Brain InjuryNCT06796335
Development and Implementation of an Intervention Enhancing Involvement of Relatives to Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour
An observational study of Brain Injury and Brain Tumor Adult, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Caring for a loved one with a serious illness like acquired brain injury (ABI) or primary malignant brain tumors (PMBT) can be a challenging and burdensome experience, often affecting the well-being and quality of life of relatives. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Injury, Brain Tumor Adult, Traumatic Brain Injury
- What is being tested?
- RIGht
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study is conducted in six inpatient units in two hospice sites in Denmark that admitted adult patients with respectively acquired brain injury and malignant brain tumor. Acquired brain injuries often occur suddenly and unexpectedly. Suffering from an acquired brain injury has major consequences, not only for the patients, due to the devastating impact on their physical, cognitive, social, and psychological well-being, but also for the relatives who may need to take on a lifelong role as carers
Who may be able to join
- Relatives of adult patients with an acquired brain injury or primary malignant brain tumor
- Patients most be hospitalized
- Patients must agree to give their informed consent to involve their relatives
- Able to read and understand english
Who cannot join
- Relatives under the age of 18 years of age
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Caring for a loved one with a serious illness like acquired brain injury (ABI) or primary malignant brain tumors (PMBT) can be a challenging and burdensome experience, often affecting the well-being and quality of life of relatives. While family and friends can provide some support, this is not always enough to address the diverse needs of caregivers. Relatives often have different requirements for support, information, and involvement in the patient's care. Understanding these varying needs is key to ensuring both the patient and their caregivers are effectively supported during the illness journey.
This study aims to develop and test an intervention that helps healthcare professionals better support relatives in their caregiving role. The intervention uses a dialogue tool, which is designed to help nurses assess and follow up on the differing needs of relatives for involvement in the care of patients with ABI and PMBT. The goal is to enhance the experience of both the patient and their caregivers throughout the illness process.
Read more
The study will take place across seven units in two regions of Denmark, and it involves relatives of patients with ABI or PMBT. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Can an intervention that involves relatives improve their role in the care of patients with ABI and PMBT?
- Will this intervention help both patients and their relatives feel more supported and satisfied during the treatment process?
Participants will receive support through an intervention that includes several key components:
- Nurse training on how to use the dialogue tool to assess and address the varying needs of relatives for involvement.
- A list created by relatives, for relatives, to share experiences and advice with one another.
- Video materials explaining the background and purpose of the intervention to help relatives understand how it can benefit them.
- Guidelines for documenting the involvement of relatives in the patient's electronic health record.
By offering targeted support to relatives, this intervention aims to enhance their involvement in the treatment process, ensuring that both patients with ABI or PMBT and their families are better supported throughout the course of the illness.
Read the detailed description
Background Relatives of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) or primary malignant brain cancer (WHO grade III and IV) often face substantial caregiving burdens, which increase the risk of anxiety and depression. The patient's condition can significantly alter the daily lives of relatives, many of whom assume long-term caregiving responsibilities. These challenges are compounded by the emotional and practical difficulties faced by families, particularly when patients experience significant cognitive, physical, and emotional impairments. In cases of ABI, relatives often witness a gradual or sudden decline in the patient's functioning, leading to a profound sense of loss and a shift in family roles. Similarly, relatives of patients with PMBT are faced with the rapid progression of the disease, which demands constant adjustment to their caregiving responsibilities.
Despite these challenges, research underscores the importance of involving relatives in the patient's care and treatment, as this involvement has been shown to improve patient outcomes and family satisfaction. Furthermore, it promotes better communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals and families, which is essential for the rehabilitation process. However, Denmark currently lacks a validated tool to assess the diverse needs of relatives during treatment and rehabilitation, considering their individual resources and capacities. This gap leaves healthcare professionals without a standardized means to engage relatives in a way that is both meaningful and beneficial for the patient's recovery.
Furthermore, no intervention studies have specifically targeted the active engagement of relatives of patients with ABI or PMBT to provide direct support to relatives and indirectly benefit the patient. Given the growing body of evidence that highlights the importance of tailored support for relatives, there is an urgent need for a structured and evidence-based approach that can address the varying needs of families in different clinical settings.
