AzTrials
AzTrials

StroketDCS and mCIMTNCT06786000

Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Modified-Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)

A study testing Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMT and Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMT in people with Stroke and Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke, run by King Saud University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different types of tDCS modulation with mCIMT in improving affected upper-limb motor function for stroke patients. The main question it seeks to answer: Which type of tDCS (bi-hemispheric, anodal, or cathodal) combined with the mCIMT program leads to greater… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMT and Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMT
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteSaudi Arabia
Study dates
11 Apr 2023to 11 Apr 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participants clinically diagnosed and confirmed by imaging of ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident (Dahl et al., 2008; Jin et al., 2019).
  • Participant's age older than 18 years (Baltar et al., 2020).
  • Stroke onset more than 3 months with unilateral motor deficits (Lin et al., 2010).
  • Adequate cognitive function is required to follow instructions. The Arabic version of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) should be ≥24 (Kim, 2021).
  • 10° of active extension to the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints and 20° at wrist will be assessed by manual goniometer (Dahl et al., 2008).
  • Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) scores between 19 and 58, indicating moderate to mild impairments.
  • Not participating in other clinical, or research studies at the same time.

Who cannot join

  • Severe muscle spasticity at the affected limb at all joints (the Modified Ashworth Scale scores > 3) (Baltar et al., 2020).
  • Contraindications to NIBS (Bornheim et al., 2019).
  • Unilateral neglect (Dahl et al., 2008)
  • Other neurologic or orthopedic conditions that may affect hand function.
  • Unstable medical conditions.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Alaa M. Albishi, PhD in Rehabilitation Sciences contact

+966555090015

aalbeshi@KSU.EDU.SA

Ahmad O. Alokaily, PhD contact

+966557447442

aalokaily@ksu.edu.sa

Saudi Arabia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • King Saud University Medical City

    Riyadh, Riyadh Region, 12372

    Alaa M Albiahi, PhD, +966555090015, aalbeshi@KSU.EDU.SA

    Ahmad O Alokaily, PhD, +966557447442, aalaokily@ksu.edu.sa

    Recruiting

Other trials in Saudi Arabia

About this study

Official title: Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and Modified-Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT) on Upper Limb Function Recovery in Patients with Stroke

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of different types of tDCS modulation with mCIMT in improving affected upper-limb motor function for stroke patients. The main question it seeks to answer:

Which type of tDCS (bi-hemispheric, anodal, or cathodal) combined with the mCIMT program leads to greater improvement in affected upper-limb function in patients with stroke? Researchers will compare these three types of tDCS to a sham tDCS. To see which kind of tDCS protocol combined with the mCIMT program will be more effective in improving affected upper-limb function for stroke patients.

Read more

Participants will:

  1. Participants will receive 12 sessions of mCIMT combined with tDCS or mCIMT alone.
  2. Visit the clinic three times a week for four weeks.
  3. Participants will do fMRI and TMS before and after the program and three times of assessment before and after two weeks after the program.
Read the detailed description

Background: After a stroke, intense motor rehabilitation is required to facilitate motor recovery. In specific, combining tDCS with neurorehabilitation interventions boosts the responses of the brain to the interventions and maximizes the effects of rehabilitation to improve upper limb recovery post-stroke. Objectives: To evaluate the effect of different modes of tDCS modulation with mCIMT in improving affected upper-limb motor recovery for patients with stroke. Method: a randomizing control trial design, after performing a baseline assessment, the participants will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups: the anodal tDCS +mCIMT group, the cathodal tDCS +mCIMT group, the bihemispheric tDCS +mCIMT group, and the mCIMT alone group. Inclusion Criteria, adult participants clinically diagnosed and confirmed by imaging of ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident, participant's age older than 18 years, Stroke onset more than 3 months with unilateral motor deficits, Adequate cognitive function is required to follow instructions. The Arabic version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) should be ≥24, 10° of active extension to the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints and 20° at the wrist, and not participating in other clinical, or research studies at the same time. Exclusion Criteria, Severe muscle spasticity at the affected limb at all joints (the Modified Ashworth Scale scores > 3), Contraindications to NIBS, unilateral neglect, Other neurologic or orthopedic conditions that may affect hand function, and unstable medical conditions. The total intervention period will be performed 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Each participant will undergo motor impairment and physiological assessments at baseline, during and after the intervention. Functional outcome measures: Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale - upper extremity (FMA-UE), Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT), Arabic version of Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16), and Stroke-Specific Measure of Adherence to Home-based Exercises (SS-MAHE). Physiological outcome measures: Cortical Excitability Assessment will be measured by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) with electromyographic (EMG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Being tested
Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMT, Sham tDCS combined with mCIMT
Keywords
stroke, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, tDCS, mCIMT, hemiparesis, neural activation, primary motor cortex, NIBS, non invasive brain stimulation, trans direct current stimulation, modified constraint induced movement therapy
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke, Hemorrhagic Stroke, Paresis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMTDevice

    20 minutes of anodal tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program. The anodal electrode will be placed over the ipsilesional M1 (primary motor cortex, C3 or C4 according to EEG 10/20 system), and the cathodal electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp1 or Fp2) ). Leading to subthreshold depolarization to promote cortical excitation. And twelve different oriented tasks will be used during the 1-hour training period.

  • Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMTDevice

    20 minutes of cathodal tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program. the cathodal electrode will be placed over the contralesional M1, and the anodal electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp1 or Fp2). leading to subthreshold polarization to promote cortical inhibition. And twelve different oriented tasks will be used during the 1-hour training period.

  • Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMTDevice

    20 minutes of Bihemispheric tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program. the cathodal electrode will be placed over the primary motor cortex (M1) of the contralesional hemisphere and the anodal electrode will be placed above the ipsilateral M1 position (C3 or C4 positions, according to the 10/20 EEG system). And twelve different oriented tasks will be used during the 1-hour training period.

  • Sham tDCS combined with mCIMTDevice

    20 minutes of sham tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program. the same stimulation place and parameters will be used as in the anodal group. However, after 30 seconds of stimulation, the stimulator will switch off. This provides the participants with the experience of the initial itchy sensation that occurs during tDCS, which is required for efficient masking. And twelve different oriented tasks will be used during the 1-hour training period.

Study groups in NCT06786000
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMTExperimental20 minutes of anodal tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program
Receives: Device: Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMT
Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMTExperimental20 minutes of cathodal tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program
Receives: Device: Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMT
Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMTExperimental20 minutes of bihemispheric tDCS followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program
Receives: Device: Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMT
Sham tDCS combined with mCIMTSham comparator20 minutes of anodal tDCS (after 30 seconds of stimulation, the stimulator will switch off) followed by 1 hour of the mCIMT program
Receives: Device: Sham tDCS combined with mCIMT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale - upper extremity (FMA-UE)

    The upper extremity domain of FMA consists of 33 items (reflex activity, volitional movement within synergies, volitional movement mixing synergies, volitional movement with little or no synergy, wrist, hand, coordination/ speed). On a 3-point ordinal scale, 0 = cannot perform, 1 = performs partially, and 2 = performs fully. The upper extremity domain has a total score of 66. A higher score indicated better performance of the affected side.

    Measured: at baseline, and after 2 weeks, and after intervention (4 weeks).

  2. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)

    It is used to assess upper-limb performance through timed and functional tasks (Wolf et al., 2001). The WMFT is preferred to frequently used upper limb performance tests since it assesses a wide range of functional activities (from simple to complex) and investigates both performance time and movement quality (Morris et al., 2001). The modified WMFT consists of 17 items, 2 of which are strength measurements, and the remaining 15 items are functional tasks that gradually progress from simple movements in the proximal joint to complex movements in the distal joint. Each of the 15 tasks is timed to completion, up to a maximum of 120 seconds (Wolf et al., 2001). The items are scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (does not attempt with the upper limb being tested) to 5 (uses the limb being tested, movement appears normal) (Wolf et al., 2005). A lower score indicates a lower functional level (Wolf et al., 2005).

    Measured: at baseline, and after 2 weeks, and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

  3. Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test (NHPT) is one of the most commonly used performance tests for measuring hand function and manual dexterity in stroke patients (Chen et al., 2009; Mathiowetz et al., 1985). The NHPT consists of a container with nine pegs and a pegboard with nine holes. The board will be placed at the midline of the patient, with the container containing the pegs on the side of the hand being evaluated. The NHPT requires the patient to pick up the pegs from the container with the affected upper limb, transfer and insert them into the holes of the pegboard until it is full, and then return them to the container. Patients will be instructed to complete the test as quickly and accurately as possible (Sommerfeld et al., 2004). The score will be based on the time it takes to complete the test activity, which will be recorded in seconds. The stopwatch should be started when the patient touches the first peg until the last peg is put in the container (Oxford Grice et al., 2003).

