FunctionNCT06760949
Comparative Study on Surgical Approaches for Elderly Femoral Neck Fractures
A study testing Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty and Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty in people with Function and Pain, run by Fujian Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
A prospective controlled study was conducted to include patients who received hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures at the National Regional Trauma Center in Fujian Province from February 2023 to August 2024. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 80 years and older
- What is being tested?
- Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty and Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2023to 31 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 80 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 80 years old;
- Diagnosed with unilateral femoral neck fracture through imaging examination;
- Patients who can tolerate surgery and agree to undergo surgery;
- Undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the first time;
- Able to walk independently and have intact cognitive function before the injury.
Who cannot join
- Bilateral femoral neck fractures;
- Patients with pathological fractures;
- Hip dysplasia, rheumatoid osteoarthritis, or other hip disorders;
- Patients with systemic or localized infections or inflammatory reactions at the surgical site;
- Patients with other lower limb fractures or severe injuries to other parts of the body; Patients with a history of previous hip surgery.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Single Center Prospective Controlled Study of Direct Anterior Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients
A prospective controlled study was conducted to include patients who received hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures at the National Regional Trauma Center in Fujian Province from February 2023 to August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the DAA group and the PLA group based on different surgical methods for a 3-month follow-up to compare the outcomes of the two groups. The main observation results include Harris hip joint function score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), VAS pain score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), and secondary observation results include surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, difference in HB before and after surgery, difference in CK before and after surgery, perioperative complications, difference in length of both lower limbs after surgery, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ICU occupancy rate, ICU length of stay, and total length of stay.
- Being tested
- Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty, Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty
- Keywords
- femoral neck fractures, direct anterior approach, hemiarthroplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Femoral Neck Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplastyProcedure or surgery
Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty
Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplastyProcedure or surgery
Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DAA group | Experimental | Patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing DAA-HA. Receives: Procedure: Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty |
| PLA group | Active comparator | Patients with femoral neck fractures undergoing PLA-HA. Receives: Procedure: Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Harris hip joint function score
Scores range from 100 to 0, with 90-100 being excellent, 80-89 being good, 70-79 being acceptable, and ≤69 being poor.
Measured: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
VAS pain score
The highest score is 10 and the lowest score is 0, with the following interpretations: 0 points indicating no pain; 1-3 points indicating mild pain with little impact on daily life; 4-6 points indicating moderate pain affecting daily life and sleep; 7-9 points indicating severe pain significantly affecting quality of life; and 10 points indicating unbearable, extreme pain.
Measured: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (10)
Operative time
Measured: Intraoperative
Intraoperative bleeding volume
Measured: Intraoperative
Intraoperative blood transfusion rate
Measured: Intraoperative
Hemoglobin value
Measured: Preoperative and postoperative 1 day
Blood creatine kinase value
Measured: Preoperative and postoperative 1 day
Incidence of complications
Measured: Perioperative period
Difference in length of both lower limbs
Measured: 3 days after surgery
Postoperative drainage volume
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
Hospital stay
Measured: The duration (in days) from admission to discharge, estimated to be no more than 21 days at most.
Mortality
Measured: 3 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jan 2025
- Study start1 Feb 2023
- Primary completion31 May 2025
- Study completion31 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (28)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fujian Provincial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, CHEN JIAN, Fujian Provincial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06760949
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Fujian Trauma Center
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 11 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Because of unit regulations.
Publications
Dahm F, Aichmair A, Dominkus M, Hofstaetter JG. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve lesions after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty - a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):102956. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102956. Epub 2021 May 4.
PubMed 33962046Zhao G, Zhu R, Jiang S, Xu N, Bao H, Wang Y. Using the anterior capsule of the hip joint to protect the tensor fascia lata muscle during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 11;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3035-9.
PubMed 31926554Ugland TO, Haugeberg G, Svenningsen S, Ugland SH, Berg OH, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L. Biomarkers of muscle damage increased in anterolateral compared to direct lateral approach to the hip in hemiarthroplasty: no correlation with clinical outcome : Short-term analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial in patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1853-1860. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4557-y. Epub 2018 May 22.
