AzTrials
AzTrials

Mild Birth AsphyxiaMEMOBRAINNCT06744244

Olfactory Testing in Perinatal Asphyxia: Enhancing Risk Assessment

An observational study of Mild Birth Asphyxia and Moderate Birth Asphyxia, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Neonatal asphyxia remains a leading cause of neurodevelopmental disabilities despite advancements in perinatal care. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), a severe outcome of asphyxia, impacts 1-3 infants per 1,000 live births annually in industrialized nations, causing long-term neurological impairments such as… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 72 hours
Conditions the study is for
Mild Birth Asphyxia, Moderate Birth Asphyxia
What is being tested?
Olfactory Testing, Heart rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Respiratory Rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and Video-EEG
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
10 Sep 2024to 10 Sep 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 72 hours
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: Newborns with signs of mild asphyxia and newborns with signs of moderate-severe asphyxia at high risk for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and brain damage.

Who may be able to join

  • Term newborns (37-41 weeks of gestational age) with signs of asphyxia at birth (cord pH < 7.10 and/or BE > -12).
  • Maternal age > 18 years.
  • No medication use during pregnancy (e.g., antipsychotics, antidepressants, sedatives, anticonvulsants, anxiolytics).
  • Absence of maternal infections.
  • Apgar score < 5 at 10 minutes of life.
  • Newborns with mild asphyxia at birth.
  • Newborns with moderate asphyxia at birth, at risk of developing hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, who don't need hypothermia treatment.
  • Newborns with severe asphyxia at birth, at risk of developing hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who don't need hypothermia treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Post-term infants (gestational age > 42 weeks).
  • Preterm infants (gestational age < 37 weeks).
  • Infants with genetic syndromes or congenital anomalies.
  • Infants from mothers using drugs of abuse.
  • Infants with scalp injuries or lesions.
  • Infants with microcephaly.
  • Infants who underwent therapeutic hypothermia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Serafina Perrone, MD, PhD contact

3388704211 ext. +39

serafina.perrone@unipr.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma

    Parma, 43126

    Serafina Perrone, MD, PhD, 3388704211 ext. +39, serafina.perrone@unipr.it

    Virginia Beretta, PhD Student

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Olfactory Memory in Infants With Signs of Asphyxia: An Early Indicator of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes

Neonatal asphyxia remains a leading cause of neurodevelopmental disabilities despite advancements in perinatal care. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), a severe outcome of asphyxia, impacts 1-3 infants per 1,000 live births annually in industrialized nations, causing long-term neurological impairments such as cognitive dysfunction, motor deficits, and sensory impairments. Early identification of at-risk newborns is critical to initiate timely interventions and improve outcomes.

Olfactory perception, crucial for newborns' adaptation to extrauterine life, involves odor identification and memory. Odor perception is known to be impaired in adults with neurological disorders and in animal models of brain injury. However, no clinical studies have assessed olfactory function in newborns with signs of asphyxia. Olfactory memory, which can be evaluated through habituation to repeated odors, may provide insights into early brain function.

This study aims to evaluate whether olfactory memory can serve as an early marker of neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborns with signs of asphyxia. By assessing physiological, behavioral, and neurological responses to olfactory stimuli, the study seeks to explore the differences between infants with mild asphyxia and those with moderate-to-severe asphyxia.

Read the detailed description

Neonatal asphyxia is the leading cause of neurodevelopmental disability. Despite recent advances in perinatal medicine, which have improved associated mortality, the neurological outcomes of hypoxic-ischemic events in newborns remain significant. The incidence of neonatal asphyxia is estimated to be 1.5 per 100 live births per year in industrialized countries with advanced obstetric-neonatal care. Between 1 and 3 infants per 1,000 live births suffer from severe neurological impairment due to perinatal asphyxia, developing hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.

Early identification of newborns with signs of asphyxia who are at high risk for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and brain damage can improve outcomes by enabling the early initiation of rehabilitative interventions. Hypoxic-ischemic injury often results in impairments in audiovisual perception, cerebral palsy, cognitive dysfunction, memory difficulties, and other neurological sequelae.

Olfactory perception (the sense of smell) is one of the most important sensory functions in humans. In newborns, the sense of smell plays a crucial role, allowing them to perceive maternal odors and breast milk, guiding them in adapting to their environment and completing the physiological transition from intrauterine to extrauterine life. Olfactory neurosensory function involves several abilities, particularly odor identification and memory. Olfactory perception is also linked to olfactory memory, which can be tested as a habituation response. Olfactory memory is defined as the recollection of odorants. In recent studies, exposure to pleasant odors, such as breast milk or vanilla, has been shown to reduce perceived pain during invasive procedures in healthy full-term newborns. Olfactory stimuli can generate various physiological changes, regulating heart and respiratory rates, as well as triggering motor responses that guide head movements and initiate orofacial responses.

