AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT06761638

Comparative Impact of RAST and TST for Improving Motor Functions in Stroke Patients

A study testing Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Therapy and Task-Specific Training in people with Stroke, run by Superior University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) therapy versus Task-Specific Training (TST) in enhancing motor function recovery in stroke patients. RAS uses rhythmic cues to aid movement synchronization, while TST focuses on practicing daily tasks to improve functional ability. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Therapy and Task-Specific Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
15 Feb 2024to 1 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female patients diagnosed with stroke
  • Age 40-80 years (46)
  • Patients having first ever stroke occurrence
  • Moderate motor function impairments (47)
  • Patients able to follow instruction

Who cannot join

  • Patients with severe motor impairments
  • Patients who had cognitive impairments
  • Patients having other neurological conditions and musculoskeletal disorders
  • Patients having history of surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Azra Naheed Medical College, Superior University

    Lahore, Punjab Province

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparative Impact of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Therapy and Task Specific Training for Improving Motor Functions in Stroke Patients

This study evaluates the effectiveness of Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation (RAS) therapy versus Task-Specific Training (TST) in enhancing motor function recovery in stroke patients. RAS uses rhythmic cues to aid movement synchronization, while TST focuses on practicing daily tasks to improve functional ability. In a randomized clinical trial, participants were assigned to either RAS or TST groups, with both receiving structured sessions over several weeks.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Therapy, Task-Specific Training
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation TherapyCombination product

    Rhythmic auditory stimulation (RAS) is a therapeutic technique that uses rhythmic auditory cues, like a metronome or music, to improve motor control and coordination. It is often used in rehabilitation for conditions such as stroke, Parkinson's disease, and other movement disorders to enhance gait and other motor functions through the synchronization of movements to auditory rhythms.

  • Task-Specific TrainingCombination product

    Task-specific training is a rehabilitation approach that involves practicing specific tasks or activities to improve the performance of those tasks. It is based on the principle that repetitive practice of functional tasks enhances neuroplasticity, leading to better motor skills and functional recovery, especially in stroke and neurological rehabilitation.

Study groups in NCT06761638
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation TherapyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Combination Product: Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Therapy
Task-Specific TrainingExperimentalNot described
Receives: Combination Product: Task-Specific Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Modified Barthel index

    The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) is a crucial tool for assessing functional independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) among patients, particularly those recovering from stroke or other debilitating conditions. It evaluates 10 key self-care and mobility tasks, including feeding, bathing, grooming, dressing, and mobility. Each task is scored based on the level of assistance required, with total scores ranging from 0 (complete dependence) to 100 (complete independence). Higher scores indicate greater independence.

    Measured: 12 Months

  2. Goniometer

    A goniometer is an instrument used to measure the angle of joints in the body, typically to assess the range of motion (ROM). It is commonly used in physical therapy, rehabilitation, and orthopedics to evaluate joint function and monitor progress in patients recovering from injury or surgery. Range of motions of upper limb measured through this goniometer."

    Measured: 12 Months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jan 2025
  2. Study start15 Feb 2024
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion1 Mar 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06761638
Sponsor's protocol ID
MSRSW/Batch-Fall22/760
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
26 Dec 2024
Last updated
7 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation Therapy and Task-Specific Training in people with Stroke, run by Superior University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Modified Barthel index (time frame: 12 Months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in