Ankle FractureNCT06811090
Telerehabilitation in Patients With Ankle Fracture
A study testing Tele-rehabilitation and Hospital rehabilitation in people with Ankle Fracture, run by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social at 1 site in Mexico.
Trial summary
The objective of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of functionality and quality of life in patients recovering from ankle fracture. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ankle Fracture
- What is being tested?
- Tele-rehabilitation and Hospital rehabilitation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMexico
- Study dates
- 18 Feb 2025to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- IMSS beneficiaries treated at HTVFN for ankle fractures, over 18 years of age, discharged and referred to Rehabilitation
- WEBER A, B, and C fractures, conservative or surgical management
- Removal of immobilization
- Partial weight bearing indicated
- Access to telephone with internet (independent or with family support)
Who cannot join
- Inability to complete a quality of life/functionality questionnaire Disability that limits compliance with instructions for completing a rehabilitation program at home or in an institutional setting
- Elimination Criteria Individuals who wish to withdraw from the clinical study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Mexico1 site
Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad (UMAE) de Traumatología, Ortopedia y Rehabilitación "Dr. Victorio de la Fuente Narváez",
México, GUSTAVO A MADERO, 07760
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness in Functional Recovery and Quality of Life After a Telerehabilitation Program for Patients With Ankle Fracture, Controlled Clinical Trial
The objective of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of functionality and quality of life in patients recovering from ankle fracture. The main questions to be answered are:
What is the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of functionality in patients with ankle fracture?
Read more
What is the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of quality of life in patients with ankle fracture?
The researchers will compare the telerehabilitation program against the usual hospital rehabilitation procedure to see if there are differences in functional recovery and quality of life.
Participants will take a telerehabilitation program at home with the help of smartphones or will be sent to the usual hospital procedure for in-person rehabilitation.
They will have monthly in-person follow-up until 3 months, and by telephone at 6 months for the evaluation of their functionality and quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Patients will be selected from the pelvic limb consultation, they will be invited to go to the tele-rehabilitation module where they will be taught the rehabilitation program that they must carry out, as well as written information about the program. Once the teaching is finished, they will be asked if they have any questions to clarify them. Once the teaching is finished, they will be followed up through the Moodle platform to see their clinical evolution and identify the date of their discharge from work. Later, this group will be compared with the patients who carried out their rehabilitation treatment in the usual way.
Randomization Randomization will be carried out through a software-based randomization program. The assignment will be done by balanced random blocks, block size 8, with an assignment ratio of 1:1. The recruitment of participants, the assignment of participants to the interventions and the evaluations will be carried out by medical evaluators.
Blinding of subjects, therapists and evaluators: Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind participants and therapists. The statistical analysis will be performed in a blinded manner, only the treatment will be mentioned as Group A or Group B.
Data quality: Several strategies will be implemented to ensure data quality. All procedures will be adjusted with the standard operating procedures of the North Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. Evaluators and treating physiotherapists will receive appropriate training before working. Compliance with the intervention follow-up will be closely monitored by a research associate in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit and on the platform. Forms and data processing will be periodically reviewed for accuracy. All data entry will be double-checked for accuracy.
Intervention Experimental group: Tele-Rehabilitation Group (Online Exercise and Counseling) Conceptual definition: Rehabilitation service that is provided remotely through information and communication technologies. In this case it will be carried out online through the Moodle platform.
Operational definition: The Moodle application will be installed on their mobile phone to access the online content that will be integrated into three modules: 1) Information module on the disease and self-care, 2) Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), 3) Phased walking module. These will be integrated with video and text. The exercise program is based on the recommendations of national and international clinical practice guidelines, which lasts 4 weeks.
Participants will also be provided with written exercise material and a physical activity diary to assess adherence to treatment.
Control Group: Exercise supervised by the physiotherapist and advice Conceptual definition: Rehabilitation program that is carried out in person. Operational Definition: The rehabilitation program will be conducted in person at the relevant Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The program will be carried out by a physiotherapist and the patient will be taught: Information about the disease and self-care, Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), gait re-education in phases. During the rehabilitation program, the physiotherapist can use physical means such as ultrasound, laser or interferential currents. The rehabilitation program is similar to the telerehabilitation program with a duration of 4 weeks.
Likewise, written exercise material will be provided to participants and a physical activity diary to evaluate adherence to treatment.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics: qualitative variables will be summarized in absolute and relative frequencies, quantitative variables will be summarized in measures of central tendency and dispersion, if they meet the normality criterion, mean and standard deviation will be used. If they do not meet the assumption, median and interquartile ranges will be used.
