AgingLOADNCT06812143
Optimizing Strength Training in Older Adults
A study testing Strength training in people with Aging, run by Queens College, The City University of New York at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of the current study is to determine whether lifting lighter loads close to failure improves strength training adaptations and function in older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. The effect of light loads on physical function 2. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging
- What is being tested?
- Strength training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Feb 2025to 25 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and females aged 65 years and above
- Inactive lifestyle (< 150 min per week of moderate intensity physical activity) and not regularly participating in a structured strength training program
- Planning to reside in the area for the duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Severe cardiac disease, including Class III or IV congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator, or uncontrolled angina
- Lung disease requiring either oral or injected steroids, or the use of supplemental oxygen
- Short, portable mental status questionnaire with 3 or more errors
- Severe arthritis (either osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis)
- Cancer requiring treatment in the past 1 year (melanomas excluded)
- Development of chest pain or severe shortness of breath during the 6 min self-paced walk test
Show all 21Show fewer
- Parkinson's disease or other serious neurological disorders
- Renal disease requiring dialysis
- Current diagnosis of schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, or bipolar disorder
- Current consumption of more than 14 alcoholic drinks per week
- Severe lower back or shoulder pain that may worsen with weightlifting exercises
- Undergoing physical therapy involving the lower extremities
- Living in nursing homes, assisted living facilities or other similar institutions
- Currently enrolled in another randomized trial involving a pharmaceutical or lifestyle intervention
- Weight change (intentional or not) over the last 6 months of > 5% of body weight, or plan to lose or gain weight during the study
- Any other cardiovascular, pulmonary, orthopedic, neurologic, or other conditions that would preclude participation and successful completion of the protocol
- Temporary Exclusion Criteria
- A person meeting any of the following temporary exclusion criteria at the time of screening will not be enrolled but may be re-screened later.
- Severe hypertension, e.g., SBP > 200 mm Hg, DBP > 110 mm Hg
- Major surgery or fracture or hip/knee replacement within the last 6 months
- Hospitalization within the last 6 months (excluding ER visits)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Exercise & Aging Lab, Queens College
Flushing, New York, 11367
Anoop T Balachandran, 718-570-0639, athozhuthungalba@qc.cuny.edu
About this study
The objective of the current study is to determine whether lifting lighter loads close to failure improves strength training adaptations and function in older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- The effect of light loads on physical function
- The effect of light loads on muscle mass, power, and strength
Researchers will compare a light-load, high-repetition program to a standard strength training program. Participants will perform supervised strength training twice per week for 20 weeks.
- Conditions
- Aging
- Being tested
- Strength training
- Keywords
- Strength training, Older adults, physical function
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Strength trainingBehavioural
Also called Resistance training, Weight training
This intervention involves strength training with lighter loads and higher repetitions.
Strength trainingBehavioural
Also called Resistance trainig, Weight training
This intervention involves conventional strength training with higher loads and moderate repetitions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Light Load, High Repetition (LLHR) | Experimental | The LLHR group will perform a full-body routine with lighter weights, performing 16-20 repetitions per set, close to failure. Receives: Behavioral: Strength training |
| Strength Training (ST) | Active comparator | The ST group will perform a full-body routine with higher weights, performing 8-12 repetitions per set, close to failure. Receives: Behavioral: Strength training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
6-minute walk test
Change in the total distance walked in 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test is an objective, well-validated, and clinically meaningful measure of physical function in older adults.
Measured: Baseline and week 21
Secondary outcomes (10)
Lower body maximal muscle strength
Change in lower body maximum muscle strength will be assessed using a one-repetition maximum (1RM) test on a leg press machine.
Measured: Baseline and week 21.
Lower body muscle power
Lower body muscle peak power (W) will be assessed using a pneumatic leg press machine.
Measured: Baseline and week 21
Lean body mass (LBM)
Change in total lean body mass (kg) will be assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Measured: Baseline and week 21
Self-reported physical function
Self-reported physical function will be assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function questionnaire. PROMIS measures are scored on the T-score metric. High scores mean more of the concept being measured.
Measured: Baseline and week 21
Get-up & go test
Change in the time (in seconds) taken to complete the get up and go test. The get up \& go test will be used to assess lower body dynamic balance and fall risk
Measured: Baseline and week 21
30-second chair stand test
Change in the number of repetitions completed during the 30-Second chair stand test. This test assesses lower body functional strength and power.
Measured: Baseline and week 21
Number of participants with adverse events
Number of participants experiencing adverse events that are possibly or definitely related to the intervention,
Measured: From enrollment to the end of 20-week intervention period
Physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES)
Participants will complete the 18-item Physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES) to assess their level of physical activity enjoyment. Scores range from 18 to 126 and higher scores indicate greater enjoyment.
