AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary Arteriovenous MalformationsPAVMNCT06735976

Efficacy & Safety of LOBO™ Vascular Occlusion Device for Embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations

A study testing PAVM Embolization and PAVM Embolization with a LOBO™ device in people with Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate both the technical success and efficacy of using the LOBO™ device in patients undergoing embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations (PAVM). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations
What is being tested?
PAVM Embolization and PAVM Embolization with a LOBO™ device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
17 Dec 2024to May 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 1 PAVM with a feeding artery ≥2 mm in diameter and a feeding artery amenable to the use of LOBO™ device (i.e. feeding artery length of ≥1 cm). Given the length of embolic devices including LOBO™, the proximal vessel length to the PAVM sac must be of sufficient size for embolization to be feasible. If patients have at least 1 PAVM where the feeding artery length is ≥1 cm, they are eligible for enrollment.
  • Patients with multiple PAVMs meeting eligibility criteria may be enrolled with the intent of embolizing multiple different PAVMs with the LOBO™ device in the same embolization session or in separate sessions.
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate >30 ml/min
  • Per standard of care (SOC), all pregnant women to be enrolled must be in their 2nd or 3rd trimesters

Who cannot join

  • Confounding bleeding disorders other than HHT
  • Life-threatening iodinated contrast allergy not amenable to prophylactic therapy with steroids
  • Underlying coagulopathy
  • Patients on anti-platelets or anti-coagulation medications

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Efficacy & Safety of LOBO™ Vascular Occlusion Device for Embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations (PAVM)

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate both the technical success and efficacy of using the LOBO™ device in patients undergoing embolization of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations (PAVM). The main question[s] it aims to answer [is/are]:

  • What is the technical success rate, the number of LOBO™ devices needed for occlusion, and time to occlusion for each feeding artery during PAVM embolization using the LOBO™ device?
  • What is the short-term occlusion rate of the LOBO™ device for PAVM embolization (6 months post-embolization)?
  • What are the medium- and long-term occlusion rate of the LOBO™ device in PAVMs (12 months and 36 months post embolization)?
Read more

Researchers will compare the percentage of LOBO™ embolized PAVMs that develop recanalization at 6, 12, and 36- month intervals compared to percentage of conventionally embolized PAVMs that develop recanalization at the same intervals.

Participants will undergo the embolization procedure and be followed for 36 months after the procedure. There will be a total of 4 study visits:

  • Treatment visit
  • 6-Month Follow-up visit
  • 12-Month Follow-up visit
  • 36-Month Follow-up visit

At each clinical follow-up visit participants will undergo imaging with a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the chest.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, interventional, single-center investigation involving the enrollment of 30 participants with PAVMs with feeding arteries ≥2 mm in diameter. Per standard of care and current clinical practice at UNC, all patients are first evaluated at the UNC Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) clinic which is run by the UNC Hematology Division. Based on clinical symptoms and signs (shortness of breath, hypoxia, positive bubble study, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack), and/or imaging findings (i.e., feeding artery size) on chest computed tomography angiography (CTA), patients are referred to interventional radiology for consultation for PAVM embolization. At this time, patients will be approached for enrollment in this study. This study aims to assess the technical success and rates of recanalization of PAVMs embolized using the LOBO™ device.

Being tested
PAVM Embolization, PAVM Embolization with a LOBO™ device
Keywords
Embolization, Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations, PAVM

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PAVM EmbolizationDevice

    This study consists of one group. All participants will undergo PAVM embolization with a LOBO™ device.

  • PAVM Embolization with a LOBO™ deviceDevice

    Participants will undergo PAVM embolization with the LOBO™ device per standard of care.

Study groups in NCT06735976
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PAVM EmbolizationOtherThis study consists of one group. All participants will undergo PAVM embolization with a LOBO™ device.
Receives: Device: PAVM Embolization; Device: PAVM Embolization with a LOBO™ device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Technical Success

    Technical success will be defined as the successful deployment of the LOBO™ device in the intended vessel and complete occlusion of the vessel. Successful deployment will be defined as 1) no technical malfunctions in the LOBO™ deployment system that leads to an inability to deploy the device and 2) deployment of the device into the intended vessel and not into surrounding vessels. Complete occlusion will be defined as complete cessation of blood flow through the embolized vessel based on intraprocedural angiography.

    Measured: At treatment until stasis is achieved. Approximately 1 - 2 hours.

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mean Number of LOBO Plugs

    Descriptive statistics for the number of LOBO™ devices needed for technical success will be reported.

    Measured: At treatment until stasis is achieved. Approx. 1 - 2 hours.

  2. Mean Time to Complete Occlusion

    Descriptive statistics for the time to completion will be reported.

    Measured: At treatment until stasis is achieved. Approx. 1 - 2 hours.

  3. Short-term Occlusion Rate

    Recanalization will be defined as contrast visualization through the plug or the aneurysmal sac on follow-up CTA's. Interpretation of these images will be done by standard clinical radiologists and not research personnel. The reading radiologist's interpretation will be used to determine if recanalization has occurred.

    Measured: 6 months post-embolization

  4. Medium- and Long-term Occlusion Rates

    Recanalization will be defined as contrast visualization through the plug or the aneurysmal sac on follow-up CTA's. Interpretation of these images will be done by standard clinical radiologists and not research personnel. The reading radiologist's interpretation will be used to determine if recanalization has occurred.

    Measured: 12 months and 36 months post-embolization

  5. Recanalization Rates by Modality (LOBO vs conventional)

    Proportion of LOBO™ embolized PAVMs that develop recanalization at 6, 12, and 36- month intervals compared to proportion of conventionally embolized PAVMs (those embolized with coils, Amplatzer, MVPs) that develop recanalization at the same intervals. The retrospective comparator group will consist of patients who have undergone conventional embolization at UNC in a separate trial.

    Measured: 6, 12, and 36-months post-embolization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2024
  2. Study start17 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion22 May 2026
  4. Study completionMay 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06735976
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-2233
Acronym
PAVM
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
11 Dec 2024
Last updated
6 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PAVM Embolization and PAVM Embolization with a LOBO™ device in people with Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Technical Success (time frame: At treatment until stasis is achieved. Approximately 1 - 2 hours.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in