Cutaneous LeishmaniasisTTCLNCT06746350
Feasibility of Integrating Thermotherapy for Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Primary Health Care Setup
A study testing Thermotherapy in people with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, run by Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Ethiopia at 1 site in Ethiopia.
Trial summary
This study will look at how feasible it is to use thermotherapy (TT) as a treatment for skin(cutaneous) leishmaniasis (CL) in health centers in the Sodo and South Sodo districts, Ethiopia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
- What is being tested?
- Thermotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEthiopia
- Study dates
- 24 Apr 2025to 30 Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females aged ≥12 and ≤60 years old.
- Patient has a lesion that satisfies the following criteria:
- Lesion size < or = 4 cm (longest diameter).
- Not located adjacent to ear, nose, eyes, lips, or close to mucosal membranes.
- Patient with < or = 4 CL lesions
- Patient able to give written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Any condition that prevents the patient from following the study treatment and/or the follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Ethiopia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
CDT-Africa
Addis Ababa
Dawit Ejigu, MD, dawit.a.ejigu@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of Integrating Thermotherapy (TT) for Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Into the Primary Healthcare Facilities in East Gurage Zone, Ethiopia
This study will look at how feasible it is to use thermotherapy (TT) as a treatment for skin(cutaneous) leishmaniasis (CL) in health centers in the Sodo and South Sodo districts, Ethiopia. The main questions the investigators want to answer are:
- Is it practical, acceptable, and suitable to use thermotherapy for treating skin leishmaniasis in these health centers?
- How effective is thermotherapy in treating skin leishmaniasis in this setting?
Read more
Health centers that do not offer thermotherapy will be used as a comparison group. Patients with CL in these areas will be monitored for up to 3 months before being sent to centers that provide thermotherapy.
Participants will be checked at a nearby health center to see if they meet the criteria for the study and then will be recruited. Patients with skin lesions will receive thermotherapy using the ThermoMed device, which heats the area to 50°C for 30 seconds. Their progress will be checked every 4 weeks until day 90 for response to TT treatment and for those who responded on day 180 to assess relapse of CL lesions. Depending on how well they respond, thermotherapy may be repeated at 4 or 8 weeks.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to improve access to effective treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), specifically focusing on treatment with thermotherapy (TT) in selected districts in Sodo and south Sodo districts in Ethiopia. The study is structured into three phases, aligned with the different phases of the MRC framework for complex interventions. It follows an iterative approach, where the following phases depend on the findings from the preceding phases.
- Phase 1 of the project works on developing the training packages for the PHC staff and Health Extension Workers (HEWs) to diagnose/manage patients with CL and to refer suspected CL patients to the health centers respectively. The investigators will develop the training packages in consultation with a dermatologist with experience in TT for CL, the research team, the health department officials, the primary healthcare (PHC) staff, and HEWs.
- Phase 2- involves piloting the intervention approach in two of the health centers and TT will be administered by the PHC staff for 20 CL patients. In this phase, the investigators will do a feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness assessment. The feasibility assessments encompass technical and allocative. Technical feasibility assesses the match between the technical complexity of the intervention and the capacity to implement it while allocative feasibility assesses whether the right approach is being followed in terms of resource allocation within the healthcare system. The PHC staff who have experience implementing TT and the health officials will be in a better position to give this critical information in a focus group discussion. The investigators will also assess fidelity to assess whether the training package has been well received by the PHC staff.
Phase 3- involves implementing the intervention in other health centers and on larger CL patients and assessing the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, as well as cost-effectiveness. In this phase, TT treatment will be administered to an additional 83 people making the total number of CL patients treated in this study 103. While implementing the study activities, the investigators will abide by the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) principles. Serious and Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs) will also be reported to the Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority (EFDA) according to the pharmacovigilance requirement of the Authority.
In this study, the following research designs will be followed:
- Qualitative study designs; The researchers will use Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT from the PHC staff, the health officials, and HEWs. Additionally, to assess the same parameters from patients and the community in-depth interviews will employed. To further augment data collected through FGD and in-depth interviews to assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness using a validated tool by Weiner et al. The investigators will assess fidelity to evaluate to what extent the trained PHC staff has adhered to the training package which could also tell us the technical feasibility of the intervention. The feasibility assessment includes allocative and technical feasibility.
- A cross-sectional study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of primary health care staff in correctly identifying CL patients using PCR as a gold standard. This design will assist in further assessing the fidelity of the PHC staff in adhering to the training package delivered in the first phase of the training. Additionally, the investigators will have information on the technical feasibility of the intervention by looking at the percentage of CL cases and non-CL cases correctly identified.