Inferential statistics: For the comparison of the dependent variables between the telerehabilitation group and the traditional rehabilitation group, at the end of the study, the Student t test will be used for independent samples.
Likewise, to assess the evolution of the dependent variables in the same group, the Kruskal Wallis test will be used.
In order to identify possible confounding variables, the clinical and demographic characteristics of both groups will be compared. The Student t test will be used to compare quantitative variables and the CHi2 test will be used to compare qualitative variables. If there is a difference in any of the variables, a multivariate model will be entered to adjust the effectiveness of the intervention. A value of p< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis using the SPSS statistical program version 20.
Blind analysis Statistical analysis will be performed by a statistician who will be blinded to group assignment by dummy coding the group names. The remaining project staff and the patient will not be blinded.
Dealing with missing data It is anticipated that missing data will be 'random'. After considering the amount and distribution of data, the likely approach will be to use multiple imputation to impute missing data for the primary outcomes. The data will be used for imputation. The researchers did not plan to impute missing data for any of the secondary outcomes or endpoints
Sample size calculation
The researchers determined the sample size based on the design of a two-group randomized trial to evaluate independent means (two-sided comparison). With an alpha level of 0.05, 80% power, an expected difference of 7 points on the FFI between the groups, and a standard deviation of 16 points, the initial requirement was 97 participants per group. After adjusting for an anticipated dropout rate of 15%, the final recruitment target was set at 100 participants per group, for a total of 200 subjects.
- Conditions
- Ankle Fracture
- Being tested
- Tele-rehabilitation, Hospital rehabilitation
- Keywords
- ankle fracture, tele-rehabilitation, functionality, quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Ankle Fractures
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tele-rehabilitationOther
Rehabilitation service provided remotely through information and communication technologies.
Hospital rehabilitationOther
Rehabilitation program that will be carried out in person at the North Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. The program will be carried out by a physiotherapist and the patient will be taught: Information about the disease and self-care, Exercise module (Stretching, strengthening and proprioception), and phased gait re-education.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital rehabilitation | Active comparator | Rehabilitation program that will be carried out in person at the North Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. The program will be carried out by a physiotherapist and the patient will be taught: Information about the disease and self-care, Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), gait re-education in phases. Receives: Other: Hospital rehabilitation |
| Tele-rehabilitation | Experimental | The Moodle application will be installed on your mobile phone to access the online content that will be integrated into three modules: 1) Information module on the disease and self-care, 2) Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), 3) Phased walking module. Which will be integrated with video and text. Receives: Other: Tele-rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
functionality
Rating obtained through the functional foot index. The participant rates the degree of difficulty in performing 23 different functional activities on a 100-point scale ranging from 0 ('no difficulty') to 100 ('extreme difficulty or inability to perform activity')
Measured: From admission, and with evaluations at the first, second and third month
Quality of Life - SF-12 health questionnaire
The score obtained by the SF12 survey, which is designed to measure health-related quality of life and be the descriptive system for a multi-attribute utility instrument.
The SF-12 response options are based on Likert-type scales that assess intensity or frequency. Each question is assigned a score, which is transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. The scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10, so scores above or below 50 indicate better or worse health, respectively, than the reference population.
Measured: From admission, and with evaluations at the first, second and third month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2025
- Study start18 Feb 2025
- Primary completion30 Dec 2025
- Study completion30 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ankle FractureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Tele-Rehabilitation Group (Online Exercise and Counselling) Conceptual definition: Rehabilitation service provided remotely through information and communication technologies. In this case, it will be carried out online through the Moodle platform.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniel Martínez Barro, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06811090
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R-2020-3401-024
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: out of respect for patient privacy
Publications
Tenforde AS, Iaccarino MA, Borgstrom H, Hefner JE, Silver J, Ahmed M, Babu AN, Blauwet CA, Elson L, Eng C, Kotler D, Homer S, Makovitch S, McInnis KC, Vora A, Borg-Stein J. Telemedicine During COVID-19 for Outpatient Sports and Musculoskeletal Medicine Physicians. PM R. 2020 Sep;12(9):926-932. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12422. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
PubMed 32424977Buker N, Savkin R, Ok N. Comparison of Supervised Exercise and Home Exercise After Ankle Fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):822-827. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.021.
PubMed 31474396Moseley AM, Beckenkamp PR, Haas M, Herbert RD, Lin CW; EXACT Team. Rehabilitation After Immobilization for Ankle Fracture: The EXACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1376-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12180.
