Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell LymphomaNCT06796517
Immunotherapy in Lymphoma
An observational study of Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell Lymphoma and High Grade B-cell Lymphoma, run by Sung-Soo Park at 2 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational study is to compare the efficacy of advanced immunochemotherapy and classical immunochemotherapy in relapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymophoma patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell Lymphoma, High Grade B-cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Relapsed
- What is being tested?
- CAR-T Therapy, Bispecific antibody and Antibody-Drug Conjugate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 72 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 26 Jun 2024to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients will be selected from Seoul St. Mary hospital and Yeoido St. Mary hospital
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 19 to 74 years.
- Diagnosed with any of the following after January 2015: diffuse large B cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma, high grade B cell lymphoma, or Burkitt lymphoma
- Patients who have received immunochemotherapy as treatment for relapsed/refractory lymphoma
Who cannot join
- Patients who have progressed to acute leukemia
- Patients who developed solid tumor during treatment
- Patients with active infectious status (acute pneumonia, viral infection, active hepatitis B state, or active pulmonary tuberculosis etc.)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
South Korea2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Seoul St. Mary Hospital
Seoul, 06591
Sung-Soo Park, MD. PhD., +82-02-2258-6754, sspark@catholic.ac.kr
- Recruiting
Yeoido St. Mary Hospital
Seoul, 07345
Young-Woo Jeon, MD. PhD., +82-10-2691-4067, native47@catholic.ac.kr
About this study
Official title: Risk Factor Analysis Study for the Efficacy Comparison Between Advanced Immunochemotherapy and Classical Immunochemotherapy: a Prospective Study for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients
The goal of this observational study is to compare the efficacy of advanced immunochemotherapy and classical immunochemotherapy in relapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymophoma patients. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does advanced immunochemotherapy, including CAR-T therapy, bispecific antibody, and antibody-drug conjugate offer superior survival outcomes than when treated with classical immunochemotherapy, such as proteasome inhibitors, immune modulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies?
Read more
Researchers will compare patients receiving advanced immunochemotherapy with those receiving classical immunochemotherapy to determine if advanced therapies result in better survival outcomes.
Laboratory findings and electronic medical records (EMR) from participants will be used to assess survival outcomes and treatment-related safety profiles.
- Conditions
- Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell Lymphoma, High Grade B-cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Relapsed, Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
- Being tested
- CAR-T Therapy, Bispecific antibody, Antibody-Drug Conjugate, Monoclonal antibody, Proteasome Inhibitor
- Keywords
- immunochemotherapy, B cell lymphoma, Relapsed, Refractory
- Medical subject headings
- Recurrence, Burkitt Lymphoma, Lymphoma, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CAR-T TherapyDrug
It uses the patient's own T cells, and requires a manufacturing process to modify and expand T cells before infusion. It directly targets B cell specific antigens, such as CD19 or CD20.
Bispecific antibodyDrug
It uses a dual targeting mechanism to enhance specificity and immune activation. It is an off-the-shelf treatment, and doesn't require a manufacturing process of patient cells.
Antibody-Drug ConjugateDrug
It is a targeted therapy consisting of a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxic drug. The antibody binds to a specific antigen on cancer cells, delivering the cytotoxic agent directly to the tumor, minimizing systemic toxicity.
Monoclonal antibodyDrug
Monoclonal antibodies are lab-engineered antibodies that target specific antigens expressed on cancer cells. These commonly target CD20 (rituximab or obinutuzumab) to mediate immune destruction.
Proteasome InhibitorDrug
It blocks the activity of proteasomes, which role is degrading damaged proteins. This disruption induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Common agents include bortezomib and carfilzomib.
IMiD treatmentDrug
Immune modulatory drugs modulate the immune response by enhancing T-cell and NK cell activty to disrupt tumor progression. Common drugs include lenalidomide and thalidomide.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced immunochemotherapy | Relapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymphoma patients treated with either chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, bispecific antibody, or antibody-drug conjugate Receives: Drug: CAR-T Therapy; Drug: Bispecific antibody; Drug: Antibody-Drug Conjugate | |
| Classical Immunochemotherapy | Relapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymphoma patients treated with either proteasome inhibitor, immune modulatory drug, or monoclonal antibody. Receives: Drug: Monoclonal antibody; Drug: Proteasome Inhibitor; Drug: IMiD treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Survival status is assessed through periodic follow-ups and medical records. Patients lost of follow-up are censored at their last known date of contact. The endpoint is either the date of death documented in medical records or the date of the last known follow-up for patients still alive.
Measured: From the start of treatment or the date of study enrollment until death from any cause, assessed up to 100 months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Progression-free survival
Disease progression is determined based on clinical, radiographic, or laboratory data, using the Lugano criteria. Patients without documented progression at the time of analysis are censored at their last assessment date.
