AzTrials
AzTrials

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)NCT06815744

Effect of Preoperative Sleep Disturbance on Postoperative Pain and Recovery

An observational study of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), run by Gansu Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study subjects consisted of patients who underwent elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM from November 2023 to January 2024. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI) was used to assess the overall sleep status of patients over the past month. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Nov 2023to 31 Jan 2024
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who were scheduled to undergo primary unilateral TKA at Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM from November 2023 to January 2024 were selected as the study subjects.

Who may be able to join

  • aged ≥ 18 years; patients scheduled for elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia; American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III ; voluntary participation and signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • unwillingness to participate in this study; concomitant serious underlying diseases that could affect postoperative rehabilitation; revision TKA ; severe neuropsychiatric disorders, especially depression, which could affect sleep quality.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Gansu provincial hospital of TCM

    Lanzhou, Gansu, 730050

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Correlation Between BDNF/CB1R Expression and Postoperative Pain and Recovery in Patients With Preoperative Sleep Disorders

The study subjects consisted of patients who underwent elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM from November 2023 to January 2024. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI) was used to assess the overall sleep status of patients over the past month. All patients were divided into normal sleep group (PSQI ≤ 5) and poor sleep group (PSQI score > 5). Postoperative pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS), and hydromorphone (HM) consumption, number of rescue analgesia, and quality of recovery QoR-15 scores were recorded 24 hours after surgery. Spearman correlation analysis was used to detect the correlation between each index and preoperative PSQI score. A logistic regression model was used to analyze the relationship between PSQI score, serum BDNF and CB1R concentrations, and the occurrence of moderate to severe pain 24 hours after surgery. Generalized linear regression models combined with restricted cubic spline models were used to analyze the relationship and dose-response relationship between PSQI, BDNF, and CB1R and QoR-15 score and HM consumption at 24 hours after surgery after adjusting for confounders. Serum BDNF and CB1R mediation effects were analyzed by Process plug-in.

Read the detailed description

This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM (2023-044-01) and was performed in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants at the time of surgery. Patients who were scheduled to undergo primary unilateral TKA at Gansu Provincial Hospital of TCM from November 2023 to January 2024 were selected as the study subjects. Inclusion criteria: (1) aged ≥ 18 years; (2) patients scheduled for elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia; (3) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III ; (4) voluntary participation and signed informed consent. Patients were excluded based on the following criteria: (1) unwillingness to participate in this study; (2) concomitant serious underlying diseases that could affect postoperative rehabilitation; (3) revision TKA ; (4) severe neuropsychiatric disorders, especially depression, which could affect sleep quality. Exclusion criteria: (1) Patients who failed spinal puncture; (2) Patients who voluntarily withdrew from the study halfway; (3) Patients with poor compliance who took other analgesic drugs by themselves to interfere with the study results; (4) Patients who were lost to follow-up and could not collect outcome measures.

Data collection Perioperative visits and basic information collection were performed by a uniformly trained anesthesiologist before surgery in all study subjects. The demographic characteristics of the participants, such as age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and sleep quality scores were recorded.

The following parameters were documented after surgery: postoperative pain score, consumption of hydromorphone (HM) 24 hours after surgery, and the number of rescue analgesia and quality of recovery 24 hours after surgery.

Before anesthesia, 3 ml of venous blood was collected from the non-infusion side of the patient (on an empty stomach). The whole blood was collected into a blood collection tube containing EDTA sodium salt. After standing at room temperature for 30 minutes, the blood was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes. The supernatant was then placed in a cryopreservation box and stored at -80℃ until use.

Laboratory Testing Serum BDNF and CB1R concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Associated definitions Sleep disorders refer to various functional disturbances occurring within the sleep-wake cycle, including difficulties falling asleep, abnormally short or long sleep durations (hypersomnia), sleep-related breathing disorders, and parasomnias[27]. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is utilized to assess patients' sleep quality. The PSQI primarily evaluates a patient's sleep quality over the past month[28, 29]. This scale consists of 19 self-rated items and 5 other-rated items. Excluding the 19th self-rated item and the 5 other-rated items, the remaining 18 self-rated items are categorized into seven dimensions: sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, use of hypnotic medication, and daytime dysfunction. A 4-point Likert scale is applied, with each dimension scoring from 0 to 3. The cumulative score across all dimensions constitutes the total PSQI score, ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality. The PSQI demonstrates a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5% in identifying patients with sleep disorders. A total score exceeding 5 suggests the presence of a sleep disorder[28]. Based on PSQI scores, patients are categorized into two groups: the normal sleep group (PSQI ≤ 5) and the poor sleep group (PSQI > 5).

The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate the level of postoperative pain in patients. NRS scores were recorded at 2h, 6h, 12h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively, and the incidence of moderate to severe pain at corresponding time points was calculated. On this scale, 0 represents no pain, while 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Based on the NRS scores, patients were classified into three pain categories: no pain (0), mild pain (1-3/10), and moderate to severe pain (≥4/10)[30].

