Adenomyosis of UterusNCT06765512
Artificial Intelligence-Based Machine Learning to Diagnose and Classify Adenomyosis from Ultrasound Scans: a Multicentre Model Development Study
An observational study of Adenomyosis of Uterus, run by CARE Fertility UK at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to use the vast dataset of annotated ultrasound images of normal uterus and of adenomyosis of varying severity to train a neural network using deep learning framework (Pytorch) and automated machine learning tool (Vertex AI). The main question it aims to answer are: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Adenomyosis of Uterus
- What is being tested?
- use of deep learning and automated machine learning to diagnose and classify adenomyosis
- How many people
- 10,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 4 Jun 2024to 6 Feb 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study cohort will comprise of ultrasound images of patients who attended CARE Fertility centres for Ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 and were diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis using Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria on screening of images. The MUSA criteria outlines the ultrasound features of myometrium and myometrial lesions using standardised terms, definitions and measurements. Previously published schematic mapping system of adenomyosis severity will be used for determining the severity of uterine adenomyosis on review of images. A score ranging from to 1 to 4 is attributed to each grade and the sum of the score numbers is used to calculate the extension of the disease: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (>7)
Who may be able to join
- Participants: Women attending CARE Fertility centre for ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 for any indication and are diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis on ultrasound on screening of images.
- Input data: Good quality and conclusive 2D and/ or 3D images of normal uterus and adenomyotic uterus where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are clearly visible.
Who cannot join
- Participants: Women with co-existing single or multiple intramural fibroids and endometrial cavity abnormalities.
- Input data: Inconclusive ultrasound on assessment by the second reviewer, poor-quality images where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are unclear and images which cannot be classified into one of the four categories will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Artificial Intelligence-Based Machine Learning to Classify Adenomyosis from Ultrasound Scans: a Multicentre Model Development Study
The aim of this study is to use the vast dataset of annotated ultrasound images of normal uterus and of adenomyosis of varying severity to train a neural network using deep learning framework (Pytorch) and automated machine learning tool (Vertex AI). The main question it aims to answer are:
- Diagnostic performance of automated (Google Vertex AI (Artificial intelligence) vision) and deep learning (Pytorch) machine learning model
- Time saved in assessment of adenomyosis per healthcare professional
Read the detailed description
Background: Adenomyosis is a benign gynaecological condition characterised by the presence of ectopic endometrial cells (cells of the lining of the womb) in the myometrium (muscle layer of the womb). Globally, though adenomyosis is prevalent in women and girls across all stages of life, starting from adolescent to perimenopause, it remains underdiagnosed. Women with adenomyosis experience debilitating symptoms of heavy menstrual bleeding, painful menstrual cycles, chronic pelvic pain, and untoward pregnancy outcomes leading to a long-term impact on their quality of life.
Diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis is not only essential to correlate with symptom severity but also in counselling women about the disease prognosis, type of management and the long-term impact of adenomyosis outcomes. However, classifying the severity is not only a time-consuming and complex process, but it also depends on the operator experience and is subjective. Achieving the same results in a fraction of time with reduced operator bias independent of the expertise of the operator would be likely beneficial.
When dealing with image classification tasks, Machine learning (ML) has an enormous potential in assisting healthcare professionals in classifying the severity of adenomyosis objectively in seconds. Deep learning framework and automated machine learning tool are state-of-the-art tools for automated transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVUS) image analysis. It can directly process and automatically learn mid to high-level abstract features acquired from ultrasound images using a deep architecture model without requiring the manual definition of features in advance. This enables one to train, test, and validate the machine learning model with example labelled images for classification
The aim of the study is to use the annotated ultrasound images of normal uterus and of adenomyosis of varying severity to train a neural network using supervised deep learning that predicts if an input image belongs to one of the following classes: none, mild, moderate or severe adenomyosis. This will be a novel project and may support the clinicians and sonographers in grading the severity of adenomyosis in fraction of a time in the future.
Objective: To investigate the use of image recognition model utilising supervised deep learning via automated machine learning tool (Vertex AI) and deep learning framework (Pytorch) for the creation of an algorithm for ultrasound classification of severity of adenomyosis.
Study design and settings:
Type of study: This will be a multicentre observational cohort study. APPRAISE-AI and Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool- Artificial Intelligence (PROBAST-AI) tools have been referred to for protocol development.
