AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseOraBilNCT06736899

Trial of Orbital Atherectomy Versus Standard Strategy in Calcified Bifurcation Lesions

A study testing Orbital Atherectomy System Treatment and Balloon System Treatment in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 9 sites in Spain.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Clinical research with medical devices indicated in accordance with the CE marking, led by researchers, multicenter, open, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients are randomized to treatment with a conventional balloon and then a coronary stent or to initial plaque modification with Orbital Atherectomy (OA)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease
What is being tested?
Orbital Atherectomy System Treatment and Balloon System Treatment
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
9 sitesSpain
Study dates
23 Oct 2025to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients over 18 years of age and
  • Patients with moderately or severely calcified bifurcation lesions (lateral vessel ≥ 2mm), candidates for PCI with coronary stent implantation, in whom there is the possibility of adequate clinical follow-up at 1 year and
  • Patients agree to participate in the study, by signing the Informed Consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with revascularization of the artery to be treated within 9 months prior to the index procedure.
  • Patients with contraindication for the use of Orbital Atherectomy:
  • Patients in cardiogenic shock.
  • Patients with Thrombotic lesions.
  • Patients with Vascular graft disease.
  • Patients with remain vessel disease.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
  • Patients allergic to the components of the washing serum (glide).
  • Patients with life expectancy less than one year.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

JORGE PALAZUELOS, MD, PhD contact

0034659768506

jpalaz@gmail.com

9 sites in 1 country

Spain9 sites, 9 recruiting
  • H. G.U. de ALICANTE DR. BALMIS

    Alicante, 03010

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

    Recruiting
  • H. de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia

    Córdoba, 14004

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Fuencarral-El Pardo, 28046

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti

    Lugo, 270003

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario La Luz

    Madrid, 28003

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitari de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, 41013

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of Orbital Atherectomy Versus Standard Strategy in Calcified Bifurcation Lesions

Clinical research with medical devices indicated in accordance with the CE marking, led by researchers, multicenter, open, prospective, randomized and controlled. Patients are randomized to treatment with a conventional balloon and then a coronary stent or to initial plaque modification with Orbital Atherectomy (OA) and then a coronary stent. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of OA in the adequate treatment with coronary stent of the calcified bifurcation lesion using angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT).

Read the detailed description

The risk profile of patients and their comorbidities have worsened and the observed lesions undergoing treatment are increasingly complex. This has promoted the development of new technologies for plaque modification, especially in the context of calcified lesions. These predispose to suboptimal results of the intervention due to an increased risk of malapposition and underexpansion of the stents, the main variables for restenosis and/or thrombosis of the stents. Thus, compared with non-calcified lesions, the increased amount of calcium in the coronary artery leads to a higher incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

Coronary bifurcation stenting remains complex and is associated with a high risk of stent thrombosis and restenosis even with contemporary techniques, and suboptimal outcomes are frequently observed due to side branch (SL) involvement that increases cardiovascular events.

Our hypothesis is that the use of orbital atherectomy (OA) for coronary revascularization in the presence of calcified bifurcation lesions is feasible and safe compared to the more common technique, favoring the subsequent performance of provisional stenting (PS).

Being tested
Orbital Atherectomy System Treatment, Balloon System Treatment
Keywords
Orbital Atherectomy (OA), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Bifurcation, Side Branch Treatment: Mid-term results
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Orbital Atherectomy System TreatmentDevice

    Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified bifurcation coronary lesion with balloon angioplasty followed by drug eluting stent. Selection of balloon type is at operator´s discretion. Baseline and post dilation OCT will be performed.

  • Balloon System TreatmentDevice

    Percutaneous coronary intervention of a calcified bifurcation coronary lesion with Orbital Atherectomy followed by drug eluting stent. Baseline and post dilation OCT will be performed.

