Cancer SurgeryPRIMENCT06744413
Prehabilitation to Improve Heart Rate Variability (PRIME)
A study testing Multimodal prehabilitation program in people with Cancer Surgery, run by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele at 4 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Cancer patients require chronic management and care. For those individuals living with cancer, a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the interdisciplinary nature of their condition can help guide appropriate care strategies and support their overall well-being. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Multimodal prehabilitation program
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 20 Dec 2024to Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled to undergo elective major abdominal or thoracic cancer surgery;
- Scheduled to undergo surgery at least three weeks after enrollment;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Provide written informed consent;
- Willing and able to use smartphone application.
Who cannot join
- Presenting with very poor functional capacity;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classes 5-6;
- Disabling orthopedic, neuromuscular, and psychiatric diseases or other conditions that preclude participation in a prehabilitation program.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy4 sites, 3 recruiting
- Active, not recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico San Marco di Catania
Catania, 95100
- Recruiting
Università di Foggia
Foggia, 71100
Gilda Cinnella, Medical Doctor, +393204394598, gilda.cinnella@unifg.it
- Recruiting
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132
Giovanni G Landoni, Full Professor, +393472520801, landoni.giovanni@hsr.it
- Recruiting
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56126
Fabio Guarracino, Medical Doctor, +393281652528, f.guarracino@ao-pisa.toscana.it
About this study
Official title: Prehabilitation to Improve Heart Rate Variability In Surgical Cancer Patients: a randoMized controllEd Trial
Cancer patients require chronic management and care. For those individuals living with cancer, a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the interdisciplinary nature of their condition can help guide appropriate care strategies and support their overall well-being. Approximately 45% of patients diagnosed with cancer undergo surgery to remove their tumor. Despite the advancements in surgical techniques, anesthesia, and perioperative care, major cancer surgeries still pose a significant challenge leading to a considerable decline in physiological and functional capacity. Traditionally, efforts focused on postoperative rehabilitation to enhance recovery. Recently, prehabilitation, a form of rehabilitation which aims to improve functional capacity before surgery, has gained attention for its potential benefits in improving surgical outcomes. However, prehabilitation lacks objective assessment measures to evaluate its effectiveness. Developing validated outcome measures is essential to enhance the impact of prehabilitation on surgical outcomes and long-term care for cancer patients. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological parameter that measures the variation in time intervals between consecutive heartbeats, reflecting the autonomic nervous system activity which might serve as a valuable solution for objective outcome measures in evaluating the effectiveness of prehabilitation for cancer patients, providing an objective tool to assess and monitor physiological response to stress, recovery capacity, and autonomic nervous system activity. A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted to assess the impact of a multimodal prehabilitation program on HRV. Patients aged 18 or older, scheduled for elective major cancer surgery will be randomized to receive either prehabilitation or standard care. The prehabilitation arm will receive a program involving home-based physical, nutritional, and psychological interventions for at least four weeks. Participants allocated to the control group will receive usual care. Patients will be followed throughout the study using an innovative mobile application, allowing for real-time monitoring and data collection during the prehabilitation program. The study has two primary outcomes: A) to assess the impact of prehabilitation on increasing preoperative HRV in chronic cancer patients undergoing surgery; B) to assess the effect of prehabilitation on length of hospital stay.
Read the detailed description
Cancer patients require long-term management and ongoing care due to the chronic nature of their condition. Major cancer surgeries pose significant challenges, resulting in a decline in physiological and functional capacity. Traditionally, postoperative rehabilitation has been the most suitable intervention to improve functional recovery. Prehabilitation, which aims to enhance patients' functional capacity before surgery and to improve patients' ability to cope with physiological stress, is considered the best form of rehabilitation. Through multimodal strategies like exercise, nutrition and psychological support, prehabilitation can improve surgical outcomes for cancer patients. However, prehabilitation lacks objective assessment measures. Heart rate variability (HRV), a physiological parameter measuring variation in heartbeats, reflects autonomic nervous system activity and an increase in HRV is associated with fitness and recovery capacity in sports medicine. Psychological factors, nutritional status and physical exercise influence HRV. Hence, HRV could be used to objectively assess prehabilitation interventions. In addition, HRV is widely used in risk assessment in cardiology, and a reduction in HRV is recognized to be associated with complications and mortality. Despite its evident potential in risk assessment, HRV has never been utilized in preoperative assessments.
This is an international, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized study in chronic cancer patients undergoing surgery. Adult men and women patients who are eligible according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to study the effect of prehabilitation versus standard care on heart rate variability (HRV).