Settings: The ultrasound images of patients with normal uterus and adenomyosis will be retrieved from ten CARE fertility centres in the United Kingdom. This would include CARE Fertility sites at Birmingham, Tamworth, Nottingham, Northampton, Sheffield, Leeds, Manchester, Bolton, Cheshire and Liverpool.
Population: The study cohort will comprise of ultrasound images of patients who attended CARE Fertility centres for Ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 and were diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis using Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria on screening of images. The MUSA criteria outlines the ultrasound features of myometrium and myometrial lesions using standardised terms, definitions and measurements.
Previously published schematic mapping system of adenomyosis severity will be used for determining the severity of uterine adenomyosis on review of images. This has been chosen due to reproducibility, substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement rate and clinical correlation with symptom severity. A score ranging from to 1 to 4 is attributed to each grade and the sum of the score numbers is used to calculate the extension of the disease: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (>7). Duration: Ultrasound performed between February 2022 until February 2024 Sample size: The minimum number of images required by Vertex AI Vision for training is 100 per category. The likelihood of successfully recognising a category goes up with the number of high quality examples for each. The target sample size to test the algorithm to classify adenomyosis will be between 1000-10,000 images each for none, mild, moderate and severe adenomyosis. The complete set of images will be distributed equally across classification categories; however, it may not be possible to source an approximately equal number of images for each category. The complete data set will be split manually into two different datasets in 9:1 ratio; 90% of the selected images will be used as training dataset (training + validation) and 10% as test dataset. This will ensure adequate inclusion of diverse and representative images for each category. The test dataset will be an independent dataset that is not used in the training phase but will be obtained from the same facility as data used in the training phase.
Minimisation of the potential impact of biases: All the stored ultrasound images of normal and adenomyotic uterus will be screened by a reviewer experienced in gynaecological and fertility scanning who will be blinded to the baseline characteristics of the women to avoid identification and recruitment bias. Two reviewers will independently classify the severity of adenomyosis into mild, moderate and severe for 1000 sets of images to establish concordance.
AI software details:
Type of machine learning Supervised Deep learning: In supervised learning, the machine needs labelled examples to learn. The aim of the study is to teach a machine to recognise varying severity of ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis. Ultrasound scan images labelled as "None", "Mild", "Moderate" and "Severe" will be uploaded as input. Studying the examples, the algorithm will learn to recognise what distinguishes a normal uterus from mild adenomyosis and a mild from a severe degree of adenomyosis and to assign the correct classification to each new image it is asked to analyse.
Type of framework and version: Google Cloud Vertex AI Vision API V1 as automated machine learning tool and the most up-to-date version of Pytorch as deep machine learning framework.
Acquisition of input data and selection: Input data to the model will be retrieved from ultrasound images of patients who attended the above mentioned fertility centres for ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 and were diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis on screening of images. Eligible ultrasound images of adenomyotic uterus participants will be extracted as two-dimensional (2D) and/or three-dimensional (3D) images after removing the patient identifiers. If a patient has more than one image of adenomyotic or normal uterus, all these images will be included. These images will be reviewed by a reviewer to reduce the risk of bias and formatted to ensure that they contain the adenomyosis ultrasound characteristic of interest in the image. These reviewed and formatted images will be labelled as none, mild, moderate and severe by two reviewers experienced in ultrasound diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis. Three set of input images will be uploaded on the machine learning framework:
- Training set: 80% of the image data will be in the training set. The model "sees" and initially learns from this data.
- Validation set: The validation set is also part of the training process, but it's kept separate to tune the model's hyperparameters.10% of the total images different to the training data set will be used so as to fine-tune model structure so that it can generalise better.
- Test set: The test set enters the stage only after the training process. It will be used to test the performance of the model on the data it has not yet seen. 10% of the total images will be used as test-set. Unlabelled test images will be uploaded to system and the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) model will be compared with the standard i.e., the original classification by the investigators. Splitting of the total image data into training set, validation set and test set will be done manually. Handling of poor quality or unavailable input data: These images will be excluded.
Eligibility criteria:
Inclusion:
- Participants: Women attending the above mentioned fertility centre for ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 for any indication and are diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis on ultrasound on screening of images.
- Input data: Good quality and conclusive 2D and/ or 3D images of normal uterus and adenomyotic uterus where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are clearly visible.
Exclusion:
- Participants: Women with co-existing single or multiple intramural fibroids and endometrial cavity abnormalities.