PubMed 29789919Dimitriou D, Helmy N, Hasler J, Flury A, Finsterwald M, Antoniadis A. The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
PubMed 30262445Oba T, Inaba Y, Saito I, Fujisawa T, Saito T. Risk factors for prolonged operative time in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty through direct anterior approach. J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):977-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
PubMed 30087014Trinh TQ, Ferrel JR, Pulley BR, Fowler TT. Short-term Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Hemiarthroplasty Using the Anterior Approach. Orthopedics. 2015 Dec;38(12):e1091-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-05.
PubMed 26652329Ding ZC, Zeng WN, Rong X, Liang ZM, Zhou ZK. Do patients with diabetes have an increased risk of impaired fracture healing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1259-1264. doi: 10.1111/ans.15878. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
PubMed 32255244Jiao H, Xiao E, Graves DT. Diabetes and Its Effect on Bone and Fracture Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015 Oct;13(5):327-35. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0286-8.
PubMed 26254939Jia P, Bao L, Chen H, Yuan J, Liu W, Feng F, Li J, Tang H. Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3113-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
PubMed 28795239Saxer F, Studer P, Jakob M, Suhm N, Rosenthal R, Dell-Kuster S, Vach W, Bless N. Minimally invasive anterior muscle-sparing versus a transgluteal approach for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures-a prospective randomised controlled trial including 190 elderly patients. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0898-9.
PubMed 30241509Verzellotti S, Candrian C, Molina M, Filardo G, Alberio R, Grassi FA. Direct anterior versus posterolateral approach for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised study. Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):810-817. doi: 10.1177/1120700019872117. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
PubMed 31450987Renken F, Renken S, Paech A, Wenzl M, Unger A, Schulz AP. Early functional results after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a randomized comparison between a minimal invasive and a conventional approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 8;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-141.
PubMed 22873207Carlson VR, Ong AC, Orozco FR, Lutz RW, Duque AF, Post ZD. The Direct Anterior Approach Does Not Increase Return to Function Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture. Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 1;40(6):e1055-e1061. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170925-08. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
PubMed 28968478Chung YY, Lee SM, Baek SN, Park TG. Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly with Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison with Conventional Posterolateral Approach. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(1):35-40. doi: 10.4055/cios21008. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
PubMed 35251539Bucs G, Dande A, Patczai B, Sebestyen A, Almasi R, Not LG, Wiegand N. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly. Injury. 2021 Mar;52 Suppl 1:S37-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.053. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
PubMed 32115214
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Single Center Prospective Controlled Study of Direct Anterior Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06760949
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Fujian Trauma Center
- Keywords
- femoral neck fractures, direct anterior approach, hemiarthroplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fujian Provincial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective controlled study was conducted to include patients who received hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures at the National Regional Trauma Center in Fujian Province from February 2023 to August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the DAA group and the PLA group based on different surgical methods for a 3-month follow-up to compare the outcomes of the two groups. The main observation results include Harris hip joint function score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), VAS pain score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), and secondary observation results include surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, difference in HB before and after surgery, difference in CK before and after surgery, perioperative complications, difference in length of both lower limbs after surgery, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ICU occupancy rate, ICU length of stay, and total length of stay.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DAA group | Experimental | Procedure: Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplastyPatients with femoral neck fractures undergoing DAA-HA. |
| PLA group | Active comparator | Procedure: Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplastyPatients with femoral neck fractures undergoing PLA-HA. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 80 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age ≥ 80 years old;
- Diagnosed with unilateral femoral neck fracture through imaging examination;
- Patients who can tolerate surgery and agree to undergo surgery;
- Undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the first time;
- Able to walk independently and have intact cognitive function before the injury.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Bilateral femoral neck fractures;
- Patients with pathological fractures;
- Hip dysplasia, rheumatoid osteoarthritis, or other hip disorders;
- Patients with systemic or localized infections or inflammatory reactions at the surgical site;
- Patients with other lower limb fractures or severe injuries to other parts of the body; Patients with a history of previous hip surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplastyDirect anterior approach hemiarthroplasty | Procedure or surgery | DAA group |
| Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplastyPosterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty | Procedure or surgery | PLA group |
Primary outcome
Harris hip joint function score
Time frame: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
Scores range from 100 to 0, with 90-100 being excellent, 80-89 being good, 70-79 being acceptable, and ≤69 being poor.
