DementiaNCT06812442
Effectiveness of a 3-month Individual Reminiscence Therapy Program in Older Adults With Alzheimer's Disease
A study testing Reminiscence therapy in people with Dementia and Alzheimer Disease, run by Rsocialform - Geriatria, Lda at 4 sites in Portugal.
Trial summary
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of individual Reminiscence Therapy (RT) program, using a simple reminiscence format, to improve the overall cognitive function, mood, and quality of life (QoL) of older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease attending social care and support services. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment
- What is being tested?
- Reminiscence therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesPortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2025to 23 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 65 years or older.
- Receiving care and support services for at least three months.
- Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), fifth edition text revision criteria.
- Intact communication skills.
- Native Portuguese speaking.
- Signed informed consent by the participant.
- Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score between 10 and 24 points
Who cannot join
- Severe sensory and physical limitations.
- Acute or serious illness precluding participation in the RT sessions.
- Evidence of aggressive and disruptive behaviour, as observed by staff at the facility.
- Starting neuroleptics or antipsychotics within two months of recruitment.
- No literacy (educational level).
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Portugal4 sites
Centro Social Remelhe D. António Barroso
Barcelos, Braga District, 4755-455
Fundação João Bento Raimundo
Guarda, 6300-659
Centro Social e Paroquial de Brinches
Serpa, Beja District, 7830-137
Associação de Socorros da Freguesia Turcifal
Torres Vedras, Lisbon District, 2565-785
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of a 3-month Individual Reminiscence Therapy Program on Global Cognition, Mood, and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of individual Reminiscence Therapy (RT) program, using a simple reminiscence format, to improve the overall cognitive function, mood, and quality of life (QoL) of older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease attending social care and support services. A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is proposed in Portugal with repeated measures (pre-intervention, and post-intervention). Intervention group will hold 26 individual RT sessions, twice a week for 13 weeks. Control group participants will maintain their treatment as usual. Make a subsample analysis of the main clinical diagnoses, and compare the results of sample and subsample with a previous study that had the same intervention protocol.
Read the detailed description
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a genetic and sporadic neurodegenerative disease that is associated with a decline in cognitive function, memory, speech, and ultimately sensory and motor problems. The onset of these changes may be gradual or sudden. In people with mild Alzheimer's, symptoms such as learning and memory problems, poor judgment, mood swings, depression, and restlessness occur.
The absence of an effective pharmacological treatment that halts or delays the development of the disease has aroused interest in non-pharmacological therapies (NPT) as a complement to pharmacological treatment that can improve the quality of life of older adults with AD. One of the most researched NPT and with the greatest tradition in this field is Reminiscence Therapy (RT).
RT implies the discussion of past activities, events and experiences, usually with the help of triggers (e.g., photographs, home objects and other familiar items from the past, music, any object or stimulus) that serve to stimulate memories. In its application to dementias, RT is based on the fact that the memory deficit of people with dementia implies that they are able to remember events from their past life, especially from childhood to early adulthood, but not newer facts. It focuses on preserved capacities and memories, promotes communication and enables the person to connect with his past and recover his sense of personal identity. In this way, the RT can be understood as an intervention on the edge of those of cognitive orientation and those centred on emotion, with potential interactive effects on autobiographical memory and psychological well-being.
In simplified form, there are at least two approaches to RT. The first approach as a "life review" where participants are guided through significant experiences of their biography trying to give meaning to their lives. This type of RT is more structured and is usually conducted in an individual format. It may involve the production of "life books". This approach is considered to have an integrative function aimed at achieving a sense of validation, coherence and reconciliation with one's past. Another approach that call general or simple reminiscence, implies the stimulation of autobiographical memory during conversations on specific themes of the past (e.g, holidays, food and drink, work) using stimulus to trigger memories. It has been described as an unstructured autobiographical memory narration. This reminiscence format can be conducted both individually and in groups and promotes communication between participants who share their memories and stories.
In either format that RT is applied on, the introduction of triggering stimulus (e.g., photographs, music, old objects) to help memory is considered fundamental. These triggers can be generic, reflecting common experiences in the lives of people relevant to their age group (e.g., a school manual can serve as a reminder of the experience during their school stage), or specific, with stimulus related to the person's own experiences (e.g., photographs of an important vital event such as their wedding day or a journey during their youth).
As for the effectiveness of RT, according to a review by Woods et al. in Cochrane, there is some evidence on its positive effects on cognition, QoL, communication and possibly on the mood of people with dementia, even if the benefits are small. Despite the distinction between the two different approaches to RT (general reminiscence vs. life history), the therapy modality does not seem to be as important to achieve positive effects as the individual or group format of the sessions and the context in which the intervention is administered (people living in the community or institutionalised).