- Input data: Inconclusive ultrasound on assessment by the reviewer, poor-quality images where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are unclear and images which cannot be classified into one of the four categories will be excluded.
Consent:
The study is purely observational with no intervention or additional step being conducted as part of the study. Ultrasound images of normal and adenomyotic uterus would have been acquired at the time of a women having a TVUS which is part of routine clinical practice. Since the ultrasound machine allows the export of images without patient identifiable information, the data (which includes ultrasound images only) will have patient identifiable information (name and date of birth) removed before the data is extracted. NHS Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) pre-application checklist has been referred to determine the eligibility of this project to process patient information without consent. Hence, no informed consent will be requested from the study participants as only anonymized data that is already available will be used.
Outcome and statistical analysis
Primary outcomes: Average precision (positive predictive value), precision, recall, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the model will be the primary outcomes of interest for automated and deep machine learning model. All the analyses will be done using Stata Statistical Software (Release 18, TX, USA) for deep machine learning (ML) framework model and using the automated machine learning software for automated ML model. After the automated model is trained, detailed analysis consisting of summary of the model's performance which will be reported (model output). The will include the following:
- Score threshold: The score threshold refers to the level of confidence the model must have to assign a category to a test item. The score threshold slider in the Google Cloud console is a visual tool to test the effect of different thresholds for all categories and individual categories in the dataset. A score threshold which provides a good balance between false positives and false negatives will be adopted during the evaluation.
- True positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives
- Precision and recall: From all the test set of images that were assigned a category, precision indicates how many actually were supposed to be categorised with that label and recall indicates how many were actually assigned the label. The reference standard label refers to the categorization by the investigators.
- Precision/recall curves
Secondary outcome: Evaluation of interrater agreement between two reviewers in the ultrasound assessment of adenomyosis using Fleiss's kappa. K-coefficients used for interpretation of the strength of agreement will be: ≤0=poor, 0.01 to 0.20=slight, 0.21 to 0.40=fair, 0.41 to 0.60=moderate, 0.61 to 0.80=substantial, and 0.81 to 1=almost perfect.
Data handling and record keeping: Data (De-identified Ultrasound images) will be stored in the Google Cloud in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2018.
Eligible ultrasound images of normal and adenomyotic uterus participants will be extracted as 2D and/or 3D images after removing the patient identifiers. After completion of the study, images stored on Google Cloud will be deleted.
Quality control and assurance: Principles of Good Clinical Practice will be followed throughout the study duration.
Adverse event reporting: Considering the observational nature of the study and no additional step involved in the study design other than baseline TVUS, there are no safety considerations involved.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethics approval has been obtained from the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) and from CARE Fertility research and development team.
Confidentiality and data protection: A unique image identification number will be used for identification of study participants. All the personal data used in the study will be processed in accordance with the Data protection Act 2018 and will be regarded as strictly confidential.
Funding: Funds for this project has been sourced from Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.
Amendments: Any amendments to the study protocol or documentation will be initiated by the Chief Investigator. All substantial amendments will be submitted to IRB for approval followed by implementation of the changes in all sites involved in the study. Amendments will be documented in the 'Protocol Amendment' section of the study protocol.
End of project definition: Data gathering and preparation, training and evaluation of the model and writing of manuscript will take place over a period of 12 months.
Future study aspects: The long-term aim is to analyse this internally validated AI model for external validation in external centres in the National Health Service (NHS) using PACS system of archived images and correlate it with histopathology of hysterectomy specimens. This would also involve analysis of clinical utility by assessing impact of model on decision making and outcomes. If the model's performance is appropriate in terms of positive predictive value, precision and clinical utility, it will be implemented for real-time usage using online prediction. The model may be deployed for classification requests in form of online application or as an application integrated within ultrasound machines.
Publication policy: The results of the study will be shared through scientific and social media, The study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal within the field of gynaecological ultrasound (Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (UOG)) and digital health (The Lancet Digital Health). The manuscript will be prepared by Dr Ishita Mishra and authorship will be determined according to the individual's degree of contribution to the study and writing of the manuscript.
