Quality Indicators, Health CareNCT06786793
Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy
A study testing Computer-aided detection (CADe) in people with Quality Indicators, Health Care and Artificial Intelligence (AI), run by Jagiellonian University at 2 sites in Poland.
Trial summary
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in the countries of the European Union. Colonoscopy is the primary method for detecting and preventing the development of colorectal cancer is endoscopic examination. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Quality Indicators, Health Care, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- What is being tested?
- Computer-aided detection (CADe)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 630 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesPoland
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consent to participate in the study,
- Age between 50 and 65 years,
- Scheduled outpatient colonoscopy.
Who cannot join
- Previous colonoscopy,
- History of colorectal surgery,
- Ongoing biological therapy for any indication,
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis,
- Familial polyposis syndrome,
- Chronic diarrhea,
- Ulcerative colitis,
- Crohn's disease.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Poland2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
MEDICINA Medical Center
Krakow, Lesser Poladn, 31559
Zofia Orzeszko, MD, +48123797145, z.orzeszko@bonifratrzy.krakow.pl
Zofia Orzeszko, MD
- Recruiting
Brothers Hospitallers Medical Center, Hospital of St John of god in Krakow
Krakow, Lesser Polasd, 31061
Zofia Orzeszko, MD, +48123797145, z.orzeszko@bonifratrzy.krakow.pl
Tomasz Gach, PhD
About this study
Official title: Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Study.
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in the countries of the European Union. Colonoscopy is the primary method for detecting and preventing the development of colorectal cancer is endoscopic examination. This study aims to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence on the detection rate of polyps and early stages of colorectal cancer.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in the countries of the European Union. The primary method for detecting and preventing the development of colorectal cancer is endoscopic examination-colonoscopy, during which precancerous lesions such as adenomas and serrated polyps can be removed. The effectiveness of colonoscopy depends on the adenoma detection rate, which varies among endoscopists and is influenced by their skills and experience. It has been proven that high-quality colonoscopy prevents the omission of colorectal cancer, which might develop in the future as so-called interval cancer. A breakthrough in machine learning in recent years has enabled the development of commercial artificial intelligence systems. These systems aim to improve the detection rates of precancerous polyps and, consequently, potentially reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Artificial intelligence is also expected to help standardize performance across endoscopic procedures of varying quality, thereby contributing to a reduction in colorectal cancer incidence in the future. This study aims to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence on the detection rate of polyps and early stages of colorectal cancer.
- Conditions
- Quality Indicators, Health Care, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Being tested
- Computer-aided detection (CADe)
- Keywords
- Quality Indicatiors, Colonoscopy, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Computer-aided Detection (CADe), Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Computer-aided detection (CADe)Device
Endo-Aid CADe system is an AI-assisted computer-aided lesion detection application on ENDO-AID hardware. It uses a complex algorithm created via a neural network developed and taught by Olympus. With this new app, the sophisticated machine learning system can alert the endoscopist in real-time when a suspicious lesion appears on the screen. The image from the vision processor is transferred to the CADe device. The computer application recognizes the shape of the polyps and marks their place on the monitor screen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AI-group | Experimental | AI-group will include patients undergoing colonoscopy with the support of the ENDO-AID OIP-1 artificial intelligence system for colorectal polyp detection. Receives: Device: Computer-aided detection (CADe) |
| Non-AI-group | No intervention | Non-AI-group will consist of patients undergoing colonoscopy without the assistance of this system. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
The percentage of colonoscopies when at least one histologically proven adenoma was found.
Measured: During the colonoscopy examination
Secondary outcomes (3)
Utility of artificial intelligence for both novice and experienced endoscopists
The difference in adenoma detection rates (ADR) achieved with and without AI in trainees and expert endoscopists.
Measured: During the colonoscopy examination
Assessing the morphology of polyps detected during colonoscopy
Assessment of the differences in polyps' morphology detected in both arms of the study.
Measured: During the colonoscopy examination
Cost analysis of procedures performed with the use of artificial intelligence
The assessment of cost-efficiency of AI implementation, including the increased cost of pathological evaluation and additional surveillance examinations.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2025
- Study start1 Nov 2024
- Primary completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Quality Indicators, Health CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jagiellonian University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zofia Orzeszko, Jagiellonian University
- Investigators
- Miroslaw Szura, Prof., Study chair, Jagiellonian University in KrakowZofia Orzeszko, MD, Principal investigator, Jagiellonian University in Krakow
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06786793
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024.000.421
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Boroff ES, Gurudu SR, Hentz JG, Leighton JA, Ramirez FC. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):993-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.68. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
PubMed 23567353Mori Y, Kudo SE, East JE, Rastogi A, Bretthauer M, Misawa M, Sekiguchi M, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Hotta K, Ohtsuka K, Kudo T, Mori K. Cost savings in colonoscopy with artificial intelligence-aided polyp diagnosis: an add-on analysis of a clinical trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):905-911.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3759. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
PubMed 32240683van Doorn SC, Klanderman RB, Hazewinkel Y, Fockens P, Dekker E. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
PubMed 25817896Barua I, Vinsard DG, Jodal HC, Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O, Misawa M, Bretthauer M, Mori Y. Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):277-284. doi: 10.1055/a-1201-7165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
PubMed 32557490Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E, Ferrara E, Spadaccini M, Alkandari A, Fugazza A, Anderloni A, Galtieri PA, Pellegatta G, Carrara S, Di Leo M, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, Lorenzetti R, Andrealli A, Antonelli G, Wallace M, Sharma P, Rosch T, Hassan C. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):512-520.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062. Epub 2020 May 1.
