Antibiotic AllergySTAALNCT06771440
Support Tool for Antibiotic Allergy deLabeling
A study testing EPR search in people with Antibiotic Allergy, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
Antibiotic allergy labels (AAL) are reported in 7% of inpatient's charts, especially for beta-lactams (86% of AAL, i.e., prevalence of 6%). They are associated with increased length of hospital stay, and use of second-line and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Antibiotic Allergy
- What is being tested?
- EPR search
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 10 Mar 2025to May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hospitalized patients
- AAL for one or more beta-lactams
Who cannot join
- Age younger than 18
- Previous enrolment in this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven
Rik Schrijvers, rik.schrijvers@uzleuven.be
Liesbeth Gilissen, liesbeth.gilissen@kuleuven.be
About this study
Official title: Impact Assessment of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Non-invasive Antibiotic Allergy Label Delabeling and Refinement
Antibiotic allergy labels (AAL) are reported in 7% of inpatient's charts, especially for beta-lactams (86% of AAL, i.e., prevalence of 6%). They are associated with increased length of hospital stay, and use of second-line and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Allergy workups are able to invalidate the majority of these AAL but are time-consuming and require invasive skin and provocation testing. The investigators recently evaluated, for the first time in Europa, a strictly non-invasive delabeling protocol using a questionnaire, medical file search and contact with primary care health care workers in 200 adult internal medicine inpatients with a beta-lactam AAL. Up to half of the AAL could be removed or refined, demonstrating the potential of this strategy. In this project, they aim to assess the impact of using the non-invasive 'AAL-fact-check' tool in a multicenter study, on antibiotic selection, and clinical, antimicrobial, and economic endpoints, as compared with the standard of care (i.e., no AAL-fact-check tool).
- Conditions
- Antibiotic Allergy
- Being tested
- EPR search
- Keywords
- Penicillin allergy, Delabeling, beta-lactam, electronic health records, clinical decision support, Antibiotic allergy, drug allergy
- Medical subject headings
- Drug Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EPR searchOther
Also called AAL-fact-check tool
A stored query in the EPR, that checks for re-exposure to the culprit antibiotic or class-member, from the date of AAL registration to the date of patient inclusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AAL fact-check | Experimental | Semi-automated EPR search for re-exposure Receives: Other: EPR search |
| Standard of care (no AAL fact-check) | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
First line antibiotic use: yes (1)/no (0)
First line and/or narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic use (depending on the index indication, and following the guidelines of the Belgian Antibiotic Policy Coordination Commission BAPCOC), as a binary outcome.
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Secondary outcomes (20)
Antibiotic allergy label removed: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Antibiotic allergy label refined: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Beta-lactam antibiotic tolerance: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Need to switch antibiotics: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Days until clinical recovery (days)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
In-hospital mortality: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge of discharge/death
3 months post-hospitalization mortality: yes (1)/ no (0)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Length of hospital stay (days)
Calculated as (date of discharge) - (date of admission) + 1
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Admission to ICU: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Readmission within 3 months after discharge: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Colonization with MRSA: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Infection with MRSA: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Colonization with VRE: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Infection with VRE: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Colonization with C.Diff: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Infection with C.Diff: yes (1)/no (0)
Measured: Until 100 days after discharge
Cost of antibiotic treatment (euro)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Cost of hospitalization (euro)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Time needed to perform the AAL fact-check (minutes)
AAL fact-check procedure will be timed by the investigator
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Cost of human resources needed for AAL-fact-check (euro)
Measured: Until 14 days after discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2025
- Study start10 Mar 2025
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Antibiotic AllergyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Multi-centre open label cross-over cluster-randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Noorderhart Pelt, AZ Herentals, Heilig Hartziekenhuis, Mol, AZ Turnhout, Sint-Jozefskliniek Izegem
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rik Schrijvers, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06771440
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- S68439
- Acronym
- STAAL
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 16 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Gilissen L, Van De Sijpe G, Spriet I, Schrijvers R. Impact Assessment of the Allergy Fact Checker, a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Noninvasive Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Allergy Label Delabeling: Protocol for a Multicenter Crossover Cluster-Controlled Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 Mar 27;15:e86056. doi: 10.2196/86056.