Purpose The primary aim of this study is to develop, pilot, and evaluate a tool designed to identify and address the varied needs and resources of relatives. This tool will ensure that the involvement needs of relatives are assessed throughout the patient's treatment and rehabilitation. Specifically, the tool will help identify the unique challenges faced by relatives based on their socio-economic, emotional, and practical circumstances, thereby providing a personalized support framework. This systematic approach aims to reduce caregiver strain, improve the well-being of relatives, and enhance the overall rehabilitation process for the patient.
Methods The intervention was developed using the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions, with a focus on the participation of both relatives and healthcare professionals. The development process was iterative, incorporating theoretical models, evidence-based practices, and practical insights from caregiving contexts. Data was gathered through scoping reviews, field observations, and discussions with relatives and nurses across seven healthcare units in two regions of Denmark. These discussions provided diverse perspectives on the challenges faced by relatives in different clinical settings, including the specific needs of families coping with ABI and glioblastoma.
Through this process, it became evident that relatives experience a wide range of needs, from emotional and psychological support to practical assistance with caregiving tasks. This input directly influenced the design of the intervention, ensuring that it would be both comprehensive and responsive to the varying circumstances of families.
Results
The intervention consists of five key components:
- Nurse education: Equipping healthcare professionals to better support and involve relatives in the patient's care.
- A dialogue tool: For structured conversations between healthcare professionals and relatives to address specific needs.
- A relative-to-relative list: Tips for navigating the healthcare system, including guidance on how to access available resources, such as financial support, social services, and patient advocacy groups, which can help alleviate the strain on families.
- Video resources for caregivers: A video explaining the background and rationale for the intervention, featuring stories from relatives sharing their experiences.
- Guidelines for documenting relative involvement in the patient's electronic health record: Standardized tracking of relative participation in care.
A panel of 18 relatives, selected based on geographic location, age, and gender, contributed to the development and evaluation of the intervention. Their roles ranged from informants to advisors, providing feedback on activities, refining ideas, and assisting in the creation of materials, such as videos and the relative-to-relative list. Additionally, they played a crucial role in training nurses, ensuring that the intervention met the needs of families in a real-world healthcare context.
Clinical Perspectives The standardized tool is expected to systematically assess the needs and resources of relatives, ensuring tailored support according to their circumstances. By recognizing that relatives of patients with ABI and PMBT have different needs based on their personal situation and available resources, the tool aims to offer a more personalized and effective intervention. This personalized approach is anticipated to improve relative satisfaction, enhance their sense of agency in the caregiving role, and contribute to the rehabilitation process for the patient.
The intervention also aims to improve communication and collaboration between relatives and healthcare professionals. By fostering a more supportive environment for both patients and families, the intervention is expected to lead to better care outcomes, greater family satisfaction, and a more efficient healthcare process. Ultimately, this will contribute to an overall improvement in the patient's rehabilitation and long-term quality of life.
- Conditions
- Brain Injury, Brain Tumor Adult, Traumatic Brain Injury, Glioblastoma
- Being tested
- RIGht
- Keywords
- Involvement, Relatives, Complex intervention, Qualitative research, nurse intervention, tool, dialog
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Glioblastoma, Margins of Excision
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RIGhtOther
The final intervention consists of five components; 1) education of nurses 2) a dialog tool used in a single session intervention and follow- up 3) a relative- to- relative list 4) video material 5) guidelines on how to document the relative involving plan in the patient's electronic journal.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ABI (Aquired Brain Injury) | Not described Receives: Other: RIGht | |
| ABI (Aquired Brain Injury), MBT (Malignant Brain Tumor) | The study will be conducted in six inpatient units in two hospice sites in Denmark that admitted adult patients with respectively acquired brain injury and malignant brain tumor. Receives: Other: RIGht |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Focus group interviews
Themes describing nurses evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the intervention will be evaluated i through qualitative focus group interviews. A Thematic analysis as suggested by Braun and Clark will be conducted.
