Nociceptive PainNCT06763653
Ultra Low Frequency Neuromodulation for Nociceptive Chronic Low Back Pain
A study testing ULF therapy and CMM in people with Nociceptive Pain and Axial Back Pain, run by Presidio Medical, Inc at 3 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) neuromodulation works to treat nociceptive chronic low back pain in adults. It will also evaluate the safety of ULF therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nociceptive Pain, Axial Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- ULF therapy and CMM
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 303 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- 17 Jan 2025to Apr 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic, intractable nociceptive axial low back pain with or without leg pain (VAS ≥6 cm for back pain over 7 days) for a minimum of 3 months.
- Symptoms have failed to respond adequately to conservative therapies, including: physical therapy/exercise, medications, and interventional therapies.
- Back pain greater than leg pain.
- ODI score ≥30 and ≤80.
- On stable pain medications or on no pain medications.
- Considered medically stable and a suitable surgical candidate.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Able to operate the device.
- Willing to sign the Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC)/Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent form.
- Willing and deemed capable of complying with the requirements of the study protocol, including attending all scheduled visits.
- Twenty-two (22) years of age or older.
- Able to complete questionnaires independently.
Who cannot join
- Have a systemic condition or disease not stabilized or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with participation in the study.
- Suffer from severe cognitive impairment that would impair ability to complete subject questionnaires or operation of the device.
- Diagnosed with an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance, intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as assessed by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist.
- Presence of spinal stenosis, structural spinal abnormality, or spinal instrumentation observed on MRI or CT that would make lead placement unsafe or untowardly difficult.
- Previous experience with neuromodulation devices for pain.
- Opioid usage with average total daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) of >100 mg.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Have an untreated addiction to alcohol or other drugs within 6 months of screening visit.
- Have a cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, or another implanted electronic device.
- Have a known hypersensitivity to any of the procedural agents or materials in the study device that is inserted into the subject.
- Have a known need for an MRI or surgery through the end of the study.
- Candidates of child-bearing potential cannot be pregnant nor plan to become pregnant during the study.
- Diagnosed with untreated malicious or malignant neoplasms or have a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
- Be participating in another interventional clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Australia3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Monash House Research Centre
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Paul Verills, MBBS, (03) 8394 0700, info@monashhouse.com.au
Paul Verrills, MBBS
- Recruiting
The International Spine Centre
Norwood, South Australia, 5067
James Swift, +61 8 8223 4055, JSwift@3dresearch.au
YH Yau, MBChB FRCSEd FCSHK DIMCRCSEd
- Recruiting
CerCare Pty Ltd
Wayville, South Australia
Helen Plummer, +61 8 8340 7733, helen@painmedsa.com
Matthew Green, BMBS
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ultra Low Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Plus Conservative Medical Management (CMM) to CMM Alone in the Treatment of Chronic Axial Low Back Pain With Prominent Nociceptive Etiology - The FULFILL Study
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) neuromodulation works to treat nociceptive chronic low back pain in adults. It will also evaluate the safety of ULF therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does ULF neuromodulation reduce chronic low back pain?
- What, if any, unexpected medical problems do participants experience when treated with ULF neuromodulation?
Read more
Researchers will compare ULF therapy to conventional treatments for chronic low back pain. Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to either the study device or to conventional medical treatments
- Undergo standard surgical procedures to place the study device if assigned to the device arm
- Attend regular clinic visits over 24 months for checkups and data collection
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial in which subjects with chronic, intractable axial low back pain with prominent nociceptive features will be randomized 2:1 into either Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) therapy combined with conventional medical management (CMM) or CMM alone. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of ULF neuromodulation to CMM in Subjects with chronic, intractable axial low back pain with prominent nociceptive features over a 24-month period.
Subjects assigned to CMM will continue with further optimization of the best available medical treatments. Subjects assigned to ULF therapy will proceed with a temporary trial phase and be eligible for permanent device implant if they experience at least 50% back pain relief. An option to cross over to the alternative treatment arm will be permitted at the 6-month timepoint for subjects who meet the criteria. The study primary endpoint will be evaluated at 3 months and follow-up will continue for 24 months total.
- Conditions
- Nociceptive Pain, Axial Back Pain
- Being tested
- ULF therapy, CMM
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Spinal cord stimulation, Chronic low back pain
- Medical subject headings
- Nociceptive Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ULF therapyDevice
ultra low frequency spinal cord stimulation
CMMOther
conventional medical management
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ULF therapy plus CMM | Experimental | An implanted SCS device delivering ultra low frequency neuromodulation Receives: Device: ULF therapy; Other: CMM |
| CMM alone | Active comparator | Conventional medical management Receives: Other: CMM |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Back pain VAS responder rate at 3 months
Comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants achieving at least 50% back pain relief from baseline, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (12)
Composite of back pain relief measured by VAS and functional improvement measured by ODI at 6 months
Comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants who are both back pain responders (at least 50% relief from baseline VAS) and have at least a 10 point improvement in disability from baseline as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Measured: 6 months
Back pain VAS responder rate at 6 months
Comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants achieving at least 50% back pain relief from baseline, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 6 months
Functional improvement measured by ODI at 6 months
Comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants who have at least a 10 point improvement in disability from baseline as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Measured: 6 months
Average change in back pain VAS at 3 months
Comparison between the groups in the average percentage change from baseline in back pain intensity, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 3 months
Average change in back pain VAS at 6 months
Comparison between the groups in the average percentage change from baseline in back pain intensity, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 6 months
Average change in disability measured by ODI at 3 months
Comparison between the groups in the average change from baseline in disability, measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Measured: 3 months
Average change in disability measured by ODI at 6 months
Comparison between the groups in the average change from baseline in disability, measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
Measured: 6 months
Average change in health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L at 6 months
Comparison between the groups in the average change from baseline in health-related quality of life, measured by the EuroQol Index (EQ-5D-5L).
