Urogenital NeoplasmsPROMES-URONCT06738797
Association Between the SPHERTEST in Vitro Test and Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatments in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
An observational study of Urogenital Neoplasms, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 5 sites in France.
Trial summary
First-line systemic treatments for bladder cancer are based on a combination of cytotoxic and immunotherapy, sequentially or concomitantly. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPI) is a powerful treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- SPHERTEST test
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 12 Dec 2024to Jun 2029
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with an indication for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor treated in the onco-urology departments of the Nîmes University Hospitals, the Antoine Lacassagne Center, the IUCT Toulouse and the Montpellier Regional Cancer Institute.
Who may be able to join
- Patient with histologically proven urothelial carcinoma, in a locally advanced or metastatic situation with indication for immunotherapy.
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
Who cannot join
- The subject is participating in a category 1 or drug monotherapy interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- History of treatment with anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 or anti-CTLA4 within the year.
- Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding patient.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
5 sites in 1 country
France5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier
Diego TOSI, 04.67.6.31.12, diego.tosi@icm.unicancer.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier
Montpellier
Céline GONGORA, 04.11.28.31.09, celine.gongora@inserm.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice
Delphine BORCHIELLINI, 04 92 03 10 00, delphine.borchiellini@nice.unicancer.fr
- Recruiting
CHU de Nimes
Nîmes
Anissa MEGZARI, 04.66.68.42.36, drc@chu-nimes.fr
- Recruiting
Iuct Oncopole
Toulouse
Damien POUESSEL, 05.31.15.50.50, pouessel.damien@iuct-oncopole.fr
About this study
Official title: Evaluation de l'Association Entre Les résultats d'un Test in Vitro en Cours de développement (SPHERTEST) et la réponse Aux Traitements Par Inhibiteur du Point de contrôle Chez Des Patients Atteints de Carcinome urothélial de Stade avancé ou métastatique.
First-line systemic treatments for bladder cancer are based on a combination of cytotoxic and immunotherapy, sequentially or concomitantly. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPI) is a powerful treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Since 2017, pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) can be offered as a second-line treatment after failure of platinum agents. In patients responding to platinum salts in first-line treatment, it is possible to maintain efficacy with maintenance treatment with another ICPI, avelumab (anti-PDL1). The phase III JAVELIN BLADDER 100 study compared avelumab to supportive care alone after successful platinum-based chemotherapy. At 30 months, 19.3% of patients were still in response compared to only 6.3% in the supportive care arm. However, biomarker analysis on tumor tissue did not show a robust signature on an individual scale. Recently, two phase 3 trials in first-line were presented at the ESMO 2023 congress. The first, in patients who could receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, found a benefit on overall survival of adding Nivolumab in combination and then maintaining it for two years. The second proposed combined Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab versus standard chemotherapy, with an overall survival for the study arm of more than 31 months. These trials confirm the essential role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinomas. This progress is tempered by toxicity, cost and the lack of data on patient selection and treatment sequence. Although "prognostic" biomarkers have been identified, they cannot guide the choice of therapy, but only predict the expected outcomes, regardless of the treatment; biomarkers capable of predicting clinical benefit ("predictive") are urgently needed. It is therefore essential to identify a predictive signature at the individual level. The study authors have validated an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids (SPHERTEST) composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and PBMCs from healthy donors. The aim of the study is to validate this model with PBMCs from UC patients to evaluate the effects of immunotherapy on the immune response and on tumor cell survival in vitro.
The study hypothesis is that the outcome of the pre-therapeutic test based on a heterotypic spheroid model with PBMC from patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (SPHERTEST) is related to the response to checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment.
