span Forward/Backward is a subset of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) that captures attention efficiency and working memory.
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Working Memory as measured by the TMT-B
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a well-established test sensitive to impairment in multiple cognitive domains.
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Working Memory as measured by Category Fluency Test
The Category Fluency Test (CFT) was created to assess semantic fluency. It consists of asking the individual to name as many animals as possible in 60 s. Performance on CFT can be evaluated through several components, such as the number of correct words, clusters, switching, related words, and intrusion and perseveration errors.
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in Blood biomarker
We do not expect a significant change in p-Tau 217 during the short-proposed study duration, however, we projected that we will successfully recruit 10 MCI patients (Intervention group = N 5; and control group (N=5) that will be willing to undergo blood draw for determination of p-Tau 217 level.
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is used for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. The scale also includes questions about current levels of experienced stress (Cohen et al, 1983).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Score
The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) has 6 items and is a reliable means of assessing resilience as the ability to bounce back or recover from stress (Smith et al., 2008).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire designed to measure sleep quality and disturbance over past month (Buysse et al.,1989).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire Score
The Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire will assess active time and time spent on exercise (PASB-Q; English Version) (Sattler et al., 2020).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Mediterranean Diet Scale(MedDiet)
The MDScale includes nine components, including beneficial components (i.e., vegetables, legumes, fruits and nuts, cereal, and fish), detrimental components (i.e., meat, poultry, and high-fat dairy products), ethanol intake, and the ratio of monounsaturated to saturated fatty acids.
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire
The WHO QOL has four domains (physical health, psychological, social relationships, and environment). The four domain scores denote an individual's perception of quality of life in each particular domain (WHOQOL Group, 1998).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Memory as measured by the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT)
The Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT) is a measure of organized visual search, attention, set shifting and divided attention (Reynolds 2002).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Cognitive Impairment as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is used extensively in clinical and research settings to systematically measure and assess mental status. It is an 11- question measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention, and calculation, recall, and language (Folstein et al., 1975)
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Verbal Memory as Measured by the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT)
The Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) evaluates verbal memory by presenting a 15- word list five times followed by attempted recall. This is followed by a second 15-word recall interference list, followed by recall of the original list (Rey A. 1964).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Process (CompACT)
The Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Process (CompACT) is a 23 item questionnaire that measures ACT processes, including psychological flexibility (Francis et al., 2016).
Measured: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Dec 2024
- Study start16 Sep 2024
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- In this study, participant randomization into intervention and control groups will be performed using computer-generated random numbers. The goal is to successfully recruit 10 MCI patients (5 in the intervention group and 5 in the control group) who are willing to undergo blood draws for p-Tau 217 level determination. For ethical reason, at the end of trial at 3 months, the control group will also be offered the CogMed intervention.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barrow Neurological Foundation, Barrow Neurological Institute
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yonas Geda, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
- Investigators
- Yonas E Geda, M.D, MSc, Principal investigator, Barrow Neurological Institute, Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Disorders Division
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06734286
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24-500-385-30-53
- Status last verified
- Nov 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: This project will be submitted for abstracts and/or publications following data analysis. If the findings are significant a follow up study will be proposed by applying to the NIH for additional grant funding.
Publications
Apiquian R, Diaz R, Victoria G, Ulloa RE. The Category Fluency Test components and their association with cognition and symptoms in adolescents with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2023 Nov 10;35:100296. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2023.100296. eCollection 2024 Mar.
PubMed 38025823Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(2):106-9. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5.
PubMed 12214820Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006667.
PubMed 9626712Flak MM, Hol HR, Hernes SS, Chang L, Engvig A, Bjuland KJ, Pripp A, Madsen BO, Knapskog AB, Ulstein I, Lona T, Skranes J, Lohaugen GCC. Adaptive Computerized Working Memory Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment. A Randomized Double-Blind Active Controlled Trial. Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 12;10:807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00807. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31031677Wilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2010). "The Valued Living Questionnaire: Defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework." The Psychological Record 60: 249-272
Reynolds, C. R. (2002). Comprehensive trail-making test : examiner's manual. Austin, Tex., Pro-Ed
Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France
Francis, A. W., D. L. Dawson and N. Golijani-Moghaddam (2016). "The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT)." Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 5(3): 134-145
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. New York, The Psychological Corporation.
