Human Papillomavirus (HPV)OPTICSNCT06815939
Validation of a Lab-free Low-cost Screening Test for Prevention of Cervical Cancer
A study testing HPV Test, EVA System and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) in people with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by DL Analytics at 1 site in El Salvador.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool for cervical cancer based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 59 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- HPV Test, EVA System and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEl Salvador
- Study dates
- 12 Feb 2025to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 59 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Women between 30 and 59 years of age
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy at the time of colposcopy/biopsy
- Hysterectomy with surgically absent cervix
- HPV test in the last 5 years independently of negative or positive result
- Previous cervical cancer diagnosis or treatment in the last 5 years
- Lack of willingness or capacity to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
El Salvador1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ministerio de Salud
San Salvador
Karla Alfaro, MD, 503-7854-7746, kalfaro@basichealth.org
Juan Carlos Rauda, MD
About this study
Official title: Validation of a Lab-free Low-cost Screening Test for Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Automated Visual Evaluation
The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool for cervical cancer based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. Several teams around the world have developed versions of AVE as a triage technology but none as a screening tool.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Cervical cancer, caused by persistent infection of carcinogenic types of the human papillomavirus (HPV), is the second leading cause of female cancer in El Salvador. Effective screening and treatment of precancerous lesions have lowered cervical cancer rates in high-income countries, but the disease remains a leading cause of death in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Currently, up to 80% of the disease burden and 90% of global deaths occur in LMICs primarily due to lack of resources and poor infrastructure. A new test, Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), is a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence.
The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. AVE has been in development since 2021. The current study will consist of a clinical trial to compare the sensitivity of AVE (CINFinder version) with traditional screening and triage tests.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a prospective paired interventional study of 10,000 women in San Salvador, El Salvador, to test the difference in sensitivities between AVE (CINFinder) and with other screening and triage tests, including HPV tests and unaided visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to detect CIN2+ as a primary screening method. As a secondary aim, investigators will also validate the use of AVE as a triage test in patients with positive HPV results. Histopathology diagnosis will be used as the reference to determine true disease status.
STUDY PROCEDURES:
The design includes a screening visit, a colposcopy visit, and a result delivery and treatment visit. During the screening visit, participants will undergo routine HPV sample collection, VIA, AVE with the EVA System (digital colposcope), and an additional cervical image capture with an Android smartphone. Women with a positive screening result on any of the three main screening tests (HPV test, VIA, or AVE with the EVA System) will be referred to a second study visit to undergo HPV testing with a genotyping test, AVE with the EVA System for the second time, and colposcopy with biopsy. In addition, 5% of screen-negative women will undergo the same procedures. Results from VIA and AVE with the EVA System during the first and the second visit will be compared to determine AVE performance as a screening and triage test, respectively. Histopathology findings will serve as the reference to establish the true diagnosis of each case. Women will receive their histopathology results during the third visit and, if eligible, will be offered ablation treatment the same day. Women ineligible for ablation will be referred to LEEP or other care as appropriate.
DATA COLLECTION \& MANAGEMENT:
This specific version of AVE (CINFinder) is designed to run on both EVA System and an Android phone, alongside additional tools for improving image quality and post-screening management.The AVE software (including CINFinder, CerVisibility, and CervManager modules), will be installed as user-friendly features that can be easily accessed by authorized
Data collection: All data will be recorded in real time on paper forms OR on an electronic tablet filled out by a nurse research assistant. All forms (digital or paper) will include the date and study ID to link information to specific patients and visits. Collected data will include eligibility criteria, a background questionnaire including relevant sociodemographic and medical history traits, clinical procedures, and laboratory results. In addition, providers conducting speculum exams during the first (screening) and second (colposcopy and biopsy) visits will use the CervManager application to create a profile for each patient to input clinical information. Thus, study data will be collected on both paper forms and CervManager for added back-up security. Providers will also capture cervical images using the CervManager application on both the EVA System and an Android mobile phone. Images belonging to the same patient will be synchronized under the same study ID. Other clinical data (e.g., HPV test results, histopathology) will also be inputted into the CervManager patient profile.