Measured: From the start of treatment or the date of study enrollment until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 100 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2025
- Study start26 Jun 2024
- Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sung-Soo Park
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Sung-Soo Park, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06796517
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XC24OIDI0042
- Other IDs
- RS-2023-00216446
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 28 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Risk Factor Analysis Study for the Efficacy Comparison Between Advanced Immunochemotherapy and Classical Immunochemotherapy: a Prospective Study for Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06796517
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XC24OIDI0042
- Conditions
- Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell Lymphoma, High Grade B-cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Relapsed, Primary Mediastinal Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
- Keywords
- immunochemotherapy, B cell lymphoma, Relapsed, Refractory
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 72 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sung-Soo ParkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
- Study start
- 26 Jun 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational study is to compare the efficacy of advanced immunochemotherapy and classical immunochemotherapy in relapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymophoma patients. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does advanced immunochemotherapy, including CAR-T therapy, bispecific antibody, and antibody-drug conjugate offer superior survival outcomes than when treated with classical immunochemotherapy, such as proteasome inhibitors, immune modulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies?
Researchers will compare patients receiving advanced immunochemotherapy with those receiving classical immunochemotherapy to determine if advanced therapies result in better survival outcomes.
Laboratory findings and electronic medical records (EMR) from participants will be used to assess survival outcomes and treatment-related safety profiles.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Advanced immunochemotherapy | – | Drug: CAR-T Therapy, Drug: Bispecific antibody, Drug: Antibody-Drug ConjugateRelapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymphoma patients treated with either chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy, bispecific antibody, or antibody-drug conjugate |
| Classical Immunochemotherapy | – | Drug: Monoclonal antibody, Drug: Proteasome Inhibitor, Drug: IMiD treatmentRelapsed/refractory high grade B cell lymphoma patients treated with either proteasome inhibitor, immune modulatory drug, or monoclonal antibody. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients will be selected from Seoul St. Mary hospital and Yeoido St. Mary hospital
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults aged 19 to 74 years.
- Diagnosed with any of the following after January 2015: diffuse large B cell lymphoma, primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma, high grade B cell lymphoma, or Burkitt lymphoma
- Patients who have received immunochemotherapy as treatment for relapsed/refractory lymphoma
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients who have progressed to acute leukemia
- Patients who developed solid tumor during treatment
- Patients with active infectious status (acute pneumonia, viral infection, active hepatitis B state, or active pulmonary tuberculosis etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CAR-T TherapyIt uses the patient's own T cells, and requires a manufacturing process to modify and expand T cells before infusion. It directly targets B cell specific antigens, such as CD19 or CD20. | Drug | Advanced immunochemotherapy |
| Bispecific antibodyIt uses a dual targeting mechanism to enhance specificity and immune activation. It is an off-the-shelf treatment, and doesn't require a manufacturing process of patient cells. | Drug | Advanced immunochemotherapy |
| Antibody-Drug ConjugateIt is a targeted therapy consisting of a monoclonal antibody linked to a cytotoxic drug. The antibody binds to a specific antigen on cancer cells, delivering the cytotoxic agent directly to the tumor, minimizing systemic toxicity. | Drug | Advanced immunochemotherapy |
| Monoclonal antibodyMonoclonal antibodies are lab-engineered antibodies that target specific antigens expressed on cancer cells. These commonly target CD20 (rituximab or obinutuzumab) to mediate immune destruction. | Drug | Classical Immunochemotherapy |
| Proteasome InhibitorIt blocks the activity of proteasomes, which role is degrading damaged proteins. This disruption induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Common agents include bortezomib and carfilzomib. | Drug | Classical Immunochemotherapy |
| IMiD treatmentImmune modulatory drugs modulate the immune response by enhancing T-cell and NK cell activty to disrupt tumor progression. Common drugs include lenalidomide and thalidomide. | Drug | Classical Immunochemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: From the start of treatment or the date of study enrollment until death from any cause, assessed up to 100 months.
Survival status is assessed through periodic follow-ups and medical records. Patients lost of follow-up are censored at their last known date of contact. The endpoint is either the date of death documented in medical records or the date of the last known follow-up for patients still alive.
1 secondary outcome
Progression-free survival
Time frame: From the start of treatment or the date of study enrollment until disease progression or death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 100 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jan 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs Mosunetuzumab, Polatuzumab Vedotin, and Lenalidomide for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Not Otherwise Specified, High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Nivolumab With or Without Varlilumab in Treating Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphomas
ALK-Positive Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Activated B-Cell Type
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Gene Therapy for CD19-Positive Hematologic Malignancies (SENTRY-CD19)
B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Large B-cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of a Combination Targeted Therapy (ViPOR) for Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma
High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Golcadomide and Rituximab as Bridging Therapy for Relapsed or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Before CAR T-cell Therapy
Large B-Cell Lymphoma With IRF4 Rearrangement, Recurrent Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Relapsed/refractory High Grade B Cell Lymphoma and High Grade B-cell Lymphoma, run by Sung-Soo Park at 2 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sung-Soo Park, MD. PhD. (+82-02-2258-6754, sspark@catholic.ac.kr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: From the start of treatment or the date of study enrollment until death from any cause, assessed up to 100 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2025.