- Conditions
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Being tested
- SPHERTEST test
- Medical subject headings
- Urogenital Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SPHERTEST testDiagnostic test
The SPHERETEST is an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and leukocyte mononuclear cells from healthy donors.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with urothelial carcinoma | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: SPHERTEST test |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SPHERTEST measurement of potential therapeutic efficacy
Yes/No. Differential in spheroid size before and after treatment according to the formula: R=M1-M0. R = test results, M0 = average spheroid size without immunotherapy treatment, M1 = average spheroid size with immunotherapy treatment. When R is ≤ 0, SPHERTEST = "yes" or "potential therapeutic efficacy". When R is > 0, SPHERTEST = "no" or "absence of potential therapeutic efficacy"
Measured: Day 0
Progression-free survival
Yes/No according to RECIST criteria
Measured: Month 12
Secondary outcomes (30)
Histology of cells
Pure transitional cells vs predominantly transitional cells
Measured: Inclusion
Presence of an aggressive minority component
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
Type of other component
Micropapillary, microcystic, trophoblastic differentiation, epidermoid differentiation, nested, plasmacytoid, sarcomatoid, rhabdoid, lymphoepitheliomatoid, large cell, undifferentiated or neuroendocrine
Measured: Inclusion
Tumor grade
WHO grading
Measured: Inclusion
PD1/PDL1 status
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
PDL1 score
positive/negative
Measured: Inclusion
Type of metastatic involvement
Locally advanced (= local recurrence, or pelvic lymph node involvement) or Metastatic sites: liver, bone, lung, brain, extrapelvic lymph node, other
Measured: Inclusion
Primary tumor site
Bladder/Urethra/upper urinary tract/Urethra
Measured: Inclusion
Hemoglobin level
g/dL
Measured: Inclusion
Hemoglobin level
g/dL
Measured: Cycle 2 visit
Lactate dehydrogenase level
UI/L
Measured: Inclusion
Lactate dehydrogenase level
UI/L
Measured: Cycle 2 visit
C-reactive protein level
mg/L
Measured: Inclusion
C-reactive protein level
mg/L
Measured: Cycle 2 visit
Neutrophil count
G/L
Measured: Inclusion
Neutrophil count
G/L
Measured: Cycle 2 visit (cycles are spaced 3 weeks (pembrolizumab) or 2 weeks (avelumab) apart)
Lymphocyte count
G/L
Measured: Inclusion
Lymphocyte count
G/L
Measured: Cycle 2 visit (cycles are spaced 3 weeks (pembrolizumab) or 2 weeks (avelumab) apart)
Number of lines of systemic treatment received in the metastatic phase
0, 1, 2, ≥3
Measured: Inclusion
Type of platinum salt received prior to immunotherapy
Cisplatin or carboplatin
Measured: Inclusion
Treatment regimen prior to anti-PD1 therapy
Neoadjuvant with progression within 12 months / Adjuvant with progression within 12 months / Initially locally advanced/metastatic
Measured: Inclusion
Current treatment: whether treatment is combined with another molecule
Cisplatin / entoftumab-vedotin
Measured: Inclusion
Antibiotics in the previous month
Duration (days)
Measured: Inclusion
Corticosteroid therapy > 10 mg prednisolone equivalent at immunotherapy initiation
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
Taking an immunosuppressant other than corticosteroid therapy at immunotherapy initiation
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
Any comedication at immunotherapy initiation
Protein pump inhibitors / beta blockers / metformin / statin
Measured: Inclusion
Patient functioning level
ECOG Performance Status Scale (1-5)
Measured: Inclusion
BCG vaccine
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
Mitomycin therapy
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
History of auto-immune disease
Yes/no
Measured: Inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2024
- Study start12 Dec 2024
- Primary completionJun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urogenital NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nadine Houede, Principal investigator, CHU de Nimes
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06738797
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NIMAO/2023-2/NH01
- Acronym
- PROMES-URO
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation de l'Association Entre Les résultats d'un Test in Vitro en Cours de développement (SPHERTEST) et la réponse Aux Traitements Par Inhibiteur du Point de contrôle Chez Des Patients Atteints de Carcinome urothélial de Stade avancé ou métastatique.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06738797
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROMES-URO / NIMAO/2023-2/NH01
- Conditions
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
First-line systemic treatments for bladder cancer are based on a combination of cytotoxic and immunotherapy, sequentially or concomitantly. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICPI) is a powerful treatment for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Since 2017, pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) can be offered as a second-line treatment after failure of platinum agents. In patients responding to platinum salts in first-line treatment, it is possible to maintain efficacy with maintenance treatment with another ICPI, avelumab (anti-PDL1). The phase III JAVELIN BLADDER 100 study compared avelumab to supportive care alone after successful platinum-based chemotherapy. At 30 months, 19.3% of patients were still in response compared to only 6.3% in the supportive care arm. However, biomarker analysis on tumor tissue did not show a robust signature on an individual scale. Recently, two phase 3 trials in first-line were presented at the ESMO 2023 congress. The first, in patients who could receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, found a benefit on overall survival of adding Nivolumab in combination and then maintaining it for two years. The second proposed combined Enfortumab Vedotin and Pembrolizumab versus standard chemotherapy, with an overall survival for the study arm of more than 31 months. These trials confirm the essential role of immunotherapy in urothelial carcinomas. This progress is tempered by toxicity, cost and the lack of data on patient selection and treatment sequence. Although "prognostic" biomarkers have been identified, they cannot guide the choice of therapy, but only predict the expected outcomes, regardless of the treatment; biomarkers capable of predicting clinical benefit ("predictive") are urgently needed. It is therefore essential to identify a predictive signature at the individual level. The study authors have validated an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids (SPHERTEST) composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and PBMCs from healthy donors. The aim of the study is to validate this model with PBMCs from UC patients to evaluate the effects of immunotherapy on the immune response and on tumor cell survival in vitro.