Data Management: For storage and management, data from paper forms will be transferred to REDCap, an electronic data management system widely used for clinical research. CervManager and REDCap can be downloaded and merged periodically to easily identify and correct any entry errors, duplications, or missing data on either database. All AVE algorithms implemented as part of this project and used for subsequent analyses will run on DL Analytics servers.
Non-participant documentation: Investigators will document the number of eligible women who decline to participate in the study (including main reasons why). If individuals agree, Investigators will collect general, de-identified information (i.e., age range, education, and previous screening). This will be done to identify any potential source of sampling bias.
STATISTICAL POWER CALCULATIONS AND SAMPLE SIZES
Aim 1: Validate AVE as a primary screening test compared to visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for the detection of high-grade cervical pre- cancer (CIN2+).
A study with 10,000 women will be able to detect a minimum difference of 10% between VIA and AVE with 80% power and a Type I error rate of 5%, assuming a minimum sensitivity of VIA of 65% and a correlation coefficient of the tests in the diseased population (Rho) of at least 50%. Based on the study design, all participants who test positive on any test will be referred to colposcopy with biopsy (i.e., proportion of verification = 1), as opposed to only 5% of those who are double negative being referred (i.e., proportion of verification = 0.05). Finally, based on the Investigators previous experience working in El Salvador, Investigators estimate the prevalence (lambda) of CIN2+ in the general screening population at 2%.
Objective 2. To compare AVE as a triage test compared to VIA for detecting CIN2+ among HPV-positive women.
Since all women who test positive with careHPV, VIA or AVE will undergo colposcopy with biopsy, the positive predictive value (PPV) for CIN2+ will be estimated directly using the women who test positive with a particular screening test. An unbiased estimate of NPV will be obtained by using only results for the 5% of women who are negative for the three screening tests who are randomly selected to receive colposcopy and a minimum of two biopsies. Methods that account for verification-biased sampling will be used to obtain unbiased estimates of sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ detection.25 A method developed by Leisenring et.al. 26 will be used to test for significant differences in PPV and NPV.
- Conditions
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervical Cancers
- Being tested
- HPV Test, EVA System, Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA), Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), Image Capture with Mobile Phone
- Keywords
- Human Papillomavirus, Cervical Cancer, Screening, Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, Uterine Diseases, Uterine Cervical Diseases, Genital Diseases, Female, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications, Urogenital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Uterine Neoplasms, Genital Neoplasms, Female, Urogenital Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, Uterine Diseases, Uterine Cervical Diseases, Genital Diseases, Female, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HPV TestDiagnostic test
The careHPV (QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD) test was developed in a public-private partnership specifically for use in low-resource settings. It is a simplified, robust, and affordable HPV test that does not distinguish specific HPV types; rather, it gives a positive result if any of 14 hrHPV types is present in the specimen. Electricity is necessary to run the test, but it does not need running water or air conditioning. In order to be most cost effective, the samples must be run with a full plate of 96 samples. Results take 3-4 hours to complete.
EVA SystemDevice
Digital colposcope
Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)Procedure or surgery
unaided visual inspection with acetic acid
Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE)Diagnostic test
Also called CINFinder
Digital diagnostic classification, quality classifier using captured images from EVA System
Image Capture with Mobile PhoneOther
Compare performance of AVE installed on a mobile phone vs. on the EVA System
Pregnancy testDiagnostic test
Urine based pregnancy test
ScreenFire HPV testDiagnostic test
ScreenFire HPV test (Atila BioSystems, Inc, Mountain View, CA) uses isothermal amplification to detect 13 high risk (hr)HPV types directly from clinical samples in approximately one hour. The test can be run on any real-time PCR machine and gives separate results for hrHPV types 16 and 18, as well as a pooled positive result for 13 other hrHPV types. The human cellular gene beta-globin is used as an internal control to measure sample adequacy. ScreenFire can be self-collected and does not require batching. AmpFire® obtained CE-mark in 2017.
Colposcopy with biopsyProcedure or surgery
A colposcopic exam with biopsy entails visual magnification of the cervix and the removal of a small piece of cervical tissue. After the application of acetic acid 5% onto the cervix, a device called a colposcope allows the clinician to visually identify changes consistent with HPV. Areas of the cervix where lesions appear (or if not, randomly selected sections) are then biopsied (small piece of sample removed) and an endocervical curettage is performed (removing a small section from the inside of the cervix). Tissue specimens are then sent to the lab for pathology diagnosis.
