AzTrials
AzTrials

Androgenetic AlopeciaPhase 1/2NCT06764329

The Effectiveness of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapy on Hair Regrowth in Androgenetic Alopecia.

A Phase 1/2 study testing Mesenchymal Stem Cells and 0.9 % saline in people with Androgenetic Alopecia and Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA), run by National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), Pakistan at 2 sites in Pakistan.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to learn if mesenchymal stem cell therapy (treatment group) can effectively treat adrogenic alopecia or male-pattern baldness, when compared to normal saline (given to placebo group). It will also assess the differences in patient satisfaction. The main focus will be to: 1. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 59 years, men only
What is being tested?
Mesenchymal Stem Cells and 0.9 % saline
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
70 participants
Where
2 sitesPakistan
Study dates
25 Dec 2024to 30 Aug 2025
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 59 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male patients with AGA between age 25 to 59 years of age
  • Clinical presentation consistent with Hamilton Norwood criteria grade ll to Vl
  • Not currently receiving antiandrogens or minoxidil therapy.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with hair loss other than AGA
  • Patients receiving 5-alpha reductase inhibitor or minoxidil therapy
  • Patients who received PRP for at least 6 months prior to enrollment
  • History of hypertrophic scars or bleeding disorders
  • History of treatment with hyper or hypothyroidism

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Pakistan2 sites
  • Department of dermatology, Pak-Emirates Military Hospital

    Rawalpindi, 46000

  • National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT)

    Rawalpindi, 46000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: The Effectiveness of Allogenic Mesenchymal Stem Cells Therapy on Hair Regrowth in Androgenetic Alopecia: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control Trial

The goal of this study is to learn if mesenchymal stem cell therapy (treatment group) can effectively treat adrogenic alopecia or male-pattern baldness, when compared to normal saline (given to placebo group). It will also assess the differences in patient satisfaction. The main focus will be to:

  1. Compare the average hair regenerative effect of mesenchymal stem cells versus Placebo, in treatment of androgenetic alopecia.
  2. To determine and compare the investigators assessment and patient satisfaction in both groups.

Patients in treatment group will receive single session of MSC therapy injected in the scalp and placebo group will receive 0.9% saline solution. The participants will be followed for 12 weeks. The hair density and thickness will be mesured along with clinicians assessment and participant's satisfaction level.

Read the detailed description
  1. Introduction: Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA) is a common form of hair loss affecting both men and women, characterized by the miniaturization of hair follicles due to the influence of a variety of factors including androgens and genetics. AGA affects a sizeable portion of the population worldwide, affecting males and females both.1 While many accept it as a normal physiological process of ageing, for others it causes remarkable concern and worry, especially pertaining to personal appearance and self-confidence. So much so leading to body image issues and even psychological disorders1,2,3. Hence it becomes empirical to treat this condition with aim to achieve patient satisfaction. Current treatment options, such as minoxidil and finasteride, have limitations in efficacy and number of adverse effects which limit their use.1 Mesenchymal derived stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a potential therapeutic option due to their regenerative and immunomodulatory properties.1 Cell-based therapy has seen a significant rise as an alternative for treating medical disorders in recent years. Specifically, stem cell therapy has been applied to address various dermatological conditions, including alopecia. Stem cells (SCs) are known to play a crucial role in initiating the hair growth cycle and remodeling.1 Emerging evidence suggests that stem cells may be responsible for releasing cytokines, chemokines, and specific growth factors like bFGF, VEGF, IGF-1, HGF, and TGF-β1. These molecules initiate cell repair processes through angiogenesis, immunomodulation, cell differentiation, and proliferation. In the scalp, they exert a paracrine effect on neighboring cells and tissues, promoting hair follicle growth, adjusting hair growth patterns, regulating follicle size via angiogenesis, and supporting the retention of the anagen phase.2,3 A RCT comparing Adipose derived Stem Cell Constituent Extract (ADSC-CE) with Placebo (Distilled water), carried out at Busan National University Yangsan Hospital, Korea showed significant statistical improvement in mean hair count and mean hair diameter in Intervention Group (IG) versus Control Group (CG) 16 weeks post treatment. Change from baseline in Hair Diameter was 0.008 ± 0.007 in IG versus 0.004 ± 0.004 in CG with p value of .023. Change from baseline in Hair counts was 3.89 ± 3.01 in IG versus 1.44 ± 1.97 in CG with p value of .025. In investigator assessment using photographs, intervention failed to show a statistically significant improvement in both groups. In the participants self-assessments, no significant intergroup differences were observed.3 Based on above evidence, there is a vast avenue of research in potential role of MSCs therapy in AGA, as an emerging approach.1,2,3 This study has the potential to pave the way for further advancements in regenerative medicine. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MSCs in the treatment of AGA through a double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT). As current treatments offer limited success, this study is directed to explore potential for a novel, minimally invasive alternative with long term effectiveness and improved outcomes in hair loss management, especially in our population, addressing an unmet clinical need.
  2. OBJECTIVE i. To compare the mean hair regenerative effect of Mesenchymal derived stem cells (MSCs) versus Placebo, in treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). ii. To determine and compare the investigators assessment and patient satisfaction in both groups.
Being tested
Mesenchymal Stem Cells, 0.9 % saline
Keywords
androgenetic alopecia, mesenchymal stem cell, placebo-controlled trial
Medical subject headings
Alopecia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mesenchymal Stem CellsBiological

    allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells therapy

  • 0.9 % salineOther

    0.9% Saline as placebo

Study groups in NCT06764329
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TreatmentExperimentalMSC therapy group
Receives: Biological: Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Placebo groupPlacebo comparatorPlacebo (0.9% saline)
Receives: Other: 0.9 % saline

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes from baseline in hair count

    Primary efficacy variables will be the changes from baseline in hair count

    Measured: 12 weeks post intervention

  2. Change in baseline hair diameter

    Change in baseline diameter measured through trichoscopic analysis.

    Measured: 12 weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Investigators assessment through photographs of patients' scalp

    investigators assessment through photographs of patients' scalp pre- and post-intervention. An investigator, blinded to the intervention, will rate the changes in scalp appearance relative to the baseline using a standardized 7-point rating scale with the following scores:

    • 3 Greatly decreased
    • 2 Moderately decreased
    • 1 Slightly decreased 0 Unchanged
    • 1 Slightly increased
    • 2 Moderately increased
    • 3 Greatly increased

    Measured: 12 weeks post-intervention

  2. Subjective satisfaction of the patient

    Likert scale: subjective satisfaction of the patient, assessed through standardized questions regarding reduction in hair fall and new hair growth.

    Changes from baseline in terms of reduction in hairfall and new hair growth will be evaluated by the participants on a 5 point Likert Scale, post treatment (week 12).

    1. Extremely Dissatisfied 4. Satisfied 3. Neutral 2. Dissatisfied
    2. Extremely Dissatisfied

    Measured: 12 weeks post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jan 2025
  2. Study start25 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
70 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06764329
Sponsor's protocol ID
AFBMTC-2024-MSC in Alopecia
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
24 Dec 2024
Last updated
8 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Mesenchymal Stem Cells and 0.9 % saline in people with Androgenetic Alopecia and Androgenetic Alopecia (AGA), run by National Institute of Blood and Marrow Transplant (NIBMT), Pakistan at 2 sites in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes from baseline in hair count (time frame: 12 weeks post intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in