AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV PreventionNCT06745947

Behavioral Economic Intervention to Improve HIV Behaviors in Sexual Minority Individuals

A study testing EFT in people with HIV Prevention, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This research study is testing a new behavioral therapy called Episodic Future Thinking or EFT can help people reduce drug use and risky sexual behaviors while helping them adhere to their HIV prevention medication (PrEP). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 34 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
HIV Prevention
What is being tested?
EFT
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
3 Mar 2025to 1 Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 34 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults 18 - 34 years of age
  • HIV negative (assessed via Rapid HIV Antibody Test)
  • Identify as gay, or bisexual
  • Recent (past 3 months) methamphetamine use
  • Currently prescribed and taking HIV PrEP medication
  • Self-reported HIV PrEP nonadherence in the past three months
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Urine screen test for PrEP nonadherence
  • Self-reported condomless anal sex or a STI in the past three months
  • Able to attend all study visits
  • Fluent in English

Who cannot join

  • Currently receiving treatment for any substance use disorder,
  • HIV positive
  • Having a medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the PI would interfere with study participation
  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Unable to attend protocol directed study visits
  • Any plans that would preclude study completion (e.g. surgery, major medical treatments such as chemotherapy, incarceration, travel/moving out of San Antonio, Texas)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Emeka Okafor, PhD, MPH contact

210-450-7377

okaforcn@uthscsa.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

    Chukwuemeka N Okafor, PhD, MPH

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Development of a Behavioral Economic Intervention to Improve HIV-related Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Individuals

This research study is testing a new behavioral therapy called Episodic Future Thinking or EFT can help people reduce drug use and risky sexual behaviors while helping them adhere to their HIV prevention medication (PrEP). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive standard care, which includes counseling on HIV prevention, drug use reduction, and sexual health. The other group will receive standard care plus a new program called Episodic Future Thinking (EFT), where participants will think about and plan for their future goals using a mobile app and counseling sessions. Study procedures that are not part of regular care include filling out surveys, providing blood, urine, and swab samples for testing, and using the EFT app.

Read the detailed description

Phase 1 of the study will involve a formative evaluation of the Episodic Future Thinking (EFT) intervention among (n=10) sexual minority individuals (SMIs) utilizing qualitative interviews. (This phase of the study data will not be reported on ClinicalTrials.gov, since it is not part of the randomized controlled trial).

Phase 2 of the study will utilize a two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial of Episodic Future Thinking plus standard of care (intervention) vs. standard of care only (control) condition to improved HIV-related behaviors (PrEP adherence, sexual risk behaviors and methamphetamine use) among sexual minority individuals.

Conditions
HIV Prevention
Being tested
EFT
Keywords
HIV negative, Methamphetamine use, HIV PrEP medication

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EFTBehavioural

    Also called Episodic Future Thinking

    Participants who meet the eligibility criteria will receive the EFT intervention, a cognitive training exercise designed to help them generate and visualize future events or goals. The intervention will be administered individually, in person, by a trained counselor

Study groups in NCT06745947
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Episodic Future Thinking AppExperimentalEFT is a behavioral economic intervention designed to improve decision-making by reducing delay discounting and improving demand. The EFT intervention will be administered through a combination of in-person counseling sessions and mobile health (mHealth) technology via an app platform.
Receives: Behavioral: EFT
Control GroupNo interventionStandard of Care: The standard of care group will receive brief information and supportive counseling around PrEP adherence, methamphetamine use reduction and engaging in safe sexual behaviors. Participants will also receive counseling on a topic of concern identified by the participant.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dried Blood Spot Analysis for STI adherence

    Blood spots will be collected and assessed for sexually transmitted infections (STI).

