B-cell LymphomaCELERITYNCT06744075
Study of the Clearance of Minimal Residual Disease Measured at the End of First-line Treatment in Patients With Lymphoma
A study testing Blood assessment in people with B-cell Lymphoma and Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by Centre Henri Becquerel at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
This study aims to assess the feasibility of predicting patient outcomes at 1 year and 2 years after the end of first-line treatment using "liquid biopsy" (monitoring of circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA), compared to the currently recommended examination, which is Positon Emission Tomography (PET-CT) imaging at the end of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- B-cell Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Blood assessment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 108 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 24 Dec 2024to 20 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosed with large B-cell lymphoma (including T-cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma), follicular B-cell lymphoma (all grades), mantle cell lymphoma (all variants), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma (classical Hodgkin lymphoma or nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma)
- Indication for first-line systemic treatment with chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy
- Has signed the study-specific informed consent form
- Pre-treatment PET-CT scan performed
- Patient is affiliated with or a beneficiary of a health insurance plan
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Patient who has already started first-line chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy for lymphoma treatment (prephase corticosteroid therapy is allowed)
- Patient enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating an early-phase therapeutic agent (Phase I-II)
- Patient weighing less than 30 kg
- Adult under legal protection measures
- Patient unable to understand the study for any reason or unable to comply with the trial requirements (e.g., language barrier, psychological, or geographic issues).
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites
Hôpital Jacques Monod
Montivilliers, 76290
Centre Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
About this study
Official title: Study of the Clearance of Minimal Residual Disease Measured at the End of First-line Treatment in Patients Treated for B-cell Lymphoma or Hodgkin Lymphoma
This study aims to assess the feasibility of predicting patient outcomes at 1 year and 2 years after the end of first-line treatment using "liquid biopsy" (monitoring of circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA), compared to the currently recommended examination, which is Positon Emission Tomography (PET-CT) imaging at the end of first-line treatment (assessment of therapeutic response using the Deauville score according to the Lugano 2014 criteria). The study will focus on demonstrating the ability of ctDNA clearance to predict 1-year and 2-year outcomes (lymphoma progression or death) in patients treated with first-line therapy for B-cell lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma. This could contribute to establishing minimal residual disease clearance as a key endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic strategies in future clinical trials and guiding patient management (e.g., de-escalation or intensification strategies, redirection toward immunotherapy, and theranostic approaches).
Read the detailed description
Over the past decade, molecular biology methods known as "liquid biopsy" tools have emerged to identify tumor genotypes without a traditional biopsy, using blood samples and sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Evidence supporting ctDNA's ability to perform comprehensive tumor genotyping, serving as an accurate reflection of the tumor genotype, has been well-documented in the literature. Two key aspects of the clinical relevance and routine applicability of ctDNA are currently under investigation:
The potential to measure and monitor the clearance of minimal residual disease (MRD) during and after treatment, which heavily depends on the detection limit and sensitivity of the analytical method.
The ability to deliver ctDNA analysis results to clinicians in real time, within timelines compatible with patient decision-making.
At Rouen, the investigators now use a method based on Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs), a type of molecular barcode that provides increased precision during sequencing. These molecular barcodes are short sequences used to uniquely label each DNA molecule in a sample library, minimizing false positives caused by random sequencing errors. By incorporating individual barcodes into each original DNA fragment, true variants in the original sample can be distinguished from errors introduced during library preparation, target enrichment, or sequencing.
The investigators have developed a new Next Generation sequencing (NGS) panel dedicated to ctDNA analysis using UMIs, encompassing 101 genes and 133 Kb of sequencing regions with phased variants on an Illumina® pipeline.
The panel offers several advantages:
It includes exons of genes involved in lymphomagenesis, with prognostic significance, or that aid in lymphoma classification.
It targets non-coding regions affected by AID (somatic hypermutation). It covers regions frequently impacted by deletions or amplifications (gene copy number variations).
It employs a genomic region capture technique, which, unlike amplicon-based methods, enables the study of the fragmentome. This is important as ctDNA fragmentation profiles are not uniform and may reflect transcriptional and epigenetic changes in the lymphoma's cell of origin, providing additional insights beyond the mutation and somatic variant data commonly used in molecular biology techniques.
The investigators aim to use this panel to refine patient outcome predictions in lymphomas at the end of first-line treatment, with a particular focus on ctDNA kinetics and clearance compared to PET-CT imaging and the synergy between these tools. The investigators anticipate that these findings will support the personalization of therapeutic strategies for lymphoma patients through appropriate escalation or de-escalation approaches guided by MRD. The results of this study will provide the proof of concept necessary for adopting this MRD monitoring test into routine clinical practice for lymphoma patients.
This MRD clearance tracking test could also serve as a key tool in clinical trials for new drug development. By eliminating the need for long follow-up periods required to establish progression-free survival (PFS), this approach could enable earlier interim analyses of efficacy, potentially accelerating and shortening the duration of Phase 3 trials and the clinical development of new lymphoma treatments. If accepted by the academic community as an early efficacy endpoint and a surrogate marker for PFS, this test could significantly impact the design of future lymphoma trials.
- Conditions
- B-cell Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Blood assessment
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, Liquid biopsy, Minimal Residual Disease, Poitron Emission Tomography, Circulating Tumor DNA
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, B-Cell, Hodgkin Disease, Lymphoma, Neoplasm, Residual
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood assessmentOther
ctDNA collection (venous blood draw) will occur at baseline, mid-treatment, and at the end of treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| CELERITY Arm | Other | CT DNA Collection at baseline, mid-treatment and at the end of treatment Receives: Other: Blood assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of treatment in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting 1-year progression-free survival (PFS).