Some studies have shown that brain injury impairs odor perception: smell is altered in several neurological conditions, including both neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. In Alzheimer (AD), Parkinson disease (PD) and in stroke, several cortical and subcortical areas directly involved in olfactory function are damaged or show signs of atrophy, including the olfactory bulb (OB), primary olfactory cortex (POC), hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), amygdala, and olfactory tract. Moreover, reduced odor detection early in life, along with anatomical and functional alterations in olfactory and higher-order cortical networks, has been reported in neurodevelopmental disorders such as Autistic Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit / Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD).

Olfactory dysfunction has also been studied and demonstrated in animal models through the induction of brain damage in rabbits. So far, no study has evaluated olfactory function in the clinical setting of brain injury due to neonatal asphyxia.

In cases of perinatal asphyxia, early identification of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy is achieved through continuous video-electroencephalographic monitoring, which is currently considered the gold standard for evaluating brain functions and detecting subclinical seizures. Although EEG does not directly assess olfactory function, certain electroencephalographic alterations may suggest impairment in brain regions involved in olfactory perception (piriform cortex, insular cortex, and amygdala).There are numerous studies in the literature that adopt various methods of olfactory testing in healthy newborns, but no validated tool or test exists to evaluate olfactory memory in newborns.

This study aims to assess olfactory function in newborns exhibiting signs of asphyxia at birth and to investigate whether infants with mild asphyxia differ from those with moderate to severe asphyxia.

The hypotheses of this study is that olfactory stimulation with odors such as rose, vanilla, and breast milk induces changes in heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, EEG activity, and neuroimaging measures in asphyxiated newborns. These changes also occur following repeated olfactory stimuli. Olfactory memory, or habituation to odors, is delayed or absent in newborns with moderate-severe asphyxia.

Being tested
Olfactory Testing, Heart rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Respiratory Rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), Video-EEG, fMRI, Neurodevelopment assessment
Keywords
Perinatal Asphyxia, Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy, Biomarkers, Olfactory Function
Medical subject headings
Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Olfactory TestingDiagnostic test

    Olfactory Test: Odor stimuli will be administered using a custom-designed olfactometer, developed by engineers specifically for this study. The olfactometer will release different odorants (maternal breast milk, vanilla essential oil, rose essential oil, and water as a control) in a controlled way. Each odor will be presented between 6 and 72 hours of life for 10 seconds (On), followed by a 50-second pause (Off) for a total of 15 cycles (On-Off). A new odor will be presented 5 minutes after the previous one. The first olfactory test will be conducted during the Video-EEG recording, and the second one will take place during the fMRI acquisition.

  • Heart rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Respiratory Rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)Diagnostic test

    Simultaneously with the presentation of odors, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), respiratory rate (RR), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) will be monitored and recorded. The onset of the odor will be recorded using a manual timer.

  • Video-EEGDiagnostic test

    The infant's Video-EEG, as per guidelines following perinatal asphyxia, will be recorded for approximately 2 hours, including the period preceding odor administration (baseline).

  • fMRIDiagnostic test

    Newborns will undergo an fMRI, as part of routine clinical practice, to identify any brain injury, its extent, and the structures involved. The use of a custom-built fMRI compatible olfactometer will facilitate these studies.

  • Neurodevelopment assessmentDiagnostic test

    Between 12 and 18 months, the infants will undergo neurodevelopmental follow-up, during which the Bayley III assessment will be administered to evaluate any potential neurocognitive deficits.

Study groups in NCT06744244
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mild Birth AsphyxiaTerm newborns (37-41 weeks of gestational age) with signs of moderate asphyxia at birth (cord pH < 7.10 and/or BE > -12), with mild asphyxia at birth.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Olfactory Testing; Diagnostic Test: Heart rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Respiratory Rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2); Diagnostic Test: Video-EEG; Diagnostic Test: fMRI; Diagnostic Test: Neurodevelopment assessment
Moderate - Severe Birth AsphyxiaTerm newborns (37-41 weeks of gestational age) with signs of moderate asphyxia at birth (cord pH < 7.10 and/or BE > -12) with moderate asphyxia at birth, at risk of developing hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, who don't need hypothermia treatment and with severe asphyxia at birth, at risk of developing hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who don't need hypothermia treatment.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Olfactory Testing; Diagnostic Test: Heart rate (HR), Heart Rate Variability (HRV), Respiratory Rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2); Diagnostic Test: Video-EEG; Diagnostic Test: fMRI; Diagnostic Test: Neurodevelopment assessment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Autonomic Responses to Olfactory Stimulation in Asphyxiated Newborns.

    Heart Rate (HR) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) will be continuously monitored via electrocardiography throughout the procedure and compared between the two groups. Data will be analyzed using software such as Kubios.

