Neck PainNCT06802601
Effect of Visio-Vestibular Exercises on Pain, Function, Balance, and Reaction Time in Chronic Neck Pain
A study testing Manual Therapy and Exercise and Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise in people with Neck Pain and Chronic Neck Pain, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of the study was to improve pain, function, balance and reaction times in people with chronic neck pain by stimulating and improving the components that provide input to the central nervous system (proprioceptive, visual, vestibular) through manual therapy and exercise and to reveal the results of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Neck Pain, Chronic Neck Pain
- What is being tested?
- Manual Therapy and Exercise and Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 28 Oct 2024to 1 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Be between the ages of 18 and 55
- Complaining of neck pain for at least 3 months or experiencing neck pain at least 2 times in 3 months
- Volunteering for the study
- To be able to read and understand Turkish
Who cannot join
- Previous history of neck and head trauma or surgery
- Vertigo or dizziness caused by known or suspected vestibular pathology, ear or brain disorders, sensory nerve pathways (e.g. BPPV) or vascular disorders (e.g. migraine, hypertension)
- Any musculoskeletal or neurological condition that may affect balance
- Inflammatory joint disease
- Cognitive impairment
- Taking four or more medicines
- Received physiotherapy treatment for neck pain in the last 12 months
- People with strabismus, lazy eye and severe refractive errors
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Visio-Vestibular Exercises Applied in Addition to Manual Therapy and Exercise on Pain, Function, Balance and Reaction Time in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study
The aim of the study was to improve pain, function, balance and reaction times in people with chronic neck pain by stimulating and improving the components that provide input to the central nervous system (proprioceptive, visual, vestibular) through manual therapy and exercise and to reveal the results of vizio-vestibular training applied in addition to manual therapy and exercise. Therefore, the hypotheses of this study were;
H1: Manual therapy and exercise have a positive effect on pain, function, balance and reaction time in people with chronic neck pain.
Read more
H2: Vizio-vestibular exercises given in addition to manual therapy and exercise have a positive effect on pain, function, balance and reaction time in people with chronic neck pain.
H3: There is no difference between the effects of manual therapy and exercise and viziovestibular exercises in addition to manual therapy and exercise on pain, function, balance and reaction time in people with chronic neck pain.
Read the detailed description
Neck pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as pain felt in the area between the occiput and the first thoracic vertebra. Neck pain is a multifactorial disorder and is a major problem in modern society. In 2016, among 154 conditions, low back and neck pain had the highest healthcare expenditure in the United States with an estimated $134.5 billion. In 2012, neck pain was responsible for 25.5 million Americans being absent from work, missing an average of 11.4 days. In 2017, the global age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates of neck pain were 3551.1 and 806.6 per 100,000, respectively.
The cervical spine, especially the upper cervical spine, is the most mobile part of the vertebral column. The highly developed proprioceptive system provides neuromuscular control to the mobile cervical spine and allows efficient utilization of vital organs in the head through unique connections to the vestibular and visual systems. In people with neck pain, disturbances in afferent input from the cervical region may be a possible cause of symptoms such as dizziness, imbalance and visual disturbances, as well as signs of altered postural stability, cervical proprioception and head and eye movement control. For neck pain patients with minimal sensorimotor proprioceptive impairments, conventional treatment approaches may be sufficient. However, clinical experience and research suggest that significant sensorimotor proprioceptive impairments in the cervical spine may be an important factor in the maintenance, relapse or progression of various symptoms in patients with neck pain.
The postural control system includes all sensorimotor and musculoskeletal components involved in the control of 2 important behavioral goals: postural orientation and postural balance. Postural orientation is the relative positioning of body segments relative to each other and to the environment; postural balance is the state in which all forces acting on the body tend to keep the body in a desired position and orientation (static balance) or to move it in a controlled manner (dynamic balance). Postural control provides a stable body platform for efficient execution of goal-directed movements. The somatosensory, vestibular and visual systems are subsystems that provide sensory input to the postural control system.