In particular, according to the results of the review study, the RT seems to be able to generate a small benefit on cognitive function immediately after the intervention, although it usually does not continue after a longer follow-up period. Regarding the administration format, the individual RT seems slightly superior in its effects on cognition both immediately and after a follow-up period. In any case, its effects seem comparable to those of other cognitive stimulation modalities.
As for the effect of RT on quality of life (QoL), an individual RT study based on life review, showed an improvement in Qol-AD. The effects with a group modality do not seem consistent, showing little or no effect on QoL, although the key factor may be the context of application (community vs. institution), with better group RT results in institutionalised patients.
In a multicentre study conducted in Portugal with older adults with neurocognitive disorders, in individual format, there was a significant effect on the overall cognition, memory and QoL of the participants. Group RT was associated with a likely effect on communication both after the intervention and in the follow-up. This effect was not replicated in the individual RT, with uncertain results.
Finally, despite the evidence on the effect of RT on the mood of older adults without dementia, in the case of people with dementia only a small effect on mood was found for those participating in individual RT. In the portuguese multicentre studies there were no significant differences in depressive symptomatology.
Based on the above, this research proposal aims to evaluate the effectiveness of individual RT program within a general reminiscence format, to improve overall cognitive function, emotional state (depression and anxiety), and QoL of older adults with AD attending social care and support services in the Portugal.
It is proposed to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention in the endpoint assessment. Furthermore, an analysis of results based on the diagnosis of the participants is proposed for those diagnoses with sufficient representation in the sample (more than 15 cases in each group). Additionally, it is proposed to analyze the factors that predict the response to the intervention (responder analysis). Finally, the results of this study will be compared and can be analyzed together with those of a previous studies that used the same individual RT program and the same experimental design.
- Conditions
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment
- Being tested
- Reminiscence therapy
- Keywords
- older adults, reminiscence therapy, quality of life, mood, depression, anxiety, Alzheimer´s disease, non-pharmacological therapies, randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction, Depression, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Reminiscence therapyOther
Intervention group will receive two RT sessions per week for 13 weeks. RT sessions will last approximately 50 minutes and will be developed according to the following structure: · Welcome to the patient and reality orientation therapy (7 minutes)· Conducting the main activity of reminiscence (40 minutes) · Closure, thank you for the participation and farewell until the next session (3 minutes). RT sessions will have an individual format and will be conducted by a therapist previously trained in the protocol and the principles of RT. The Reminiscence activities of each session will be carried out following the protocol proposed in the Book of the Past and the Present.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the intervention group receiving Reminiscence Therapy (RT) or to a control group receiving only Treatment as Usual (TAU). Participants in the intervention group will participate in two RT sessions per week for 13 weeks besides their TAU. The sessions will be based on the Book of the Past and the Present and they will follow the same protocol in every participant site. Receives: Other: Reminiscence therapy |
| Control Group | No intervention | Participants assigned to the control group will maintain TAU in the site, participating in the activities previously assigned to their individual care plan. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cognitive functioning evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
MMSE is a widely used screening tool that evaluates cognitive domains such as orientation, attention, memory, language, and visual-spatial skills. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning
Measured: baseline
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated through MMSE
Cognitive functioning is assessed using the MMSE is a widely used screening tool that evaluates global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
Measured: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Secondary outcomes (8)
Mood assessed through the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15)
The GDS-15 is used to measure mood. It is considered a reliable tool to screen depressive symptoms in older people. With a dichotomous format (yes/no answers), this scale assesses depression in older people. Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Measured: baseline
Change in mood assessed through the GDS-15
The GDS-15 is used to measure mood. It is considered a reliable tool to screen depressive symptoms in older people. With a dichotomous format (yes/no answers), this scale assesses depression in older people. Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.
Measured: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Anxiety symptomatology assessed through the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
It assesses, in several contexts, the severity of anxiety symptoms in the older adults. It consists in 20 dichotomous response items (I agree/disagree) and refers to the subject's feelings in the week prior to the evaluation. One (1) point is assigned to each agree answer and the overall score is obtained by adding the scores of all items. Scores over 10/11 points indicate symptoms of severe anxiety.
Measured: baseline
Change in anxiety symptomatology assessed through the GAI
It assesses, in several contexts, the severity of anxiety symptoms in the older adults. It consists in 20 dichotomous response items (I agree/disagree) and refers to the subject's feelings in the week prior to the evaluation. One (1) point is assigned to each agree answer and the overall score is obtained by adding the scores of all items. Scores over 10/11 points indicate symptoms of severe anxiety.
