Congenital Heart DiseaseNCT06752187
Value of MRI in Congenital Heart Disease
An observational study of Congenital Heart Disease, run by Assiut University.
Trial summary
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent congenital anomaly and a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. It encompasses various cardiac chamber anomalies. CHD diagnosis relied on clinical information from auscultation and heart sounds, with X-rays providing indirect information. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 0 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Congenital Heart Disease
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2025to Feb 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 0 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: The study population will include infants and children aged 0-18 years who are either suspected of having or diagnosed with congenital heart disease (CHD). Inclusion will require patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to further evaluate cardiac anatomy, function, or associated vascular anomalies.
Who may be able to join
- Infants and children who diagnosed or suspected congenital heart diseases
- Infants and children who can tolerate sedation or general anesthesia
Who cannot join
- patients with contraindications to MRI as pacemaker or defibrillator
- patients unable to tolerate sedation or anesthesia
About this study
Official title: Diagnostic Values of MRI in Congenital Heart Disease
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent congenital anomaly and a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. It encompasses various cardiac chamber anomalies.
CHD diagnosis relied on clinical information from auscultation and heart sounds, with X-rays providing indirect information. Since the 1970s, echocardiography has become the primary diagnostic tool due to its direct, safe, and portable nature, capable of defining anatomy and estimating hemodynamics. However, echocardiography has limitations, While CT provides valuable anatomical details, it lacks hemodynamic information and involves ionizing radiation. MRI, on the other hand, excels in both anatomical and functional analysis, offering detailed hemodynamic evaluations of blood flow through valves, great vessels, and septal defects.
Read the detailed description
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent congenital anomaly and a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. It encompasses various cardiac chamber anomalies such as septal defects, valvular lesions, and outflow tract anomalies. Advances in diagnostic tools, medical management, and surgical techniques have significantly improved survival rates, with over 90% of children with complex CHD living into adulthood. As of 2012, the prevalence of CHD was estimated at 3000 per million, and in the U.S., the number of adults with complex CHD increased from 110,000 in 1968 to 270,000 in 2010.
Historically, CHD diagnosis relied on clinical information from auscultation and heart sounds, with X-rays providing indirect information. Since the 1970s, echocardiography has become the primary diagnostic tool due to its direct, safe, and portable nature, capable of defining anatomy and estimating hemodynamics. However, echocardiography has limitations, including a restricted window of visualization.
Previously, CT and MRI faced challenges due to cardiac motion artifacts, but advancements in rapid imaging and high-resolution technology have improved their diagnostic capabilities. While CT provides valuable anatomical details, it lacks hemodynamic information and involves ionizing radiation. MRI, on the other hand, excels in both anatomical and functional analysis, offering detailed hemodynamic evaluations of blood flow through valves, great vessels, and septal defects.
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Keywords
- Congenital heart disease, MRI
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Defects, Congenital
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of hemodynamics in congenital heart disease
- The added value of MRI is evaluation of cardiac hemodynamics in congenital heart disease, and these hemodynamics include evaluation of the direction \& amount of blood flow through valves ,great vessels and septal defects.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Dec 2024
- Study startJan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Congenital Heart DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aya Ezzat Abd el-aa, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06752187
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- congenital heart disease MRI
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 30 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Muntean I, Toganel R, Benedek T. Genetics of Congenital Heart Disease: Past and Present. Biochem Genet. 2017 Apr;55(2):105-123. doi: 10.1007/s10528-016-9780-7. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
PubMed 27807680Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF, Samyn MM, Taylor AM, Valsangiacomo Buechel ER, Yoo SJ, Powell AJ. Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 13;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-51.
PubMed 23763839Renz DM, Bottcher J, Eckstein J, Huisinga C, Pfeil A, Lucke C, Gutberlet M. [Imaging of congenital heart defects with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography]. Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 May;64(5):382-391. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01301-4. Epub 2024 Apr 24. German.
PubMed 38656344Ma P, Zhu L, Wen R, Lv F, Li Y, Li X, Zhang Z. Revolutionizing vascular imaging: trends and future directions of 4D flow MRI based on a 20-year bibliometric analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1873-1890. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1227. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
PubMed 38415143
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Values of MRI in Congenital Heart Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06752187
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- congenital heart disease MRI
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Keywords
- Congenital heart disease, MRI
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent congenital anomaly and a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. It encompasses various cardiac chamber anomalies.
