Postoperative Dental PainNCT06760312
Effect of Different Apical Actions on Local Inflammatory Mediators and Pain
A study testing Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation, Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse and Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic. in people with Postoperative Dental Pain and Pulp Disease, Dental, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine patients' the inflammation and pain response to different apical actions used in rotary instrumentation during root canal shaping process. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Dental Pain, Pulp Disease, Dental, Pulpitis - Irreversible
- What is being tested?
- Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation, Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse and Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 75 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 1 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Mild, moderate pulpitis and pulpal expose patients in need of root canal -treatment to their mandibular premolars.
- Healthy periodontal tissue with Periapical Index under 2.
- Helathy adjacent teeth.
Who cannot join
- Systemic diseases
- Percussion pain
- Patients who did not consent to a vital pulp therapy
- Radiologically seen open apex, root resorption, calcification
- Periodontal pocket beyond 4mm in length
- Consumption of Antibiotics or Corticosteroids 1 month before the treatment
- Consumption of antiinflammatory drugs 2 days before the treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Izmir, Çiğli, 35649
About this study
Official title: Effect of Different Apical Actions on Local Inflammatory Mediators and Pain During Root Canal Preparation: A Randomized Clinical Study
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine patients' the inflammation and pain response to different apical actions used in rotary instrumentation during root canal shaping process. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How the different apical actions of endodontic motors influence the pain and inflammatory mediator release from the periapical region of related tooth?
- Does the perceived pain differ among the used apical action methods after the root canal preparation?
- Are the perceived pain and local pain mediator levels coherent?
Read more
Participants will:
Attend to the root canal treatment in the endodontics clinic. The treatment will be two visits.
Answer the Visual Analog Scale questionnaire on day 0 (first appt.) and Day 3 (second appt.) Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use an anti-inflammatory drug.
Read the detailed description
Study Protocol
This study will include patients aged 18-49 years who present to the İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Department of Endodontics, requiring root canal treatment for vital, lesion-free mandibular first and second molars. Patients with systemic diseases will be excluded. The study will involve 66 patients. The sample size was calculated according to the effect size of 0,25 recommended by Cohen (1988).
Pre-Treatment Assessment:
- Patients will be asked about spontaneous pain and percussion pain related to the affected tooth prior to the session.
- These pain levels will be recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Group Allocation:
- After rubber dam isolation and access cavity preparation, patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups using a four-sided die.
- Each group will consist of 22 patients and will undergo root canal shaping using an endomotor with one of the following techniques:
- Continuous Rotation
- Apical Reverse
- Apical Slow-Down
Questionnaire:
Patients will be given a pen and will be asked to mark the current and percussion-provoked pain of the related tooth by a numbered linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment on Day 0 and Day 3.
Root Canal Shaping:
- Working Length Determination: Establish the working length and create a glide path using a #10 K-file.
- Instrumentation Sequence: Enlarge the canals sequentially using rotary files of sizes 15.04, 20.04, 25.06, 30.06, and 35.06.
- Irrigation: Use 2 ml of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for irrigation after each file change.
Sample Collection (First Session):
- After completing the first session:
- Rinse the canals with distilled water.
- Remove remaining liquid with #45 paper points.
- Insert sterile #20.02 paper points into the canals and leave them for 30 seconds to collect periapical exudates.
- Collect three samples per canal. Cut the apical 5 mm of the paper points and place them in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes for storage at -80°C.
- The canals will then be rinsed again with 2.5% NaOCl. Patients will be dismissed without using intra-canal medication and instructed to return for the filling session after three days. Patients will be advised to take 800 mg ibuprofen if they experience pain. The medication use will be documented.
Second Session:
- The questionnaire will be held again with the VAS scores and percussion sensivity.
- After local anesthesia the intermediate restorative material is removed and root canal irrigation with distilled water.
- Working length is confirmed again with a file. Collect three additional samples per canal using #20.02 paper points as in the first session.
- Proceed to finalize the root canal treatment.
Final Root Canal Treatment:
- Perform the final irrigation using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA.
- Fit gutta-percha cones. 35.06 cone or fitting .02 tapered cones will be selected as the master cone according to the anatomy and fit.
- Fill the canals using a resin-based root canal sealer with lateral condensation utilizing #25 spreader and accessory #20.02 gutta-percha cones.
- After cutting the excess gutta-percha, clean the cavity and complete the treatment with composite resin restoration.
Sample Handling:
- All collected samples will be stored in a -80°C freezer for biochemical analysis. The analysis will be based on ELISA tests which will investigate the Substance P, IL-1ß, TNF alpha and IL-6 on Day 0 and Day 3.
Post-Treatment:
- The occlusion will be checked using articulation paper, and adjustments will be made if primary contact is present to ensure no traumatic occlusion.
