Spinal Cord InjuryNCT06782113
Safety and Efficacy of the UNILEXA Exoskeleton for Regular Verticalization and Assisted Walking
An observational study of Spinal Cord Injury and Exoskeleton Device, run by MEBSTER at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this clinical follow-up is to analyze data regarding the safety of the UNILEXA passive exoskeleton post-market. The secondary objective is to assess the effectiveness of the device in improving activities of daily living (ADL) through improved mobility, endurance and health-related quality of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Exoskeleton Device
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 28 Nov 2024to Mar 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Individuals with lower limb paralysis who have purchased and are actively using the UNILEXA exoskeleton.
Who may be able to join
- Individuals with lower limb paralysis due to spinal cord injury (T5-T12 lesion) in chronic phase (> 6 months)
- Age 18 years and older.
- ASIA score: AIS A or AIS B.
- Ability to provide informed consent and follow study procedures.
- Weight below 100 kg.
- Height between 165 - 195 cm. (PI can decide to include participants outside of this range. The IFU specifies an EXTENDED range of 160 - 200 cm with certain conditions.)
Who cannot join
- Severe contractures in the lower limbs.
- Spasticity greater than 2 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
- Autonomic dysreflexia.
- Spinal instability.
- Untreated deep vein thrombosis.
- Untreated fractures of the pelvis or limbs.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Advanced osteoporosis.
- Complete tetraplegia.
- Lack of upper limb control grade 3 or less, according to the ASIA test.
- History of fracture due to osteoporosis.
- Medication that increases the chance of fracture.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Czechia1 site
Státní léčebné lázně Janské Lázně, státní podnik
Janske Lazne, 542 25
About this study
Official title: Prospective Study on the Safety and Efficacy of the UNILEXA Exoskeleton for Regular Verticalization and Assisted Walking
The primary objective of this clinical follow-up is to analyze data regarding the safety of the UNILEXA passive exoskeleton post-market. The secondary objective is to assess the effectiveness of the device in improving activities of daily living (ADL) through improved mobility, endurance and health-related quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide real-world evidence to support wider clinical and home use of the exoskeleton. This observational study is designed for 6 participants from a population of individuals with lower limb paralysis. The study will have a duration of 14 weeks. During this period, participants will visit Janske Lazne three times for routine measurements in a biomechanical laboratory, which will be integrated into their usual physiotherapy sessions.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Exoskeleton Device
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects [Safety Assessment]
Analyze data regarding the safety of the UNILEXA exoskeleton by determining the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs), such as falls, skin injuries, and other injuries, over the study period.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Secondary outcomes (8)
Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL)
To assess improvements in health-related quality of life (QoL) using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, a standardized questionnaire measuring QoL across four domains: physical, psychological, social relationships, and environment.
Scale range: 0-100. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
User Satisfaction Measured by QUEST 2.0
To assess user satisfaction with the UNILEXA exoskeleton using the QUEST 2.0 questionnaire. This evaluates satisfaction with the device and associated services.
QUEST 2.0: A validated user satisfaction questionnaire consisting of 12 items across two subscales: device satisfaction and service satisfaction. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not satisfied at all, 5 = very satisfied).
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Time to Complete the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
To evaluate the time required to walk 10 meters at a comfortable speed.
Unit of Measure: Seconds. Interpretation: Lower times indicate better functional mobility.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Time to Complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
To assess mobility performance by measuring the time required to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, and return to sit in the chair.
Unit of Measure: Seconds. Interpretation: Lower times indicate better functional mobility.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Level of Assistance Required for Mobility
To evaluate the level of physical assistance required during mobility tasks using a 6-point ordinal scale.
Scale range: 0-5, where 0 = no assistance and 5 = full physical assistance required.
Interpretation: Lower scores indicate better functional independence.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Rating of Perceived Exertion Measured by Borg RPE
To evaluate the perceived exertion of participants during mobility tasks using the Borg RPE scale.
Borg RPE Scale: Measures exertion on a scale from 0-10, where 0 = no exertion and 10 = maximal exertion.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
To assess the pain intensity experienced by participants during mobility tasks using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
VAS Scale: Measures pain on a scale from 0-10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst imaginable pain.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Cognitive and Physical Workload Measured by NASA-TLX
To evaluate the cognitive and physical workload experienced by participants during mobility tasks using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire.
NASA-TLX: A multidimensional workload assessment tool with six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration.
Scale range: 0-20 for each subscale. Interpretation: Higher scores indicate greater workload in each category.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2025
- Study start28 Nov 2024
- Primary completionMar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MEBSTER
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06782113
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202411 J01
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Study on the Safety and Efficacy of the UNILEXA Exoskeleton for Regular Verticalization and Assisted Walking
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06782113
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202411 J01
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Exoskeleton Device
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- MEBSTERIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 28 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this clinical follow-up is to analyze data regarding the safety of the UNILEXA passive exoskeleton post-market. The secondary objective is to assess the effectiveness of the device in improving activities of daily living (ADL) through improved mobility, endurance and health-related quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study is to provide real-world evidence to support wider clinical and home use of the exoskeleton. This observational study is designed for 6 participants from a population of individuals with lower limb paralysis. The study will have a duration of 14 weeks. During this period, participants will visit Janske Lazne three times for routine measurements in a biomechanical laboratory, which will be integrated into their usual physiotherapy sessions.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Individuals with lower limb paralysis who have purchased and are actively using the UNILEXA exoskeleton.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Individuals with lower limb paralysis due to spinal cord injury (T5-T12 lesion) in chronic phase (> 6 months)
- Age 18 years and older.
- ASIA score: AIS A or AIS B.
- Ability to provide informed consent and follow study procedures.
- Weight below 100 kg.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Severe contractures in the lower limbs.
- Spasticity greater than 2 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS).
- Autonomic dysreflexia.
- Spinal instability.
- Untreated deep vein thrombosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Incidence of Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects [Safety Assessment]
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Analyze data regarding the safety of the UNILEXA exoskeleton by determining the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse device effects (ADEs), such as falls, skin injuries, and other injuries, over the study period.
8 secondary outcomes
Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
User Satisfaction Measured by QUEST 2.0
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Time to Complete the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Time to Complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Level of Assistance Required for Mobility
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Rating of Perceived Exertion Measured by Borg RPE
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Pain Intensity Measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Cognitive and Physical Workload Measured by NASA-TLX
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2025.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Spinal Cord Injury and Exoskeleton Device, run by MEBSTER at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Adverse Events and Adverse Device Effects [Safety Assessment] (time frame: From enrollment to the end of observation at 14 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2025.