The Somatosensory System encompasses all mechanoreceptive information from the periphery that leads to the perception of pain, temperature, touch and proprioception. In particular, the proprioceptive system of the cervical spine is highly developed thanks to the large number of mechanoreceptors from the γ-muscle spindles in the deep segmental upper cervical muscles. The γ-muscle spindle system serves as the last common pathway for the regulation of muscle stiffness required for various neuromuscular performances. The dense network of mechanoreceptors in the soft tissues in this region not only controls the movements of each joint, but more importantly, through direct neurophysiological connections to the vestibular and visual systems, informs the Central Nervous System about the orientation of the head relative to the rest of the body. Somatosensory information from the cervical region is the only region with such direct access to the senses of balance and vision.
The Vestibular Subsystem is specifically designed to maintain adequate postural tone in the trunk and limb muscles to ensure overall balance during posture and movement. Neck, eye, trunk and limb muscle reflexes have evolved to meet these requirements. Specialized mechanoreceptors in the semicircular canals become sensitive during changes in the speed of movement, i.e. angular velocity, and specialized mechanoreceptors in the otolith systems of the utricular and saccular maculae provide information about the position and velocity of the head relative to the direction of gravitational forces. Sensory information from the vestibular system is integrated via the vestibular nerve in all the nuclei that make up the vestibular nuclear complex and in the cerebellum.
The Visual Subsystem plays a dominant role in the guidance of movements and this is reflected by the fact that when there is a mismatch between somatosensory inputs and vision, the visual version of events usually prevails. The visual postural system consists of 3 different eye movement systems: the smooth pursuit system, the saccadic system and the optokinetic system. The smooth pursuit system stabilizes images of smoothly moving targets on the fovea with slow eye movements. The saccadic system is responsible for rapid and small movements of both eyes simultaneously when changing a fixation point. The optokinetic system stabilizes images on the entire retina when the entire visual field moves (e.g. when walking).
The aim of the study was to improve pain, function, balance and reaction times in people with chronic neck pain by stimulating and improving the components that provide input to the central nervous system (proprioceptive, visual, vestibular) through manual therapy and exercise.
- Conditions
- Neck Pain, Chronic Neck Pain
- Being tested
- Manual Therapy and Exercise, Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise
- Keywords
- Manual Therapy, Neck Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Neck Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Manual Therapy and ExerciseOther
Manual Therapy and Exercise
Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular ExerciseOther
Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Manuel Therapy and Stabilization Exercises | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Manual Therapy and Exercise |
| Manuel Therapy and Stabilization Exercises plus Visio-Vestibular Exercises | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain
Pain intensity will be questioned with the Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analog Scale pain assessment scale was first used by Hayes and Patterson in 1921. It measures the severity of pain based on the patient's statement. A straight thin 10 cm line is used. 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 as "unbearable pain". The patient is asked to mark the point on the line describing the pain. The length of the distance indicates the severity of the patient's pain.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Cervical Range of Motion
Goniometric measurement is used in the clinic as an objective measurement tool for the assessment of active range of motion. Goniometer is a durable, simple, easy-to-carry device that can be easily used in almost all joints. Neck flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation movements will be evaluated with goniometer.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Function
The Neck and Neck Disability Index will be used to assess the level of function in people with neck pain. The questionnaire, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Aslan et al. consists of 10 items. Each item is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability). The total score is between 0 (no disability) and 50 (total disability). Disability increases with increasing score and decreases with decreasing score.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Pressure Pain Threshold
The pressure value is obtained by pressing a dynamic metal piston with a round disk with a surface area of 1 cm² at its tip into the relevant area. Under the influence of the pressure applied by the metal piston, the hand on the dial moves clockwise. When the algometer leaves the relevant area, the last measured value on the hand is recorded and the zero button is pressed. Thus, the instrument is made ready for further measurements. While applying pressure to the relevant points with the algometer, patients will be asked to say "stop" at the first moment when the feeling of pressure causes discomfort. At the first moment when the patients feel pain, the application of pressure will be stopped and the pressure value at that moment will be recorded. A total of 3 measurements will be made for each marked point with a 30 sec. rest interval between each measurement. Afterwards, the average pressure pain threshold values will be recorded. In this direction, the Trapezius, Biceps Brachi