Measured: Op til 6 weeks post intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
PEIRS-22
To evaluate the relatives' experience of being involved in the research process, the Patient Engagement in Research Scale (PEIRS-22) is being utilized. This tool measures the degree of meaningful participation on a scale from 0 to 100, where a high score reflects a high level of meaningful engagement in the research.
Measured: Op til 6 weeks post intervention
Semi-structured interviews
To evaluate the acceptability, relevance, and apprropriateness semi-structured interviews will be conducted with relatives who received the intervention. Data will be analysed utilizing Braun and Clarks' thematic analysis
Measured: Op til 10 weeks post intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2025
- Study start10 Oct 2024
- Primary completion31 Jan 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hvidovre University Hospital, Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocenter
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rikke Guldager, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06796335
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ID P-2022-733
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Not relevant for this study
Publications
Guldager R, Gyldenohr E, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Nordentoft S, Loft MI. Relatives' Involvement in the Care Pathway of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour: An Observational Study. Nurs Res Pract. 2026 Apr 19;2026:2280006. doi: 10.1155/nrp/2280006. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42016768Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Aadal L, Loft MI, Poulsen I. Wants and needs of relatives' involvement in patient care: the same but different. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Nov 1;21(11):2154-2155. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00469. No abstract available.
PubMed 37935421Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Loft MI. Wants and needs for involvement reported by relatives of patients with a malignant brain tumor: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Nov 1;21(11):2188-2210. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00311.
PubMed 37435678Lundh MG, Nordentoft S, Smedegaard PS, Aadal L, Loft MI, Poulsen I, Guldager R. Interventions facilitating the involvement of relatives of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2025 Mar;34(3):784-794. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17328. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
PubMed 39078079Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Loft MI. Wants and needs for involvement experienced by relatives of patients with an acquired brain injury: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 May 1;21(5):886-912. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00022.
PubMed 36729839Guldager R, Sejr Smedegaard P, Nordentoft S, Aadal L, Ingerslev Loft M, Poulsen I. Facilitators and Barriers of Relatives' Involvement in Care of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour: Scoping Review. Nurs Open. 2026 Jan;13(1):e70417. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70417.
PubMed 41559742
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Implementation of an Intervention Enhancing Involvement of Relatives to Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06796335
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ID P-2022-733
- Conditions
- Brain Injury, Brain Tumor Adult, Traumatic Brain Injury, Glioblastoma
- Keywords
- Involvement, Relatives, Complex intervention, Qualitative research, nurse intervention, tool, dialog
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Copenhagen University Hospital, RigshospitaletUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hvidovre University Hospital, Regionshospitalet Hammel Neurocenter
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Caring for a loved one with a serious illness like acquired brain injury (ABI) or primary malignant brain tumors (PMBT) can be a challenging and burdensome experience, often affecting the well-being and quality of life of relatives. While family and friends can provide some support, this is not always enough to address the diverse needs of caregivers. Relatives often have different requirements for support, information, and involvement in the patient's care. Understanding these varying needs is key to ensuring both the patient and their caregivers are effectively supported during the illness journey.
This study aims to develop and test an intervention that helps healthcare professionals better support relatives in their caregiving role. The intervention uses a dialogue tool, which is designed to help nurses assess and follow up on the differing needs of relatives for involvement in the care of patients with ABI and PMBT. The goal is to enhance the experience of both the patient and their caregivers throughout the illness process.
The study will take place across seven units in two regions of Denmark, and it involves relatives of patients with ABI or PMBT. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- Can an intervention that involves relatives improve their role in the care of patients with ABI and PMBT?
- Will this intervention help both patients and their relatives feel more supported and satisfied during the treatment process?
Participants will receive support through an intervention that includes several key components:
- Nurse training on how to use the dialogue tool to assess and address the varying needs of relatives for involvement.
- A list created by relatives, for relatives, to share experiences and advice with one another.
- Video materials explaining the background and purpose of the intervention to help relatives understand how it can benefit them.
- Guidelines for documenting the involvement of relatives in the patient's electronic health record.