- Quasi-experimental design to assess the treatment success rate of TT in treating CL. An independent dermatologist will assess the response to TT. In this study, there is neither a control group nor randomized patients. The catchment areas of health centers that are not providing TT will serve as a control group. Patients with CL within these control catchment areas will be followed for a maximum of 3 months before they are referred to TT-providing centers for treatment. Eligible CL patients are offered TT treatment by the PHC staff and only if interested, the CL Patients will undergo TT treatment. TT will be administered up to two times to the Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) patients in the intervention group:
- CL patients who do not show a response during their week 4 visit will receive a second dose of TT at the same visit.
- CL patients who show an initial response at week 4, will be assessed further during their week 8 visit. If it is unlikely that the patients will achieve complete epithelialization of their ulcers or flattening of their nodules within the next 4 weeks, they will receive a second dose of TT during that same week 8 visit.
Patients will be followed for response to treatment. In addition to allowing the targets for the qualitative studies to experience first-hand the effects of TT, this part of the study further helps in indirectly verifying whether the PHC staff are adhering to the training on the administration of TT and the technical feasibility of TT administration.
PHC staff, i.e. general practitioners, health officers, and/or nurses, will be trained on the spot diagnosis of CL, taking digital pictures of lesions, taking scrape samples from the lesions, as well as administration of TT to the suspected CL lesions with the training package developed under phase 1 of the study. Then the primary healthcare staff, as per their training, will make clinical suspicion of CL and apply TT on the suspected CL lesions. Suspected CL lesions will also be followed for up to a maximum of 180 days. Before administering TT, the primary healthcare staff will take good-quality digital pictures and skin scrape samples from the suspected CL lesions for later confirmation with PCR. HEWs, who are based in the health posts, will be an integral part of the whole process by sending possible cases of CL to the primary healthcare facilities for initial diagnosis as well as sensitizing the patients for follow up visits. The investigators will carefully choose two to three primary health care facilities located in areas with a notably higher occurrence of CL within their catchment areas for the implementation of CL diagnosis and TT application. The deployment of ThermoMed™ devices will initially occur at these selected facilities. CL patients living within the catchment areas of the remaining health centers that are not providing the TT intervention will serve as the control group. These control group patients will be observed for a maximum of three months and they will be referred to TT-providing centers for treatment. Patients in the control group have the right to seek CL treatment on their own during this observation period. If the flow of CL patients at these facilities is considered insufficient, there is a possibility of relocating the ThermoMed™ devices to other primary healthcare facilities in Sodo and South Sodo. An equal number of digital pictures of and scrape samples from the lesions of participants suspected to have skin diseases other than CL will be collected for comparison. TT will be administered using a radio frequency-induced heat therapy (RFHT) by a ThermoMed™ device (Thermosurgery Technologies, Inc., Phoenix, AZ). RFHT is applied only once for 30 seconds at 50°C. TT could also be delivered by handheld exothermic crystallization thermotherapy for CL (HECT-CL) device. However, since HECT-CL needs repeated applications up to seven times and due to its lower rate of efficacy compared to RHFT, the researchers decided to use ThermoMed™. Patients who are successfully treated with TT, based on day 90 assessment, will be visited on day 180 to see if the lesions relapse.
- Conditions
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
- Being tested
- Thermotherapy
- Keywords
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Sodo, Thermotherapy, ThermoMed
- Medical subject headings
- Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous, Hyperthermia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ThermotherapyDevice
Also called ThermoMed™
Radio frequency-induced heat treatment using the ThermoMed device at 50-degree centigrade for 30 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Thermotherapy | Experimental | This arm receives thermotherapy right after CL diagnosis Receives: Device: Thermotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT into primary healthcare.
- Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview
Measured: Day 90 reached for 20 patients
Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT into primary healthcare.
Assessment of Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) using a validated psychometric tool.
Measured: Day 90 reached for 20 patients
Secondary outcomes (2)
Treatment success rate
The proportion of patients who are cured at day 90. Cure is defined as complete epithelialization for ulcer lesions and complete flattening of nodules. Participants, who responded to TT based on day 90 assessment, will be reassessed on day180 for relapse of CL lesions
Measured: Day 90 reached for all patients
Diagnostic accuracy of primary health care staff
Calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values of CL diagnosis by primary healthcare staff using PCR as a gold standard.
Measured: Day 0 for all the participants reached
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2024
- Study start24 Apr 2025
- Primary completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cutaneous LeishmaniasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Ethiopia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06746350
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TTCL
- Other IDs
- TTCL
- Acronym
- TTCL
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: We don't have a plan to share IPD at the current moment.
Publications
Ejigu DA, Fekadu A, Kinfe M, Doni SN, Gadisa E, Ali S, Schunk M, Wieser A, Rothe C. Feasibility of integrating thermotherapy (TT) for the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis into the primary healthcare facilities in east gurage zone, ethiopia: a protocol for an implementation research study. BMC Prim Care. 2026 Oct 21;27(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12875-026-03615-9.
