Non-obstructive Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyPACE-nHCMNCT06775886
Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing in Symptomatic Patients With Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
A study testing myPACE+ algorithm in people with Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction ≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- What is being tested?
- myPACE+ algorithm
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2025to 23 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Non obstructive HCM: Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) gradient <30mmHg at rest and with provocation
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%
- New York Heart Association (NYHA II-III) symptoms
- Normal intrinsic conduction system
- Suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) system
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- LVEF <50%
- LVOT gradient > 30mmHg at rest or with provocation
- Prolonged PR > 250ms
- Baseline RV-pacing burden of > 1% more than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation
- Aortic valve replacement in the past one year
- Significant primary pulmonary disease on home oxygen
- Uncontrolled hypertension as defined by BP >160/100 mmHg on two measurements ≥15 minutes apart
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
About this study
This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction ≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires.
The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure.
Read the detailed description
This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires.
The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure. An interim data safety analysis will be conducted.
- Being tested
- myPACE+ algorithm
- Keywords
- Cardiomyopathy, Personalized Accelerated Pacing, Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic, Cardiomyopathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
myPACE+ algorithmOther
myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| myPACE+ | Experimental | Participants will be programmed to a personalized lower rate setting based on the myPACE+ resting heart rate algorithm will be conducted using the myPACE+ algorithm Receives: Other: myPACE+ algorithm |
| Usual Care | No intervention | Standard of care. Participants will retain a standard pacing lower rate setting of 60 beats per minute (bpm). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) status
Change in HRQoL from prior to randomization to the time of 3-month follow-up will be assessed based on patient responses to the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). The KCCQ-12 is a validated health status measure for patients with heart failure. An overall summary score (OSS) is tabulated based on responses ranging from 0-100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible HRQoL status. Change from baseline scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. A logistic mixed-effect model will be employed to calculate the odds ratio for a ≥ 5 point or more improvement of the KCCQ-OSS, which is considered clinically meaningful.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Secondary outcomes (10)
Change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Change in NT-proBNP concentration from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and subsequently compared between groups. Samples will be obtained by venipuncture and submitted to a local laboratory for analysis. While normal NT-proBNP levels vary by age, the normal threshold for those under 50 years of age is 450 pg/mL, while it is 900 pg/mL for those greater than 50 years of age. Higher than normal NT-proBNP levels may be indicative of heart failure. As part of an exploratory analysis for this trial a >29% decrease in NT-proBNP concentration from baseline will be considered a "clinically meaningful threshold"
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Peak Oxygen (pVO2) Uptake and predicted pVO2
Change in pVO2 and predicted pVO2 from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). CPET is a functional assessment that helps to detect disorders affecting the system involved in oxygen transport and utilization through the analysis of gas exchange during exercise. Change in pVO2 uptake from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. An increase in pVO2 >1.5mL/kg/min from baseline will be considered a "clinically meaningful threshold" as part of an exploratory analysis for this trial.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden
Change in pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed by interrogation of the pacemaker. Pacemaker-detected data will be continuously collected and stored by the pacemaker. Atrial arrhythmia burden is quantified as the percentage of time per day the patient is in atrial fibrillation (AF). Change in percentage over time will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. Pacemaker-detected arrhythmia burden is associated with more adverse cardiac outcomes including increased risk of stroke or thromboembolism.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity level
Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity levels from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using the pacemaker's built-in accelerometer. This accelerometer can measure a patient's physical activity levels by detecting the frequency and amplitude of a patient's motion. The device measures the number of hours/minutes the patient is active, based on a threshold for the number and magnitude of accelerometer signal deflections. Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity levels from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. As part of an exploratory analysis for this trial an increase in pacemaker detected daily activity >0.5 hour/day from baseline will be considered a "clinically meaningful threshold".