By offering targeted support to relatives, this intervention aims to enhance their involvement in the treatment process, ensuring that both patients with ABI or PMBT and their families are better supported throughout the course of the illness.
Detailed description
Background Relatives of patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) or primary malignant brain cancer (WHO grade III and IV) often face substantial caregiving burdens, which increase the risk of anxiety and depression. The patient's condition can significantly alter the daily lives of relatives, many of whom assume long-term caregiving responsibilities. These challenges are compounded by the emotional and practical difficulties faced by families, particularly when patients experience significant cognitive, physical, and emotional impairments. In cases of ABI, relatives often witness a gradual or sudden decline in the patient's functioning, leading to a profound sense of loss and a shift in family roles. Similarly, relatives of patients with PMBT are faced with the rapid progression of the disease, which demands constant adjustment to their caregiving responsibilities.
Despite these challenges, research underscores the importance of involving relatives in the patient's care and treatment, as this involvement has been shown to improve patient outcomes and family satisfaction. Furthermore, it promotes better communication and collaboration between healthcare professionals and families, which is essential for the rehabilitation process. However, Denmark currently lacks a validated tool to assess the diverse needs of relatives during treatment and rehabilitation, considering their individual resources and capacities. This gap leaves healthcare professionals without a standardized means to engage relatives in a way that is both meaningful and beneficial for the patient's recovery.
Furthermore, no intervention studies have specifically targeted the active engagement of relatives of patients with ABI or PMBT to provide direct support to relatives and indirectly benefit the patient. Given the growing body of evidence that highlights the importance of tailored support for relatives, there is an urgent need for a structured and evidence-based approach that can address the varying needs of families in different clinical settings.
Purpose The primary aim of this study is to develop, pilot, and evaluate a tool designed to identify and address the varied needs and resources of relatives. This tool will ensure that the involvement needs of relatives are assessed throughout the patient's treatment and rehabilitation. Specifically, the tool will help identify the unique challenges faced by relatives based on their socio-economic, emotional, and practical circumstances, thereby providing a personalized support framework. This systematic approach aims to reduce caregiver strain, improve the well-being of relatives, and enhance the overall rehabilitation process for the patient.
Methods The intervention was developed using the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions, with a focus on the participation of both relatives and healthcare professionals. The development process was iterative, incorporating theoretical models, evidence-based practices, and practical insights from caregiving contexts. Data was gathered through scoping reviews, field observations, and discussions with relatives and nurses across seven healthcare units in two regions of Denmark. These discussions provided diverse perspectives on the challenges faced by relatives in different clinical settings, including the specific needs of families coping with ABI and glioblastoma.
Through this process, it became evident that relatives experience a wide range of needs, from emotional and psychological support to practical assistance with caregiving tasks. This input directly influenced the design of the intervention, ensuring that it would be both comprehensive and responsive to the varying circumstances of families.
Results
The intervention consists of five key components:
- Nurse education: Equipping healthcare professionals to better support and involve relatives in the patient's care.
- A dialogue tool: For structured conversations between healthcare professionals and relatives to address specific needs.
- A relative-to-relative list: Tips for navigating the healthcare system, including guidance on how to access available resources, such as financial support, social services, and patient advocacy groups, which can help alleviate the strain on families.
- Video resources for caregivers: A video explaining the background and rationale for the intervention, featuring stories from relatives sharing their experiences.
- Guidelines for documenting relative involvement in the patient's electronic health record: Standardized tracking of relative participation in care.
A panel of 18 relatives, selected based on geographic location, age, and gender, contributed to the development and evaluation of the intervention. Their roles ranged from informants to advisors, providing feedback on activities, refining ideas, and assisting in the creation of materials, such as videos and the relative-to-relative list. Additionally, they played a crucial role in training nurses, ensuring that the intervention met the needs of families in a real-world healthcare context.