This standardized protocol ensures consistent data collection and optimal treatment outcomes for all participants.
- Being tested
- Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation, Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse, Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.
- Keywords
- apical kinematics, apical action, apical reverse, apical slow-down, continuous rotation, Substance P, postoperative pain, Inflammation
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Pulp Diseases, Pain, Postoperative, Inflammation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Root canal shaping with Continuous RotationProcedure or surgery
The root canal shaping is conducted with a continuous rotation kinematic.
Root canal shaping with Apical ReverseProcedure or surgery
The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical reverse kinematic.
Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.Procedure or surgery
The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical slow-down kinematic.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Rotation | Experimental | The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Continuous Rotation" which is the standard and mostly used option in endodontics. Works as a Control group also Receives: Procedure: Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation |
| Apical Reverse | Experimental | The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Reverse". The motor makes a reverse movement to prevent the file over the working length Receives: Procedure: Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse |
| Apical Slow-down | Experimental | The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Apical Slow-down". The motor slows down the rotation to preserve the working length and apical constriction. Receives: Procedure: Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Substance P
The local Substance P amount will be assesed with ELISA kits
Measured: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Visual Analog Scale
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire of perceived pain. A visual linear scale starting from 0 to 10. 0 represents no pain and 10 is the highest pain patient ever endured. Patient is asked to mark the pain in the scale.
Measured: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Inflammatory Mediator: IL-1ß
Local IL-1ß will be assessed with local collection from apical site.
Measured: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Inflammatory Mediator: IL-6
Local IL-6 will be assessed with local collection from apical site.
Measured: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Inflammatory Mediator: TNF alpha
Local TNF-alpha will be assessed with local collection from apical site.
Measured: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2025
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion1 May 2025
- Study completion1 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Postoperative Dental PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- n=66 participants will be randomized into 3 different intervention groups.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Katip Celebi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Emrah Karataşlıoğlu, Izmir Katip Celebi University
- Investigators
- Emrah Karataşlıoğlu, PhD, Study chair, İzmir Katip Çelebi ÜniversitesiMustafa Mert Tulgar, Dmd, Principal investigator, İzmir Katip Çelebi ÜniversitesiYağmur Kılıç, Dmd, Principal investigator, İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06760312
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2023-KAE-0080
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The patients' written consent also required that the data, which involves biological markers, be used only within the experiment and not shared with a third party.
Publications
Cohen, J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Different Apical Actions on Local Inflammatory Mediators and Pain During Root Canal Preparation: A Randomized Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06760312
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2023-KAE-0080
- Keywords
- apical kinematics, apical action, apical reverse, apical slow-down, continuous rotation, Substance P, postoperative pain, Inflammation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 75 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine patients' the inflammation and pain response to different apical actions used in rotary instrumentation during root canal shaping process. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How the different apical actions of endodontic motors influence the pain and inflammatory mediator release from the periapical region of related tooth?
- Does the perceived pain differ among the used apical action methods after the root canal preparation?
- Are the perceived pain and local pain mediator levels coherent?
Participants will:
Attend to the root canal treatment in the endodontics clinic. The treatment will be two visits.
Answer the Visual Analog Scale questionnaire on day 0 (first appt.) and Day 3 (second appt.) Keep a diary of their symptoms and the number of times they use an anti-inflammatory drug.
Detailed description
Study Protocol
This study will include patients aged 18-49 years who present to the İzmir Katip Çelebi University, Department of Endodontics, requiring root canal treatment for vital, lesion-free mandibular first and second molars. Patients with systemic diseases will be excluded. The study will involve 66 patients. The sample size was calculated according to the effect size of 0,25 recommended by Cohen (1988).
Pre-Treatment Assessment:
- Patients will be asked about spontaneous pain and percussion pain related to the affected tooth prior to the session.
- These pain levels will be recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Group Allocation:
- After rubber dam isolation and access cavity preparation, patients will be randomly assigned to one of four groups using a four-sided die.
- Each group will consist of 22 patients and will undergo root canal shaping using an endomotor with one of the following techniques:
- Continuous Rotation
- Apical Reverse
- Apical Slow-Down
Questionnaire:
Patients will be given a pen and will be asked to mark the current and percussion-provoked pain of the related tooth by a numbered linear Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment on Day 0 and Day 3.
Root Canal Shaping:
- Working Length Determination: Establish the working length and create a glide path using a #10 K-file.
- Instrumentation Sequence: Enlarge the canals sequentially using rotary files of sizes 15.04, 20.04, 25.06, 30.06, and 35.06.
- Irrigation: Use 2 ml of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for irrigation after each file change.
Sample Collection (First Session):
- After completing the first session:
- Rinse the canals with distilled water.
