AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Non-Specific Low Back PainNCT06762951

Pilates Mat Versus Segmental Control Exercises In Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

A study testing Pilates mat exercices and Traditional physical therapy in people with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study sought to determine the effect of Pilates exercises versus segmental control exercises on spinopelvic angles, pain intensity, and functional disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Pilates mat exercices and Traditional physical therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Feb 2025to 1 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age group: 18 to 65 years. (Yentür et al., 2021)
  • Both male and female gender will be included in the study. (Akhtar et al., 2017)
  • Nonspecific, non-radicular (axial) chronic LBP diagnosis with hyperlordosis (LBP for at least three months). (Kızıltaş et al., 2022)
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score of 3 or higher. (Mannion et al., 2009)

Who cannot join

  • Patients with acute attacks of LBP. (Caglayan et al.,2014)
  • Pain referred from the lumbar to the lower extremities.
  • Serious spinal disorder including malignancy, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, cauda equina compression, and infection.
  • Fracture of vertebrae, and administered epidural injection. (Sarker et al., 2020)
  • Pregnancy and feeding
  • Structural abnormalities in the lumbar region
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Surgical history in the lumbar spine area
  • Heart disease. (Kızıltaş et al., 2022)
  • History of Vestibular dysfunction
  • Regular Pilates/any other specific exercise program in the last 3 months. (Mehta et al.,2022)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Cairo Univercity

    Giza

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Pilates Mat Versus Segmental Control Exercises On Spinopelvic Angles In Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

This study sought to determine the effect of Pilates exercises versus segmental control exercises on spinopelvic angles, pain intensity, and functional disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) is the most common musculoskeletal condition and constitutes a global public health problem. The majority of patients (up to 90%) are categorized as having nonspecific low back pain, which is described as symptoms lack of clear particular reasons, i.e., beginning of low back pain is not known. Many clinical guidelines and systematic reviews have recommended exercise therapy as one of the preferred treatments at decreasing pain and improving function in NSLBP. In the last decade, the Pilates method has become one of the most popular exercise programmes incorporated in clinical practice. Therapeutic exercises, specifically Segmental control exercises, decrease pain, reduce disability, improve quality of life, increase muscular endurance and strength, improve segmental stability, and reduce risk of injury. Studies have shown that both segmental control exercises and Pilate's exercises are effective in the management of pain and disability in individuals with Chronic LBP. However, it appears there is dearth of empirical data establishing which is more effective between the segmental control exercises and Pilates exercises on individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain. Thus, there exist certain gaps involving the two therapeutic techniques. Therefore, this study sought to determine the effect of Pilates exercises versus segmental control exercises on spinopelvic angles, pain intensity, and functional disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain.

Being tested
Pilates mat exercices, Segmental control exercises, Traditional physical therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pilates mat exercicesOther

    Pilates mat exercise which consists of (single leg stretch + Pelvic press + Swimming + Opposite arm and leg reach + Side to side), 3 sets of 10 repetitions.

  • Segmental control exercisesOther

    Segmental control exercise which consists of (Segmental control over primary stabilizers, Exercises in closed chain, and Exercises in open chain)

  • Traditional physical therapyOther

    Traditional physical therapy eg. (Back, hamstring, calf and hip flexors stretches, Abdominal curl-up exercise in supine, Back extensors exercise in prone, and Hip extensors exercises in prone along with ultrasound and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Study groups in NCT06762951
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group (A)ExperimentalGroup (A): Twenty patients will receive Pilates mat exercise which consists of (single leg stretch + Pelvic press + Swimming + Opposite arm and leg reach + Side to side), 3 sets of 10 repetitions. And conventional physiotherapy treatment which consists of traditional physical therapy eg. (Back, hamstring, calf and hip flexors stretches, Abdominal curl-up exercise in supine, Back extensors exercise in prone, and Hip extensors exercises in prone along with ultrasound and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), two sessions per week for six weeks.
Receives: Other: Pilates mat exercices; Other: Traditional physical therapy
Group (B)ExperimentalGroup B: Twenty patients will receive Segmental control exercise which consists of (Segmental control over primary stabilizers, Exercises in closed chain, and Exercises in open chain) and conventional physiotherapy treatment which consists of traditional physical therapy eg. (Back, hamstring, calf and hip flexors stretches, Abdominal curl-up exercise in supine, Back extensors exercise in prone, and Hip extensors exercises in prone along with ultrasound and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), two sessions per week for six weeks
Receives: Other: Segmental control exercises; Other: Traditional physical therapy
Group (C)Active comparatorGroup C: Twenty patients will receive conventional physiotherapy treatment only which consists of traditional physical therapy eg. (Back, hamstring, calf and hip flexors stretches, Abdominal curl-up exercise in supine, Back extensors exercise in prone, and Hip extensors exercises in prone along with ultrasound and Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), two sessions per week for six weeks.
Receives: Other: Traditional physical therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Spinopelvic angels

    Spinopelvic angles consists of (Sacral slope, lumber lordosis, pelvic incidence, and pelvic tilt) from the X-ray picture of the lateral view of the lumbosacral region by using CorelDraw graphic suits X7 software program. (Bhosale et al.2020)

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity by using a Visual analogue scale (VAS). (Begum, and Hossain 2019)

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Functional disability

    Functional disability by using the Oswestry disability questionnaire. (Koivunen et al., 2024)

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2025
  2. Study start1 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion1 Apr 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06762951
Sponsor's protocol ID
Spinopelvic Angels In CNSLBP
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
2 Jan 2025
Last updated
30 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Dimitrijevic V, Scepanovic T, Milankov V, Milankov M, Drid P. Effects of Corrective Exercises on Lumbar Lordotic Angle Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 18;19(8):4906. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084906.

    PubMed 35457772
  • Tamartash H, Bahrpeyma F. Evaluation of Lumbar Myofascial Release Effects on Lumbar Flexion Angle and Pelvic Inclination Angle in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2022 Mar 2;15(1):15-22. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v15i1.709. eCollection 2022 Mar.

    PubMed 35280247
  • Koivunen K, Widbom-Kolhanen S, Pernaa K, Arokoski J, Saltychev M. Reliability and validity of Oswestry Disability Index among patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery. BMC Surg. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02307-w.

    PubMed 38172794
  • Bhosale S, Pinto D, Srivastava S, Purohit S, Gautham S, Marathe N. Measurement of spinopelvic parameters in healthy adults of Indian origin - A cross sectional study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Sep-Oct;11(5):883-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.07.013. Epub 2019 Jul 23.

    PubMed 32879575
  • Huang C, Hsieh YL, Chou LW, Wang JL, Chien A. Effects of pilates exercises on radiographic lumbo-pelvic alignment and range of motion in non-specific low back pain patients. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Apr;38:339-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.10.004. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

    PubMed 38763578

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pilates mat exercices and Traditional physical therapy in people with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Spinopelvic angels (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06762951, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in