Measured: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Quality of life evaluated through Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
The QoL-AD is used to assess quality of life. This 13-item scale assesses the quality of life in people diagnosed with dementia, gathering information from the patient about the following domains: perceived health, mood, physical condition, interpersonal relationships, hobbies, decision-making skills, and life as a whole. Scores range from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Measured: baseline
Change in quality of life evaluated through QoL-AD
The QoL-AD is used to assess quality of life. This 13-item scale assesses the quality of life in people diagnosed with dementia, gathering information from the patient about the following domains: perceived health, mood, physical condition, interpersonal relationships, hobbies, decision-making skills, and life as a whole. Scores range from 13 to 52, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Measured: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Quality of life evaluated through dementia Quality of Life scale (DEMQoL)
The DEMQoL is used to assess quality of life. Suitable for use in cases of mild/moderate dementia (MMSE score higher or equal 10 points) based on information provided by the patient (patient version). This 29-item scale assesses perceptions of daily activities and looking after yourself, health and well-being, cognitive functioning, social relationships and self-concept. The first 28 items are summed to calculate the DEMQOL score. Scores range from 28 to 112,with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Measured: baseline
Change in quality of life evaluated through DEMQoL
The DEMQoL is used to assess quality of life. Suitable for use in cases of mild/moderate dementia (MMSE score higher or equal 10 points) based on information provided by the patient (patient version). This 29-item scale assesses perceptions of daily activities and looking after yourself, health and well-being, cognitive functioning, social relationships and self-concept. The first 28 items are summed to calculate the DEMQOL score. Scores range from 28 to 112,with higher scores indicating better quality of life. It has good psychometric characteristics and its use has been recommended to evaluate psychosocial interventions.
Measured: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Feb 2025
- Study start1 Feb 2025
- Primary completion23 May 2025
- Study completion23 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rsocialform - Geriatria, Lda
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susana I. Justo Henriques, PhD, Study director, Polytechnic University of BejaCélia C Silva, BsC, Principal investigator, Polytechnic University of Beja
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06812442
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 01022025
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 28 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of a 3-month Individual Reminiscence Therapy Program on Global Cognition, Mood, and Quality of Life in Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06812442
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 01022025
- Conditions
- Dementia, Alzheimer Disease, Cognitive Impairment
- Keywords
- older adults, reminiscence therapy, quality of life, mood, depression, anxiety, Alzheimer´s disease, non-pharmacological therapies
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rsocialform - Geriatria, LdaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 23 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of individual Reminiscence Therapy (RT) program, using a simple reminiscence format, to improve the overall cognitive function, mood, and quality of life (QoL) of older adults with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease attending social care and support services. A multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) is proposed in Portugal with repeated measures (pre-intervention, and post-intervention). Intervention group will hold 26 individual RT sessions, twice a week for 13 weeks. Control group participants will maintain their treatment as usual. Make a subsample analysis of the main clinical diagnoses, and compare the results of sample and subsample with a previous study that had the same intervention protocol.
Detailed description
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a genetic and sporadic neurodegenerative disease that is associated with a decline in cognitive function, memory, speech, and ultimately sensory and motor problems. The onset of these changes may be gradual or sudden. In people with mild Alzheimer's, symptoms such as learning and memory problems, poor judgment, mood swings, depression, and restlessness occur.
The absence of an effective pharmacological treatment that halts or delays the development of the disease has aroused interest in non-pharmacological therapies (NPT) as a complement to pharmacological treatment that can improve the quality of life of older adults with AD. One of the most researched NPT and with the greatest tradition in this field is Reminiscence Therapy (RT).
RT implies the discussion of past activities, events and experiences, usually with the help of triggers (e.g., photographs, home objects and other familiar items from the past, music, any object or stimulus) that serve to stimulate memories. In its application to dementias, RT is based on the fact that the memory deficit of people with dementia implies that they are able to remember events from their past life, especially from childhood to early adulthood, but not newer facts. It focuses on preserved capacities and memories, promotes communication and enables the person to connect with his past and recover his sense of personal identity. In this way, the RT can be understood as an intervention on the edge of those of cognitive orientation and those centred on emotion, with potential interactive effects on autobiographical memory and psychological well-being.
In simplified form, there are at least two approaches to RT. The first approach as a "life review" where participants are guided through significant experiences of their biography trying to give meaning to their lives. This type of RT is more structured and is usually conducted in an individual format. It may involve the production of "life books". This approach is considered to have an integrative function aimed at achieving a sense of validation, coherence and reconciliation with one's past. Another approach that call general or simple reminiscence, implies the stimulation of autobiographical memory during conversations on specific themes of the past (e.g, holidays, food and drink, work) using stimulus to trigger memories. It has been described as an unstructured autobiographical memory narration. This reminiscence format can be conducted both individually and in groups and promotes communication between participants who share their memories and stories.
In either format that RT is applied on, the introduction of triggering stimulus (e.g., photographs, music, old objects) to help memory is considered fundamental. These triggers can be generic, reflecting common experiences in the lives of people relevant to their age group (e.g., a school manual can serve as a reminder of the experience during their school stage), or specific, with stimulus related to the person's own experiences (e.g., photographs of an important vital event such as their wedding day or a journey during their youth).