- Conditions
- Adenomyosis of Uterus
- Being tested
- use of deep learning and automated machine learning to diagnose and classify adenomyosis
- Keywords
- diagnosis, deep learning, machine learning, classification, artificial learning, automated machine learning
- Medical subject headings
- Adenomyosis, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
use of deep learning and automated machine learning to diagnose and classify adenomyosisOther
Vertex AI Vision V1 software will be used as an automated machine learning tool and Pytorch 2.5 as deep learning framework. The complete set of reviewed, formatted and labelled images will be uploaded and split manually into two different datasets in 9:1 ratio; 90% of the selected images will be used as training dataset (training + validation) and 10% as test dataset.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| None (Non-adenomyosis) and adenomyotic uterus ultrasound images | None group will be set of images with homogenous myometrium. The Adenomyosis group will be a set of images with ultrasound features of adenomyosis as per MUSA diagnostic criteria. These will be divided into mild, moderate and severe. Receives: Other: use of deep learning and automated machine learning to diagnose and classify adenomyosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Precision
Precision will indicate how well the model is capturing information and how much it is leaving out. From all the test set of images that were assigned a category, precision indicates how many actually were supposed to be categorised with that label.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Recall
From all the test set of images that were assigned a category, recall indicates indicates how many were actually assigned the label.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Average precision
The model accuracy will be determined by the area under the precision-recall curve and in Vertex AI, this metric is called average precision. It measures how well the model performs across all score threshold. The closer the score is to 1, the better is the model's performance on the test set.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Number of images correctly identified as per their original classification
Images correctly identified as per their original classification label e.g. Mild labelled image of adenomyosis identified as mild. This will be true positive.
Images incorrectly identified and not in line with original classification system e.g. moderate labelled image of adenomyosis classified as mild. This will be false positive
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Interrater agreement
Evaluation of interrater agreement between two reviewers in the ultrasound assessment of adenomyosis using Fleiss's kappa for a certain set of images. K-coefficients used for interpretation of the strength of agreement will be: ≤0=poor, 0.01 to 0.20=slight, 0.21 to 0.40=fair, 0.41 to 0.60=moderate, 0.61 to 0.80=substantial, and 0.81 to 1=almost perfect
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time taken to classify all the set of images
No of days/hours taken to classify all the images by healthcare professionals and the machine learning framework. This will determine the time saved in assessment of adenomyosis per healthcare professional.
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2025
- Study start4 Jun 2024
- Primary completion4 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion6 Feb 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adenomyosis of UterusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CARE Fertility UK
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Birmingham
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohammed Khairy, Principal investigator, CARE Fertility, Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06765512
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AIMLadeno
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Berendt N, Jacobsen M, Hertz JB. Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy. Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2418-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2418.
PubMed 11679531Munro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.008.
PubMed 30929720Drukker L, Noble JA, Papageorghiou AT. Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;56(4):498-505. doi: 10.1002/uog.22122.
PubMed 32530098Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68.
PubMed 15733050Zapf A, Castell S, Morawietz L, Karch A. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 5;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0200-9.
PubMed 27495131Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.
PubMed 30596876Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Hehenkamp WJK, Groenman F, De Bruyn C, Rasmussen C, Lazzeri L, Jokubkiene L, Jurkovic D, Naftalin J, Tellum T, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):118-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786.
PubMed 34587658Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installe AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D'Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brolmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):284-98. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
PubMed 25652685Ito Y, Unagami M, Yamabe F, Mitsui Y, Nakajima K, Nagao K, Kobayashi H. A method for utilizing automated machine learning for histopathological classification of testis based on Johnsen scores. Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89369-z.
PubMed 33967273LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
PubMed 26017442Collins GS, Dhiman P, Andaur Navarro CL, Ma J, Hooft L, Reitsma JB, Logullo P, Beam AL, Peng L, Van Calster B, van Smeden M, Riley RD, Moons KG. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008.
PubMed 34244270Kwong JCC, Khondker A, Lajkosz K, McDermott MBA, Frigola XB, McCradden MD, Mamdani M, Kulkarni GS, Johnson AEW. APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35377.
PubMed 37747733Guerriero S, Pascual M, Ajossa S, Neri M, Musa E, Graupera B, Rodriguez I, Alcazar JL. Artificial intelligence (AI) in the detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jun;261:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
PubMed 33873085Singhal N, Kudavelly S, Ramaraju GA. Deep Learning Based Junctional Zone Quantification using 3D Transvaginal Ultrasound in Assisted Reproduction. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2020 Jul;2020:2133-2136. doi: 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175358.
PubMed 33018428Lazzeri L, Morosetti G, Centini G, Monti G, Zupi E, Piccione E, Exacoustos C. A sonographic classification of adenomyosis: interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of type and degree of the myometrial involvement. Fertil Steril. 2018 Nov;110(6):1154-1161.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.031.