Clinical Perspectives The standardized tool is expected to systematically assess the needs and resources of relatives, ensuring tailored support according to their circumstances. By recognizing that relatives of patients with ABI and PMBT have different needs based on their personal situation and available resources, the tool aims to offer a more personalized and effective intervention. This personalized approach is anticipated to improve relative satisfaction, enhance their sense of agency in the caregiving role, and contribute to the rehabilitation process for the patient.
The intervention also aims to improve communication and collaboration between relatives and healthcare professionals. By fostering a more supportive environment for both patients and families, the intervention is expected to lead to better care outcomes, greater family satisfaction, and a more efficient healthcare process. Ultimately, this will contribute to an overall improvement in the patient's rehabilitation and long-term quality of life.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ABI (Aquired Brain Injury) | – | Other: RIGht |
| ABI (Aquired Brain Injury), MBT (Malignant Brain Tumor) | – | Other: RIGhtThe study will be conducted in six inpatient units in two hospice sites in Denmark that admitted adult patients with respectively acquired brain injury and malignant brain tumor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study is conducted in six inpatient units in two hospice sites in Denmark that admitted adult patients with respectively acquired brain injury and malignant brain tumor. Acquired brain injuries often occur suddenly and unexpectedly. Suffering from an acquired brain injury has major consequences, not only for the patients, due to the devastating impact on their physical, cognitive, social, and psychological well-being, but also for the relatives who may need to take on a lifelong role as carers
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Relatives of adult patients with an acquired brain injury or primary malignant brain tumor
- Patients most be hospitalized
- Patients must agree to give their informed consent to involve their relatives
- Able to read and understand english
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Relatives under the age of 18 years of age
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RIGhtThe final intervention consists of five components; 1) education of nurses 2) a dialog tool used in a single session intervention and follow- up 3) a relative- to- relative list 4) video material 5) guidelines on how to document the relative involving plan in the patient's electronic journal. | Other | ABI (Aquired Brain Injury), ABI (Aquired Brain Injury), MBT (Malignant Brain Tumor) |
Primary outcome
Focus group interviews
Time frame: Op til 6 weeks post intervention
Themes describing nurses evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the intervention will be evaluated i through qualitative focus group interviews. A Thematic analysis as suggested by Braun and Clark will be conducted.
2 secondary outcomes
PEIRS-22
Time frame: Op til 6 weeks post intervention
Semi-structured interviews
Time frame: Op til 10 weeks post intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 42016768Guldager R, Gyldenohr E, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Nordentoft S, Loft MI. Relatives' Involvement in the Care Pathway of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour: An Observational Study. Nurs Res Pract. 2026 Apr 19;2026:2280006. doi: 10.1155/nrp/2280006. eCollection 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37935421Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Aadal L, Loft MI, Poulsen I. Wants and needs of relatives' involvement in patient care: the same but different. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Nov 1;21(11):2154-2155. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00469. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 37435678Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Loft MI. Wants and needs for involvement reported by relatives of patients with a malignant brain tumor: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Nov 1;21(11):2188-2210. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00311.
- Results publication: PubMed 39078079Lundh MG, Nordentoft S, Smedegaard PS, Aadal L, Loft MI, Poulsen I, Guldager R. Interventions facilitating the involvement of relatives of patients with acquired brain injury or malignant brain tumour: A scoping review. J Clin Nurs. 2025 Mar;34(3):784-794. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17328. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 36729839Guldager R, Nordentoft S, Poulsen I, Aadal L, Loft MI. Wants and needs for involvement experienced by relatives of patients with an acquired brain injury: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2023 May 1;21(5):886-912. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41559742Guldager R, Sejr Smedegaard P, Nordentoft S, Aadal L, Ingerslev Loft M, Poulsen I. Facilitators and Barriers of Relatives' Involvement in Care of Patients With Acquired Brain Injury or Malignant Brain Tumour: Scoping Review. Nurs Open. 2026 Jan;13(1):e70417. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70417.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Not relevant for this study
Related trials for Brain Injury
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Additional Effects on tDCS With AOT on Lower Limb Functions on Children With Diplegic CP
Diplegic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Brain Injury and Brain Tumor Adult, run by Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Focus group interviews (time frame: Op til 6 weeks post intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06796335, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.