- Remove remaining liquid with #45 paper points.
- Insert sterile #20.02 paper points into the canals and leave them for 30 seconds to collect periapical exudates.
- Collect three samples per canal. Cut the apical 5 mm of the paper points and place them in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes for storage at -80°C.
- The canals will then be rinsed again with 2.5% NaOCl. Patients will be dismissed without using intra-canal medication and instructed to return for the filling session after three days. Patients will be advised to take 800 mg ibuprofen if they experience pain. The medication use will be documented.
Second Session:
- The questionnaire will be held again with the VAS scores and percussion sensivity.
- After local anesthesia the intermediate restorative material is removed and root canal irrigation with distilled water.
- Working length is confirmed again with a file. Collect three additional samples per canal using #20.02 paper points as in the first session.
- Proceed to finalize the root canal treatment.
Final Root Canal Treatment:
- Perform the final irrigation using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA.
- Fit gutta-percha cones. 35.06 cone or fitting .02 tapered cones will be selected as the master cone according to the anatomy and fit.
- Fill the canals using a resin-based root canal sealer with lateral condensation utilizing #25 spreader and accessory #20.02 gutta-percha cones.
- After cutting the excess gutta-percha, clean the cavity and complete the treatment with composite resin restoration.
Sample Handling:
- All collected samples will be stored in a -80°C freezer for biochemical analysis. The analysis will be based on ELISA tests which will investigate the Substance P, IL-1ß, TNF alpha and IL-6 on Day 0 and Day 3.
Post-Treatment:
- The occlusion will be checked using articulation paper, and adjustments will be made if primary contact is present to ensure no traumatic occlusion.
This standardized protocol ensures consistent data collection and optimal treatment outcomes for all participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- n=66 participants will be randomized into 3 different intervention groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous Rotation | Experimental | Procedure: Root canal shaping with Continuous RotationThe apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Continuous Rotation" which is the standard and mostly used option in endodontics. Works as a Control group also |
| Apical Reverse | Experimental | Procedure: Root canal shaping with Apical ReverseThe apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Reverse". The motor makes a reverse movement to prevent the file over the working length |
| Apical Slow-down | Experimental | Procedure: Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.The apical root canal shaping mode of the apex locator integrated endodontic motor is "Apical Slow-down". The motor slows down the rotation to preserve the working length and apical constriction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Mild, moderate pulpitis and pulpal expose patients in need of root canal -treatment to their mandibular premolars.
- Healthy periodontal tissue with Periapical Index under 2.
- Helathy adjacent teeth.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Systemic diseases
- Percussion pain
- Patients who did not consent to a vital pulp therapy
- Radiologically seen open apex, root resorption, calcification
- Periodontal pocket beyond 4mm in length
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Root canal shaping with Continuous RotationThe root canal shaping is conducted with a continuous rotation kinematic. | Procedure or surgery | Continuous Rotation |
| Root canal shaping with Apical ReverseThe root canal shaping is conducted with a apical reverse kinematic. | Procedure or surgery | Apical Reverse |
| Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic.The root canal shaping is conducted with a apical slow-down kinematic. | Procedure or surgery | Apical Slow-down |
Primary outcome
Substance P
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
The local Substance P amount will be assesed with ELISA kits
4 secondary outcomes
Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Inflammatory Mediator: IL-1ß
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Inflammatory Mediator: IL-6
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Inflammatory Mediator: TNF alpha
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2025.
- BackgroundCohen, J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The patients' written consent also required that the data, which involves biological markers, be used only within the experiment and not shared with a third party.
Related trials for Postoperative Dental Pain
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Not yet recruiting
PRP-Assisted Regenerative Endodontics Versus Conventional Root Canal Treatment in Mature Necrotic Teeth
Pulp Necrosis, Apical Periodontitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Submucosal Cryotherapy and Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Postoperative Pain Following Root Canal Treatment in Maxillary Molars
Pulpitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of CYT-1010 in Healthy Volunteers and Participants With Acute Pain After Third Molar Extraction
Acute Postoperative Pain, Dental Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Intracanal Cryotherapy on Pain, Anxiety, and Salivary Irisin After Root Canal Treatment
Postoperative Pain After Endodontic Treatment, Dental Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Emrah Karataşlıoğlu, PhD study chair
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Mustafa Mert Tulgar, Dmd principal investigator
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
Yağmur Kılıç, Dmd principal investigator
İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Root canal shaping with Continuous Rotation, Root canal shaping with Apical Reverse and Root canal shaping is conducted with Apical slow-down kinematic. in people with Postoperative Dental Pain and Pulp Disease, Dental, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Substance P (time frame: From Day 0 to Day 3. The last measurement will be taken just before the end of the interventional treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06760312, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.