PubMed 30396560
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Machine Learning to Classify Adenomyosis from Ultrasound Scans: a Multicentre Model Development Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06765512
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AIMLadeno
- Conditions
- Adenomyosis of Uterus
- Keywords
- diagnosis, deep learning, machine learning, classification, artificial learning, automated machine learning
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- CARE Fertility UKUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Birmingham
- Study start
- 4 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 6 Feb 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to use the vast dataset of annotated ultrasound images of normal uterus and of adenomyosis of varying severity to train a neural network using deep learning framework (Pytorch) and automated machine learning tool (Vertex AI). The main question it aims to answer are:
- Diagnostic performance of automated (Google Vertex AI (Artificial intelligence) vision) and deep learning (Pytorch) machine learning model
- Time saved in assessment of adenomyosis per healthcare professional
Detailed description
Background: Adenomyosis is a benign gynaecological condition characterised by the presence of ectopic endometrial cells (cells of the lining of the womb) in the myometrium (muscle layer of the womb). Globally, though adenomyosis is prevalent in women and girls across all stages of life, starting from adolescent to perimenopause, it remains underdiagnosed. Women with adenomyosis experience debilitating symptoms of heavy menstrual bleeding, painful menstrual cycles, chronic pelvic pain, and untoward pregnancy outcomes leading to a long-term impact on their quality of life.
Diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis is not only essential to correlate with symptom severity but also in counselling women about the disease prognosis, type of management and the long-term impact of adenomyosis outcomes. However, classifying the severity is not only a time-consuming and complex process, but it also depends on the operator experience and is subjective. Achieving the same results in a fraction of time with reduced operator bias independent of the expertise of the operator would be likely beneficial.
When dealing with image classification tasks, Machine learning (ML) has an enormous potential in assisting healthcare professionals in classifying the severity of adenomyosis objectively in seconds. Deep learning framework and automated machine learning tool are state-of-the-art tools for automated transvaginal ultrasound scan (TVUS) image analysis. It can directly process and automatically learn mid to high-level abstract features acquired from ultrasound images using a deep architecture model without requiring the manual definition of features in advance. This enables one to train, test, and validate the machine learning model with example labelled images for classification
The aim of the study is to use the annotated ultrasound images of normal uterus and of adenomyosis of varying severity to train a neural network using supervised deep learning that predicts if an input image belongs to one of the following classes: none, mild, moderate or severe adenomyosis. This will be a novel project and may support the clinicians and sonographers in grading the severity of adenomyosis in fraction of a time in the future.
Objective: To investigate the use of image recognition model utilising supervised deep learning via automated machine learning tool (Vertex AI) and deep learning framework (Pytorch) for the creation of an algorithm for ultrasound classification of severity of adenomyosis.
Study design and settings:
Type of study: This will be a multicentre observational cohort study. APPRAISE-AI and Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool- Artificial Intelligence (PROBAST-AI) tools have been referred to for protocol development.
Settings: The ultrasound images of patients with normal uterus and adenomyosis will be retrieved from ten CARE fertility centres in the United Kingdom. This would include CARE Fertility sites at Birmingham, Tamworth, Nottingham, Northampton, Sheffield, Leeds, Manchester, Bolton, Cheshire and Liverpool.
Population: The study cohort will comprise of ultrasound images of patients who attended CARE Fertility centres for Ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 and were diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis using Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria on screening of images. The MUSA criteria outlines the ultrasound features of myometrium and myometrial lesions using standardised terms, definitions and measurements.
Previously published schematic mapping system of adenomyosis severity will be used for determining the severity of uterine adenomyosis on review of images. This has been chosen due to reproducibility, substantial to almost perfect interobserver agreement rate and clinical correlation with symptom severity. A score ranging from to 1 to 4 is attributed to each grade and the sum of the score numbers is used to calculate the extension of the disease: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (>7). Duration: Ultrasound performed between February 2022 until February 2024 Sample size: The minimum number of images required by Vertex AI Vision for training is 100 per category. The likelihood of successfully recognising a category goes up with the number of high quality examples for each. The target sample size to test the algorithm to classify adenomyosis will be between 1000-10,000 images each for none, mild, moderate and severe adenomyosis. The complete set of images will be distributed equally across classification categories; however, it may not be possible to source an approximately equal number of images for each category. The complete data set will be split manually into two different datasets in 9:1 ratio; 90% of the selected images will be used as training dataset (training + validation) and 10% as test dataset. This will ensure adequate inclusion of diverse and representative images for each category. The test dataset will be an independent dataset that is not used in the training phase but will be obtained from the same facility as data used in the training phase.