As for the effectiveness of RT, according to a review by Woods et al. in Cochrane, there is some evidence on its positive effects on cognition, QoL, communication and possibly on the mood of people with dementia, even if the benefits are small. Despite the distinction between the two different approaches to RT (general reminiscence vs. life history), the therapy modality does not seem to be as important to achieve positive effects as the individual or group format of the sessions and the context in which the intervention is administered (people living in the community or institutionalised).
In particular, according to the results of the review study, the RT seems to be able to generate a small benefit on cognitive function immediately after the intervention, although it usually does not continue after a longer follow-up period. Regarding the administration format, the individual RT seems slightly superior in its effects on cognition both immediately and after a follow-up period. In any case, its effects seem comparable to those of other cognitive stimulation modalities.
As for the effect of RT on quality of life (QoL), an individual RT study based on life review, showed an improvement in Qol-AD. The effects with a group modality do not seem consistent, showing little or no effect on QoL, although the key factor may be the context of application (community vs. institution), with better group RT results in institutionalised patients.
In a multicentre study conducted in Portugal with older adults with neurocognitive disorders, in individual format, there was a significant effect on the overall cognition, memory and QoL of the participants. Group RT was associated with a likely effect on communication both after the intervention and in the follow-up. This effect was not replicated in the individual RT, with uncertain results.
Finally, despite the evidence on the effect of RT on the mood of older adults without dementia, in the case of people with dementia only a small effect on mood was found for those participating in individual RT. In the portuguese multicentre studies there were no significant differences in depressive symptomatology.
Based on the above, this research proposal aims to evaluate the effectiveness of individual RT program within a general reminiscence format, to improve overall cognitive function, emotional state (depression and anxiety), and QoL of older adults with AD attending social care and support services in the Portugal.
It is proposed to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention in the endpoint assessment. Furthermore, an analysis of results based on the diagnosis of the participants is proposed for those diagnoses with sufficient representation in the sample (more than 15 cases in each group). Additionally, it is proposed to analyze the factors that predict the response to the intervention (responder analysis). Finally, the results of this study will be compared and can be analyzed together with those of a previous studies that used the same individual RT program and the same experimental design.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Reminiscence therapyParticipants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the intervention group receiving Reminiscence Therapy (RT) or to a control group receiving only Treatment as Usual (TAU). Participants in the intervention group will participate in two RT sessions per week for 13 weeks besides their TAU. The sessions will be based on the Book of the Past and the Present and they will follow the same protocol in every participant site. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Participants assigned to the control group will maintain TAU in the site, participating in the activities previously assigned to their individual care plan. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- 65 years or older.
- Receiving care and support services for at least three months.
- Diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), fifth edition text revision criteria.
- Intact communication skills.
- Native Portuguese speaking.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Severe sensory and physical limitations.
- Acute or serious illness precluding participation in the RT sessions.
- Evidence of aggressive and disruptive behaviour, as observed by staff at the facility.
- Starting neuroleptics or antipsychotics within two months of recruitment.
- No literacy (educational level).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Reminiscence therapyIntervention group will receive two RT sessions per week for 13 weeks. RT sessions will last approximately 50 minutes and will be developed according to the following structure: · Welcome to the patient and reality orientation therapy (7 minutes)· Conducting the main activity of reminiscence (40 minutes) · Closure, thank you for the participation and farewell until the next session (3 minutes). RT sessions will have an individual format and will be conducted by a therapist previously trained in the protocol and the principles of RT. The Reminiscence activities of each session will be carried out following the protocol proposed in the Book of the Past and the Present. | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Cognitive functioning evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time frame: baseline
MMSE is a widely used screening tool that evaluates cognitive domains such as orientation, attention, memory, language, and visual-spatial skills. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated through MMSE
Time frame: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Cognitive functioning is assessed using the MMSE is a widely used screening tool that evaluates global cognitive function. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
8 secondary outcomes
Mood assessed through the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15)
Time frame: baseline
Change in mood assessed through the GDS-15
Time frame: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Anxiety symptomatology assessed through the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)
Time frame: baseline
Change in anxiety symptomatology assessed through the GAI
Time frame: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Quality of life evaluated through Quality of Life - Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD)
Time frame: baseline
Change in quality of life evaluated through QoL-AD
Time frame: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Quality of life evaluated through dementia Quality of Life scale (DEMQoL)
Time frame: baseline
Change in quality of life evaluated through DEMQoL
Time frame: 13 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susana I. Justo Henriques, PhD study director
Polytechnic University of Beja
Célia C Silva, BsC principal investigator
Polytechnic University of Beja
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Reminiscence therapy in people with Dementia and Alzheimer Disease, run by Rsocialform - Geriatria, Lda at 4 sites in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cognitive functioning evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (time frame: baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2025.