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic parameters: Left Atrial (LA) Strain
Change in LA strain from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using TTE. Strain is a measure of deformation of the myocardium during the cardiac cycle in multiple directions; lengthening, shortening and thickening and is expressed as a fractional length change, where shortening is a negative value and lengthening a positive value. The difference between length at the reference point (end-diastole) and the current length (end-systole) will be calculated in accordance with American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) January 2015 guidelines related to strains. This is then divided by original reference length and then expressed as a percentage for the given timepoint. Change in this percentage from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. LA strain is an earlier marker of underlying cardiovascular pathology than many conventional echocardiographic parameters given the relatively thinner walls of the atria.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic parameters: Left Ventricular (LV) Strain
Change in LV strain from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). Strain is a measure of deformation of the myocardium during the cardiac cycle in multiple directions; lengthening, shortening and thickening and is expressed as a fractional length change, where shortening is a negative value and lengthening a positive value. The difference between length at the reference point (end-diastole) and the current length (end-systole) will be calculated in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines related to strain. This is then divided by original reference length and then expressed as a percentage for the given timepoint. Change in this percentage from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios. LV Strain can be used for the early detection of left ventricular dysfunction by detecting subtle changes in deformation of heart muscle, which can lead to earlier diagnosis/prognosis.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic E/e' ratio
Change in echocardiographic E/e' ratio from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE). E/e' ratio is a measure of diastolic function that is calculated by dividing the peak E wave velocity (early filling velocity, or E) by the peak e' wave velocity (or the early relaxation velocity, e') and will be calculated in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. Elevated E/e' ratios are a key indicator of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and, as such, are often used to assess the severity of diastolic dysfunction. Change in E/e' ratios will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Ventricular Myocardial Thickness (LVMT)
Change LVMT from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be evaluated using motion-mode echocardiography in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. This one-dimensional view allows for digitized, linear measurements of LV thickness in the parasternal long-axis view. Increased LV myocardial wall thickness can lead to Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), making it more difficult for the heart to pump blood and increase the risk of unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes. Change in LV myocardial thickness will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Atrial (LA) chamber size
Change in LA chamber size from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. An enlarged left atrium, known as Left Atrial Enlargement (LAE), is a result of increased left atrial pressure over a prolonged period and can be a predictor of clinically significant cardiovascular diseases and heart failure. Change in LA chamber size from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Ventricular (LV) chamber size
Change in LV chamber size from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be evaluated using transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) in accordance with (ASE) January 2015 guidelines. An increased left ventricular chamber size is caused by elevated blood pressure over a prolonged period and can lead to Left Ventricular Hypertrophy (LVH) complications of which can lead to heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Change in LV chamber size from baseline will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics and analyzed by win ratios.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2025
- Study start2 Oct 2025
- Primary completion23 Oct 2025
- Study completion23 Oct 2025
Why it stopped: PI left the institution. IRB study closure date of 11/12/2025. IRB approved closeout on 2/6/2026.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-obstructive Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Montefiore Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Luigi Di Biase, MD, Principal investigator, Montefiore Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06775886
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-16244
- Acronym
- PACE-nHCM
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):1757-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
PubMed 35379504Ommen SR, Mital S, Burke MA, Day SM, Deswal A, Elliott P, Evanovich LL, Hung J, Joglar JA, Kantor P, Kimmelstiel C, Kittleson M, Link MS, Maron MS, Martinez MW, Miyake CY, Schaff HV, Semsarian C, Sorajja P. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):3022-3055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.044. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
PubMed 33229115Infeld M, Wahlberg K, Cicero J, Plante TB, Meagher S, Novelli A, Habel N, Krishnan AM, Silverman DN, LeWinter MM, Lustgarten DL, Meyer M. Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;8(3):213-221. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320.
PubMed 36723919Weissler-Snir A, Rakowski H, Meyer M. Beta-blockers in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: time to ease the heart rate restriction? Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3655-3657. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad518. No abstract available.
PubMed 37650505
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing in Symptomatic Patients With Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06775886
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PACE-nHCM / 2024-16244
- Keywords
- Cardiomyopathy, Personalized Accelerated Pacing, Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: PI left the institution. IRB study closure date of 11/12/2025. IRB approved closeout on 2/6/2026.
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronic
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction ≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires.
The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure.