Minimisation of the potential impact of biases: All the stored ultrasound images of normal and adenomyotic uterus will be screened by a reviewer experienced in gynaecological and fertility scanning who will be blinded to the baseline characteristics of the women to avoid identification and recruitment bias. Two reviewers will independently classify the severity of adenomyosis into mild, moderate and severe for 1000 sets of images to establish concordance.
AI software details:
Type of machine learning Supervised Deep learning: In supervised learning, the machine needs labelled examples to learn. The aim of the study is to teach a machine to recognise varying severity of ultrasound diagnosed adenomyosis. Ultrasound scan images labelled as "None", "Mild", "Moderate" and "Severe" will be uploaded as input. Studying the examples, the algorithm will learn to recognise what distinguishes a normal uterus from mild adenomyosis and a mild from a severe degree of adenomyosis and to assign the correct classification to each new image it is asked to analyse.
Type of framework and version: Google Cloud Vertex AI Vision API V1 as automated machine learning tool and the most up-to-date version of Pytorch as deep machine learning framework.
Acquisition of input data and selection: Input data to the model will be retrieved from ultrasound images of patients who attended the above mentioned fertility centres for ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 and were diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis on screening of images. Eligible ultrasound images of adenomyotic uterus participants will be extracted as two-dimensional (2D) and/or three-dimensional (3D) images after removing the patient identifiers. If a patient has more than one image of adenomyotic or normal uterus, all these images will be included. These images will be reviewed by a reviewer to reduce the risk of bias and formatted to ensure that they contain the adenomyosis ultrasound characteristic of interest in the image. These reviewed and formatted images will be labelled as none, mild, moderate and severe by two reviewers experienced in ultrasound diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis. Three set of input images will be uploaded on the machine learning framework:
- Training set: 80% of the image data will be in the training set. The model "sees" and initially learns from this data.
- Validation set: The validation set is also part of the training process, but it's kept separate to tune the model's hyperparameters.10% of the total images different to the training data set will be used so as to fine-tune model structure so that it can generalise better.
- Test set: The test set enters the stage only after the training process. It will be used to test the performance of the model on the data it has not yet seen. 10% of the total images will be used as test-set. Unlabelled test images will be uploaded to system and the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) model will be compared with the standard i.e., the original classification by the investigators. Splitting of the total image data into training set, validation set and test set will be done manually. Handling of poor quality or unavailable input data: These images will be excluded.
Eligibility criteria:
Inclusion:
- Participants: Women attending the above mentioned fertility centre for ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 for any indication and are diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis on ultrasound on screening of images.
- Input data: Good quality and conclusive 2D and/ or 3D images of normal uterus and adenomyotic uterus where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are clearly visible.
Exclusion:
- Participants: Women with co-existing single or multiple intramural fibroids and endometrial cavity abnormalities.
- Input data: Inconclusive ultrasound on assessment by the reviewer, poor-quality images where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are unclear and images which cannot be classified into one of the four categories will be excluded.
Consent:
The study is purely observational with no intervention or additional step being conducted as part of the study. Ultrasound images of normal and adenomyotic uterus would have been acquired at the time of a women having a TVUS which is part of routine clinical practice. Since the ultrasound machine allows the export of images without patient identifiable information, the data (which includes ultrasound images only) will have patient identifiable information (name and date of birth) removed before the data is extracted. NHS Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) pre-application checklist has been referred to determine the eligibility of this project to process patient information without consent. Hence, no informed consent will be requested from the study participants as only anonymized data that is already available will be used.
Outcome and statistical analysis
Primary outcomes: Average precision (positive predictive value), precision, recall, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the model will be the primary outcomes of interest for automated and deep machine learning model. All the analyses will be done using Stata Statistical Software (Release 18, TX, USA) for deep machine learning (ML) framework model and using the automated machine learning software for automated ML model. After the automated model is trained, detailed analysis consisting of summary of the model's performance which will be reported (model output). The will include the following:
- Score threshold: The score threshold refers to the level of confidence the model must have to assign a category to a test item. The score threshold slider in the Google Cloud console is a visual tool to test the effect of different thresholds for all categories and individual categories in the dataset. A score threshold which provides a good balance between false positives and false negatives will be adopted during the evaluation.