Westwood AJ, Beiser A, Jain N, Himali JJ, DeCarli C, Auerbach SH, Pase MP, Seshadri S. Prolonged sleep duration as a marker of early neurodegeneration predicting incident dementia. Neurology. 2017 Mar 21;88(12):1172-1179. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003732. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
PubMed 28228567Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
PubMed 18696313Simons DJ, Boot WR, Charness N, Gathercole SE, Chabris CF, Hambrick DZ, Stine-Morrow EA. Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Oct;17(3):103-186. doi: 10.1177/1529100616661983.
PubMed 27697851Sattler MC, Jaunig J, Tosch C, Watson ED, Mokkink LB, Dietz P, van Poppel MNM. Current Evidence of Measurement Properties of Physical Activity Questionnaires for Older Adults: An Updated Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2020 Jul;50(7):1271-1315. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01268-x.
PubMed 32125670Norton MC, Clark CJ, Tschanz JT, Hartin P, Fauth EB, Gast JA, Dorsch TE, Wengreen H, Nugent C, Robinson WD, Lefevre M, McClean S, Cleland I, Schaefer SY, Aguilar S. The design and progress of a multidomain lifestyle intervention to improve brain health in middle-aged persons to reduce later Alzheimer's disease risk: The Gray Matters randomized trial. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2015 May 16;1(1):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2015.05.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.
PubMed 29854925Marengoni A, Winblad B, Karp A, Fratiglioni L. Prevalence of chronic diseases and multimorbidity among the elderly population in Sweden. Am J Public Health. 2008 Jul;98(7):1198-200. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.121137. Epub 2008 May 29.
PubMed 18511722
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CogMed Intervention Targeting Working Memory in Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06734286
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 24-500-385-30-53
- Conditions
- Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
- Keywords
- CogMed, Mild cognitive Impairment, CogMed intervention targeting working memory, CogMed Intervention Vs Treatment as Usual, working memory training, Alzheimer's Disease
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Barrow Neurological Foundation, Barrow Neurological Institute
- Study start
- 16 Sep 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test whether a special memory training program, called CogMed, can help people with early memory problems. The Investigators want to see if this training improves memory and also helps reduce stress.
The Investigators also want to see if CogMed results in changes to a blood biomarker called p-Tau 217, which possibly indicate Alzheimer's disease (AD).
Detailed description
The goal of this study is to conduct a pilot clinical trial aimed at comparing the effects of CogMed intervention plus Treatment As Usual (TAU) versus TAU alone in patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Based on our preliminary data from brain health program, the primary hypothesis is that the CogMed intervention may improve the CogMed measures and possibly working memory. This may improve sense of self-efficacy and lead to a decrease in perceived stress, thereby demonstrating possible transfer of cognitive benefits to biobehavioral construct of perceived stress. Additionally, the study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of collecting p-Tau 217, a blood based Alzheimer's Disease biomarker, from MCI patients. Though no significant changes in pTau 217 are expected due to the short duration of the study, the goal is to successfully recruit 10 MCI patients (5 in the intervention group and 5 in the control group) who are willing to undergo blood draws for p-Tau 217 level determination.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- In this study, participant randomization into intervention and control groups will be performed using computer-generated random numbers. The goal is to successfully recruit 10 MCI patients (5 in the intervention group and 5 in the control group) who are willing to undergo blood draws for p-Tau 217 level determination. For ethical reason, at the end of trial at 3 months, the control group will also be offered the CogMed intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: CogMedThe Intervention Group (N = 5) Participants will be instructed to do CogMed intervention (computerized working memory activity carried out for 25 minutes daily for 5 days per week for a total of 10 weeks). |
| Control Group | No intervention | –The Control group(N = 5) follow there Treatment as usual(TAU). For ethical reasons, at the end of trial, the control group will also be offered the CogMed intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female outpatients ages ≥ 50 years;
- Meet Mayo Clinic Criteria for MCI. (Patients with mild cognitive impairment)
- Access to the internet through computer
- A proficiency in speaking and reading English or having a family member who is proficient in reading and speaking English and is willing to serve as a translator.
- Vision and hearing must be sufficient to comply with study procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) score less than 19 or patients diagnosed with moderate or severe dementia by a clinician.