PubMed 26441182
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness in Functional Recovery and Quality of Life After a Telerehabilitation Program for Patients With Ankle Fracture, Controlled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06811090
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R-2020-3401-024
- Conditions
- Ankle Fracture
- Keywords
- ankle fracture, tele-rehabilitation, functionality, quality of life
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialOther government
- Study start
- 18 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this clinical trial is to determine the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of functionality and quality of life in patients recovering from ankle fracture. The main questions to be answered are:
What is the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of functionality in patients with ankle fracture?
What is the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation program in the recovery of quality of life in patients with ankle fracture?
The researchers will compare the telerehabilitation program against the usual hospital rehabilitation procedure to see if there are differences in functional recovery and quality of life.
Participants will take a telerehabilitation program at home with the help of smartphones or will be sent to the usual hospital procedure for in-person rehabilitation.
They will have monthly in-person follow-up until 3 months, and by telephone at 6 months for the evaluation of their functionality and quality of life.
Detailed description
Patients will be selected from the pelvic limb consultation, they will be invited to go to the tele-rehabilitation module where they will be taught the rehabilitation program that they must carry out, as well as written information about the program. Once the teaching is finished, they will be asked if they have any questions to clarify them. Once the teaching is finished, they will be followed up through the Moodle platform to see their clinical evolution and identify the date of their discharge from work. Later, this group will be compared with the patients who carried out their rehabilitation treatment in the usual way.
Randomization Randomization will be carried out through a software-based randomization program. The assignment will be done by balanced random blocks, block size 8, with an assignment ratio of 1:1. The recruitment of participants, the assignment of participants to the interventions and the evaluations will be carried out by medical evaluators.
Blinding of subjects, therapists and evaluators: Due to the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind participants and therapists. The statistical analysis will be performed in a blinded manner, only the treatment will be mentioned as Group A or Group B.
Data quality: Several strategies will be implemented to ensure data quality. All procedures will be adjusted with the standard operating procedures of the North Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. Evaluators and treating physiotherapists will receive appropriate training before working. Compliance with the intervention follow-up will be closely monitored by a research associate in the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit and on the platform. Forms and data processing will be periodically reviewed for accuracy. All data entry will be double-checked for accuracy.
Intervention Experimental group: Tele-Rehabilitation Group (Online Exercise and Counseling) Conceptual definition: Rehabilitation service that is provided remotely through information and communication technologies. In this case it will be carried out online through the Moodle platform.
Operational definition: The Moodle application will be installed on their mobile phone to access the online content that will be integrated into three modules: 1) Information module on the disease and self-care, 2) Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), 3) Phased walking module. These will be integrated with video and text. The exercise program is based on the recommendations of national and international clinical practice guidelines, which lasts 4 weeks.
Participants will also be provided with written exercise material and a physical activity diary to assess adherence to treatment.
Control Group: Exercise supervised by the physiotherapist and advice Conceptual definition: Rehabilitation program that is carried out in person. Operational Definition: The rehabilitation program will be conducted in person at the relevant Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The program will be carried out by a physiotherapist and the patient will be taught: Information about the disease and self-care, Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), gait re-education in phases. During the rehabilitation program, the physiotherapist can use physical means such as ultrasound, laser or interferential currents. The rehabilitation program is similar to the telerehabilitation program with a duration of 4 weeks.
Likewise, written exercise material will be provided to participants and a physical activity diary to evaluate adherence to treatment.
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistics: qualitative variables will be summarized in absolute and relative frequencies, quantitative variables will be summarized in measures of central tendency and dispersion, if they meet the normality criterion, mean and standard deviation will be used. If they do not meet the assumption, median and interquartile ranges will be used.
Inferential statistics: For the comparison of the dependent variables between the telerehabilitation group and the traditional rehabilitation group, at the end of the study, the Student t test will be used for independent samples.
Likewise, to assess the evolution of the dependent variables in the same group, the Kruskal Wallis test will be used.
In order to identify possible confounding variables, the clinical and demographic characteristics of both groups will be compared. The Student t test will be used to compare quantitative variables and the CHi2 test will be used to compare qualitative variables. If there is a difference in any of the variables, a multivariate model will be entered to adjust the effectiveness of the intervention. A value of p< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis using the SPSS statistical program version 20.
Blind analysis Statistical analysis will be performed by a statistician who will be blinded to group assignment by dummy coding the group names. The remaining project staff and the patient will not be blinded.