Study groups in NCT06736899
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Balloon Angioplasty (BA)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Balloon System Treatment
Orbital Atherectomy (OA)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Orbital Atherectomy System Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. EFFICACY: Angiographic criteria success

    Percentage of Main vessel and side branch (≥2 mm) patency (final stenosis <20%) without the presence of: residual lesion >70% and TIMI flow < 3 and residual ≥ type C disection

    Measured: At the end of PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)

  2. EFFICACY: OCT criteria: Stent expansion

    Percentage of MLA / mean reference luminal area (mean proximal and distal reference luminal)

    Measured: At the end of PCI

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. SAFETY:Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and non-target lesion target vessel revascularization (TVR non-TLR), thrombosis and stroke

    Measured: 12 months

  2. SAFETY:Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and non-target lesion target vessel revascularization (TVR non-TLR), thrombosis and stroke

    Measured: 6 months

  3. SAFETY:Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and non-target lesion target vessel revascularization (TVR non-TLR), thrombosis and stroke

    Measured: 30 days

  4. SAFETY:Major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Rate of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and non-target lesion target vessel revascularization (TVR non-TLR), thrombosis and stroke

    Measured: At the end of PCI

  5. EFFICACY: Other variables related to stent expansion. Minimal Lumen Area (MLA) in mm2

    Cut-off point >5 mm2

    Measured: At the end of PCI

  6. EFFICACY: Other variables related to stent expansion. Minimal Lumen Area (MLA)

    Percentage of Cut-off point >90 mm2

    Measured: At the end of PCI

  7. EFFICACY: Other variables related to stent expansion. Mean stent expansion

    Percentage of mean stent area (sum of stent area/analyzed stent length)/mean reference lumen area (cut-off point>80%)

    Measured: At the end of PCI

  8. EFFICACY: Other variables related to stent expansion. Stent expansion using linear model

    Percentage of stent volume/adaptative reference lumen volume. (cut-off point>65%)

    Measured: At the end of PCI

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2024
  2. Study start23 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06736899
Sponsor's protocol ID
EPIC44-OraBil
Acronym
OraBil
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
11 Dec 2024
Last updated
8 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Parikh K, Chandra P, Choksi N, Khanna P, Chambers J. Safety and feasibility of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions: the ORBIT I trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1134-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24700. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

    PubMed 23460596
  • Burzotta F, Louvard Y, Lassen JF, Lefevre T, Finet G, Collet C, Legutko J, Lesiak M, Hikichi Y, Albiero R, Pan M, Chatzizisis YS, Hildick-Smith D, Ferenc M, Johnson TW, Chieffo A, Darremont O, Banning A, Serruys PW, Stankovic G. Percutaneous coronary intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions using optimised angiographic guidance: the 18th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2024 Aug 5;20(15):e915-e926. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00160.

    PubMed 38752714
  • den Dekker WK, Siskos AA, Wilschut JM, Nuis RJ, Scarparo P, Neleman T, Masdjedi K, Ligthart JMR, Diletti R, Daemen J, Van Mieghem NM. Initial experience with orbital atherectomy in a tertiary centre in the Netherlands. Neth Heart J. 2023 May;31(5):196-201. doi: 10.1007/s12471-022-01742-3. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

    PubMed 36507948
  • Donatelle M, Agasthi P, Parise H, Igyarto Z, Martinsen BJ, Leon MB, Beohar N. Coronary Orbital Atherectomy in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 Oct;34(10):E696-E700. doi: 10.25270/jic/22.00066.

    PubMed 36200995
  • Jurado-Román A, Gómez-Menchero A, Gonzalo N, et al. Plaque modification techniques to treat calcified coronary lesions. Position paper from the ACI-SEC. REC Interv Cardiol Engl Ed. Published online February 7, 2023:9672. doi:10.24875/RECICE.M22000345

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Orbital Atherectomy System Treatment and Balloon System Treatment in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Disease, run by Fundación EPIC at 9 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact JORGE PALAZUELOS, MD, PhD (0034659768506, jpalaz@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

EFFICACY: Angiographic criteria success (time frame: At the end of PCI (Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06736899, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in