- True positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives
- Precision and recall: From all the test set of images that were assigned a category, precision indicates how many actually were supposed to be categorised with that label and recall indicates how many were actually assigned the label. The reference standard label refers to the categorization by the investigators.
- Precision/recall curves
Secondary outcome: Evaluation of interrater agreement between two reviewers in the ultrasound assessment of adenomyosis using Fleiss's kappa. K-coefficients used for interpretation of the strength of agreement will be: ≤0=poor, 0.01 to 0.20=slight, 0.21 to 0.40=fair, 0.41 to 0.60=moderate, 0.61 to 0.80=substantial, and 0.81 to 1=almost perfect.
Data handling and record keeping: Data (De-identified Ultrasound images) will be stored in the Google Cloud in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2018.
Eligible ultrasound images of normal and adenomyotic uterus participants will be extracted as 2D and/or 3D images after removing the patient identifiers. After completion of the study, images stored on Google Cloud will be deleted.
Quality control and assurance: Principles of Good Clinical Practice will be followed throughout the study duration.
Adverse event reporting: Considering the observational nature of the study and no additional step involved in the study design other than baseline TVUS, there are no safety considerations involved.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethics approval has been obtained from the local Institutional Review Board (IRB) and from CARE Fertility research and development team.
Confidentiality and data protection: A unique image identification number will be used for identification of study participants. All the personal data used in the study will be processed in accordance with the Data protection Act 2018 and will be regarded as strictly confidential.
Funding: Funds for this project has been sourced from Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.
Amendments: Any amendments to the study protocol or documentation will be initiated by the Chief Investigator. All substantial amendments will be submitted to IRB for approval followed by implementation of the changes in all sites involved in the study. Amendments will be documented in the 'Protocol Amendment' section of the study protocol.
End of project definition: Data gathering and preparation, training and evaluation of the model and writing of manuscript will take place over a period of 12 months.
Future study aspects: The long-term aim is to analyse this internally validated AI model for external validation in external centres in the National Health Service (NHS) using PACS system of archived images and correlate it with histopathology of hysterectomy specimens. This would also involve analysis of clinical utility by assessing impact of model on decision making and outcomes. If the model's performance is appropriate in terms of positive predictive value, precision and clinical utility, it will be implemented for real-time usage using online prediction. The model may be deployed for classification requests in form of online application or as an application integrated within ultrasound machines.
Publication policy: The results of the study will be shared through scientific and social media, The study results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal within the field of gynaecological ultrasound (Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (UOG)) and digital health (The Lancet Digital Health). The manuscript will be prepared by Dr Ishita Mishra and authorship will be determined according to the individual's degree of contribution to the study and writing of the manuscript.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| None (Non-adenomyosis) and adenomyotic uterus ultrasound images | – | Other: use of deep learning and automated machine learning to diagnose and classify adenomyosisNone group will be set of images with homogenous myometrium. The Adenomyosis group will be a set of images with ultrasound features of adenomyosis as per MUSA diagnostic criteria. These will be divided into mild, moderate and severe. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study cohort will comprise of ultrasound images of patients who attended CARE Fertility centres for Ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 and were diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis using Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) criteria on screening of images. The MUSA criteria outlines the ultrasound features of myometrium and myometrial lesions using standardised terms, definitions and measurements. Previously published schematic mapping system of adenomyosis severity will be used for determining the severity of uterine adenomyosis on review of images. A score ranging from to 1 to 4 is attributed to each grade and the sum of the score numbers is used to calculate the extension of the disease: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (>7)
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants: Women attending CARE Fertility centre for ultrasound between February 2022 to February 2024 for any indication and are diagnosed with normal uterus and adenomyosis on ultrasound on screening of images.
- Input data: Good quality and conclusive 2D and/ or 3D images of normal uterus and adenomyotic uterus where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are clearly visible.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Participants: Women with co-existing single or multiple intramural fibroids and endometrial cavity abnormalities.