A total of 600 patients will be recruited by systematic screening of patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures. All patients undergoing major cancer surgery will be screened for eligibility and those who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be approached for consent. Research personnel will use a web-based randomization system to assign patients (1:1 ratio) to either the prehabilitation or control arm. Study personnel will also collect data on recruitment rates, with reasons for non-enrollment.
Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of two treatments:
- Multimodal prehabilitation program for four weeks starting as soon as possible before surgery;
- Standard care.
The multimodal prehabilitation program will be individualized by carefully integrating and adapting various components to meet individual needs. The program will last four weeks (plus maintenance in case of delayed surgery), and will incorporate exercise training, nutritional therapy, and anxiety reduction techniques. After enrollment, patients will receive initial contact from trained personnel through telemedicine. To ensure personalized care, a comprehensive assessment will be conducted to identify specific physical, nutritional, or psychological challenges. Based on this assessment, a customized intervention plan will be prescribed to achieve tailored exercise training, optimized nutrition, and effective distress-coping strategies. Patients will be requested to download a dedicated smartphone application, which will comprehensively monitor and track their progress towards achieving their prehabilitation goals. After completing the four-week program, patients will continue a maintenance program until surgery.
The first HRV measurement will be performed for 5 minutes in an isolated room, after signing the written consent and before randomization, on the day of screening which occurs several weeks before surgery. The second HRV measurement will be performed the day before surgery. Both HRV time-domain measurements and HRV frequency-domain measurements will be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Cancer Surgery
- Being tested
- Multimodal prehabilitation program
- Keywords
- Cancer surgery, Prehabilitation, Multimodal prehabilitation program, Standard care treatment, Hospital stay, Functional walking, Nutrition, Diet, Exercise, Relaxation, Functional recovery, Anesthesiology
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multimodal prehabilitation programBehavioural
A tailored intervention will be prescribed if specific physical, nutritional or psychological impairments will be identified during the assessment phase. Based on the data obtained during the multimodal assessment, different domains and levels of care will be prescribed, focusing on exercise training, and/or nutrition optimization, and/or distress-coping techniques. Different combinations of these three domains will be utilized to maximize their synergistic anabolic effect.
The duration of the program will be set at 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation | Experimental | Prehabilitation arm groups will receive preoperative intervention which includes exercise training, nutritional therapy and anxiety reducing techniques, aimed at preventing or attenuating surgery-driven functional decline. Receives: Behavioral: Multimodal prehabilitation program |
| Control group | No intervention | Standard care treatment: application of ERAS pathways (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assess the impact of prehabilitation on heart rate variability
This primary outcome measure will be the change in the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) from baseline to the day before surgery.
Measured: Preoperative
Days at home within first 30 days after surgery
The mean number of days at home in the first 30 days after surgery will be compared between groups
Measured: 30-days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Quality of life at 30 days
Assess quality of life in the first 30 days at home after surgery using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire, a validated tool for evaluating health-related quality of life. The outcome will be reported as the mean EQ-5D-5L index score and the mean EQ-VAS score measured at 30 days postoperatively.
Measured: 30-days after surgery
30-days postoperative complication
Assess the occurrence of postoperative complications in the first 30 days after surgery
Measured: 30-days after surgery
Correlation between preoperative standard deviation of all normal to normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and quality of life at 30 days postoperatively
Investigate the association between preoperative heart rate variability (HRV) and life at 30 days postoperatively
Measured: 30-days after surgery
Correlation between preoperative SDNN and DAH-30
Investigate the association between preoperative heart rate variability (HRV) and the days alive and at home within 30 days after surgery (DAH-30)
Measured: 30-days after surgery
Correlation between preoperative SDNN and postoperative complication
Investigate the association between preoperative heart rate variability (HRV) and postoperative complication
Measured: 30-days after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2024
- Study start20 Dec 2024
- Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (32)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cancer SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dott. Fabio Guarracino, Prof. Gilda Cinnella, Dott. Filippo Sanfilippo
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giovanni Landoni, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele
- Investigators
- Fabio Guarracino, Doctor, Principal investigator, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06744413
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PNRR-MCNT2-2023-12377934
- Acronym
- PRIME
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Apr;129(4):687-702.
PubMed 2646917Zhou X, Ma Z, Zhang L, Zhou S, Wang J, Wang B, Fu W. Heart rate variability in the prediction of survival in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Oct;89:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
PubMed 27663106Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS; American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf. No abstract available.