    Measured: at baseline, and after 2 weeks, and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

  4. Cortical Excitability Assessment

    The Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) will be used to assess the corticospinal excitability through the measurement of the TMS-elicited motor evoked potential (MEP) in both the lesioned and the nonlesioned motor cortices (Wassermann et al., 2008). Online monitoring of the electromyographic (EMG) activity in response to TMS will be performed, MEPs will be recorded from the left and the right first interosseous (FDI) muscles

    Measured: at baseline and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

  5. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)

    Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is a type of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that measures brain activity and connectivity. During an fMRI scan, a block design will be used. Each scan will take 6 minutes and be split into six blocks in the following order, with a rest of 30 seconds between each of the 15 contractions that last 2 seconds each and 30 seconds of rest in between (Wen et al., 2014). In each task, participants will be asked to grip a rubber ball at a target pressure of 30% of their maximum voluntary contraction using their affected hand (Cheng et al., 2021; Ismail et al., 2014). Visual feedback will be provided for the patients to guide the movement (Könönen et al., 2012).

    Measured: at baseline and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

  6. Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)

    It is used to assess upper-limb performance through timed and functional tasks (Wolf et al., 2001). The WMFT is preferred to frequently used upper limb performance tests since it assesses a wide range of functional activities (from simple to complex) and investigates both performance time and movement quality (Morris et al., 2001). The modified WMFT consists of 17 items, 2 of which are strength measurements, and the remaining 15 items are functional tasks that gradually progress from simple movements in the proximal joint to complex movements in the distal joint. Each of the 15 tasks is timed to completion, up to a maximum of 120 seconds (Wolf et al., 2001). The items are scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (does not attempt with the upper limb being tested) to 5 (uses the limb being tested, movement appears normal) (Wolf et al., 2005). A lower score indicates a lower functional level (Wolf et al., 2005).

    Measured: at baseline and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Arabic version of Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16)

    Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-16) is a stroke specific, self-reported outcome measure used to assess the impact of stroke on health-related quality of life status related to physical function (P. Duncan et al., 2003). It consists of 16 items, basic and instrumental activities of daily living (7 items), mobility (8 items), and hand function (1 item) on a 5-level Likert scale, 1 = inability to complete the item; 5 = not difficult at all (P. Duncan et al., 2003; P. W. Duncan et al., 2003). Higher scores indicate a better level of health-related quality of life status for stroke patients (P. W. Duncan et al., 2003).

    Measured: at baseline, and after 2 weeks, and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

  2. Motor Activity log (MAL)

    The MAL consists of two scales; amount of use (AOU), which is the amount the stroke patient uses on the affected limb, and quality of movement (QOM), which is the patient's perceived quality of movement while performing 30 items of daily life (Taub et al., 1993). The items are scored on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (did not use my weaker arm) to 5 (used my weaker arm as often as before the stroke) for measuring AOU; and to measure QOM, the patient is asked how well the affected limb helped during this activity. Possible scores range from 0 (my weaker arm was not used at all for that activity) to 5 (the ability to use my weaker arm for that activity was as good as before the stroke) (Taub et al., 1993).

    Measured: at baseline, week 1, week 2, week 3 and after intervention ( 4 weeks).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2025
  2. Study start11 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion11 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion11 Apr 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06786000
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-23-7495
Acronym
tDCS and mCIMT
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
2 Jan 2025
Last updated
22 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Baltar A, Piscitelli D, Marques D, Shirahige L, Monte-Silva K. Baseline Motor Impairment Predicts Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Physical Therapy-Induced Improvement in Individuals with Chronic Stroke. Neural Plast. 2020 Nov 25;2020:8859394. doi: 10.1155/2020/8859394. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33299400

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anodal tDCS combined with mCIMT, Cathodal tDCS combined with mCIMT and Bihemispheric tDCS combined with mCIMT in people with Stroke and Hemiparesis of the Upper Limb Following Stroke, run by King Saud University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Alaa M. Albishi, PhD in Rehabilitation Sciences (+966555090015, aalbeshi@KSU.EDU.SA), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale - upper extremity (FMA-UE) (time frame: at baseline, and after 2 weeks, and after intervention (4 weeks).). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06786000, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in