Thermal AblationProcedure or surgery
Thermal ablation is utilized to treat high-grade cervical precancer. First, a speculum is introduced into the vagina to identify the cervix. Acetic acid 5% is applied to the cervix for one minute and the cervix is observed to look for changes consistent with precancer. If the cervix is able to be fully evaluated and there are no signs of invasive cancer, the tip of the device is heated to 100ºC and applied directly to the cervix for 1-2 minutes, which ablates or destroys the abnormal cells.
Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)Procedure or surgery
LEEP is utilized to remove abnormal tissue from the cervix. This may include tissue with precancerous cells (called cervical dysplasia) or cancerous cells. The loop is heated using electricity to remove the tissue. LEEP may also be called a loop excision or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Women eligible for HPV screening based on El Salvador's national guidelines will receive careHPV, VIA, and AVE (active comparator).
Screen-positive women by HPV, VIA or AVE referred to colposcopy clinic and 5% of screen-negative women (negative on HPV, VIA, and AVE).
Cervical cancer triage and diagnostic tests among screen- positive women and screen negative women.
Biopsy-confirmed positive will receive necessary treatment by local standard of care. Receives: Diagnostic Test: HPV Test; Device: EVA System; Procedure: Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA); Diagnostic Test: Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE); Other: Image Capture with Mobile Phone; Diagnostic Test: Pregnancy test; Diagnostic Test: ScreenFire HPV test; Procedure: Colposcopy with biopsy; Procedure: Thermal Ablation; Procedure: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity
Proportion of true CIN2+ positive cases based on biopsy, detected by AVE compared to VIA.
Measured: 12 months, non-randomized
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Proportion of participants with AVE positive tests that have cervical precancer based on biopsy compared to those with positive VIA positive tests
Measured: 12 months, non-randomized
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Feb 2025
- Study start12 Feb 2025
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Human Papillomavirus (HPV)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- DL Analytics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Basic Health International, Inc., National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Karla Alfaro, MD, Principal investigator, Basic Health International, Inc.David Levitz, PhD, Principal investigator, DL Analytics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06815939
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4R44CA247137
- Other IDs
- 4R44CA247137
- Acronym
- OPTICS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rao DW, Bayer CJ, Liu G, Chikandiwa A, Sharma M, Hathaway CL, Tan N, Mugo N, Barnabas RV. Modelling cervical cancer elimination using single-visit screening and treatment strategies in the context of high HIV prevalence: estimates for KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Oct;25(10):e26021. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26021.
PubMed 36225139Parham GP, Egemen D, Befano B, Mwanahamuntu MH, Rodriguez AC, Antani S, Chisele S, Munalula MK, Kaunga F, Musonda F, Malyangu E, Shibemba AL, de Sanjose S, Schiffman M, Sahasrabuddhe VV. Validation in Zambia of a cervical screening strategy including HPV genotyping and artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated visual evaluation. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00536-5.
PubMed 37845724Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, Hicks C, Wang SM, Reis RM, Mehrotra R, Mkhize-Kwitshana Z, Kibiki G, Bates DO, Dlamini Z. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Oncol Lett. 2020 Sep;20(3):2058-2074. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11754. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
PubMed 32782524Desai KT, Befano B, Xue Z, Kelly H, Campos NG, Egemen D, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Sahasrabuddhe V, Levitz D, Pearlman P, Jeronimo J, Antani S, Schiffman M, de Sanjose S. The development of "automated visual evaluation" for cervical cancer screening: The promise and challenges in adapting deep-learning for clinical testing: Interdisciplinary principles of automated visual evaluation in cervical screening. Int J Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;150(5):741-752. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33879. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
PubMed 34800038Xue Z, Novetsky AP, Einstein MH, Marcus JZ, Befano B, Guo P, Demarco M, Wentzensen N, Long LR, Schiffman M, Antani S. A demonstration of automated visual evaluation of cervical images taken with a smartphone camera. Int J Cancer. 2020 Nov 1;147(9):2416-2423. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33029. Epub 2020 May 19.
