AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Cancer (NSCLC)NCT06752395

Cryobiopsy Vs. Forceps Biopsy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

A study testing Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered) and Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered) in people with Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by Pusan National University Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the diagnostic yields of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy for peripheral lung nodules. In the cryobiopsy group, cryobiopsy is the primary method, supplemented by forceps biopsy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
What is being tested?
Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered) and Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
3 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
1 Nov 2024to 1 Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Obtained written informed consent
  • Subjects having <30mm nodule on computed tomography
  • Subjects without contraindication to brochoscopy

Who cannot join

  • Patients with central lesions that can be visually confirmed by bronchoscopy or those with suspicious findings of cancer metastasis in the mediastinal lymph nodes, who do not require radial bronchial endoscopic ultrasound (RP-EBUS).
  • Patients who cannot discontinue medications that increase bleeding risk, such as antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants.
  • Patients with bleeding disorders (e.g., platelet count < 100,000/mm³).
  • Patients with severe comorbidities (e.g., serious respiratory or cardiovascular diseases) that make bronchoscopy unsafe.
  • Patients with hypersensitivity or allergies to drugs commonly used in endoscopic procedures, including lidocaine, midazolam, fentanyl, or flumazenil.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients.
  • Patients with confirmed lung cancer undergoing rebiopsy for genetic testing or other purposes.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

South Korea3 sites
  • Pusan National University Hospital

    Busan

  • Yeungnam University Medical Center

    Daegu

  • Chungnam National University Hospital

    Daejeon

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Cryobiopsy-centered Versus Forceps Biopsy-centered Sampling for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions - a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This multicenter clinical trial evaluates the diagnostic yields of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy for peripheral lung nodules. In the cryobiopsy group, cryobiopsy is the primary method, supplemented by forceps biopsy. Conversely, in the forceps biopsy group, forceps biopsy is the primary method, supplemented by cryobiopsy. The study also explores the complementary relationship between the two methods and examines differences in diagnostic rates based on the order in which the procedures are performed.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi center, clinical trial evaluating the diagnostic yields of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy methods used for the biopsy of peripheral lung nodules. In the cryobiopsy group, cryobiopsy is the primary method, with forceps biopsy used as an auxiliary technique, while in the forceps biopsy group, forceps biopsy is the primary method, with cryobiopsy as the auxiliary technique. The study also investigates the complementary relationship between these biopsy methods and evaluates differences in diagnostic rates based on the sequence of the procedures.

Being tested
Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered), Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered)
Keywords
Bronchoscpy, Cryobiopsy, Forceps biopsy, Lung cancer, Radial probe EBUS
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered)Diagnostic test

    When the lung nodule is visualized by bronchoscope using RP-EBUS, cryobiopsy is performed, followed by forceps biopsy.

  • Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered)Diagnostic test

    When the lung nodule is visualized by bronchoscope using RP-EBUS, forceps biopsy is performed, followed by cryobiopsy.

Study groups in NCT06752395
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CryobiopsyExperimentalCryobiopsy Group (Primary: Cryobiopsy, Auxiliary: Forceps Biopsy) In this group, cryobiopsy is performed as the primary biopsy method for sampling peripheral lung nodules. After the cryobiopsy is completed, forceps biopsy is conducted as an auxiliary method to obtain additional tissue samples.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered)
Forceps biopsyExperimentalForceps Biopsy Group (Primary: Forceps Biopsy, Auxiliary: Cryobiopsy) In this group, forceps biopsy is performed as the primary biopsy method for sampling peripheral lung nodules. Following the forceps biopsy, cryobiopsy is conducted as an auxiliary method to obtain additional tissue samples.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The overall cumulative diagnostic yield

    Pathologic diagnostic yield of primary method and overall procedures

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Diagnosis Rate According to Lesion Size

    This outcome measures the diagnostic success rate based on the size of the peripheral lung nodule. Lesions are categorized by size (e.g., <20 mm, 20 mm-30mm) to determine whether lesion size affects the accuracy and success of the biopsy method.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Diagnosis Rate According to Malignant and Benign Disease Classification

    This measures the diagnostic yield of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy by differentiating between malignant and benign lesions. The diagnostic rate is compared between cases of cancerous and non-cancerous nodules to assess the performance of the biopsy methods in each category.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. Diagnosis Rate According to Bronchus Sign

    The bronchus sign refers to whether or not the lesion is connected to a bronchus, as seen on imaging. This outcome evaluates whether the presence or absence of a bronchus sign impacts the diagnostic success of the biopsies.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  4. Diagnosis Rate According to Image Classification Detected by Radial Bronchial Endoscopic Ultrasound (RP-EBUS)

    This outcome assesses the diagnostic rate based on the characteristics of the lesion as identified by RP-EBUS imaging (e.g., solid, partially solid, or ground-glass opacities). The study evaluates whether different imaging characteristics influence the biopsy's diagnostic accuracy.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  5. Complication Rate

    This outcome measures the incidence of complications (e.g., bleeding, pneumothorax) that occur during or after the biopsy procedure. The complication rates are compared between the two biopsy methods to evaluate their safety profiles.

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Dec 2024
  2. Study start1 Nov 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06752395
Sponsor's protocol ID
2306-027-128
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
21 Dec 2024
Last updated
3 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Cryobiopsy centered) and Transbronchial lung biopsy with radial probe endobronchial ultrasound (Forceps biopsy centered) in people with Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by Pusan National University Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The overall cumulative diagnostic yield (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in