Measured: Week 21
Exercise self-efficacy questionnaire
Participants will complete the exercise self-efficacy scale to assess their belief in their ability to continue strength training twice per week at the prescribed intensity in the future. Scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Measured: Week 21
Exercise session attendance
The total number of supervised exercise sessions attended by participants over the 20-week intervention period.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of 20-week intervention period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2025
- Study start5 Feb 2025
- Primary completion25 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion25 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queens College, The City University of New York
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anoop T Balachandran, Queens College, The City University of New York
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06812143
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R15AG085170
- Other IDs
- 1R15AG085170-01
- Acronym
- LOAD
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
T Balachandran A, Wang Y, Szabo F, Watts-Battey C, Schoenfeld BJ, Zenko Z, Quiles N. Comparison of traditional vs. lighter load strength training on fat-free mass, strength, power and affective responses in middle and older-aged adults: A pilot randomized trial. Exp Gerontol. 2023 Jul;178:112219. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112219. Epub 2023 May 30.
PubMed 37236327
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing Strength Training in Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06812143
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LOAD / R15AG085170
- Conditions
- Aging
- Keywords
- Strength training, Older adults, physical function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Queens College, The City University of New YorkUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 5 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 25 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of the current study is to determine whether lifting lighter loads close to failure improves strength training adaptations and function in older adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- The effect of light loads on physical function
- The effect of light loads on muscle mass, power, and strength
Researchers will compare a light-load, high-repetition program to a standard strength training program. Participants will perform supervised strength training twice per week for 20 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Light Load, High Repetition (LLHR) | Experimental | Behavioral: Strength trainingThe LLHR group will perform a full-body routine with lighter weights, performing 16-20 repetitions per set, close to failure. |
| Strength Training (ST) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Strength trainingThe ST group will perform a full-body routine with higher weights, performing 8-12 repetitions per set, close to failure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Males and females aged 65 years and above
- Inactive lifestyle (< 150 min per week of moderate intensity physical activity) and not regularly participating in a structured strength training program
- Planning to reside in the area for the duration of the study
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- Severe cardiac disease, including Class III or IV congestive heart failure, clinically significant aortic stenosis, history of cardiac arrest, use of a cardiac defibrillator, or uncontrolled angina
- Lung disease requiring either oral or injected steroids, or the use of supplemental oxygen
- Short, portable mental status questionnaire with 3 or more errors
- Severe arthritis (either osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis)
- Cancer requiring treatment in the past 1 year (melanomas excluded)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Strength trainingAlso: Resistance training, Weight trainingThis intervention involves strength training with lighter loads and higher repetitions. | Behavioural | Light Load, High Repetition (LLHR) |
| Strength trainingAlso: Resistance trainig, Weight trainingThis intervention involves conventional strength training with higher loads and moderate repetitions. | Behavioural | Strength Training (ST) |
Primary outcome
6-minute walk test
Time frame: Baseline and week 21
Change in the total distance walked in 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test is an objective, well-validated, and clinically meaningful measure of physical function in older adults.
10 secondary outcomes
Lower body maximal muscle strength
Time frame: Baseline and week 21.
Lower body muscle power
Time frame: Baseline and week 21
Lean body mass (LBM)
Time frame: Baseline and week 21
Self-reported physical function
Time frame: Baseline and week 21
Get-up & go test
Time frame: Baseline and week 21
30-second chair stand test
Time frame: Baseline and week 21
Number of participants with adverse events
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of 20-week intervention period
Physical activity enjoyment scale (PACES)
Time frame: Week 21
Exercise self-efficacy questionnaire
Time frame: Week 21
Exercise session attendance
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of 20-week intervention period
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2025.
- Background: PubMed 37236327T Balachandran A, Wang Y, Szabo F, Watts-Battey C, Schoenfeld BJ, Zenko Z, Quiles N. Comparison of traditional vs. lighter load strength training on fat-free mass, strength, power and affective responses in middle and older-aged adults: A pilot randomized trial. Exp Gerontol. 2023 Jul;178:112219. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112219. Epub 2023 May 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Aging
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Passive Limb Movement: A Tool to Assess Vascular Health and Guide Rehabilitation
Aging, Cardiovascular Disease
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MCR Syndrome in Quebec : Results From NuAge Study
Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome, Aging Disorder
Recruiting
Passive Heat Therapy for Lowering Systolic Blood Pressure and Improving Vascular Function in Mid-life and Older Adults
Aging
RecruitingObservational study
PET Imaging in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)
Aging
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of a Smartphone Chatbot to Improve Exercise Adherence in Older Adults
Exercise Adherence, Healthy Aging
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Strength training in people with Aging, run by Queens College, The City University of New York at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Anoop T Balachandran, PhD (718-997-2729, athozhuthungalba@qc.cuny.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
6-minute walk test (time frame: Baseline and week 21). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06812143, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.