PubMed 23851406Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
PubMed 8598068Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-Aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV--heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
PubMed 24054542Scheede-Bergdahl C, Minnella EM, Carli F. Multi-modal prehabilitation: addressing the why, when, what, how, who and where next? Anaesthesia. 2019 Jan;74 Suppl 1:20-26. doi: 10.1111/anae.14505.
PubMed 30604416Orange ST, Northgraves MJ, Marshall P, Madden LA, Vince RV. Exercise prehabilitation in elective intra-cavity surgery: A role within the ERAS pathway? A narrative review. Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.054. Epub 2018 May 3.
PubMed 29730070Nolan J, Batin PD, Andrews R, Lindsay SJ, Brooksby P, Mullen M, Baig W, Flapan AD, Cowley A, Prescott RJ, Neilson JM, Fox KA. Prospective study of heart rate variability and mortality in chronic heart failure: results of the United Kingdom heart failure evaluation and assessment of risk trial (UK-heart). Circulation. 1998 Oct 13;98(15):1510-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1510.
PubMed 9769304Myles PS, Shulman MA, Heritier S, Wallace S, McIlroy DR, McCluskey S, Sillar I, Forbes A. Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e015828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015828.
PubMed 28821518Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, Christophi C, Leslie K, McGuinness S, Parke R, Serpell J, Chan MTV, Painter T, McCluskey S, Minto G, Wallace S; Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Clinical Trials Network and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2263-2274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801601. Epub 2018 May 9.
PubMed 29742967Mostarda C, Castro-Filha J, Reis AD, Sevilio M Jr, Dias CJ, Silva-Filho AC, Garcia JBS, do Desterro Nascimento M, Coelho-Junior HJ, Rodrigues B. Short-term combined exercise training improves cardiorespiratory fitness and autonomic modulation in cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Oct 30;13(5):599-607. doi: 10.12965/jer.1735048.524. eCollection 2017 Oct.
PubMed 29114536Scott WR. Conflicting levels of rationality: regulators, managers, and professionals in the medical care sector. J Health Adm Educ. 1985 Spring;3(2 Pt 2):113-31. No abstract available.
PubMed 10276329Marinelli V, Danzi OP, Mazzi MA, Secchettin E, Tuveri M, Bonamini D, Rimondini M, Salvia R, Bassi C, Del Piccolo L. PREPARE: PreoPerative Anxiety REduction. One-Year Feasibility RCT on a Brief Psychological Intervention for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Prior to Major Surgery. Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 5;11:362. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00362. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32194490Lundstrom CJ, Foreman NA, Biltz G. Practices and Applications of Heart Rate Variability Monitoring in Endurance Athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2023 Jan;44(1):9-19. doi: 10.1055/a-1864-9726. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
PubMed 35853460Leite MR, Ramos EM, Kalva-Filho CA, Rodrigues FM, Freire AP, Tacao GY, de Toledo AC, Cecilio MJ, Vanderlei LC, Ramos D. Correlation between heart rate variability indexes and aerobic physiological variables in patients with COPD. Respirology. 2015 Feb;20(2):273-8. doi: 10.1111/resp.12424. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
PubMed 25381699
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prehabilitation to Improve Heart Rate Variability In Surgical Cancer Patients: a randoMized controllEd Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06744413
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRIME / PNRR-MCNT2-2023-12377934
- Conditions
- Cancer Surgery
- Keywords
- Cancer surgery, Prehabilitation, Multimodal prehabilitation program, Standard care treatment, Hospital stay, Functional walking, Nutrition, Diet
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Dott. Fabio Guarracino, Prof. Gilda Cinnella, Dott. Filippo Sanfilippo
- Study start
- 20 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cancer patients require chronic management and care. For those individuals living with cancer, a comprehensive approach that acknowledges the interdisciplinary nature of their condition can help guide appropriate care strategies and support their overall well-being. Approximately 45% of patients diagnosed with cancer undergo surgery to remove their tumor. Despite the advancements in surgical techniques, anesthesia, and perioperative care, major cancer surgeries still pose a significant challenge leading to a considerable decline in physiological and functional capacity. Traditionally, efforts focused on postoperative rehabilitation to enhance recovery. Recently, prehabilitation, a form of rehabilitation which aims to improve functional capacity before surgery, has gained attention for its potential benefits in improving surgical outcomes. However, prehabilitation lacks objective assessment measures to evaluate its effectiveness. Developing validated outcome measures is essential to enhance the impact of prehabilitation on surgical outcomes and long-term care for cancer patients. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological parameter that measures the variation in time intervals between consecutive heartbeats, reflecting the autonomic nervous system activity which might serve as a valuable solution for objective outcome measures in evaluating the effectiveness of prehabilitation for cancer patients, providing an objective tool to assess and monitor physiological response to stress, recovery capacity, and autonomic nervous system activity. A multicenter randomized controlled trial will be conducted to assess the impact of a multimodal prehabilitation program on HRV. Patients aged 18 or older, scheduled for elective major cancer surgery will be randomized to receive either prehabilitation or standard care. The prehabilitation arm will receive a program involving home-based physical, nutritional, and psychological interventions for at least four weeks. Participants allocated to the control group will receive usual care. Patients will be followed throughout the study using an innovative mobile application, allowing for real-time monitoring and data collection during the prehabilitation program. The study has two primary outcomes: A) to assess the impact of prehabilitation on increasing preoperative HRV in chronic cancer patients undergoing surgery; B) to assess the effect of prehabilitation on length of hospital stay.