- Input data: Inconclusive ultrasound on assessment by the second reviewer, poor-quality images where the ultrasound characteristics of adenomyosis are unclear and images which cannot be classified into one of the four categories will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| use of deep learning and automated machine learning to diagnose and classify adenomyosisVertex AI Vision V1 software will be used as an automated machine learning tool and Pytorch 2.5 as deep learning framework. The complete set of reviewed, formatted and labelled images will be uploaded and split manually into two different datasets in 9:1 ratio; 90% of the selected images will be used as training dataset (training + validation) and 10% as test dataset. | Other | None (Non-adenomyosis) and adenomyotic uterus ultrasound images |
Primary outcome
Precision
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Precision will indicate how well the model is capturing information and how much it is leaving out. From all the test set of images that were assigned a category, precision indicates how many actually were supposed to be categorised with that label.
Recall
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
From all the test set of images that were assigned a category, recall indicates indicates how many were actually assigned the label.
Average precision
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The model accuracy will be determined by the area under the precision-recall curve and in Vertex AI, this metric is called average precision. It measures how well the model performs across all score threshold. The closer the score is to 1, the better is the model's performance on the test set.
Number of images correctly identified as per their original classification
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Images correctly identified as per their original classification label e.g. Mild labelled image of adenomyosis identified as mild. This will be true positive. Images incorrectly identified and not in line with original classification system e.g. moderate labelled image of adenomyosis classified as mild. This will be false positive
2 secondary outcomes
Interrater agreement
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time taken to classify all the set of images
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 11679531Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Berendt N, Jacobsen M, Hertz JB. Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy. Hum Reprod. 2001 Nov;16(11):2418-21. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.11.2418.
- Background: PubMed 30929720Munro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):629-640. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.02.008.
- Background: PubMed 32530098Drukker L, Noble JA, Papageorghiou AT. Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;56(4):498-505. doi: 10.1002/uog.22122.
- Background: PubMed 15733050Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68.
- Background: PubMed 27495131Zapf A, Castell S, Morawietz L, Karch A. Measuring inter-rater reliability for nominal data - which coefficients and confidence intervals are appropriate? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 5;16:93. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0200-9.
- Background: PubMed 30596876Moons KGM, Wolff RF, Riley RD, Whiting PF, Westwood M, Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Kleijnen J, Mallett S. PROBAST: A Tool to Assess Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies: Explanation and Elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33. doi: 10.7326/M18-1377.
- Background: PubMed 34587658Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, Hehenkamp WJK, Groenman F, De Bruyn C, Rasmussen C, Lazzeri L, Jokubkiene L, Jurkovic D, Naftalin J, Tellum T, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):118-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.24786.
- Background: PubMed 25652685Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, Van Schoubroeck D, Landolfo C, Installe AJ, Guerriero S, Exacoustos C, Gordts S, Benacerraf B, D'Hooghe T, De Moor B, Brolmann H, Goldstein S, Epstein E, Bourne T, Timmerman D. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):284-98. doi: 10.1002/uog.14806. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 33967273Ito Y, Unagami M, Yamabe F, Mitsui Y, Nakajima K, Nagao K, Kobayashi H. A method for utilizing automated machine learning for histopathological classification of testis based on Johnsen scores. Sci Rep. 2021 May 10;11(1):9962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89369-z.
- Background: PubMed 26017442LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.
- Background: PubMed 34244270Collins GS, Dhiman P, Andaur Navarro CL, Ma J, Hooft L, Reitsma JB, Logullo P, Beam AL, Peng L, Van Calster B, van Smeden M, Riley RD, Moons KG. Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e048008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048008.
- Background: PubMed 37747733Kwong JCC, Khondker A, Lajkosz K, McDermott MBA, Frigola XB, McCradden MD, Mamdani M, Kulkarni GS, Johnson AEW. APPRAISE-AI Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of AI Studies for Clinical Decision Support. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2335377. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35377.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Adenomyosis of Uterus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Linzagolix in Adenomyosis and Recurrent Implantation Failure
Adenomyosis of Uterus, Implantation Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Association of Ultrasound Features of the Myometrium Suggestive of Adenomyosis and Clinical Symptoms
Adenomyosis of Uterus
Recruiting
Stellate Ganglion Block and Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Sleep in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
Uterine Fibroids (Leiomyoma), Adenomyosis of Uterus
RecruitingObservational study
Artificial Intelligence Into Ultrasound Diagnostics in Reproductive Medicine
Endometriosis, Adenomyosis of Uterus
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy on Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis of Uterus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohammed Khairy principal investigator
CARE Fertility, Birmingham
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Adenomyosis of Uterus, run by CARE Fertility UK at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Precision (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06765512, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2025.