AzTrials
AzTrials

FunctionNCT06760949

Comparative Study on Surgical Approaches for Elderly Femoral Neck Fractures

A study testing Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty and Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty in people with Function and Pain, run by Fujian Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective controlled study was conducted to include patients who received hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures at the National Regional Trauma Center in Fujian Province from February 2023 to August 2024. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 80 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Function, Pain
What is being tested?
Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty and Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Feb 2023to 31 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 80 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 80 years old;
  • Diagnosed with unilateral femoral neck fracture through imaging examination;
  • Patients who can tolerate surgery and agree to undergo surgery;
  • Undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the first time;
  • Able to walk independently and have intact cognitive function before the injury.

Who cannot join

  • Bilateral femoral neck fractures;
  • Patients with pathological fractures;
  • Hip dysplasia, rheumatoid osteoarthritis, or other hip disorders;
  • Patients with systemic or localized infections or inflammatory reactions at the surgical site;
  • Patients with other lower limb fractures or severe injuries to other parts of the body; Patients with a history of previous hip surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Fujian Provincial Hospital Trauma Center

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Single Center Prospective Controlled Study of Direct Anterior Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients

A prospective controlled study was conducted to include patients who received hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures at the National Regional Trauma Center in Fujian Province from February 2023 to August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the DAA group and the PLA group based on different surgical methods for a 3-month follow-up to compare the outcomes of the two groups. The main observation results include Harris hip joint function score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), VAS pain score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), and secondary observation results include surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, difference in HB before and after surgery, difference in CK before and after surgery, perioperative complications, difference in length of both lower limbs after surgery, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ICU occupancy rate, ICU length of stay, and total length of stay.

Conditions
Function, Pain
Being tested
Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty, Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty
Keywords
femoral neck fractures, direct anterior approach, hemiarthroplasty
Medical subject headings
Pain, Femoral Neck Fractures

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplastyProcedure or surgery

    Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty

  • Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplastyProcedure or surgery

    Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty

Study groups in NCT06760949
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DAA groupExperimentalPatients with femoral neck fractures undergoing DAA-HA.
Receives: Procedure: Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty
PLA groupActive comparatorPatients with femoral neck fractures undergoing PLA-HA.
Receives: Procedure: Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Harris hip joint function score

    Scores range from 100 to 0, with 90-100 being excellent, 80-89 being good, 70-79 being acceptable, and ≤69 being poor.

    Measured: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery

  2. VAS pain score

    The highest score is 10 and the lowest score is 0, with the following interpretations: 0 points indicating no pain; 1-3 points indicating mild pain with little impact on daily life; 4-6 points indicating moderate pain affecting daily life and sleep; 7-9 points indicating severe pain significantly affecting quality of life; and 10 points indicating unbearable, extreme pain.

    Measured: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Operative time

    Measured: Intraoperative

  2. Intraoperative bleeding volume

    Measured: Intraoperative

  3. Intraoperative blood transfusion rate

    Measured: Intraoperative

  4. Hemoglobin value

    Measured: Preoperative and postoperative 1 day

  5. Blood creatine kinase value

    Measured: Preoperative and postoperative 1 day

  6. Incidence of complications

    Measured: Perioperative period

  7. Difference in length of both lower limbs

    Measured: 3 days after surgery

  8. Postoperative drainage volume

    Measured: 24 hours after surgery

  9. Hospital stay

    Measured: The duration (in days) from admission to discharge, estimated to be no more than 21 days at most.

  10. Mortality

    Measured: 3 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2025
  2. Study start1 Feb 2023
  3. Primary completion31 May 2025
  4. Study completion31 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06760949
Sponsor's protocol ID
Fujian Trauma Center
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
20 Dec 2024
Last updated
11 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Because of unit regulations.

Publications

  • Dahm F, Aichmair A, Dominkus M, Hofstaetter JG. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve lesions after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty - a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):102956. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102956. Epub 2021 May 4.

    PubMed 33962046
  • Zhao G, Zhu R, Jiang S, Xu N, Bao H, Wang Y. Using the anterior capsule of the hip joint to protect the tensor fascia lata muscle during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 11;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3035-9.

    PubMed 31926554
  • Ugland TO, Haugeberg G, Svenningsen S, Ugland SH, Berg OH, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L. Biomarkers of muscle damage increased in anterolateral compared to direct lateral approach to the hip in hemiarthroplasty: no correlation with clinical outcome : Short-term analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial in patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1853-1860. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4557-y. Epub 2018 May 22.

    PubMed 29789919
  • Dimitriou D, Helmy N, Hasler J, Flury A, Finsterwald M, Antoniadis A. The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

    PubMed 30262445
  • Oba T, Inaba Y, Saito I, Fujisawa T, Saito T. Risk factors for prolonged operative time in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty through direct anterior approach. J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):977-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4.

    PubMed 30087014
  • Trinh TQ, Ferrel JR, Pulley BR, Fowler TT. Short-term Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Hemiarthroplasty Using the Anterior Approach. Orthopedics. 2015 Dec;38(12):e1091-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-05.

    PubMed 26652329
  • Ding ZC, Zeng WN, Rong X, Liang ZM, Zhou ZK. Do patients with diabetes have an increased risk of impaired fracture healing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1259-1264. doi: 10.1111/ans.15878. Epub 2020 Apr 7.

    PubMed 32255244
  • Jiao H, Xiao E, Graves DT. Diabetes and Its Effect on Bone and Fracture Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015 Oct;13(5):327-35. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0286-8.

    PubMed 26254939
  • Jia P, Bao L, Chen H, Yuan J, Liu W, Feng F, Li J, Tang H. Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3113-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

    PubMed 28795239
  • Saxer F, Studer P, Jakob M, Suhm N, Rosenthal R, Dell-Kuster S, Vach W, Bless N. Minimally invasive anterior muscle-sparing versus a transgluteal approach for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures-a prospective randomised controlled trial including 190 elderly patients. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0898-9.

    PubMed 30241509
  • Verzellotti S, Candrian C, Molina M, Filardo G, Alberio R, Grassi FA. Direct anterior versus posterolateral approach for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised study. Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):810-817. doi: 10.1177/1120700019872117. Epub 2019 Aug 26.

    PubMed 31450987
  • Renken F, Renken S, Paech A, Wenzl M, Unger A, Schulz AP. Early functional results after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a randomized comparison between a minimal invasive and a conventional approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 8;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-141.

    PubMed 22873207
  • Carlson VR, Ong AC, Orozco FR, Lutz RW, Duque AF, Post ZD. The Direct Anterior Approach Does Not Increase Return to Function Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture. Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 1;40(6):e1055-e1061. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170925-08. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

    PubMed 28968478
  • Chung YY, Lee SM, Baek SN, Park TG. Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly with Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison with Conventional Posterolateral Approach. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(1):35-40. doi: 10.4055/cios21008. Epub 2022 Jan 21.

    PubMed 35251539
  • Bucs G, Dande A, Patczai B, Sebestyen A, Almasi R, Not LG, Wiegand N. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly. Injury. 2021 Mar;52 Suppl 1:S37-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.053. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

    PubMed 32115214

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty and Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty in people with Function and Pain, run by Fujian Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Harris hip joint function score (time frame: 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06760949, which also lists 28 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in