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Balance
Static, eyes open-eyes closed and stability limits will be evaluated with a computerized balance device. The device consists of a computer and a balance platform. The individual will be asked to step on the platform barefoot and step on the designated areas. For static balance with eyes open and eyes closed, the individual will be asked to stand on the device for 30 seconds without speaking and moving as stably as possible. Balance results with eyes open and eyes closed will be recorded in square millimeters and anteroposterior and medio-lateral deviation values will be recorded in millimeters. For the stability limit, it will be asked to try to reach 4 different points by transferring the body weight in 4 different directions in a 360-degree circle on the screen. The limits he/she can reach will be recorded in degrees.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Reaction Time
Reaction time measurements of the upper extremities will be performed on the dominant side, non-dominant side and bilaterally with the "Test You Brain Pro" system. Measurements will be made with the help of a device containing visual/auditory and perceptual/cognitive tasks. Using a program with sound, light and variable timer, the participant will be asked to follow the stimuli, hand contact with the light will be monitored and the time until the program ends will be recorded.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
The Cervical Flexor Endurance Test
The Cervical Flexor Endurance Test is a test that measures the endurance of participants' deep neck flexors. The participant lies supine on the bed without a pillow. The participant is asked to keep the occiput 2.5 cm above the bed while maintaining the neck position. When the participant starts the test, the time is started and stopped when the participant cannot control the occiput.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Cervical Extensor Endurance Test
The cervical extensor endurance test aims to be able to determine the weakness of both the superficial and deep neck extensors. With the participant lying prone, the head and neck past the edge of the table and the cervicothoracic region stabilized, the patient is asked to maintain a neutral head position. At the beginning of the test, the test is timed with a chronimeter and terminated when the participant is unable to maintain the position.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Quality of Life
The Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a test consisting of 8 sub-parameters and 36 items that the participant fills in and answers by himself/herself to obtain information about the health status of the person. Scoring is based on 100 points and the scores are between 0 and 100 points for each sub-parameter. "0" is calculated as the worst value and '100' as the best value.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2025
- Study start28 Oct 2024
- Primary completion21 May 2025
- Study completion1 Jun 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neck PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Katip Celebi University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Faruk TANIK, Izmir Katip Celebi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06802601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1620
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Guitton D, Kearney RE, Wereley N, Peterson BW. Visual, vestibular and voluntary contributions to human head stabilization. Exp Brain Res. 1986;64(1):59-69. doi: 10.1007/BF00238201.
PubMed 3490396Kristjansson E, Treleaven J. Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):364-77. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2834.
PubMed 19411769Tanik F, Altas EU, Ozer Kaya D. The effect of combining visuo-vestibular exercises with manual therapy and exercise on sensorimotor function in chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2026 Oct;130:110604. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110604. Epub 2026 Jul 30.
PubMed 42541826
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Visio-Vestibular Exercises Applied in Addition to Manual Therapy and Exercise on Pain, Function, Balance and Reaction Time in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06802601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1620
- Conditions
- Neck Pain, Chronic Neck Pain
- Keywords
- Manual Therapy, Neck Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Izmir Katip Celebi UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Oct 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 21 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study was to improve pain, function, balance and reaction times in people with chronic neck pain by stimulating and improving the components that provide input to the central nervous system (proprioceptive, visual, vestibular) through manual therapy and exercise and to reveal the results of vizio-vestibular training applied in addition to manual therapy and exercise. Therefore, the hypotheses of this study were;
H1: Manual therapy and exercise have a positive effect on pain, function, balance and reaction time in people with chronic neck pain.