Detailed description
Cancer patients require long-term management and ongoing care due to the chronic nature of their condition. Major cancer surgeries pose significant challenges, resulting in a decline in physiological and functional capacity. Traditionally, postoperative rehabilitation has been the most suitable intervention to improve functional recovery. Prehabilitation, which aims to enhance patients' functional capacity before surgery and to improve patients' ability to cope with physiological stress, is considered the best form of rehabilitation. Through multimodal strategies like exercise, nutrition and psychological support, prehabilitation can improve surgical outcomes for cancer patients. However, prehabilitation lacks objective assessment measures. Heart rate variability (HRV), a physiological parameter measuring variation in heartbeats, reflects autonomic nervous system activity and an increase in HRV is associated with fitness and recovery capacity in sports medicine. Psychological factors, nutritional status and physical exercise influence HRV. Hence, HRV could be used to objectively assess prehabilitation interventions. In addition, HRV is widely used in risk assessment in cardiology, and a reduction in HRV is recognized to be associated with complications and mortality. Despite its evident potential in risk assessment, HRV has never been utilized in preoperative assessments.
This is an international, multicenter, parallel-group, randomized study in chronic cancer patients undergoing surgery. Adult men and women patients who are eligible according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized to study the effect of prehabilitation versus standard care on heart rate variability (HRV).
A total of 600 patients will be recruited by systematic screening of patients scheduled for elective surgical procedures. All patients undergoing major cancer surgery will be screened for eligibility and those who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be approached for consent. Research personnel will use a web-based randomization system to assign patients (1:1 ratio) to either the prehabilitation or control arm. Study personnel will also collect data on recruitment rates, with reasons for non-enrollment.
Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to one of two treatments:
- Multimodal prehabilitation program for four weeks starting as soon as possible before surgery;
- Standard care.
The multimodal prehabilitation program will be individualized by carefully integrating and adapting various components to meet individual needs. The program will last four weeks (plus maintenance in case of delayed surgery), and will incorporate exercise training, nutritional therapy, and anxiety reduction techniques. After enrollment, patients will receive initial contact from trained personnel through telemedicine. To ensure personalized care, a comprehensive assessment will be conducted to identify specific physical, nutritional, or psychological challenges. Based on this assessment, a customized intervention plan will be prescribed to achieve tailored exercise training, optimized nutrition, and effective distress-coping strategies. Patients will be requested to download a dedicated smartphone application, which will comprehensively monitor and track their progress towards achieving their prehabilitation goals. After completing the four-week program, patients will continue a maintenance program until surgery.
The first HRV measurement will be performed for 5 minutes in an isolated room, after signing the written consent and before randomization, on the day of screening which occurs several weeks before surgery. The second HRV measurement will be performed the day before surgery. Both HRV time-domain measurements and HRV frequency-domain measurements will be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prehabilitation | Experimental | Behavioral: Multimodal prehabilitation programPrehabilitation arm groups will receive preoperative intervention which includes exercise training, nutritional therapy and anxiety reducing techniques, aimed at preventing or attenuating surgery-driven functional decline. |
| Control group | No intervention | –Standard care treatment: application of ERAS pathways (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Scheduled to undergo elective major abdominal or thoracic cancer surgery;
- Scheduled to undergo surgery at least three weeks after enrollment;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Provide written informed consent;
- Willing and able to use smartphone application.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presenting with very poor functional capacity;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classes 5-6;
- Disabling orthopedic, neuromuscular, and psychiatric diseases or other conditions that preclude participation in a prehabilitation program.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multimodal prehabilitation programA tailored intervention will be prescribed if specific physical, nutritional or psychological impairments will be identified during the assessment phase. Based on the data obtained during the multimodal assessment, different domains and levels of care will be prescribed, focusing on exercise training, and/or nutrition optimization, and/or distress-coping techniques. Different combinations of these three domains will be utilized to maximize their synergistic anabolic effect. The duration of the program will be set at 4 weeks. | Behavioural | Prehabilitation |
Primary outcome
Assess the impact of prehabilitation on heart rate variability
Time frame: Preoperative
This primary outcome measure will be the change in the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) from baseline to the day before surgery.