Measured: 6 months
Back pain VAS remitter rate at 6 months
Comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants achieving back pain remission from baseline, defined as a score of 3 cm or less for 6 consecutive months, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 6 months
Leg pain VAS responder rate at 3 months
Among subjects with baseline leg pain VAS of at least 5 cm, comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants achieving at least 50% leg pain relief from baseline, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 3 months
Leg pain VAS responder rate at 6 months
Among subjects with baseline leg pain VAS of at least 5 cm, comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants achieving at least 50% leg pain relief from baseline, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
Measured: 6 months
Average change in opioid dose at 6 months
Comparison between the groups in the average change from baseline in opioid equivalent medication dosage.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2025
- Study start17 Jan 2025
- Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nociceptive PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Option to crossover to alternate treatment arm at 6 months
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 303 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Presidio Medical, Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06763653
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PMH-006
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Ultra Low Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Plus Conservative Medical Management (CMM) to CMM Alone in the Treatment of Chronic Axial Low Back Pain With Prominent Nociceptive Etiology - The FULFILL Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06763653
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PMH-006
- Conditions
- Nociceptive Pain, Axial Back Pain
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Spinal cord stimulation, Chronic low back pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 303 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Presidio Medical, IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) neuromodulation works to treat nociceptive chronic low back pain in adults. It will also evaluate the safety of ULF therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does ULF neuromodulation reduce chronic low back pain?
- What, if any, unexpected medical problems do participants experience when treated with ULF neuromodulation?
Researchers will compare ULF therapy to conventional treatments for chronic low back pain. Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to either the study device or to conventional medical treatments
- Undergo standard surgical procedures to place the study device if assigned to the device arm
- Attend regular clinic visits over 24 months for checkups and data collection
Detailed description
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled trial in which subjects with chronic, intractable axial low back pain with prominent nociceptive features will be randomized 2:1 into either Ultra Low Frequency (ULF) therapy combined with conventional medical management (CMM) or CMM alone. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of ULF neuromodulation to CMM in Subjects with chronic, intractable axial low back pain with prominent nociceptive features over a 24-month period.
Subjects assigned to CMM will continue with further optimization of the best available medical treatments. Subjects assigned to ULF therapy will proceed with a temporary trial phase and be eligible for permanent device implant if they experience at least 50% back pain relief. An option to cross over to the alternative treatment arm will be permitted at the 6-month timepoint for subjects who meet the criteria. The study primary endpoint will be evaluated at 3 months and follow-up will continue for 24 months total.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Option to crossover to alternate treatment arm at 6 months
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ULF therapy plus CMM | Experimental | Device: ULF therapy, Other: CMMAn implanted SCS device delivering ultra low frequency neuromodulation |
| CMM alone | Active comparator | Other: CMMConventional medical management |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Chronic, intractable nociceptive axial low back pain with or without leg pain (VAS ≥6 cm for back pain over 7 days) for a minimum of 3 months.
- Symptoms have failed to respond adequately to conservative therapies, including: physical therapy/exercise, medications, and interventional therapies.
- Back pain greater than leg pain.
- ODI score ≥30 and ≤80.
- On stable pain medications or on no pain medications.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Have a systemic condition or disease not stabilized or judged by the investigator to be incompatible with participation in the study.
- Suffer from severe cognitive impairment that would impair ability to complete subject questionnaires or operation of the device.
- Diagnosed with an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance, intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as assessed by a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist.
- Presence of spinal stenosis, structural spinal abnormality, or spinal instrumentation observed on MRI or CT that would make lead placement unsafe or untowardly difficult.
- Previous experience with neuromodulation devices for pain.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ULF therapyultra low frequency spinal cord stimulation | Device | ULF therapy plus CMM |
| CMMconventional medical management | Other | CMM alone, ULF therapy plus CMM |
Primary outcome
Back pain VAS responder rate at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Comparison between the groups of the proportion of participants achieving at least 50% back pain relief from baseline, measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS).
12 secondary outcomes
Composite of back pain relief measured by VAS and functional improvement measured by ODI at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Back pain VAS responder rate at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Functional improvement measured by ODI at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Average change in back pain VAS at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Average change in back pain VAS at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Average change in disability measured by ODI at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Average change in disability measured by ODI at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Average change in health-related quality of life assessed by EQ-5D-5L at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Back pain VAS remitter rate at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Leg pain VAS responder rate at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Leg pain VAS responder rate at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Average change in opioid dose at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Nociceptive Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Consciousness Depth (qCON) and Analgesia Depth (qNOX) Indices in General Anesthesia
Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585), Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Overlapping Pain Trajectory Study
Migraine, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruiting
TAP vs. ESP Blocks for Post-Cesarean Analgesia
Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ULF therapy and CMM in people with Nociceptive Pain and Axial Back Pain, run by Presidio Medical, Inc at 3 sites in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Valerie Cimmarusti (+1 (626) 353-8667, vcimmarusti@presidiomedical.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Back pain VAS responder rate at 3 months (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2025.