H2: Vizio-vestibular exercises given in addition to manual therapy and exercise have a positive effect on pain, function, balance and reaction time in people with chronic neck pain.
H3: There is no difference between the effects of manual therapy and exercise and viziovestibular exercises in addition to manual therapy and exercise on pain, function, balance and reaction time in people with chronic neck pain.
Detailed description
Neck pain is defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as pain felt in the area between the occiput and the first thoracic vertebra. Neck pain is a multifactorial disorder and is a major problem in modern society. In 2016, among 154 conditions, low back and neck pain had the highest healthcare expenditure in the United States with an estimated $134.5 billion. In 2012, neck pain was responsible for 25.5 million Americans being absent from work, missing an average of 11.4 days. In 2017, the global age-standardized prevalence and incidence rates of neck pain were 3551.1 and 806.6 per 100,000, respectively.
The cervical spine, especially the upper cervical spine, is the most mobile part of the vertebral column. The highly developed proprioceptive system provides neuromuscular control to the mobile cervical spine and allows efficient utilization of vital organs in the head through unique connections to the vestibular and visual systems. In people with neck pain, disturbances in afferent input from the cervical region may be a possible cause of symptoms such as dizziness, imbalance and visual disturbances, as well as signs of altered postural stability, cervical proprioception and head and eye movement control. For neck pain patients with minimal sensorimotor proprioceptive impairments, conventional treatment approaches may be sufficient. However, clinical experience and research suggest that significant sensorimotor proprioceptive impairments in the cervical spine may be an important factor in the maintenance, relapse or progression of various symptoms in patients with neck pain.
The postural control system includes all sensorimotor and musculoskeletal components involved in the control of 2 important behavioral goals: postural orientation and postural balance. Postural orientation is the relative positioning of body segments relative to each other and to the environment; postural balance is the state in which all forces acting on the body tend to keep the body in a desired position and orientation (static balance) or to move it in a controlled manner (dynamic balance). Postural control provides a stable body platform for efficient execution of goal-directed movements. The somatosensory, vestibular and visual systems are subsystems that provide sensory input to the postural control system.
The Somatosensory System encompasses all mechanoreceptive information from the periphery that leads to the perception of pain, temperature, touch and proprioception. In particular, the proprioceptive system of the cervical spine is highly developed thanks to the large number of mechanoreceptors from the γ-muscle spindles in the deep segmental upper cervical muscles. The γ-muscle spindle system serves as the last common pathway for the regulation of muscle stiffness required for various neuromuscular performances. The dense network of mechanoreceptors in the soft tissues in this region not only controls the movements of each joint, but more importantly, through direct neurophysiological connections to the vestibular and visual systems, informs the Central Nervous System about the orientation of the head relative to the rest of the body. Somatosensory information from the cervical region is the only region with such direct access to the senses of balance and vision.
The Vestibular Subsystem is specifically designed to maintain adequate postural tone in the trunk and limb muscles to ensure overall balance during posture and movement. Neck, eye, trunk and limb muscle reflexes have evolved to meet these requirements. Specialized mechanoreceptors in the semicircular canals become sensitive during changes in the speed of movement, i.e. angular velocity, and specialized mechanoreceptors in the otolith systems of the utricular and saccular maculae provide information about the position and velocity of the head relative to the direction of gravitational forces. Sensory information from the vestibular system is integrated via the vestibular nerve in all the nuclei that make up the vestibular nuclear complex and in the cerebellum.
The Visual Subsystem plays a dominant role in the guidance of movements and this is reflected by the fact that when there is a mismatch between somatosensory inputs and vision, the visual version of events usually prevails. The visual postural system consists of 3 different eye movement systems: the smooth pursuit system, the saccadic system and the optokinetic system. The smooth pursuit system stabilizes images of smoothly moving targets on the fovea with slow eye movements. The saccadic system is responsible for rapid and small movements of both eyes simultaneously when changing a fixation point. The optokinetic system stabilizes images on the entire retina when the entire visual field moves (e.g. when walking).
