AzTrials
AzTrials

Advanced Lung CancerBREEZE+NCT06791057

Multi-site Trial of a Brief Behavioral Intervention for Dyspnea in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

A study testing Dyspnea Intervention in people with Advanced Lung Cancer and Dyspnea, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 2 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Dyspnea, or breathlessness, is one of the most common and distressing symptoms experienced by patients with advanced lung cancer. The purpose of this multi-site trial is to test the effectiveness of a dyspnea intervention (called BREEZE+) that includes three brief nurse-delivered sessions and access to a digital… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Advanced Lung Cancer, Dyspnea
What is being tested?
Dyspnea Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
420 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
1 Nov 2026to 30 Jun 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (i.e., non-small cell lung cancer or small cell lung cancer) or mesothelioma, not being treated with curative intent
  • Self-report at least moderate dyspnea per a rating ≥4 on the validated 0-10 breathlessness item of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-Revised
  • Functioning independently per an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤2
  • Ability to read and respond to questions in English or Spanish
  • Receiving primary cancer care at one of the participating institutions

Who cannot join

  • Significant uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or other co-morbid disease (e.g., dementia, cognitive impairment), which the treating oncology clinician reports would prohibit the patient's ability to participate in study procedures.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Jennifer S. Temel, MD contact

617-724-4000

jtemel@mgh.harvard.edu

Joseph A. Greer, PhD contact

617-724-4000

jgreer2@mgh.harvard.edu

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

    Jennifer S. Temel, MD, 617-724-4000, jtemel@mgh.harvard.edu

    Joseph A. Greer, PhD, 617-643-2143, jgreer2@mgh.harvard.edu

    Recruiting
  • University of Miami

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33124

    Lara Traeger, PhD, 305-284-3012, ltraeger@miami.edu

    Lara Traeger, PhD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Dyspnea, or breathlessness, is one of the most common and distressing symptoms experienced by patients with advanced lung cancer. The purpose of this multi-site trial is to test the effectiveness of a dyspnea intervention (called BREEZE+) that includes three brief nurse-delivered sessions and access to a digital health app that teaches and reinforces patients' use of skills for managing and coping with this highly debilitating symptom. This study will lay the groundwork for a follow-up pragmatic implementation trial integrating BREEZE+ into usual oncology care for patients with advanced lung cancer experiencing dyspnea.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to improve dyspnea, one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients with advanced lung cancer. Despite improvements in survival from novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy for patients with advanced lung cancer, the proportion of patients experiencing dyspnea (i.e., difficulty breathing) has not decreased. In fact, recent data show that the prevalence of dyspnea is now over 70%, higher than estimates reported in older cohorts. Although cancer burden, such as extensive disease in the lung or pleural effusions, certainly causes and exacerbates symptoms of breathlessness, psychological factors also underlie the experience of dyspnea. Patient-reported dyspnea is associated with impaired quality of life, decreased functioning at home and work, withdrawal from social activities, heightened symptoms of anxiety and depression, and even a desire for hastened death. Moreover, dyspnea leads to unscheduled visits to oncology clinics and the emergency department, often resulting in hospitalization. Recognizing the notable impact of breathlessness on patient functioning and health care utilization, the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative for the American Society of Clinical Oncology identified the assessment and management of dyspnea as a key measure of quality cancer care. Unfortunately, data are limited to support efficacious treatments for dyspnea. While clinicians commonly prescribe opioids to treat breathlessness, recent systematic reviews concluded that pharmacologic management did not improve dyspnea and carried potential harm. In a recent Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Comparative Effectiveness Review of non-pharmacological interventions for dyspnea, the authors reported that behavioral and multicomponent interventions involving physical activity or rehabilitation hold the greatest promise for addressing dyspnea, despite having low strength of evidence to date. Therefore, comprehensive approaches to care incorporating behavioral interventions for dyspnea are greatly needed, given the degree of patient suffering and the lack of evidence-based protocols. To address this evidence gap, the investigators developed a brief, two-session behavioral intervention for dyspnea management in patients with advanced lung cancer called, "BREEZE." To ensure the potential for broad dissemination of BREEZE, the investigators purposefully limited the number of sessions, trained oncology nurses to serve as interventionists, and successfully transitioned to fully remote delivery during the pandemic. The investigators completed a single-center randomized controlled efficacy trial of BREEZE versus usual care in patients with advanced lung cancer and self-reported dyspnea. Patients assigned to BREEZE reported significant improvements in the primary outcome of self-reported dyspnea and functional wellbeing at week eight. However, intervention effects were not sustained by the six-month follow-up time point. The investigators now propose to build upon these encouraging findings by conducting a multi-site trial of BREEZE in a diverse patient population. Moreover, the investigators have enhanced the intervention by adding a nurse-led booster session and integrating the dyspnea management components from a digital health app that their team developed for patients with advanced lung cancer, to reinforce BREEZE's evidence-based skills and to sustain intervention effects while preserving the "low-touch" for dissemination. The investigators propose to conduct a multi-site type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of BREEZE plus the booster and digital health app (i.e., BREEZE+) versus an enhanced usual care control (entailing educational resources on dyspnea management) in 420 patients with advanced lung cancer reporting dyspnea. Massachusetts General Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Miami will serve as study sites. The nurse-led sessions and digital health app components will be available in Spanish and English to enable the recruitment of a diverse sample, and the investigators will centralize intervention delivery to facilitate implementation. Data from this study will ultimately serve as the basis for a follow-up large-scale, multi-site dissemination trial of BREEZE+.