PubMed 32371116Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
PubMed 24693890Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
PubMed 20463339
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps: A Prospective Randomized Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06786793
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024.000.421
- Conditions
- Quality Indicators, Health Care, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Colonoscopy Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Keywords
- Quality Indicatiors, Colonoscopy, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Computer-aided Detection (CADe), Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 630 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Jagiellonian UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in the countries of the European Union. Colonoscopy is the primary method for detecting and preventing the development of colorectal cancer is endoscopic examination. This study aims to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence on the detection rate of polyps and early stages of colorectal cancer.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy in the countries of the European Union. The primary method for detecting and preventing the development of colorectal cancer is endoscopic examination-colonoscopy, during which precancerous lesions such as adenomas and serrated polyps can be removed. The effectiveness of colonoscopy depends on the adenoma detection rate, which varies among endoscopists and is influenced by their skills and experience. It has been proven that high-quality colonoscopy prevents the omission of colorectal cancer, which might develop in the future as so-called interval cancer. A breakthrough in machine learning in recent years has enabled the development of commercial artificial intelligence systems. These systems aim to improve the detection rates of precancerous polyps and, consequently, potentially reduce the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Artificial intelligence is also expected to help standardize performance across endoscopic procedures of varying quality, thereby contributing to a reduction in colorectal cancer incidence in the future. This study aims to evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence on the detection rate of polyps and early stages of colorectal cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AI-group | Experimental | Device: Computer-aided detection (CADe)AI-group will include patients undergoing colonoscopy with the support of the ENDO-AID OIP-1 artificial intelligence system for colorectal polyp detection. |
| Non-AI-group | No intervention | –Non-AI-group will consist of patients undergoing colonoscopy without the assistance of this system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Consent to participate in the study,
- Age between 50 and 65 years,
- Scheduled outpatient colonoscopy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Previous colonoscopy,
- History of colorectal surgery,
- Ongoing biological therapy for any indication,
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis,
- Familial polyposis syndrome,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Computer-aided detection (CADe)Endo-Aid CADe system is an AI-assisted computer-aided lesion detection application on ENDO-AID hardware. It uses a complex algorithm created via a neural network developed and taught by Olympus. With this new app, the sophisticated machine learning system can alert the endoscopist in real-time when a suspicious lesion appears on the screen. The image from the vision processor is transferred to the CADe device. The computer application recognizes the shape of the polyps and marks their place on the monitor screen. | Device | AI-group |
Primary outcome
Adenoma detection rate (ADR)
Time frame: During the colonoscopy examination
The percentage of colonoscopies when at least one histologically proven adenoma was found.
3 secondary outcomes
Utility of artificial intelligence for both novice and experienced endoscopists
Time frame: During the colonoscopy examination
Assessing the morphology of polyps detected during colonoscopy
Time frame: During the colonoscopy examination
Cost analysis of procedures performed with the use of artificial intelligence
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2025.
- Background: PubMed 23567353Boroff ES, Gurudu SR, Hentz JG, Leighton JA, Ramirez FC. Polyp and adenoma detection rates in the proximal and distal colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jun;108(6):993-9. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.68. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 32240683Mori Y, Kudo SE, East JE, Rastogi A, Bretthauer M, Misawa M, Sekiguchi M, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Ikematsu H, Hotta K, Ohtsuka K, Kudo T, Mori K. Cost savings in colonoscopy with artificial intelligence-aided polyp diagnosis: an add-on analysis of a clinical trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):905-911.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3759. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 25817896van Doorn SC, Klanderman RB, Hazewinkel Y, Fockens P, Dekker E. Adenoma detection rate varies greatly during colonoscopy training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jul;82(1):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 32557490Barua I, Vinsard DG, Jodal HC, Loberg M, Kalager M, Holme O, Misawa M, Bretthauer M, Mori Y. Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):277-284. doi: 10.1055/a-1201-7165. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 32371116Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R, Correale L, Radaelli F, Rondonotti E, Ferrara E, Spadaccini M, Alkandari A, Fugazza A, Anderloni A, Galtieri PA, Pellegatta G, Carrara S, Di Leo M, Craviotto V, Lamonaca L, Lorenzetti R, Andrealli A, Antonelli G, Wallace M, Sharma P, Rosch T, Hassan C. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):512-520.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062. Epub 2020 May 1.
- Background: PubMed 24693890Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.
- Background: PubMed 20463339Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, Polkowski M, Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J, Zwierko M, Rupinski M, Nowacki MP, Butruk E. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 May 13;362(19):1795-803. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907667.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Quality Indicators, Health Care
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Optimize the Performance and Delivery of Acute Dialysis
Renal Dialysis, Renal Replacement Therapy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Perceptions of Leadership in Quality Culture for Infection Prevention Among Intensive Care Nurses and Unit-Based Assessment of Antimicrobial Resistance Indicators in Intensive Care Units
Healthcare-associated Infections, Quality Culture and Leadership in Intensive Care
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Epidemiology of Antimicrobial-use and Antimicrobial-resistant Infections in Four Hospitals in Thailand
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Nurses' Behavior Change and Evidence-Based Practice Implementation on Quality Indicators in Intensive Care Units in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP), Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Optimization and Validation of Quality Control Indicators for Coronary Revascularization Based on Antiplatelet Therapy
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), High Bleeding Risk (HBR)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Miroslaw Szura, Prof. study chair
Jagiellonian University in Krakow
Zofia Orzeszko, MD principal investigator
Jagiellonian University in Krakow
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Computer-aided detection (CADe) in people with Quality Indicators, Health Care and Artificial Intelligence (AI), run by Jagiellonian University at 2 sites in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zofia Orzeszko, MD (+48123797145, z.orzeszko@bonifratrzy.krakow.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Adenoma detection rate (ADR) (time frame: During the colonoscopy examination). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06786793, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2025.