The aim of the study was to improve pain, function, balance and reaction times in people with chronic neck pain by stimulating and improving the components that provide input to the central nervous system (proprioceptive, visual, vestibular) through manual therapy and exercise.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Manuel Therapy and Stabilization Exercises | Active comparator | Other: Manual Therapy and Exercise |
| Manuel Therapy and Stabilization Exercises plus Visio-Vestibular Exercises | Experimental | Other: Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Be between the ages of 18 and 55
- Complaining of neck pain for at least 3 months or experiencing neck pain at least 2 times in 3 months
- Volunteering for the study
- To be able to read and understand Turkish
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Previous history of neck and head trauma or surgery
- Vertigo or dizziness caused by known or suspected vestibular pathology, ear or brain disorders, sensory nerve pathways (e.g. BPPV) or vascular disorders (e.g. migraine, hypertension)
- Any musculoskeletal or neurological condition that may affect balance
- Inflammatory joint disease
- Cognitive impairment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Manual Therapy and ExerciseManual Therapy and Exercise | Other | Manuel Therapy and Stabilization Exercises |
| Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular ExerciseManual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise | Other | Manuel Therapy and Stabilization Exercises plus Visio-Vestibular Exercises |
Primary outcome
Pain
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Pain intensity will be questioned with the Visual Analog Scale. The Visual Analog Scale pain assessment scale was first used by Hayes and Patterson in 1921. It measures the severity of pain based on the patient's statement. A straight thin 10 cm line is used. 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 as "unbearable pain". The patient is asked to mark the point on the line describing the pain. The length of the distance indicates the severity of the patient's pain.
Cervical Range of Motion
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Goniometric measurement is used in the clinic as an objective measurement tool for the assessment of active range of motion. Goniometer is a durable, simple, easy-to-carry device that can be easily used in almost all joints. Neck flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation movements will be evaluated with goniometer.
Function
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
The Neck and Neck Disability Index will be used to assess the level of function in people with neck pain. The questionnaire, whose Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Aslan et al. consists of 10 items. Each item is scored from 0 (no disability) to 5 (complete disability). The total score is between 0 (no disability) and 50 (total disability). Disability increases with increasing score and decreases with decreasing score.
6 secondary outcomes
Pressure Pain Threshold
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Balance
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Reaction Time
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
The Cervical Flexor Endurance Test
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Cervical Extensor Endurance Test
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Quality of Life
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 3490396Guitton D, Kearney RE, Wereley N, Peterson BW. Visual, vestibular and voluntary contributions to human head stabilization. Exp Brain Res. 1986;64(1):59-69. doi: 10.1007/BF00238201.
- Results publication: PubMed 19411769Kristjansson E, Treleaven J. Sensorimotor function and dizziness in neck pain: implications for assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):364-77. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2834.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42541826Tanik F, Altas EU, Ozer Kaya D. The effect of combining visuo-vestibular exercises with manual therapy and exercise on sensorimotor function in chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Gait Posture. 2026 Oct;130:110604. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110604. Epub 2026 Jul 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Strain Counter Strain and Conventional Stretching in School-aged Children With Mechanical Neck Pain Due to Prolong Screen Use
Mechanical Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Alexander Technique Versus Feldenkrais Somatic Training in Patients With Text Neck Syndrome
Text Neck Syndrome
Recruiting
Longitudinal Stripping Massage vs. Percussion Device for Neck Pain: Ultrasound Study.
Chronic Neck Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Manual Therapy and Exercise and Manual Therapy, Exercise and Visio-Vestibular Exercise in people with Neck Pain and Chronic Neck Pain, run by Izmir Katip Celebi University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at week 6. Follow-up assessment 6 weeks after the end of treatment.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06802601, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2025.