PubMed 32356305Ebrahimi N, Yousefi Z, Khosravi G, Malayeri FE, Golabi M, Askarzadeh M, Shams MH, Ghezelbash B, Eskandari N. Human papillomavirus vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: progression, barriers, and future prospective. Front Immunol. 2023 May 12;14:1150238. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1150238. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 37261366Desai KT, Ajenifuja KO, Banjo A, Adepiti CA, Novetsky A, Sebag C, Einstein MH, Oyinloye T, Litwin TR, Horning M, Olanrewaju FO, Oripelaye MM, Afolabi E, Odujoko OO, Castle PE, Antani S, Wilson B, Hu L, Mehanian C, Demarco M, Gage JC, Xue Z, Long LR, Cheung L, Egemen D, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. Design and feasibility of a novel program of cervical screening in Nigeria: self-sampled HPV testing paired with visual triage. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020 Oct 14;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00324-5. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33072178de Sanjose S, Perkins RB, Campos N, Inturrisi F, Egemen D, Befano B, Rodriguez AC, Jeronimo J, Cheung LC, Desai K, Han P, Novetsky AP, Ukwuani A, Marcus J, Ahmed SR, Wentzensen N, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Schiffman M; PAVE Study Group. Design of the HPV-automated visual evaluation (PAVE) study: Validating a novel cervical screening strategy. Elife. 2024 Jan 15;12:RP91469. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91469.
PubMed 38224340Hu L, Bell D, Antani S, Xue Z, Yu K, Horning MP, Gachuhi N, Wilson B, Jaiswal MS, Befano B, Long LR, Herrero R, Einstein MH, Burk RD, Demarco M, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):923-932. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy225.
PubMed 30629194
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of a Lab-free Low-cost Screening Test for Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Automated Visual Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06815939
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTICS / 4R44CA247137
- Conditions
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervical Cancers
- Keywords
- Human Papillomavirus, Cervical Cancer, Screening, Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, Uterine Diseases, Uterine Cervical Diseases, Genital Diseases, Female
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- DL AnalyticsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Basic Health International, Inc., National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 12 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool for cervical cancer based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. Several teams around the world have developed versions of AVE as a triage technology but none as a screening tool.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Cervical cancer, caused by persistent infection of carcinogenic types of the human papillomavirus (HPV), is the second leading cause of female cancer in El Salvador. Effective screening and treatment of precancerous lesions have lowered cervical cancer rates in high-income countries, but the disease remains a leading cause of death in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). Currently, up to 80% of the disease burden and 90% of global deaths occur in LMICs primarily due to lack of resources and poor infrastructure. A new test, Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), is a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence.
The purpose of this study is to validate Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), specifically the CINFinder version developed by DL Analytics, a point-of-care screening and triage diagnostic tool based on the assessment of digital images through artificial intelligence. AVE has been in development since 2021. The current study will consist of a clinical trial to compare the sensitivity of AVE (CINFinder version) with traditional screening and triage tests.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a prospective paired interventional study of 10,000 women in San Salvador, El Salvador, to test the difference in sensitivities between AVE (CINFinder) and with other screening and triage tests, including HPV tests and unaided visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) to detect CIN2+ as a primary screening method. As a secondary aim, investigators will also validate the use of AVE as a triage test in patients with positive HPV results. Histopathology diagnosis will be used as the reference to determine true disease status.
STUDY PROCEDURES:
The design includes a screening visit, a colposcopy visit, and a result delivery and treatment visit. During the screening visit, participants will undergo routine HPV sample collection, VIA, AVE with the EVA System (digital colposcope), and an additional cervical image capture with an Android smartphone. Women with a positive screening result on any of the three main screening tests (HPV test, VIA, or AVE with the EVA System) will be referred to a second study visit to undergo HPV testing with a genotyping test, AVE with the EVA System for the second time, and colposcopy with biopsy. In addition, 5% of screen-negative women will undergo the same procedures. Results from VIA and AVE with the EVA System during the first and the second visit will be compared to determine AVE performance as a screening and triage test, respectively. Histopathology findings will serve as the reference to establish the true diagnosis of each case. Women will receive their histopathology results during the third visit and, if eligible, will be offered ablation treatment the same day. Women ineligible for ablation will be referred to LEEP or other care as appropriate.
