AzTrials
AzTrials

Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralNCT06737185

Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Setting Based on Evolutionary Algorithms

A study testing EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting in people with Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, run by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH at 1 site in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Main objective: Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and with tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral
What is being tested?
EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Jan 2025to 15 Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patient (>= 18 years old) speaking French
  • Patient who fulfils the criteria for cochlear implantation

Who cannot join

  • retro-cochlear pathology: auditory neuropathy, vestibular schwannoma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU

    Dijon, 21000

    Alexis BOZORG GRAYELI, Pr, 0380293758, alexis.bozorggrayeli@chu-dijon.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Speech Understanding Between Tonotopy-based Fitting and Evolutionary Algorithm-based Setting: a Prospective Cross-sectional Study

Main objective:

Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and with tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.

Secondary objectives:

Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings

  • for speech recognition in quiet
  • for subjective auditory spatial perception
  • for subjective auditory and musical perception
Read the detailed description

Introduction: Cochlear implantation allows the rehabilitation of profound bilateral deafness, restoring speech perception and verbal communication when the traditional hearing aid no longer provides satisfactory hearing gain. A cochlear implant includes an electrode array and its functioning is based on the principle of cochlear tonotopy: each electrode encodes a frequency spectrum according to its position in the cochlea (high frequencies are assigned to the basal electrodes and low frequencies to the apical electrodes). The cochlear implant thus breaks down the frequency spectrum into a number of frequency bands via bandpass filters corresponding to the number of electrodes in the implant. During the fitting these bands can be modified by the audiologist. The fitting software developed by the manufacturers proposed a default fitting with a lower limit between 100 and 250 Hz according to the brands and an upper limit of about 8500 Hz. The frequency bands assigned to each electrode follow a logarithmic scale with the high frequencies for the basal electrodes and the low frequencies for the apical electrodes. This distribution takes into account the number of active electrodes but does not take into account the anatomy and the natural cochlear tonotopy specific to each patient. Several studies have analyzed the anatomical variations of the cochlear dimensions: size of the cochlea and the ratio between the contact surfaces of the electrodes with the cochlea are variable from one patient to another. The insertion depth during surgery is also variable due to parameters related to the patients as well as to the operator, which seems to impact the understanding of speech in noise. Mathematical algorithms have recently been developed to estimate the cochlear tonotopy of each patient from a CT scan assessment. CT imaging of the implanted ear combined with 3D reconstruction software, provides cochlear length measurements Using this approach it is possible to measure the position of each electrode relative to the cochlear apex. Recently, MED-EL (Austria) has developed a new approach based on CT-scan and tuning of the frequencies associated with each electrode using anatomical information of position of the electrodes in the cochlea: this fitting is called anatomy-based fitting.

A tonotopy-based fitting allows for better results in pitch perception or speech perception in noise or musical perception. However, there is a large variability in the results observed between patients. This variability could be due to the individual characteristics of the listeners (neuronal survival, current propagation and spread, duration of deafness, lack of cortical plasticity).

A modification of frequency allocations in the setting could take into account this individual variability and improve speech discrimination and music perception. Saadoun et al. (2022) studied on 27 subjects the effect of an adjustment of frequency allocation by an evolutionary algorithm (EA) approach and showed an improvement in speech perception in noise compared to a default setting (not based on tonotopy) for patients implanted for more than 6 months in a bimodal situation (with a contralateral prosthesis). We therefore propose to use evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting and improve the perception in noise of implanted patients.

Main objective:

Compare speech recognition in noise with tonotopic setting (FS4T) and tonotopic fitting modified by evolutionary algorithm (EAFS4T) in adult patients implanted for 6 months or more with a MED-EL cochlear implant with FS4T.

Secondary objectives:

Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T settings

  • for speech recognition in quiet
  • for subjective auditory spatial perception
  • for subjective auditory and musical perception

Plan of the study: It is a prospective open monocentric transversal study.

Being tested
EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting
Keywords
cochlear implant, evolutionary algorithms, tonotopy-based fitting
Medical subject headings
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fittingOther

    Also called FS4T: tonotopic-based fitting

    Comparison of FS4T and EAFS4T

Study groups in NCT06737185
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EA armOtherat 6 month post-activation: evolutionary algorithms to modify the tonotopy-based fitting FS4T to give EAFS4T fitting. Participant wears EAFS4T during 6 weeks.
Receives: Other: EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Speech recognition in noise

    HINT-5 min test. Noise level: 60 dB SPL. Speech level: adaptive with the answers of the participant. Result: speech-to-noise ratio (speech reception threshold, SRT50) for 50% of intelligibility in noise.

    Test with EAFS4T and with FS4T.

    Measured: 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Speech recognition in quiet

    One list of 10 disyllabic words (Fournier lists) at 65 dB SPL. The participant has to repeat the word emitted.

    Result: score on 10. Test with EAFS4T and with FS4T

    Measured: 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting

  2. Subjective auditory spatial perception

    SSQi15 questionnaire (" Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of hearing scale ", SSQ). The questionnaire consists of 15 questions describing various real-world hearing situations.

    The subject answers each question with a score on a visual analogue scale graduated from 0 to 10 ranging from "not at all" to "yes perfectly".

    The result obtained is composed of

    • a total average score equal to the sum of the scores of all the questions divided by the total number of questions.
    • 3 average sub-scores describing 3 subscales: Speech hearing with 5 questions, Spatial hearing with 5 questions, Quality of hearing with 5 questions.

    Questionnaire with FS4T (at EAFS4T fitting) and with EAFS4T (6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting)

    Measured: at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting

  3. Subjective assessment of auditory perception

    Assessment of sound quality in silence and in noise with 4 statements. Likert scale from 1 to 5. Score on 20.

    Likert scale with FS4T (at EAFS4T fitting) and with EAFS4T (6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting)

    Measured: at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting

  4. Subjective assessment of musical perception

    Six questions from the Munich Music Self-Questionnaire [Stark et al. 2003]. Questionnaire with FS4T (at EAFS4T fitting) and with EAFS4T (6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting)

    Measured: at EAFS4T fitting (6 months after cochlear implant activation) and 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2024
  2. Study start15 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completion15 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06737185
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEDEL_algoevIC_Dijon_study
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
5 Dec 2024
Last updated
6 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EAFS4T: modification with evolutionary algorithm of tonotopic-based fitting in people with Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral, run by MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GmbH at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Vincent Péan, PhD (603592974 ext. +33, vincent.pean@medel.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Speech recognition in noise (time frame: 6 weeks after EAFS4T fitting). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in