PubMed 41894402
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact Assessment of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Non-invasive Antibiotic Allergy Label Delabeling and Refinement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06771440
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STAAL / S68439
- Conditions
- Antibiotic Allergy
- Keywords
- Penicillin allergy, Delabeling, beta-lactam, electronic health records, clinical decision support, Antibiotic allergy, drug allergy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Noorderhart Pelt, AZ Herentals, Heilig Hartziekenhuis, Mol, AZ Turnhout, Sint-Jozefskliniek Izegem
- Study start
- 10 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Antibiotic allergy labels (AAL) are reported in 7% of inpatient's charts, especially for beta-lactams (86% of AAL, i.e., prevalence of 6%). They are associated with increased length of hospital stay, and use of second-line and broad-spectrum antibiotics. Allergy workups are able to invalidate the majority of these AAL but are time-consuming and require invasive skin and provocation testing. The investigators recently evaluated, for the first time in Europa, a strictly non-invasive delabeling protocol using a questionnaire, medical file search and contact with primary care health care workers in 200 adult internal medicine inpatients with a beta-lactam AAL. Up to half of the AAL could be removed or refined, demonstrating the potential of this strategy. In this project, they aim to assess the impact of using the non-invasive 'AAL-fact-check' tool in a multicenter study, on antibiotic selection, and clinical, antimicrobial, and economic endpoints, as compared with the standard of care (i.e., no AAL-fact-check tool).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multi-centre open label cross-over cluster-randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AAL fact-check | Experimental | Other: EPR searchSemi-automated EPR search for re-exposure |
| Standard of care (no AAL fact-check) | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Hospitalized patients
- AAL for one or more beta-lactams
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age younger than 18
- Previous enrolment in this study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EPR searchAlso: AAL-fact-check toolA stored query in the EPR, that checks for re-exposure to the culprit antibiotic or class-member, from the date of AAL registration to the date of patient inclusion | Other | AAL fact-check |
Primary outcome
First line antibiotic use: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
First line and/or narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic use (depending on the index indication, and following the guidelines of the Belgian Antibiotic Policy Coordination Commission BAPCOC), as a binary outcome.
20 secondary outcomes
Antibiotic allergy label removed: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Antibiotic allergy label refined: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Beta-lactam antibiotic tolerance: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Need to switch antibiotics: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Days until clinical recovery (days)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
In-hospital mortality: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge of discharge/death
3 months post-hospitalization mortality: yes (1)/ no (0)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Length of hospital stay (days)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Admission to ICU: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Readmission within 3 months after discharge: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Colonization with MRSA: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Infection with MRSA: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Colonization with VRE: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Infection with VRE: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Colonization with C.Diff: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Infection with C.Diff: yes (1)/no (0)
Time frame: Until 100 days after discharge
Cost of antibiotic treatment (euro)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Cost of hospitalization (euro)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Time needed to perform the AAL fact-check (minutes)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Cost of human resources needed for AAL-fact-check (euro)
Time frame: Until 14 days after discharge
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Dec 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41894402Gilissen L, Van De Sijpe G, Spriet I, Schrijvers R. Impact Assessment of the Allergy Fact Checker, a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Noninvasive Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Allergy Label Delabeling: Protocol for a Multicenter Crossover Cluster-Controlled Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2026 Mar 27;15:e86056. doi: 10.2196/86056.
Related trials for Antibiotic Allergy
RecruitingPhase 2
Effects of Treatments on Atopic Dermatitis
Eczema, Dermatitis
Not yet recruiting
Multimodal Stewardship Programme to Improve Antibiotic Prescribing for Children With Lower Respiratory Tract Infections
Bronchitis, Acute, Community-acquired Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Secondary Bacterial Infections and Nasal Colonization in Scabies and Atopic Dermatitis
Atopic Dermatitis (AD), Scabies
RecruitingPhase 2
Optimizing the Diagnostic Approach to Cephalosporin Allergy Testing
Drug Allergy, Cephalosporin Allergy
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Emergency Optimization of Antibiotic Therapy for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
Urinary Tract Infections, Antiobiotic Stewardship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rik Schrijvers, MD, PhD principal investigator
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EPR search in people with Antibiotic Allergy, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Liesbeth Gilissen, PhD (+32 16 71 00 84, liesbeth.gilissen@kuleuven.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
First line antibiotic use: yes (1)/no (0) (time frame: Until 100 days after discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06771440, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Dec 2025.