AzTrials
AzTrials

Sports Physical TherapyEBVPBNCT06796842

Effects of Ballistic vs Plyometric Training on Performance of Badminton Players

A study testing Ballistic Exercises and Plyometric exercises in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ballistic and plyometric training are both frequently utilized to enhance physical performance in a variety of sporting activities that require the ability to jump, sprint, and change direction. both are designed to improve explosive power, but they differ in their approaches and focus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 28 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sports Physical Therapy
What is being tested?
Ballistic Exercises and Plyometric exercises
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
3 Feb 2025to 10 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 28 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Active Badminton player.
  • Age between 20-28 years.
  • Male Badminton players

Who cannot join

  • Athletes with injuries, trauma, pathology, any neurological or psychological complications.
  • Athletes with Metabolic diseases.
  • Age above 28 years or less than 20.
  • Other than male Players.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

imran Amjad, PHD contact

03324390125

imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk

Pakistan1 site
  • Liaqat Bagh Stadium Rawalpindi

    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 46000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Ballistic and plyometric training are both frequently utilized to enhance physical performance in a variety of sporting activities that require the ability to jump, sprint, and change direction. both are designed to improve explosive power, but they differ in their approaches and focus. Although many studies highlight the significance of both plyometric and ballistic exercises in enhancing athletic performance in badminton players no direct comparison has been made between the two.

In this study we compared the effectiveness of Ballistic exercises versus Plyometric exercises on performance in Badminton players, which is going to help us to select the best possible training program for badminton athletes

Read the detailed description

Ballistic and plyometric training are both frequently utilized to enhance physical performance in a variety of sporting activities that require the ability to jump, sprint, and change direction. both are designed to improve explosive power, but they differ in their approaches and focus. Although many studies highlight the significance of both plyometric and ballistic exercises in enhancing athletic performance in badminton players no direct comparison has been made between the two.

In this study we compared the effectiveness of Ballistic exercises versus Plyometric exercises on performance in Badminton players, which is going to help us to select the best possible training program for badminton athletes

Being tested
Ballistic Exercises, Plyometric exercises
Keywords
badminton, performance, ballistic, plyometrics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ballistic ExercisesOther

    Ballistic training program was set for 6 weeks. Each week consisting of 5 exercises with sets of 3 and repetitions of 10,15 and 20 times, recovery time and training intensity differed each week.

  • Plyometric exercisesOther

    Plyometric training program was set for 6 weeks. With four exercises in 1st week. Five in 2nd and 3rd weeks, six exercises in 4th and seven exercises in last two weeks. Each exercise consisted of 3 sets with 10, 15 and 20 repetitions in each. Recovery time and training intensity differed each week.

Study groups in NCT06796842
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ballistic groupOtherBallistic training program was set for 6 weeks. Each week consisting of 5 exercises with sets of 3 and repetitions of 10,15 and 20 times, recovery time and training intensity differed each week.
Receives: Other: Ballistic Exercises
Plyometric GroupExperimentalPlyometric training program was set for 6 weeks. With four exercises in 1st week. Five in 2nd and 3rd weeks, six exercises in 4th and seven exercises in last two weeks. Each exercise consisted of 3 sets with 10, 15 and 20 repetitions in each. Recovery time and training intensity differed each week.
Receives: Other: Plyometric exercises

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Push up test

    The Test demanded that the test subject lie face down on the floor with their elbows pointing backward down their side, their hands beneath their shoulders, and their fingers pointing forward. The individual's body weight rested on their hands and toes after pushing themselves to full arm extension; The up position was this. Then, maintaining a straight body, the person lowered himself until the entire body, from the chest to the thighs, made contact with the ground. Then the participants returned to the up position after being pulled up to full arm extension. One push-up test was made up of these up and down steps. from enrollment to the end of treatment up to six weeks

    Measured: six weeks

  2. Closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test

    On a tiled floor, athletic tape strips were positioned 36 inches apart and parallel to one another. The test began with one hand in the push-up position on each piece of tape. From the beginning, the patients were told to reach across their body with one hand and touch the piece of tape underneath the other hand. The hand was put back in the beginning position after touching the tape line. The patient then used the other hand to make the same motion. The testing lasted 15 seconds in total. from enrollment to the end of treatment up to six weeks

    Measured: six weeks

  3. Seated medicine ball throw test

    Each athlete started the test by holding the 2 kg medicine ball with both hands, resting it firmly against their chest. The task was to throw the ball forward as far as possible using a chest press motion, a movement that primarily engages the chest, shoulders, and arms in an effort to achieve maximum distance. from enrollment to the end of treatment up to six weeks

    Measured: six weeks

  4. Unilateral single arm shot put test

    To evaluate upper body strength and power, a 3-kilogram medicine ball was used. On the floor, athletes sat with their feet flat, knees bent at a 90-degree angle, and backs against the wall on the floor for stability. They were positioned next to a doorway to allow unrestricted arm movement on the test side. The participants were instructed to hold the medicine ball at shoulder height and push it forward-rather than throwing it-using an explosive chest press motion to propel it as far as possible. from enrollment to the end of treatment up to six weeks

    Measured: six weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2025
  2. Study start3 Feb 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion10 Apr 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion10 May 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06796842
Sponsor's protocol ID
Nadia Ishtiaq
Acronym
EBVPB
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
10 Jan 2025
Last updated
28 Jan 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ballistic Exercises and Plyometric exercises in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact imran Amjad, PHD (03324390125, imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Push up test (time frame: six weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in