AzTrials
AzTrials

Ovarian DiseasesTOLSTOYNCT06750003

4K Versus 3D Total Laparoscopic Bilateral Oophorectomy: Tools in Comparison

A study testing 3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in people with Ovarian Diseases, run by Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Evaluate whether the 4K laparoscopic vision system can provide an advantage in performing bilateral oophorectomy procedures for benign conditions carried out by trainee surgeons compared to 3D laparoscopy Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Ovarian Diseases
What is being tested?
3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Dec 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with benign ovarian pathology requiring bilateral oophorectomy
  • ASA score <3
  • Patients who have signed the appropriate informed consent
  • Patients who are not pregnant or diagnosed with pelvic inflammatory disease
  • No history of prior major abdominal surgery

Who cannot join

  • Suspected neoplastic pathology
  • Patients not eligible for surgery

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: 4K Versus 3D Total Laparoscopic Bilateral Oophorectomy by Surgeons in Training: Tools in Comparison

Evaluate whether the 4K laparoscopic vision system can provide an advantage in performing bilateral oophorectomy procedures for benign conditions carried out by trainee surgeons compared to 3D laparoscopy

Read the detailed description

All patients diagnosed with suspected benign ovarian pathology based on preoperative examinations (pelvic Doppler ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging and/or CT scan) and with indication for bilateral laparoscopic adnexectomy will be enrolled in the study. The primary objective of the study is to compare surgical times between the 3D and 4K vision systems in laparoscopic ovarian surgery, specifically in bilateral adnexectomy performed by trainee surgeons. Secondary objectives will include evaluating intra- and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and costs to the healthcare system

Being tested
3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
Keywords
Benign ovarian disease, laparoscopy, annessiectomy, ovariectomy, resident, tridimensional, high definition surgery, 3D, 4K
Medical subject headings
Ovarian Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomyProcedure or surgery

    3D laparoscopy versus 4K laparoscopy for bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed by residents

Study groups in NCT06750003
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
3D laparoscopyActive comparatorPerformed using 3D laparoscopy
Receives: Procedure: 3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
4K laparoscopyExperimentalPerformed using 4K laparoscopy
Receives: Procedure: 3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. operative time

    To compare the operative time of bilateral oophorectomy performed using 3D laparoscopy versus 4K laparoscopy for benign indications, conducted by trainee surgeons.

    Measured: from enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Dec 2024
  2. Study start15 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06750003
Sponsor's protocol ID
33935
Acronym
TOLSTOY
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
15 Dec 2024
Last updated
27 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 3D versus 4K laparoscopic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in people with Ovarian Diseases, run by Azienda Sanitaria-Universitaria Integrata di Udine.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact MD, Graduation (0432 559695, stefano.restaino@asufc.sanita.fvg.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

operative time (time frame: from enrollment to the end of follow up at 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in