Quality of recovery (QoR) is a crucial concept in perioperative patient management. Assessing QoR is significant for patient prognosis and economics, offering potential for clinical and research applications and enhancing perioperative patient satisfaction. The QoR-15 scale is employed to evaluate patients' recovery quality at 24 hours postoperatively. The QoR-15 score is a recommended outcome measure in studies focusing on postoperative patient comfort[26]. This scale comprises 15 questions assessing five dimensions of patients' postoperative health status[31], including physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, emotions, and pain. Each item is scored from 0 to 10, with a total possible score of 150, where higher scores indicate better recovery.

Anesthesia Protocol All enrolled patients underwent a unified anesthesia protocol. After entering the operating room, patients received routine intravenous infusion oxygen inhalation and were connected to a multifunction electrocardiogram monitor. In the lateral position, a subarachnoid block was performed at the L3-4 intervertebral space using a spinal anesthesia needle. Upon successful puncture and withdrawal of clear cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 2ml of 0.75% bupivacaine mixed with CSF to a total volume of 3ml was slowly injected, with 2ml administered. After completion, the spinal anesthesia needle was removed, and the level of anesthesia was controlled below T8. If the subarachnoid block failed, the anesthesia method was changed to general anesthesia, and the case was excluded from the study. Before the incision, blood was driven away from the surgical site using an Esmarch bandage, and an electric tourniquet was applied with a pressure of 300 mmHg. At the end of the surgery, the tourniquet was released slowly while the patient's vital signs and discomfort were observed. Patients were then transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) for observation for 30 minutes.

Postoperative analgesia protocol: All patients followed a standardized protocol for postoperative pain management. Oral etoricoxib 120 mg (Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., specification: 60 mg/tablet, 2 times/day) was given for preemptive analgesia on the day before surgery. This analgesic regimen was repeated when patients resumed oral intake postoperatively. A "cocktail" therapy (compounding betamethasone injection 1 mL, epinephrine 0.5 mL, ropivacaine hydrochloride 150 mg, diluted with normal saline to 100 mL) was administered before suturing. All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) postoperatively, consisting of hydromorphone (HM) 6 mg diluted with 0.9% NaCl solution to 100 mL, with an infusion rate of 2.0 mL/h, a PCIA bolus of 0.5 mL, and a lockout time of 15 minutes. The criterion for initiating PCIA therapy was an NRS score of ≥3. When the NRS score was ≥4[32], patients were instructed to press the PCIA pump for medication. If the effective PCIA bolus presses were ≥2 times within 30 minutes or the NRS score remained ≥4, rescue analgesia with 40 mg of intramuscular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug parecoxib sodium was administered.

Statistical Analyses A descriptive analysis of patients' basic characteristics was conducted based on PSQI scores. Categorical data were expressed as frequencies or percentages, and comparisons between groups were made using the Chi-square test. For continuous variables, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess normal distribution, and Levene's test was applied to check for homogeneity of variance. Normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (± s) and compared using the t-test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were reported as the median and interquartile range (IQR) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's correlation analysis was employed to examine the association between various indicators and preoperative PSQI scores.

A multivariate logistic regression model was employed to examine the association between the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score, serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1R) concentrations, and the incidence of moderate to severe pain within 24 hours following surgery, with the latter serving as the dependent variable. Model 1 did not adjust for confounding factors; Model 2 adjusted for age and gender; Model 3 added body mass index (BMI), operation time (<80 min, ≥80 min), education level (below high school, high school, and above), diabetes (yes, no), hypertension (yes, no), and dyslipidemia (yes, no) to Model 2.

The 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were selected as knots. A generalized linear regression model combined with a restricted cubic spline model was employed to analyze the relationship and dose-response relationship between PSQI, BDNF, CB1R, and postoperative 24-hour QoR-15 scores and HM consumption after adjusting for confounding factors. Additionally, the same variables involved in logistic regression were corrected. A Poverall <0.05 indicated the presence of a dose-response relationship between variables, while a Pnonlinear <0.05 suggested a nonlinear dose-response relationship between two variables.

Keywords
total knee arthroplasty, sleep quality, postoperative pain, quality of recovery, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, cannabinoid receptor type 1
Medical subject headings
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06815744
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
the normal sleep groupThe Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI) ≤ 5
the poor sleep group (PSQI > 5)The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Questionnaire (PSQI) > 5

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postoperative pain score

    The numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate the level of postoperative pain in patients. NRS scores were recorded at 2h, 6h, 12h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively, and the incidence of moderate to severe pain at corresponding time points was calculated. On this scale, 0 represents no pain, while 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Based on the NRS scores, patients were classified into three pain categories: no pain (0), mild pain (1-3/10), and moderate to severe pain (≥4/10)

    Measured: Day 0,Day 1,Day 2

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. consumption of hydromorphone (HM)

    consumption of hydromorphone (HM) 24 hours after surgery

    Measured: D1

  2. the number of rescue analgesia

    the number of rescue analgesia 24 hours after surgery.

    Measured: Day 1

  3. QoR-15 score

    quality of recovery 24 hours after surgery

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Feb 2025
  2. Study start1 Nov 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06815744
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-044-01
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
31 Jan 2025
Last updated
7 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), run by Gansu Provincial Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postoperative pain score (time frame: Day 0,Day 1,Day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in