Being tested
Dyspnea Intervention, Enhanced Usual Care
Keywords
Dyspnea, Breathlessness, Lung Cancer, Behavioral Intervention
Medical subject headings
Dyspnea, Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dyspnea InterventionBehavioural

    Brief behavioral intervention for dyspnea management that includes three nurse-led sessions focused on psychoeducation, behavioral techniques for managing acute breathlessness, and relaxation training for reducing physiological stress as well as a digital health app to reinforce practice of breathing skills.

  • Enhanced Usual CareBehavioural

    Patients will receive educational materials on the management of symptoms of lung cancer and its treatment as well as any usual care for dyspnea deemed appropriate by the clinical team.

Study groups in NCT06791057
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dyspnea InterventionExperimentalPatients will receive three nurse-delivered sessions that focus on: (1) psychoeducation about the relationship between dyspnea and the physiologic stress response, (2) behavioral techniques for managing acute episodes of breathlessness (i.e., pursed-lip breathing, postural positions, and fan therapy), and (3) skills for reducing physiologic stress and strengthening lung capacity (e.g., slow diaphragmatic breathing; mindful breathing). Patients will also receive a digital health app downloaded to their mobile phone to reinforce daily practice of the dyspnea management skills. Patients may receive any usual care for their dyspnea as deemed appropriate by their clinicians.
Receives: Behavioral: Dyspnea Intervention
Enhanced Usual CareActive comparatorPatients will receive printed or electronic handouts regarding the common symptoms and side effects of lung cancer, including dyspnea, and recommendations for management from the American Cancer Society, with a link to their website of patient-education materials. Patients may receive any usual care for their dyspnea as deemed appropriate by their clinicians.
Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Usual Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient-reported Dyspnea

    To compare patient-reported dyspnea between study groups at 8 weeks using the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, which is a one-item self-report scale to evaluate the degree of a patient's dyspnea (score range: 0-4), with a higher score indicating worse dyspnea.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Patient-reported Dyspnea-related Anxiety and Discomfort

    To compare patient-reported dyspnea-related anxiety and discomfort between study groups at 8 weeks using the Cancer Dyspnea Scale, which is a 12-item self-report scale that assesses the multidimensional nature of dyspnea in patients with cancer (total scale score range: 0-48), with higher scores reflecting worse dyspnea-related effort, anxiety, and physical discomfort.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  2. Patient-reported Physical Function

    To compare patient-reported physical function between study groups at 8 weeks using the PROMIS Physical Function 8b Short Form, which is an 8-item measure that evaluates self-perceived capability of one's upper dexterity, lower extremities, and activities of daily living (total scale raw score range: 8-40), with higher scores indicating a greater level of physical function.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  3. Patient-reported Quality of Life

    To compare patient-reported quality of life between study groups at 8 weeks using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Questionnaire, which is a 36-item self-report measure of physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing and lung-cancer specific symptoms (total scale score range: 0-136), with higher scores indicating better overall quality of life.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  4. Patient-reported Self-Efficacy for Managing Dyspnea

    To compare patient-reported self-efficacy for managing dyspnea between study groups at 8 weeks using the Activity Self-Efficacy subscale of the 30-item Dyspnea Management Questionnaire (DMQ-30). This 5-item subscale assesses patients' confidence in their ability to manage shortness of breath while engaging in physical and daily activities. Each item is scored from 0 to 6, and the subscale score is calculated as the mean of completed items (range: 0-6). Higher scores indicate greater dyspnea-related self-efficacy.

    Measured: 8 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2025
  2. Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
420 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06791057
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-657
Other IDs
R01CA292902
Acronym
BREEZE+
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
18 Jan 2025
Last updated
19 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The total scale, subscale scores, and item-level scores from the self-report measures, sociodemographic information, and electronic health record data will be preserved and stored within a secure computing environment. All participant identifiers will be removed and maintained in a separate secure file that will not be shared to protect confidentiality.

Publications

  • Greer JA, MacDonald JJ, Vaughn J, Viscosi E, Traeger L, McDonnell T, Pirl WF, Temel JS. Pilot Study of a Brief Behavioral Intervention for Dyspnea in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Dec;50(6):854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jul 10.

    PubMed 26166181
  • Greer JA, Post KE, Chabria R, Aribindi S, Brennan N, Eche-Ugwu IJ, Halpenny B, Fox E, Lo S, Waldman LP, Pintro K, Rabideau DJ, Pirl WF, Cooley ME, Temel JS. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Nurse-Led Brief Behavioral Intervention for Dyspnea in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Oct 20;42(30):3570-3580. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00048. Epub 2024 Aug 1.

    PubMed 39088766

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dyspnea Intervention in people with Advanced Lung Cancer and Dyspnea, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jennifer S. Temel, MD (617-724-4000, jtemel@mgh.harvard.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient-reported Dyspnea (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06791057, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in