DATA COLLECTION \& MANAGEMENT:
This specific version of AVE (CINFinder) is designed to run on both EVA System and an Android phone, alongside additional tools for improving image quality and post-screening management.The AVE software (including CINFinder, CerVisibility, and CervManager modules), will be installed as user-friendly features that can be easily accessed by authorized
Data collection: All data will be recorded in real time on paper forms OR on an electronic tablet filled out by a nurse research assistant. All forms (digital or paper) will include the date and study ID to link information to specific patients and visits. Collected data will include eligibility criteria, a background questionnaire including relevant sociodemographic and medical history traits, clinical procedures, and laboratory results. In addition, providers conducting speculum exams during the first (screening) and second (colposcopy and biopsy) visits will use the CervManager application to create a profile for each patient to input clinical information. Thus, study data will be collected on both paper forms and CervManager for added back-up security. Providers will also capture cervical images using the CervManager application on both the EVA System and an Android mobile phone. Images belonging to the same patient will be synchronized under the same study ID. Other clinical data (e.g., HPV test results, histopathology) will also be inputted into the CervManager patient profile.
Data Management: For storage and management, data from paper forms will be transferred to REDCap, an electronic data management system widely used for clinical research. CervManager and REDCap can be downloaded and merged periodically to easily identify and correct any entry errors, duplications, or missing data on either database. All AVE algorithms implemented as part of this project and used for subsequent analyses will run on DL Analytics servers.
Non-participant documentation: Investigators will document the number of eligible women who decline to participate in the study (including main reasons why). If individuals agree, Investigators will collect general, de-identified information (i.e., age range, education, and previous screening). This will be done to identify any potential source of sampling bias.
STATISTICAL POWER CALCULATIONS AND SAMPLE SIZES
Aim 1: Validate AVE as a primary screening test compared to visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) for the detection of high-grade cervical pre- cancer (CIN2+).
A study with 10,000 women will be able to detect a minimum difference of 10% between VIA and AVE with 80% power and a Type I error rate of 5%, assuming a minimum sensitivity of VIA of 65% and a correlation coefficient of the tests in the diseased population (Rho) of at least 50%. Based on the study design, all participants who test positive on any test will be referred to colposcopy with biopsy (i.e., proportion of verification = 1), as opposed to only 5% of those who are double negative being referred (i.e., proportion of verification = 0.05). Finally, based on the Investigators previous experience working in El Salvador, Investigators estimate the prevalence (lambda) of CIN2+ in the general screening population at 2%.
Objective 2. To compare AVE as a triage test compared to VIA for detecting CIN2+ among HPV-positive women.
Since all women who test positive with careHPV, VIA or AVE will undergo colposcopy with biopsy, the positive predictive value (PPV) for CIN2+ will be estimated directly using the women who test positive with a particular screening test. An unbiased estimate of NPV will be obtained by using only results for the 5% of women who are negative for the three screening tests who are randomly selected to receive colposcopy and a minimum of two biopsies. Methods that account for verification-biased sampling will be used to obtain unbiased estimates of sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ detection.25 A method developed by Leisenring et.al. 26 will be used to test for significant differences in PPV and NPV.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: HPV Test, Device: EVA System, Procedure: Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA), Diagnostic Test: Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE), Other: Image Capture with Mobile Phone, Diagnostic Test: Pregnancy test, Diagnostic Test: ScreenFire HPV test, Procedure: Colposcopy with biopsy, Procedure: Thermal Ablation, Procedure: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)Women eligible for HPV screening based on El Salvador's national guidelines will receive careHPV, VIA, and AVE (active comparator). Screen-positive women by HPV, VIA or AVE referred to colposcopy clinic and 5% of screen-negative women (negative on HPV, VIA, and AVE). Cervical cancer triage and diagnostic tests among screen- positive women and screen negative women. Biopsy-confirmed positive will receive necessary treatment by local standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 59 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women between 30 and 59 years of age