PubMed 42934502
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of Integrating Thermotherapy (TT) for Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Into the Primary Healthcare Facilities in East Gurage Zone, Ethiopia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06746350
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TTCL / TTCL
- Conditions
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
- Keywords
- Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Sodo, Thermotherapy, ThermoMed
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Armauer Hansen Research Institute, EthiopiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will look at how feasible it is to use thermotherapy (TT) as a treatment for skin(cutaneous) leishmaniasis (CL) in health centers in the Sodo and South Sodo districts, Ethiopia. The main questions the investigators want to answer are:
- Is it practical, acceptable, and suitable to use thermotherapy for treating skin leishmaniasis in these health centers?
- How effective is thermotherapy in treating skin leishmaniasis in this setting?
Health centers that do not offer thermotherapy will be used as a comparison group. Patients with CL in these areas will be monitored for up to 3 months before being sent to centers that provide thermotherapy.
Participants will be checked at a nearby health center to see if they meet the criteria for the study and then will be recruited. Patients with skin lesions will receive thermotherapy using the ThermoMed device, which heats the area to 50°C for 30 seconds. Their progress will be checked every 4 weeks until day 90 for response to TT treatment and for those who responded on day 180 to assess relapse of CL lesions. Depending on how well they respond, thermotherapy may be repeated at 4 or 8 weeks.
Detailed description
This study aims to improve access to effective treatment for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL), specifically focusing on treatment with thermotherapy (TT) in selected districts in Sodo and south Sodo districts in Ethiopia. The study is structured into three phases, aligned with the different phases of the MRC framework for complex interventions. It follows an iterative approach, where the following phases depend on the findings from the preceding phases.
- Phase 1 of the project works on developing the training packages for the PHC staff and Health Extension Workers (HEWs) to diagnose/manage patients with CL and to refer suspected CL patients to the health centers respectively. The investigators will develop the training packages in consultation with a dermatologist with experience in TT for CL, the research team, the health department officials, the primary healthcare (PHC) staff, and HEWs.
- Phase 2- involves piloting the intervention approach in two of the health centers and TT will be administered by the PHC staff for 20 CL patients. In this phase, the investigators will do a feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness assessment. The feasibility assessments encompass technical and allocative. Technical feasibility assesses the match between the technical complexity of the intervention and the capacity to implement it while allocative feasibility assesses whether the right approach is being followed in terms of resource allocation within the healthcare system. The PHC staff who have experience implementing TT and the health officials will be in a better position to give this critical information in a focus group discussion. The investigators will also assess fidelity to assess whether the training package has been well received by the PHC staff.
Phase 3- involves implementing the intervention in other health centers and on larger CL patients and assessing the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, as well as cost-effectiveness. In this phase, TT treatment will be administered to an additional 83 people making the total number of CL patients treated in this study 103. While implementing the study activities, the investigators will abide by the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) principles. Serious and Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions (SUSARs) will also be reported to the Ethiopian Food and Drug Authority (EFDA) according to the pharmacovigilance requirement of the Authority.
In this study, the following research designs will be followed:
- Qualitative study designs; The researchers will use Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT from the PHC staff, the health officials, and HEWs. Additionally, to assess the same parameters from patients and the community in-depth interviews will employed. To further augment data collected through FGD and in-depth interviews to assess feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness using a validated tool by Weiner et al. The investigators will assess fidelity to evaluate to what extent the trained PHC staff has adhered to the training package which could also tell us the technical feasibility of the intervention. The feasibility assessment includes allocative and technical feasibility.
- A cross-sectional study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of primary health care staff in correctly identifying CL patients using PCR as a gold standard. This design will assist in further assessing the fidelity of the PHC staff in adhering to the training package delivered in the first phase of the training. Additionally, the investigators will have information on the technical feasibility of the intervention by looking at the percentage of CL cases and non-CL cases correctly identified.
- Quasi-experimental design to assess the treatment success rate of TT in treating CL. An independent dermatologist will assess the response to TT. In this study, there is neither a control group nor randomized patients. The catchment areas of health centers that are not providing TT will serve as a control group. Patients with CL within these control catchment areas will be followed for a maximum of 3 months before they are referred to TT-providing centers for treatment. Eligible CL patients are offered TT treatment by the PHC staff and only if interested, the CL Patients will undergo TT treatment. TT will be administered up to two times to the Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) patients in the intervention group:
- CL patients who do not show a response during their week 4 visit will receive a second dose of TT at the same visit.
- CL patients who show an initial response at week 4, will be assessed further during their week 8 visit. If it is unlikely that the patients will achieve complete epithelialization of their ulcers or flattening of their nodules within the next 4 weeks, they will receive a second dose of TT during that same week 8 visit.