Detailed description
This will be a two-arm investigator-initiated randomized controlled study of patients with nHCM and LV ejection fraction≥50% and NYHA II-III symptoms, normal intrinsic conduction system and pre-existing suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. Patients will be randomly assigned to either personalized accelerated pacing (using the myPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent) or usual care groups. At baseline and after 3 months of pacing all patients will undergo a CPET, echocardiogram, blood work for NT-proBNP levels and complete the KCCQ-OSS and HCMSQ, questionnaires.
The investigator team hypothesizes that personalized accelerated pacing will be safe and improve symptoms and heart-failure related quality of life, physical activity, pVO2, biomarkers (i.e. NT-proBNP), diastolic parameters and cardiac structure. An interim data safety analysis will be conducted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| myPACE+ | Experimental | Other: myPACE+ algorithmParticipants will be programmed to a personalized lower rate setting based on the myPACE+ resting heart rate algorithm will be conducted using the myPACE+ algorithm |
| Usual Care | No intervention | –Standard of care. Participants will retain a standard pacing lower rate setting of 60 beats per minute (bpm). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Non obstructive HCM: Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) gradient <30mmHg at rest and with provocation
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%
- New York Heart Association (NYHA II-III) symptoms
- Normal intrinsic conduction system
- Suitable dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) system
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Pregnancy
- LVEF <50%
- LVOT gradient > 30mmHg at rest or with provocation
- Prolonged PR > 250ms
- Baseline RV-pacing burden of > 1% more than moderate valvular stenosis or regurgitation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| myPACE+ algorithmmyPACE+ algorithm with mono-fractional exponent | Other | myPACE+ |
Primary outcome
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) status
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in HRQoL from prior to randomization to the time of 3-month follow-up will be assessed based on patient responses to the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12). The KCCQ-12 is a validated health status measure for patients with heart failure. An overall summary score (OSS) is tabulated based on responses ranging from 0-100, with 0 denoting the worst and 100 the best possible HRQoL status. Change from baseline scores will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics. A logistic mixed-effect model will be employed to calculate the odds ratio for a ≥ 5 point or more improvement of the KCCQ-OSS, which is considered clinically meaningful.
10 secondary outcomes
Change in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Peak Oxygen (pVO2) Uptake and predicted pVO2
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected atrial arrhythmia burden
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in pacemaker-detected patient activity level
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic parameters: Left Atrial (LA) Strain
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic parameters: Left Ventricular (LV) Strain
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in echocardiographic E/e' ratio
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Ventricular Myocardial Thickness (LVMT)
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Atrial (LA) chamber size
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Change in Left Ventricular (LV) chamber size
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI left the institution. IRB study closure date of 11/12/2025. IRB approved closeout on 2/6/2026.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35379504Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):1757-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
- Background: PubMed 33229115Ommen SR, Mital S, Burke MA, Day SM, Deswal A, Elliott P, Evanovich LL, Hung J, Joglar JA, Kantor P, Kimmelstiel C, Kittleson M, Link MS, Maron MS, Martinez MW, Miyake CY, Schaff HV, Semsarian C, Sorajja P. 2020 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):3022-3055. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.044. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
- Background: PubMed 36723919Infeld M, Wahlberg K, Cicero J, Plante TB, Meagher S, Novelli A, Habel N, Krishnan AM, Silverman DN, LeWinter MM, Lustgarten DL, Meyer M. Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;8(3):213-221. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320.
- Background: PubMed 37650505Weissler-Snir A, Rakowski H, Meyer M. Beta-blockers in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: time to ease the heart rate restriction? Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3655-3657. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad518. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of HTX-001
Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Patients With Non-Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ninerafaxstat in Patients With Symptomatic Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2/3
Open-label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Aficamten in Adults With HCM
Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
Not yet recruiting
Coronary Sinus Reducer Objective Impact on SymptoMs, Ischaemia and miCrovascular Resistance in Non-obstructive Hypertrophic CardioMyopathy
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Luigi Di Biase, MD principal investigator
Montefiore Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing myPACE+ algorithm in people with Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: PI left the institution. IRB study closure date of 11/12/2025. IRB approved closeout on 2/6/2026.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) status (time frame: Baseline to 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06775886, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2026.