VAS pain score
Time frame: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
The highest score is 10 and the lowest score is 0, with the following interpretations: 0 points indicating no pain; 1-3 points indicating mild pain with little impact on daily life; 4-6 points indicating moderate pain affecting daily life and sleep; 7-9 points indicating severe pain significantly affecting quality of life; and 10 points indicating unbearable, extreme pain.
10 secondary outcomes
Operative time
Time frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative bleeding volume
Time frame: Intraoperative
Intraoperative blood transfusion rate
Time frame: Intraoperative
Hemoglobin value
Time frame: Preoperative and postoperative 1 day
Blood creatine kinase value
Time frame: Preoperative and postoperative 1 day
Incidence of complications
Time frame: Perioperative period
Difference in length of both lower limbs
Time frame: 3 days after surgery
Postoperative drainage volume
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
Hospital stay
Time frame: The duration (in days) from admission to discharge, estimated to be no more than 21 days at most.
Mortality
Time frame: 3 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jun 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 33962046Dahm F, Aichmair A, Dominkus M, Hofstaetter JG. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve lesions after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty - a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):102956. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102956. Epub 2021 May 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 31926554Zhao G, Zhu R, Jiang S, Xu N, Bao H, Wang Y. Using the anterior capsule of the hip joint to protect the tensor fascia lata muscle during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 11;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3035-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 29789919Ugland TO, Haugeberg G, Svenningsen S, Ugland SH, Berg OH, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L. Biomarkers of muscle damage increased in anterolateral compared to direct lateral approach to the hip in hemiarthroplasty: no correlation with clinical outcome : Short-term analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial in patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1853-1860. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4557-y. Epub 2018 May 22.
- Results publication: PubMed 30262445Dimitriou D, Helmy N, Hasler J, Flury A, Finsterwald M, Antoniadis A. The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 30087014Oba T, Inaba Y, Saito I, Fujisawa T, Saito T. Risk factors for prolonged operative time in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty through direct anterior approach. J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):977-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 26652329Trinh TQ, Ferrel JR, Pulley BR, Fowler TT. Short-term Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Hemiarthroplasty Using the Anterior Approach. Orthopedics. 2015 Dec;38(12):e1091-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-05.
- Results publication: PubMed 32255244Ding ZC, Zeng WN, Rong X, Liang ZM, Zhou ZK. Do patients with diabetes have an increased risk of impaired fracture healing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1259-1264. doi: 10.1111/ans.15878. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 26254939Jiao H, Xiao E, Graves DT. Diabetes and Its Effect on Bone and Fracture Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015 Oct;13(5):327-35. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0286-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 28795239Jia P, Bao L, Chen H, Yuan J, Liu W, Feng F, Li J, Tang H. Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3113-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 30241509Saxer F, Studer P, Jakob M, Suhm N, Rosenthal R, Dell-Kuster S, Vach W, Bless N. Minimally invasive anterior muscle-sparing versus a transgluteal approach for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures-a prospective randomised controlled trial including 190 elderly patients. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0898-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 31450987Verzellotti S, Candrian C, Molina M, Filardo G, Alberio R, Grassi FA. Direct anterior versus posterolateral approach for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised study. Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):810-817. doi: 10.1177/1120700019872117. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 22873207Renken F, Renken S, Paech A, Wenzl M, Unger A, Schulz AP. Early functional results after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a randomized comparison between a minimal invasive and a conventional approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 8;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-141.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Because of unit regulations.
Related trials for Function
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Developing Transcranial Neuromodulation Protocols for Learning and Decision-Making
Normal Physiology
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty and Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty in people with Function and Pain, run by Fujian Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Harris hip joint function score (time frame: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06760949, which also lists 28 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2025.