The study hypothesis is that the outcome of the pre-therapeutic test based on a heterotypic spheroid model with PBMC from patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (SPHERTEST) is related to the response to checkpoint inhibitor (CI) treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with urothelial carcinoma | – | Diagnostic Test: SPHERTEST test |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with an indication for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor treated in the onco-urology departments of the Nîmes University Hospitals, the Antoine Lacassagne Center, the IUCT Toulouse and the Montpellier Regional Cancer Institute.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient with histologically proven urothelial carcinoma, in a locally advanced or metastatic situation with indication for immunotherapy.
- The patient must have given their free and informed consent and signed the consent form
- The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- The subject is participating in a category 1 or drug monotherapy interventional study, or is in a period of exclusion determined by a previous study
- It is impossible to give the subject informed information
- The patient is under safeguard of justice or state guardianship
- History of treatment with anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 or anti-CTLA4 within the year.
- Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding patient.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SPHERTEST testThe SPHERETEST is an in vitro model of heterotypic spheroids composed of commercial urothelial carcinoma tumor cells and leukocyte mononuclear cells from healthy donors. | Diagnostic test | Patients with urothelial carcinoma |
Primary outcome
SPHERTEST measurement of potential therapeutic efficacy
Time frame: Day 0
Yes/No. Differential in spheroid size before and after treatment according to the formula: R=M1-M0. R = test results, M0 = average spheroid size without immunotherapy treatment, M1 = average spheroid size with immunotherapy treatment. When R is ≤ 0, SPHERTEST = "yes" or "potential therapeutic efficacy". When R is > 0, SPHERTEST = "no" or "absence of potential therapeutic efficacy"
Progression-free survival
Time frame: Month 12
Yes/No according to RECIST criteria
30 secondary outcomes
Histology of cells
Time frame: Inclusion
Presence of an aggressive minority component
Time frame: Inclusion
Type of other component
Time frame: Inclusion
Tumor grade
Time frame: Inclusion
PD1/PDL1 status
Time frame: Inclusion
PDL1 score
Time frame: Inclusion
Type of metastatic involvement
Time frame: Inclusion
Primary tumor site
Time frame: Inclusion
Hemoglobin level
Time frame: Inclusion
Hemoglobin level
Time frame: Cycle 2 visit
Lactate dehydrogenase level
Time frame: Inclusion
Lactate dehydrogenase level
Time frame: Cycle 2 visit
C-reactive protein level
Time frame: Inclusion
C-reactive protein level
Time frame: Cycle 2 visit
Neutrophil count
Time frame: Inclusion
Neutrophil count
Time frame: Cycle 2 visit (cycles are spaced 3 weeks (pembrolizumab) or 2 weeks (avelumab) apart)
Lymphocyte count
Time frame: Inclusion
Lymphocyte count
Time frame: Cycle 2 visit (cycles are spaced 3 weeks (pembrolizumab) or 2 weeks (avelumab) apart)
Number of lines of systemic treatment received in the metastatic phase
Time frame: Inclusion
Type of platinum salt received prior to immunotherapy
Time frame: Inclusion
Treatment regimen prior to anti-PD1 therapy
Time frame: Inclusion
Current treatment: whether treatment is combined with another molecule
Time frame: Inclusion
Antibiotics in the previous month
Time frame: Inclusion
Corticosteroid therapy > 10 mg prednisolone equivalent at immunotherapy initiation
Time frame: Inclusion
Taking an immunosuppressant other than corticosteroid therapy at immunotherapy initiation
Time frame: Inclusion
Any comedication at immunotherapy initiation
Time frame: Inclusion
Patient functioning level
Time frame: Inclusion
BCG vaccine
Time frame: Inclusion
Mitomycin therapy
Time frame: Inclusion
History of auto-immune disease
Time frame: Inclusion
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2026.
Related trials for Urogenital Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-101556143 With Best Supportive Care in Participants With Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Treating Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer With A Non-surgical Method Consisting of Anti-PD-1 Therapy and Chemoradiation
Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma, Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibitor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nadine Houede principal investigator
CHU de Nimes
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Urogenital Neoplasms, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes at 5 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nadine Houede (04.66.68.33.01, nadine.houede@chu-nimes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SPHERTEST measurement of potential therapeutic efficacy (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2026.