Dealing with missing data It is anticipated that missing data will be 'random'. After considering the amount and distribution of data, the likely approach will be to use multiple imputation to impute missing data for the primary outcomes. The data will be used for imputation. The researchers did not plan to impute missing data for any of the secondary outcomes or endpoints
Sample size calculation
The researchers determined the sample size based on the design of a two-group randomized trial to evaluate independent means (two-sided comparison). With an alpha level of 0.05, 80% power, an expected difference of 7 points on the FFI between the groups, and a standard deviation of 16 points, the initial requirement was 97 participants per group. After adjusting for an anticipated dropout rate of 15%, the final recruitment target was set at 100 participants per group, for a total of 200 subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Tele-Rehabilitation Group (Online Exercise and Counselling) Conceptual definition: Rehabilitation service provided remotely through information and communication technologies. In this case, it will be carried out online through the Moodle platform.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital rehabilitation | Active comparator | Other: Hospital rehabilitationRehabilitation program that will be carried out in person at the North Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. The program will be carried out by a physiotherapist and the patient will be taught: Information about the disease and self-care, Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), gait re-education in phases. |
| Tele-rehabilitation | Experimental | Other: Tele-rehabilitationThe Moodle application will be installed on your mobile phone to access the online content that will be integrated into three modules: 1) Information module on the disease and self-care, 2) Exercise module (stretching, strengthening and proprioception), 3) Phased walking module. Which will be integrated with video and text. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- IMSS beneficiaries treated at HTVFN for ankle fractures, over 18 years of age, discharged and referred to Rehabilitation
- WEBER A, B, and C fractures, conservative or surgical management
- Removal of immobilization
- Partial weight bearing indicated
- Access to telephone with internet (independent or with family support)
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Inability to complete a quality of life/functionality questionnaire Disability that limits compliance with instructions for completing a rehabilitation program at home or in an institutional setting
- Elimination Criteria Individuals who wish to withdraw from the clinical study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-rehabilitationRehabilitation service provided remotely through information and communication technologies. | Other | Tele-rehabilitation |
| Hospital rehabilitationRehabilitation program that will be carried out in person at the North Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit. The program will be carried out by a physiotherapist and the patient will be taught: Information about the disease and self-care, Exercise module (Stretching, strengthening and proprioception), and phased gait re-education. | Other | Hospital rehabilitation |
Primary outcome
functionality
Time frame: From admission, and with evaluations at the first, second and third month
Rating obtained through the functional foot index. The participant rates the degree of difficulty in performing 23 different functional activities on a 100-point scale ranging from 0 ('no difficulty') to 100 ('extreme difficulty or inability to perform activity')
Quality of Life - SF-12 health questionnaire
Time frame: From admission, and with evaluations at the first, second and third month
The score obtained by the SF12 survey, which is designed to measure health-related quality of life and be the descriptive system for a multi-attribute utility instrument. The SF-12 response options are based on Likert-type scales that assess intensity or frequency. Each question is assigned a score, which is transformed into a scale from 0 to 100. The scores have a mean of 50 with a standard deviation of 10, so scores above or below 50 indicate better or worse health, respectively, than the reference population.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 32424977Tenforde AS, Iaccarino MA, Borgstrom H, Hefner JE, Silver J, Ahmed M, Babu AN, Blauwet CA, Elson L, Eng C, Kotler D, Homer S, Makovitch S, McInnis KC, Vora A, Borg-Stein J. Telemedicine During COVID-19 for Outpatient Sports and Musculoskeletal Medicine Physicians. PM R. 2020 Sep;12(9):926-932. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12422. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 31474396Buker N, Savkin R, Ok N. Comparison of Supervised Exercise and Home Exercise After Ankle Fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Sep;58(5):822-827. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.021.
- Background: PubMed 26441182Moseley AM, Beckenkamp PR, Haas M, Herbert RD, Lin CW; EXACT Team. Rehabilitation After Immobilization for Ankle Fracture: The EXACT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1376-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12180.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. out of respect for patient privacy
Related trials for Ankle Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Biodegradable Magnesium Screws for Unstable Ankle Fracture Surgery
Ankle Fractures, Syndesmotic Injury
Recruiting
Investigating Auto Adjusting Dynamic AFO
Lower Limb; Fusion, Congenital, Lower Limb Fracture
Recruiting
Lateral Ankle Treatment
Avulsion Fracture
RecruitingObservational study
Use of Bioresorbable Magnesium Set Screws in Syndesmotic Injuries: a Pilot Study
Syndesmotic Injury, Trimalleolar Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Outpatient Floor Pedal Bike Utilization
Femur Fracture, Tibia Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tele-rehabilitation and Hospital rehabilitation in people with Ankle Fracture, run by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social at 1 site in Mexico.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
functionality (time frame: From admission, and with evaluations at the first, second and third month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06811090, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2026.