- In the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CogMedAlso: Computer based training program., CogMed Intervention.CogMed which is a computerized working memory training program developed by Karolinska University. | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Working Memory as measured by the WAIS-IV Digit Span Forward/Backward
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
The Digit Span Forward/Backward is a subset of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) that captures attention efficiency and working memory.
Working Memory as measured by the TMT-B
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
The Trail Making Test (TMT) is a well-established test sensitive to impairment in multiple cognitive domains.
Working Memory as measured by Category Fluency Test
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
The Category Fluency Test (CFT) was created to assess semantic fluency. It consists of asking the individual to name as many animals as possible in 60 s. Performance on CFT can be evaluated through several components, such as the number of correct words, clusters, switching, related words, and intrusion and perseveration errors.
11 secondary outcomes
Change in Blood biomarker
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) Score
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Score
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Score
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire Score
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Mediterranean Diet Scale(MedDiet)
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
WHO Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Memory as measured by the Comprehensive Trail Making Test (CTMT)
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Cognitive Impairment as measured by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Verbal Memory as Measured by the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT)
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Process (CompACT)
Time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 38025823Apiquian R, Diaz R, Victoria G, Ulloa RE. The Category Fluency Test components and their association with cognition and symptoms in adolescents with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2023 Nov 10;35:100296. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2023.100296. eCollection 2024 Mar.
- Background: PubMed 12214820Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(2):106-9. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5.
- Background: PubMed 9626712Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006667.
- Background: PubMed 31031677Flak MM, Hol HR, Hernes SS, Chang L, Engvig A, Bjuland KJ, Pripp A, Madsen BO, Knapskog AB, Ulstein I, Lona T, Skranes J, Lohaugen GCC. Adaptive Computerized Working Memory Training in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment. A Randomized Double-Blind Active Controlled Trial. Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 12;10:807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00807. eCollection 2019.
- BackgroundWilson, K. G., Sandoz, E. K., Kitchens, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2010). "The Valued Living Questionnaire: Defining and measuring valued action within a behavioral framework." The Psychological Record 60: 249-272
- BackgroundReynolds, C. R. (2002). Comprehensive trail-making test : examiner's manual. Austin, Tex., Pro-Ed
- BackgroundRey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France
- BackgroundFrancis, A. W., D. L. Dawson and N. Golijani-Moghaddam (2016). "The development and validation of the Comprehensive assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy processes (CompACT)." Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 5(3): 134-145
- BackgroundWechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III. New York, The Psychological Corporation.
- Background: PubMed 28228567Westwood AJ, Beiser A, Jain N, Himali JJ, DeCarli C, Auerbach SH, Pase MP, Seshadri S. Prolonged sleep duration as a marker of early neurodegeneration predicting incident dementia. Neurology. 2017 Mar 21;88(12):1172-1179. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003732. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
- Background: PubMed 18696313Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
- Background: PubMed 27697851Simons DJ, Boot WR, Charness N, Gathercole SE, Chabris CF, Hambrick DZ, Stine-Morrow EA. Do "Brain-Training" Programs Work? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2016 Oct;17(3):103-186. doi: 10.1177/1529100616661983.
- World Health Organization (2017). "Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017-2025."Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. This project will be submitted for abstracts and/or publications following data analysis. If the findings are significant a follow up study will be proposed by applying to the NIH for additional grant funding.
Related trials for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
RecruitingPhase 1
A First-In-Human Study of LY3954068 in Participants With Early Symptomatic Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
PET Imaging of Phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) in Volunteers With Alzheimer Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)
Alzheimer s Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment
RecruitingObservational study
Loneliness as Risk Factor for Dementia
Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Dementia (Diagnosis)
Active, not recruiting
EFFECTS OF AN OUTDOOR MAT PILATES PROGRAM ON NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS OF ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS WITH MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
Cognition Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Yonas E Geda, M.D, MSc principal investigator
Barrow Neurological Institute, Alzheimer's Disease and Cognitive Disorders Division
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CogMed in people with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), run by St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Yonas E Geda, M.D, MSc (833-233-3073, yonas.geda@commonspirit.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Working Memory as measured by the WAIS-IV Digit Span Forward/Backward (time frame: Will be assessed at baseline and again at a 3-month follow-up following the intervention period.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06734286, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2024.