Days at home within first 30 days after surgery
Time frame: 30-days after surgery
The mean number of days at home in the first 30 days after surgery will be compared between groups
5 secondary outcomes
Quality of life at 30 days
Time frame: 30-days after surgery
30-days postoperative complication
Time frame: 30-days after surgery
Correlation between preoperative standard deviation of all normal to normal R-R intervals (SDNN) and quality of life at 30 days postoperatively
Time frame: 30-days after surgery
Correlation between preoperative SDNN and DAH-30
Time frame: 30-days after surgery
Correlation between preoperative SDNN and postoperative complication
Time frame: 30-days after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 2646917The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study: design and objectives. The ARIC investigators. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Apr;129(4):687-702.
- Background: PubMed 27663106Zhou X, Ma Z, Zhang L, Zhou S, Wang J, Wang B, Fu W. Heart rate variability in the prediction of survival in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Oct;89:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.08.004. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 23851406Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS; American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8598068Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):1043-65. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24054542Tarvainen MP, Niskanen JP, Lipponen JA, Ranta-Aho PO, Karjalainen PA. Kubios HRV--heart rate variability analysis software. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.07.024. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
- Background: PubMed 30604416Scheede-Bergdahl C, Minnella EM, Carli F. Multi-modal prehabilitation: addressing the why, when, what, how, who and where next? Anaesthesia. 2019 Jan;74 Suppl 1:20-26. doi: 10.1111/anae.14505.
- Background: PubMed 29730070Orange ST, Northgraves MJ, Marshall P, Madden LA, Vince RV. Exercise prehabilitation in elective intra-cavity surgery: A role within the ERAS pathway? A narrative review. Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.04.054. Epub 2018 May 3.
- Background: PubMed 9769304Nolan J, Batin PD, Andrews R, Lindsay SJ, Brooksby P, Mullen M, Baig W, Flapan AD, Cowley A, Prescott RJ, Neilson JM, Fox KA. Prospective study of heart rate variability and mortality in chronic heart failure: results of the United Kingdom heart failure evaluation and assessment of risk trial (UK-heart). Circulation. 1998 Oct 13;98(15):1510-6. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1510.
- Background: PubMed 28821518Myles PS, Shulman MA, Heritier S, Wallace S, McIlroy DR, McCluskey S, Sillar I, Forbes A. Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 18;7(8):e015828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015828.
- Background: PubMed 29742967Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, Forbes A, Peyton P, Story D, Christophi C, Leslie K, McGuinness S, Parke R, Serpell J, Chan MTV, Painter T, McCluskey S, Minto G, Wallace S; Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Clinical Trials Network and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 14;378(24):2263-2274. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801601. Epub 2018 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 29114536Mostarda C, Castro-Filha J, Reis AD, Sevilio M Jr, Dias CJ, Silva-Filho AC, Garcia JBS, do Desterro Nascimento M, Coelho-Junior HJ, Rodrigues B. Short-term combined exercise training improves cardiorespiratory fitness and autonomic modulation in cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Oct 30;13(5):599-607. doi: 10.12965/jer.1735048.524. eCollection 2017 Oct.
- Background: PubMed 10276329Scott WR. Conflicting levels of rationality: regulators, managers, and professionals in the medical care sector. J Health Adm Educ. 1985 Spring;3(2 Pt 2):113-31. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer Surgery
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Testing the Safety of Dapagliflozin Prior to Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma
Lung Adenocarcinoma, Stage IA1 Lung Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
Active, not recruiting
Telehealth for the Self-Management of Dietary Quality of Life in Patients After Stomach Cancer Surgery
Gastric Carcinoma, Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Zanzalintinib for the Treatment of Advanced Thyroid Cancer Before Surgery
Neoadjuvant Treatment, Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Neoadjuvant Folfirinox Combined With Pembrolizumab Followed by Surgery for Patients With Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Fabio Guarracino, Doctor principal investigator
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Pisana
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multimodal prehabilitation program in people with Cancer Surgery, run by Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele at 4 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fabio Guarracino, Dr (+393281652528, f.guarracino@ao-pisa.toscana.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assess the impact of prehabilitation on heart rate variability (time frame: Preoperative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06744413, which also lists 32 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2025.