CHD diagnosis relied on clinical information from auscultation and heart sounds, with X-rays providing indirect information. Since the 1970s, echocardiography has become the primary diagnostic tool due to its direct, safe, and portable nature, capable of defining anatomy and estimating hemodynamics. However, echocardiography has limitations, While CT provides valuable anatomical details, it lacks hemodynamic information and involves ionizing radiation. MRI, on the other hand, excels in both anatomical and functional analysis, offering detailed hemodynamic evaluations of blood flow through valves, great vessels, and septal defects.
Detailed description
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most prevalent congenital anomaly and a major cause of infant morbidity and mortality. It encompasses various cardiac chamber anomalies such as septal defects, valvular lesions, and outflow tract anomalies. Advances in diagnostic tools, medical management, and surgical techniques have significantly improved survival rates, with over 90% of children with complex CHD living into adulthood. As of 2012, the prevalence of CHD was estimated at 3000 per million, and in the U.S., the number of adults with complex CHD increased from 110,000 in 1968 to 270,000 in 2010.
Historically, CHD diagnosis relied on clinical information from auscultation and heart sounds, with X-rays providing indirect information. Since the 1970s, echocardiography has become the primary diagnostic tool due to its direct, safe, and portable nature, capable of defining anatomy and estimating hemodynamics. However, echocardiography has limitations, including a restricted window of visualization.
Previously, CT and MRI faced challenges due to cardiac motion artifacts, but advancements in rapid imaging and high-resolution technology have improved their diagnostic capabilities. While CT provides valuable anatomical details, it lacks hemodynamic information and involves ionizing radiation. MRI, on the other hand, excels in both anatomical and functional analysis, offering detailed hemodynamic evaluations of blood flow through valves, great vessels, and septal defects.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 0 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- The study population will include infants and children aged 0-18 years who are either suspected of having or diagnosed with congenital heart disease (CHD). Inclusion will require patients referred for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to further evaluate cardiac anatomy, function, or associated vascular anomalies.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Infants and children who diagnosed or suspected congenital heart diseases
- Infants and children who can tolerate sedation or general anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients with contraindications to MRI as pacemaker or defibrillator
- patients unable to tolerate sedation or anesthesia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Evaluation of hemodynamics in congenital heart disease
Time frame: Baseline
• The added value of MRI is evaluation of cardiac hemodynamics in congenital heart disease, and these hemodynamics include evaluation of the direction \& amount of blood flow through valves ,great vessels and septal defects.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 27807680Muntean I, Toganel R, Benedek T. Genetics of Congenital Heart Disease: Past and Present. Biochem Genet. 2017 Apr;55(2):105-123. doi: 10.1007/s10528-016-9780-7. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
- Background: PubMed 23763839Fratz S, Chung T, Greil GF, Samyn MM, Taylor AM, Valsangiacomo Buechel ER, Yoo SJ, Powell AJ. Guidelines and protocols for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in children and adults with congenital heart disease: SCMR expert consensus group on congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 13;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-51.
- Background: PubMed 38656344Renz DM, Bottcher J, Eckstein J, Huisinga C, Pfeil A, Lucke C, Gutberlet M. [Imaging of congenital heart defects with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography]. Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 May;64(5):382-391. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01301-4. Epub 2024 Apr 24. German.
- Background: PubMed 38415143Ma P, Zhu L, Wen R, Lv F, Li Y, Li X, Zhang Z. Revolutionizing vascular imaging: trends and future directions of 4D flow MRI based on a 20-year bibliometric analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):1873-1890. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1227. Epub 2024 Jan 18.
Related trials for Congenital Heart Disease
Not yet recruiting
Autologous Thymus Transplant in Children With Congenital Heart Disease: A Pilot Study
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of SGT-212 Gene Therapy in Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich's Ataxia (FA)
RecruitingObservational study
The CACHE Study: Coronary Artery Care in HaEmophilia
Haemophilia, Cardiovascular Diseases
RecruitingObservational study
Essen Amyloidosis Registry
Amyloidosis; Systemic, Amyloidosis Cardiac
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Lonapegsomatropin Compared to Daily Somatropin in Children and Adolescents With Short Stature or Growth Failure Due to Growth Hormone Sufficient Disorders
Turner Syndrome, Short Stature Homeobox Gene Mutation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Congenital Heart Disease, run by Assiut University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of hemodynamics in congenital heart disease (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06752187, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2024.