Comparison with the diagnostic performance of PET-CT imaging at the end of first-line treatment for predicting 1-year PFS
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Response rates
Evaluation of responses based on PET-CT with Lugano 2014 Criteria
Measured: 6 months
Overall survival
Time between inclusion and death
Measured: one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2024
- Study start24 Dec 2024
- Primary completion20 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for B-cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Henri Becquerel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06744075
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHB24.02
- Acronym
- CELERITY
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of the Clearance of Minimal Residual Disease Measured at the End of First-line Treatment in Patients Treated for B-cell Lymphoma or Hodgkin Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06744075
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CELERITY / CHB24.02
- Conditions
- B-cell Lymphoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, Liquid biopsy, Minimal Residual Disease, Poitron Emission Tomography, Circulating Tumor DNA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 108 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Henri BecquerelUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to assess the feasibility of predicting patient outcomes at 1 year and 2 years after the end of first-line treatment using "liquid biopsy" (monitoring of circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA), compared to the currently recommended examination, which is Positon Emission Tomography (PET-CT) imaging at the end of first-line treatment (assessment of therapeutic response using the Deauville score according to the Lugano 2014 criteria). The study will focus on demonstrating the ability of ctDNA clearance to predict 1-year and 2-year outcomes (lymphoma progression or death) in patients treated with first-line therapy for B-cell lymphoma or Hodgkin lymphoma. This could contribute to establishing minimal residual disease clearance as a key endpoint for evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic strategies in future clinical trials and guiding patient management (e.g., de-escalation or intensification strategies, redirection toward immunotherapy, and theranostic approaches).
Detailed description
Over the past decade, molecular biology methods known as "liquid biopsy" tools have emerged to identify tumor genotypes without a traditional biopsy, using blood samples and sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Evidence supporting ctDNA's ability to perform comprehensive tumor genotyping, serving as an accurate reflection of the tumor genotype, has been well-documented in the literature. Two key aspects of the clinical relevance and routine applicability of ctDNA are currently under investigation:
The potential to measure and monitor the clearance of minimal residual disease (MRD) during and after treatment, which heavily depends on the detection limit and sensitivity of the analytical method.
The ability to deliver ctDNA analysis results to clinicians in real time, within timelines compatible with patient decision-making.
At Rouen, the investigators now use a method based on Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs), a type of molecular barcode that provides increased precision during sequencing. These molecular barcodes are short sequences used to uniquely label each DNA molecule in a sample library, minimizing false positives caused by random sequencing errors. By incorporating individual barcodes into each original DNA fragment, true variants in the original sample can be distinguished from errors introduced during library preparation, target enrichment, or sequencing.
The investigators have developed a new Next Generation sequencing (NGS) panel dedicated to ctDNA analysis using UMIs, encompassing 101 genes and 133 Kb of sequencing regions with phased variants on an Illumina® pipeline.
The panel offers several advantages:
It includes exons of genes involved in lymphomagenesis, with prognostic significance, or that aid in lymphoma classification.
It targets non-coding regions affected by AID (somatic hypermutation). It covers regions frequently impacted by deletions or amplifications (gene copy number variations).
It employs a genomic region capture technique, which, unlike amplicon-based methods, enables the study of the fragmentome. This is important as ctDNA fragmentation profiles are not uniform and may reflect transcriptional and epigenetic changes in the lymphoma's cell of origin, providing additional insights beyond the mutation and somatic variant data commonly used in molecular biology techniques.
The investigators aim to use this panel to refine patient outcome predictions in lymphomas at the end of first-line treatment, with a particular focus on ctDNA kinetics and clearance compared to PET-CT imaging and the synergy between these tools. The investigators anticipate that these findings will support the personalization of therapeutic strategies for lymphoma patients through appropriate escalation or de-escalation approaches guided by MRD. The results of this study will provide the proof of concept necessary for adopting this MRD monitoring test into routine clinical practice for lymphoma patients.
This MRD clearance tracking test could also serve as a key tool in clinical trials for new drug development. By eliminating the need for long follow-up periods required to establish progression-free survival (PFS), this approach could enable earlier interim analyses of efficacy, potentially accelerating and shortening the duration of Phase 3 trials and the clinical development of new lymphoma treatments. If accepted by the academic community as an early efficacy endpoint and a surrogate marker for PFS, this test could significantly impact the design of future lymphoma trials.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| CELERITY Arm | Other | Other: Blood assessmentCT DNA Collection at baseline, mid-treatment and at the end of treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient aged 18 years or older
- Diagnosed with large B-cell lymphoma (including T-cell/histiocyte-rich B-cell lymphoma, high-grade B-cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma), follicular B-cell lymphoma (all grades), mantle cell lymphoma (all variants), marginal zone B-cell lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma (classical Hodgkin lymphoma or nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma)
- Indication for first-line systemic treatment with chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy
- Has signed the study-specific informed consent form
- Pre-treatment PET-CT scan performed
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Patient who has already started first-line chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy for lymphoma treatment (prephase corticosteroid therapy is allowed)
- Patient enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating an early-phase therapeutic agent (Phase I-II)
- Patient weighing less than 30 kg
- Adult under legal protection measures
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood assessmentctDNA collection (venous blood draw) will occur at baseline, mid-treatment, and at the end of treatment | Other | CELERITY Arm |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of treatment in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting 1-year progression-free survival (PFS).
Time frame: 1 year
Comparison with the diagnostic performance of PET-CT imaging at the end of first-line treatment for predicting 1-year PFS
2 secondary outcomes
Response rates
Time frame: 6 months
Overall survival
Time frame: one year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2025.
Related trials for B-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Anakinra to Prevent or Treat Severe Side Effects for Patients Receiving CAR-T Cell Therapy
B Cell ALL, B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood assessment in people with B-cell Lymphoma and Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by Centre Henri Becquerel at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of treatment in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2025.