    For HRV, the following metrics will be extracted:

    SDNN (Standard Deviation of NN Intervals): Reflects overall HRV. RMSSD (Root Mean Square of Successive Differences): Reflects parasympathetic (vagal) activity.

    LF Power (Low-Frequency): Reflects both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity (0.04 - 0.15 Hz).

    HF Power (High-Frequency): Primarily reflects parasympathetic activity (0.15 - 0.4 Hz).

    LF/HF Ratio: Assesses the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity, with a higher ratio indicating sympathetic dominance.

    Measured: during the Olfactory Testing

  2. Breathing patterns in Asphyxiated Newborns.

    Variations in breathing patterns are assessed by the pulse oximeter that operates on the principle of light absorption, emitting red and infrared light through the skin. A photodetector measures the light absorbed by the blood, with oxygenated hemoglobin absorbing more infrared light and deoxygenated hemoglobin absorbing more red light. The ratio of light absorption at these wavelengths is used to estimate the percentage of oxygenated hemoglobin (Peripheral Oxygen Saturation - SpO2), displayed as a percentage on the device's screen. This metric provides insight into oxygenation levels in the bloodstream, which may improve due to enhanced respiratory efficiency triggered by olfactory exposure. The pulse oximeter also features a respiratory rate (RR) measurement, estimating RR by detecting changes in blood flow or pulse linked to breathing patterns.

    Measured: during the Olfactory Testing

  3. Cerebral functioning in Asphyxiated Newborns.

    Amplitude EEG (aEEG) provides a continuous, real-time overview of cerebral function by measuring the brain's electrical activity. In the context of perinatal asphyxia, aEEG is used to detect abnormal brain patterns, such as reduced or absent brain activity. These patterns are reflected in the amplitude of the signal (measured in microvolts), which can indicate the severity of brain injury and help clinicians assess the extent of neurological damage.

    Measured: Within 6 to 72 hours of life

  4. Changes in olfactory evoked potentials (EOPs) in Asphyxiated Newborns.

    The analysis of EOPs in response to olfactory stimuli, such as rose, vanilla, and breast milk, will be conducted using dedicated software like EEGLAB and ERPLAB (MATLAB). The analysis parameters for EOPs will include latency, amplitude, wave components, spatial distribution, duration, topography and localization, as well as habituation and adaptation. These parameters will be compared between the two groups.

    Measured: during the Olfactory Testing

  5. Spectral analysis of brain oscillatory rhythms to monitor changes in global brain activity.

    Brain activity will be continuously monitored with electroencephalography (EEG) throughout the procedure using a 12-channel system and oscillatory activity across brain rhythm bands (Delta: 0.5 - 4 Hz, Theta: 4 - 8 Hz, Alpha: 8 - 12 Hz, Beta: 12 - 30 Hz, Gamma: 30 - 100 Hz) will be analyzed with dedicated software such as EEGLAB (MATLAB) in both groups.

    Measured: Within 6 to 72 hours of life

  6. Changes in behavioral responsens to Olfactory Stimulation in Asphyxiated Newborns.

    Facial expressions obtained from video-recordings will be assessed by two neonatologists, who will be blinded to the odor used to obtain insight into changes in behavioral responsens.

    A score will be assigned on a scale of 0 to 100 (0 = extremely disgusted; 100 = extremely pleased).

    The neonatologists will view the video as many times as necessary to ensure the highest accuracy inscoring. The videos will be destroyed after 5 years.

    Measured: Within 6 to 72 hours of life

  7. Highlight a different activation within brain areas involved in olfactory perception, memory, and learning through fMRI.

    Data from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be analyzed to compare the activation of regions of interest (ROIs), especially in regions such as the olfactory bulb, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala, between the two groups of patients during the execution of olfactory test. The parameters that will be evalueted and compared between the two groups will be: BOLD Signal (Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent), Activation Intensity (Signal Strength), Peak Activation, Time Course of Activation, Functional Connectivity and Effect Size.

    Measured: Within 6 to 72 hours of life

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Neurodevelopmental follow-up

    The Bayley III assessment will be administered in both groups. It provides a comprehensive overview of a child's cognitive, motor, and socio-emotional abilities. The measures obtained from the Bayley-III include cognitive, motor, language, social-emotional and adaptive behavior scales. Scores from the different scales are converted into standard scores (mean of 100, standard deviation of 15), which help compare the child to the general population.

    Measured: Between 12 and 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2024
  2. Study start10 Sep 2024
  3. Primary completionJan 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 Sep 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06744244
Sponsor's protocol ID
27408
Acronym
MEMOBRAIN
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
6 Dec 2024
Last updated
31 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Chavez-Valdez R, Miller S, Spahic H, Vaidya D, Parkinson C, Dietrick B, Brooks S, Gerner GJ, Tekes A, Graham EM, Northington FJ, Everett AD. Therapeutic Hypothermia Modulates the Relationships Between Indicators of Severity of Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy and Serum Biomarkers. Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 2;12:748150. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.748150. eCollection 2021.