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnancy at the time of colposcopy/biopsy
- Hysterectomy with surgically absent cervix
- HPV test in the last 5 years independently of negative or positive result
- Previous cervical cancer diagnosis or treatment in the last 5 years
- Lack of willingness or capacity to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HPV TestThe careHPV (QIAGEN, Gaithersburg, MD) test was developed in a public-private partnership specifically for use in low-resource settings. It is a simplified, robust, and affordable HPV test that does not distinguish specific HPV types; rather, it gives a positive result if any of 14 hrHPV types is present in the specimen. Electricity is necessary to run the test, but it does not need running water or air conditioning. In order to be most cost effective, the samples must be run with a full plate of 96 samples. Results take 3-4 hours to complete. | Diagnostic test | Experimental |
| EVA SystemDigital colposcope | Device | Experimental |
| Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA)unaided visual inspection with acetic acid | Procedure or surgery | Experimental |
| Automated Visual Evaluation (AVE)Also: CINFinderDigital diagnostic classification, quality classifier using captured images from EVA System | Diagnostic test | Experimental |
| Image Capture with Mobile PhoneCompare performance of AVE installed on a mobile phone vs. on the EVA System | Other | Experimental |
| Pregnancy testUrine based pregnancy test | Diagnostic test | Experimental |
| ScreenFire HPV testScreenFire HPV test (Atila BioSystems, Inc, Mountain View, CA) uses isothermal amplification to detect 13 high risk (hr)HPV types directly from clinical samples in approximately one hour. The test can be run on any real-time PCR machine and gives separate results for hrHPV types 16 and 18, as well as a pooled positive result for 13 other hrHPV types. The human cellular gene beta-globin is used as an internal control to measure sample adequacy. ScreenFire can be self-collected and does not require batching. AmpFire® obtained CE-mark in 2017. | Diagnostic test | Experimental |
| Colposcopy with biopsyA colposcopic exam with biopsy entails visual magnification of the cervix and the removal of a small piece of cervical tissue. After the application of acetic acid 5% onto the cervix, a device called a colposcope allows the clinician to visually identify changes consistent with HPV. Areas of the cervix where lesions appear (or if not, randomly selected sections) are then biopsied (small piece of sample removed) and an endocervical curettage is performed (removing a small section from the inside of the cervix). Tissue specimens are then sent to the lab for pathology diagnosis. | Procedure or surgery | Experimental |
| Thermal AblationThermal ablation is utilized to treat high-grade cervical precancer. First, a speculum is introduced into the vagina to identify the cervix. Acetic acid 5% is applied to the cervix for one minute and the cervix is observed to look for changes consistent with precancer. If the cervix is able to be fully evaluated and there are no signs of invasive cancer, the tip of the device is heated to 100ºC and applied directly to the cervix for 1-2 minutes, which ablates or destroys the abnormal cells. | Procedure or surgery | Experimental |
| Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)LEEP is utilized to remove abnormal tissue from the cervix. This may include tissue with precancerous cells (called cervical dysplasia) or cancerous cells. The loop is heated using electricity to remove the tissue. LEEP may also be called a loop excision or large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). | Procedure or surgery | Experimental |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity
Time frame: 12 months, non-randomized
Proportion of true CIN2+ positive cases based on biopsy, detected by AVE compared to VIA.
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Time frame: 12 months, non-randomized
Proportion of participants with AVE positive tests that have cervical precancer based on biopsy compared to those with positive VIA positive tests
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 36225139Rao DW, Bayer CJ, Liu G, Chikandiwa A, Sharma M, Hathaway CL, Tan N, Mugo N, Barnabas RV. Modelling cervical cancer elimination using single-visit screening and treatment strategies in the context of high HIV prevalence: estimates for KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2022 Oct;25(10):e26021. doi: 10.1002/jia2.26021.
- Background: PubMed 37845724Parham GP, Egemen D, Befano B, Mwanahamuntu MH, Rodriguez AC, Antani S, Chisele S, Munalula MK, Kaunga F, Musonda F, Malyangu E, Shibemba AL, de Sanjose S, Schiffman M, Sahasrabuddhe VV. Validation in Zambia of a cervical screening strategy including HPV genotyping and artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated visual evaluation. Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00536-5.