Patients will be followed for response to treatment. In addition to allowing the targets for the qualitative studies to experience first-hand the effects of TT, this part of the study further helps in indirectly verifying whether the PHC staff are adhering to the training on the administration of TT and the technical feasibility of TT administration.
PHC staff, i.e. general practitioners, health officers, and/or nurses, will be trained on the spot diagnosis of CL, taking digital pictures of lesions, taking scrape samples from the lesions, as well as administration of TT to the suspected CL lesions with the training package developed under phase 1 of the study. Then the primary healthcare staff, as per their training, will make clinical suspicion of CL and apply TT on the suspected CL lesions. Suspected CL lesions will also be followed for up to a maximum of 180 days. Before administering TT, the primary healthcare staff will take good-quality digital pictures and skin scrape samples from the suspected CL lesions for later confirmation with PCR. HEWs, who are based in the health posts, will be an integral part of the whole process by sending possible cases of CL to the primary healthcare facilities for initial diagnosis as well as sensitizing the patients for follow up visits. The investigators will carefully choose two to three primary health care facilities located in areas with a notably higher occurrence of CL within their catchment areas for the implementation of CL diagnosis and TT application. The deployment of ThermoMed™ devices will initially occur at these selected facilities. CL patients living within the catchment areas of the remaining health centers that are not providing the TT intervention will serve as the control group. These control group patients will be observed for a maximum of three months and they will be referred to TT-providing centers for treatment. Patients in the control group have the right to seek CL treatment on their own during this observation period. If the flow of CL patients at these facilities is considered insufficient, there is a possibility of relocating the ThermoMed™ devices to other primary healthcare facilities in Sodo and South Sodo. An equal number of digital pictures of and scrape samples from the lesions of participants suspected to have skin diseases other than CL will be collected for comparison. TT will be administered using a radio frequency-induced heat therapy (RFHT) by a ThermoMed™ device (Thermosurgery Technologies, Inc., Phoenix, AZ). RFHT is applied only once for 30 seconds at 50°C. TT could also be delivered by handheld exothermic crystallization thermotherapy for CL (HECT-CL) device. However, since HECT-CL needs repeated applications up to seven times and due to its lower rate of efficacy compared to RHFT, the researchers decided to use ThermoMed™. Patients who are successfully treated with TT, based on day 90 assessment, will be visited on day 180 to see if the lesions relapse.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Thermotherapy | Experimental | Device: ThermotherapyThis arm receives thermotherapy right after CL diagnosis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Males and females aged ≥12 and ≤60 years old.
- Patient has a lesion that satisfies the following criteria:
- Patient able to give written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any condition that prevents the patient from following the study treatment and/or the follow-up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ThermotherapyAlso: ThermoMed™Radio frequency-induced heat treatment using the ThermoMed device at 50-degree centigrade for 30 seconds. | Device | Thermotherapy |
Primary outcome
Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT into primary healthcare.
Time frame: Day 90 reached for 20 patients
- Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and in-depth interview
Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT into primary healthcare.
Time frame: Day 90 reached for 20 patients
Assessment of Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), and Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) using a validated psychometric tool.
2 secondary outcomes
Treatment success rate
Time frame: Day 90 reached for all patients
Diagnostic accuracy of primary health care staff
Time frame: Day 0 for all the participants reached
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42934502Ejigu DA, Fekadu A, Kinfe M, Doni SN, Gadisa E, Ali S, Schunk M, Wieser A, Rothe C. Feasibility of integrating thermotherapy (TT) for the treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis into the primary healthcare facilities in east gurage zone, ethiopia: a protocol for an implementation research study. BMC Prim Care. 2026 Oct 21;27(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12875-026-03615-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. We don't have a plan to share IPD at the current moment.
Related trials for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
RecruitingObservational study
Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmania Infections
Kinetoplastid, Skin Diseases, Parasitic
Not yet recruiting
Immersive Technology Headsets to Reduce Procedural Pain and Anxiety: Feasibility and Effects in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis Patients in Pakistan
Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Ex Vivo Immunogenicity Screening of Vaccine Candidate Antigen Combinations in Ethiopian Patients With Leishmaniasis
Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous, Leishmaniasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Comparison of Intralesional Glucantime With and Without Fractional CO₂ Laser in Adults With Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
Cutaneous Leishminiasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Two LXE408 Oral Regimens and Oral Miltefosine as Active Control in Participants Aged ≥ 18 Years Old With Localized Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in the Region of the Americas (AMR).
Localized Cutaneous Leishmaniasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Thermotherapy in people with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, run by Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Ethiopia at 1 site in Ethiopia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Ethiopia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dawit Ejigu, MD, MSc (+251911405540, dawit.a.ejigu@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of integrating TT into primary healthcare. (time frame: Day 90 reached for 20 patients). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06746350, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.