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  2. Urine Collection for Drug Screening

    Urine will be tested for drug screening. Number of subjects that result in a negative drug screening will be reported.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  3. Urine Collection for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs) and Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence

    Urine will be tested for STIs. Number of subjects that test negative for STIs will be reported.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  4. Rectal Swab for STI testing

    A rectal swab will be obtained for STI. Number of subjects that test negative for STIs will be reported.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  5. Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Related Intentions

    A 3-item scale to measure PrEP-related intentions (e.g., "During the next three months, I will talk to a health care provider about PrEP"; "During the next three months, I will seek out more information about PrEP" and "During the next three months, I will get a prescription for PrEP"). Response options will be 1 = No, definitely not; 2 = No, probably not; 3 = Yes, probably and 4=Yes, definitely. A total range of scores is 3-12 with a higher score indication a greater intention of taking preventative measures.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  6. PrEP Attitudes

    A 5-item scale to evaluate attitudes regarding PrEP use (e.g., "People who take PrEP are responsible"; "Taking PrEP is safe"). Response options will range from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree. Total scores will range between 5 and 25, with higher scores indicating more favorable attitudes toward PrEP use.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  7. PrEP Stigma

    A 5-item scale to assess PrEP stigma (e.g., "People who take PrEP are promiscuous"). Responses will be on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly disagree. The total range of scores is 5-25, where higher scores denote greater stigma associated with PrEP.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  8. PrEP Self-efficacy

    Participants will self-report the level of difficulty they anticipate in performing 8 behaviors associated with PrEP use (e.g., "How difficult would it be for you to seek out more information about PrEP to decide if it is right for you?"). Responses will be on a scale from 1=very hard to do to 4=very easy to do. Total scores range from 8-32, where higher scores suggest higher levels of self-efficacy.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Rapid HIV test

    Test for HIV infection. Number of negative results will be reported.

    Measured: Day 30 to Day 180

  2. Delayed Discounting

    Delay discounting tasks will consist of 1) a standard adjusting-amount monetary tasks presenting repeated choices between various amounts of money now ($0 to $1,000) and $1,000 after a fixed delay (1 day to 25 years); 2) a cross-commodity task presenting choices between various amounts of methamphetamine now and money later in which the values are made equivalent with the monetary task; and 3) a condom delay discounting task assessing the likelihood that the participant would have sex with their ideal partner immediately with no condom vs. with a condom following a delay. Delayed discounting rate (or k) is an index of the devaluation of a rewards over time, with higher k values representing steeper discounting rates and a greater preferences for immediate rewards.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  3. Demand

    Demand tasks will consist of hypothetical purchasing tasks assessing 1) Methamphetamine demand (grams of methamphetamine purchased as a function of increasing price); 2) condom demand (likelihood of purchasing condoms as a function of increasing price, with the follow-up question of whether they do not have sex or have sex without a condom when the likelihood of condom purchasing goes to zero); and 3) PrEP demand (likelihood of purchasing a one-month supply of PrEP as a function of increasing price). Demand data will be fit to an exponentiated demand model: Q=Q0*10k(e-αQ0C-1), where Q represents consumption/use of the commodity as a function of increasing cost (C).

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  4. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-5-TR Self-rated Level 1

    This adult version of the measure consists of 23 questions that assess 13 psychiatric domains, including depression, anger, mania, anxiety, somatic symptoms, suicidal ideation, psychosis, sleep problems, memory, repetitive thoughts and behaviors, dissociation, personality functioning, and substance use. Each item inquires about how much (or how often) the individual has been bothered by the specific symptom during the past 2 weeks. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (0=none or not at all; 1=slight or rare, less than a day or two; 2=mild or several days; 3=moderate or more than half the days; and 4=severe or nearly every day).

    Scoring:

    Scoring can be done at three levels:

    Item Level: Review individual item scores. Domain Level: Sum item scores within each domain. Full Survey Level: Sum all item scores.

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

  5. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 will be used to assess generalized anxiety symptomology. This is a 7-item measure that asks participants to rate the frequency with which they have been bothered by anxiety symptoms within the past two weeks on a scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Scores on all items are summed up to obtain a total severity score between 0 and 28. Scores reflect no significant anxiety symptoms (0-4), mild anxiety symptoms (5-9), moderate anxiety symptoms (10-14), and severe anxiety symptoms (>15)

    Measured: Day 1 to Day 180

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2024
  2. Study start3 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A two-arm pilot randomized controlled trial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06745947
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00000869
Other IDs
R34DA060078
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
13 Dec 2024
Last updated
23 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Publication policy will focus on ensuring that all dissemination of research findings from this study is conducted in an accurate, transparent and ethical manner. Authorship will be determined based on significant contributions to the study's conception, design, data acquisition, analysis or interpretation as well as in drafting and critically revising the manuscript. During this review process any potentially identifiable information will be carefully reviewed and anonymized if necessary.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in