    PubMed 34795631
  • Finder M, Boylan GB, Twomey D, Ahearne C, Murray DM, Hallberg B. Two-Year Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Mild Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy in the Era of Therapeutic Hypothermia. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Jan 1;174(1):48-55. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4011.

    PubMed 31710357
  • Ambalavanan N, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Carper BA, Das A, Carlo WA, Cotten CM, Duncan AF, Higgins RD; EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NICHD NEONATAL RESEARCH NETWORK. Early Determination of Prognosis in Neonatal Moderate or Severe Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy. Pediatrics. 2021 Jun;147(6):e2020048678. doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-048678. Epub 2021 May 13.

    PubMed 33986149
  • Disdier C, Stonestreet BS. Hypoxic-ischemic-related cerebrovascular changes and potential therapeutic strategies in the neonatal brain. J Neurosci Res. 2020 Jul;98(7):1468-1484. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24590. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

    PubMed 32060970
  • Drobyshevsky A, Robinson AM, Derrick M, Wyrwicz AM, Ji X, Englof I, Tan S. Sensory deficits and olfactory system injury detected by novel application of MEMRI in newborn rabbit after antenatal hypoxia-ischemia. Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

    PubMed 16861007
  • Juliano C, Sosunov S, Niatsetskaya Z, Isler JA, Utkina-Sosunova I, Jang I, Ratner V, Ten V. Mild intermittent hypoxemia in neonatal mice causes permanent neurofunctional deficit and white matter hypomyelination. Exp Neurol. 2015 Feb;264:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

    PubMed 25476492
  • Schaal B, Saxton TK, Loos H, Soussignan R, Durand K. Olfaction scaffolds the developing human from neonate to adolescent and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 8;375(1800):20190261. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0261. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

    PubMed 32306879
  • Tristao RM, Lauand L, Costa KSF, Brant LA, Fernandes GM, Costa KN, Spilski J, Lachmann T. Olfactory sensory and perceptual evaluation in newborn infants: A systematic review. Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Nov;63(7):e22201. doi: 10.1002/dev.22201.

    PubMed 34674234
  • Chen X, Gao F, Lin C, Chen A, Deng J, Chen P, Lin M, Xie B, Liao Y, Gong C, Zheng X. mTOR-mediated autophagy in the hippocampus is involved in perioperative neurocognitive disorders in diabetic rats. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2022 Apr;28(4):540-553. doi: 10.1111/cns.13762. Epub 2021 Nov 16.

    PubMed 34784444
  • Lan HY, Yang L, Lin CH, Hsieh KH, Chang YC, Yin T. Breastmilk as a Multisensory Intervention for Relieving Pain during Newborn Screening Procedures: A Randomized Control Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;18(24):13023. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413023.

    PubMed 34948633
  • Baudesson de Chanville A, Brevaut-Malaty V, Garbi A, Tosello B, Baumstarck K, Gire C. Analgesic Effect of Maternal Human Milk Odor on Premature Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Hum Lact. 2017 May;33(2):300-308. doi: 10.1177/0890334417693225. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

    PubMed 28346843
  • Zhang S, Su F, Li J, Chen W. The Analgesic Effects of Maternal Milk Odor on Newborns: A Meta-Analysis. Breastfeed Med. 2018 Jun;13(5):327-334. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2017.0226. Epub 2018 May 7.

    PubMed 29733222
  • Doucet S, Soussignan R, Sagot P, Schaal B. The "smellscape" of mother's breast: effects of odor masking and selective unmasking on neonatal arousal, oral, and visual responses. Dev Psychobiol. 2007 Mar;49(2):129-38. doi: 10.1002/dev.20210.

    PubMed 17299785
  • Schaal B, Marlier L, Soussignan R. Responsiveness to the odour of amniotic fluid in the human neonate. Biol Neonate. 1995;67(6):397-406. doi: 10.1159/000244192.

    PubMed 7578623
  • Schaal B, Marlier L, Soussignan R. Olfactory function in the human fetus: evidence from selective neonatal responsiveness to the odor of amniotic fluid. Behav Neurosci. 1998 Dec;112(6):1438-49. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.112.6.1438.

    PubMed 9926826

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Mild Birth Asphyxia and Moderate Birth Asphyxia, run by University of Parma at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Serafina Perrone, MD, PhD (3388704211 ext. +39, serafina.perrone@unipr.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Autonomic Responses to Olfactory Stimulation in Asphyxiated Newborns. (time frame: during the Olfactory Testing). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06744244, which also lists 26 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Dec 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in