- Background: PubMed 32782524Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, Hicks C, Wang SM, Reis RM, Mehrotra R, Mkhize-Kwitshana Z, Kibiki G, Bates DO, Dlamini Z. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Oncol Lett. 2020 Sep;20(3):2058-2074. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11754. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
- Background: PubMed 34800038Desai KT, Befano B, Xue Z, Kelly H, Campos NG, Egemen D, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Sahasrabuddhe V, Levitz D, Pearlman P, Jeronimo J, Antani S, Schiffman M, de Sanjose S. The development of "automated visual evaluation" for cervical cancer screening: The promise and challenges in adapting deep-learning for clinical testing: Interdisciplinary principles of automated visual evaluation in cervical screening. Int J Cancer. 2022 Mar 1;150(5):741-752. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33879. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
- Background: PubMed 32356305Xue Z, Novetsky AP, Einstein MH, Marcus JZ, Befano B, Guo P, Demarco M, Wentzensen N, Long LR, Schiffman M, Antani S. A demonstration of automated visual evaluation of cervical images taken with a smartphone camera. Int J Cancer. 2020 Nov 1;147(9):2416-2423. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33029. Epub 2020 May 19.
- Background: PubMed 37261366Ebrahimi N, Yousefi Z, Khosravi G, Malayeri FE, Golabi M, Askarzadeh M, Shams MH, Ghezelbash B, Eskandari N. Human papillomavirus vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: progression, barriers, and future prospective. Front Immunol. 2023 May 12;14:1150238. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1150238. eCollection 2023.
- Background: PubMed 33072178Desai KT, Ajenifuja KO, Banjo A, Adepiti CA, Novetsky A, Sebag C, Einstein MH, Oyinloye T, Litwin TR, Horning M, Olanrewaju FO, Oripelaye MM, Afolabi E, Odujoko OO, Castle PE, Antani S, Wilson B, Hu L, Mehanian C, Demarco M, Gage JC, Xue Z, Long LR, Cheung L, Egemen D, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. Design and feasibility of a novel program of cervical screening in Nigeria: self-sampled HPV testing paired with visual triage. Infect Agent Cancer. 2020 Oct 14;15:60. doi: 10.1186/s13027-020-00324-5. eCollection 2020.
- Background: PubMed 38224340de Sanjose S, Perkins RB, Campos N, Inturrisi F, Egemen D, Befano B, Rodriguez AC, Jeronimo J, Cheung LC, Desai K, Han P, Novetsky AP, Ukwuani A, Marcus J, Ahmed SR, Wentzensen N, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Schiffman M; PAVE Study Group. Design of the HPV-automated visual evaluation (PAVE) study: Validating a novel cervical screening strategy. Elife. 2024 Jan 15;12:RP91469. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91469.
- Background: PubMed 30629194Hu L, Bell D, Antani S, Xue Z, Yu K, Horning MP, Gachuhi N, Wilson B, Jaiswal MS, Befano B, Long LR, Herrero R, Einstein MH, Burk RD, Demarco M, Gage JC, Rodriguez AC, Wentzensen N, Schiffman M. An Observational Study of Deep Learning and Automated Evaluation of Cervical Images for Cancer Screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Sep 1;111(9):923-932. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy225.
Related trials for Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Combination Bevacizumab and PRGN-2012 in Adults With Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis (RRP)
Respiratory Recurrent Papillomatosis (RRP), Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
RecruitingObservational study
The Natural History of Severe Viral Infections and Characterization of Immune Defects in Patients Without Known Immunocompromise
EBV, HSV
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Liquid Biopsies in HPV-associated Cancer Treatment Monitoring
Cervical Cancer, Cervical Dysplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Lived Experiences of Women Diagnosed With HPV Infection
Human Papillomavirus Infection
Recruiting
Feasibility Study Comparing One vs Two Probes for TA Among Cervical Cancer Screen Positive WLWH in C1001P-CS5 Rwanda
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), HPV
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Karla Alfaro, MD principal investigator
Basic Health International, Inc.
David Levitz, PhD principal investigator
DL Analytics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HPV Test, EVA System and Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) in people with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by DL Analytics at 1 site in El Salvador.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in El Salvador. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact David Levitz, PhD (817-966-5600, levitz@dlanalytics.ai), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity (time frame: 12 months, non-randomized). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06815939, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2026.