Osteoarthritis, HipNCT06823089
Early Feasibility Study of Cartilage Defect Repair
A study testing ReNew Hip Implant in people with Osteoarthritis, Hip and Femoroacetabular Impingement, run by Cytex Therapeutics, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Any patient aged 14 or older up to 64 years of age with hip disease, resulting in loss of articular cartilage integrity on the femoral head (e.g., femoroacetabular impingement or other structural deformity), has failed conservative care, and is a candidate for surgical intervention to treat. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Femoroacetabular Impingement, Osteonecrosis
- What is being tested?
- ReNew Hip Implant
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Nov 2025to Oct 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 14 years of age to no older than 64 years of age Subjects 14-21 years of age must have radiographic evidence of epiphyseal closure in the hip joint
- BMI < 35
- Failed at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment (e.g., anti-inflammatory pain medications, physical therapy, injections)
- Duration of symptoms consistent with intra-articular disease (i.e., groin, lateral and/or posterior hip pain) that have persisted for at least 3 months)
- Loss of articular cartilage integrity (~1 - 6 cm^2 in area) on the femoral head (confirmed by MRI), without an opposing lesion, that can be treated with a single ReNew Hip Implant
- Radiographic assessment with joint space width > 2 mm (verified by x-ray)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Meets an acceptable preoperative medical clearance and is free of conditions that would pose excessive operative risk, in the opinion of the investigator
- Given consent to participate in the study
- Able to understand the purpose of the study, his/her role, and is available for follow-up for the duration of the study:
- Subject has signed an IRB (Institutional Review Board) approved Informed Consent Form agreeing to participate in the extension study after the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study have been explained in an understandable form
- Subject is able to fully understand the purpose of the study, his/her role as a participant in the study, and plans to be available through five years post-operative follow-up
Who cannot join
- Current users of nicotine in any form (e.g., cigarettes, e- cigarettes/vaping, chewing tobacco, nicotine patches, gum, lozenges), or individuals who have discontinued nicotine use less than 30 days prior to screening.
- Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes
- Systemic steroid use in the 3 months prior to screening
- Coxa plana, coxa magna, or proximal femoral focal deficiency on the femoral head that would result in implant mismatch of the femoral head contour
- Any acute or chronic condition that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the study (e.g., COPD, congestive heart failure),
- Bleeding disorders
Show all 23Show fewer
- Current cancer (with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer)
- Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study period
- Active infection or sepsis
- History of local hip infection
- Known metastatic or neoplastic disease
- Conditions that may interfere with implant survival or outcomes (e.g., severe dysplasia)
- Life expectancy less than 2 years
- Intra-articular therapy within 3 months of enrollment
- Inadequate bone stock (as determined by SCORE or MORES assessment) to support the device
- Femoral head is:
- outside of the 46 - 56 mm range in either anteroposterior diameter or lateral diameters or
- an aspherical head deformity that results in contour mismatch of 16a
- Moderate to severe renal insufficiency
- Emotional or neurological condition that would preempt ability or willingness to participate in the study
- Above the knee amputation of the contralateral or ipsilateral leg
- Known allergies to the components of the device (polycaprolactone)
- Is a prisoner
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Any patient aged 14 or older up to 64 years of age with hip disease, resulting in loss of articular cartilage integrity on the femoral head (e.g., femoroacetabular impingement or other structural deformity), has failed conservative care, and is a candidate for surgical intervention to treat.
Read the detailed description
When patients suffer from arthritis in the hip joint and fail conservative treatment, the standard surgical approach is total joint arthroplasty, where the joint is entirely removed and replaced with artificial materials. While this procedure is suitable for less active or older individuals, it is not ideal for younger, more active patients. Despite this, the number of total hip replacements in younger patients is increasing, requiring significant lifestyle adjustments to extend the implant's lifespan. Even with these efforts, most patients will face at least one total joint revision in their lifetime, each carrying an increased risk of complications and decreased patient satisfaction. As a result, total hip replacements are generally not recommended for patients aged 40 to 65 who experience activity-limiting symptoms and have exhausted conservative treatments.
The Cytex device offers an alternative treatment option for this patient population - those suffering from hip osteoarthritis (OA), unresponsive to conservative care, yet considered too young or active for total joint replacement. Notably, the Cytex implant preserves all pre-existing healthy bone stock, unlike traditional total hip resurfacing or arthroplasty procedures, allowing for future revision to conventional resurfacing or arthroplasty if needed.
The investigational device for this study, the ReNew Hip Implant, is a bioabsorbable, highly porous implant designed with mechanical properties that closely mimic those of healthy articular cartilage. The implant features a bicomponent structure, combining a biomimetic 3D woven textile with a porous 3D-printed framework.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Femoroacetabular Impingement, Osteonecrosis, Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease, Osteochondral Lesion, Hip Dysplasia
- Being tested
- ReNew Hip Implant
- Keywords
- articular cartilage, hip resurfacing, residual Perthes disease, post-Perthes deformity, femoral head deformity, secondary hip osteoarthritis, hip preservation surgery, adolescent hip deformity, adult hip deformity, avascular necrosis of femoral head, early-stage avascular necrosis, Perthes sequelae, traumatic femoral head lesion
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Femoracetabular Impingement, Osteonecrosis, Legg-Calve-Perthes Disease, Hip Dislocation, Coxa Magna, Femur Head Necrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ReNew Hip ImplantDevice
Surgical Intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Investigational Arm | Experimental | The investigation device for this study will be the ReNew Hip Implant. Receives: Device: ReNew Hip Implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To establish initial safety (adverse events and device related serious adverse events) and effectiveness (pain and function) of the ReNew Hip Implant
Incidence rate of all adverse events including general adverse events, procedure related events and device related events.
Incidence rate of device-related serious adverse events
Measured: 6, 12, and 60 months
The international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33)
Difference demonstrated between pre-op and post-op iHOT-33
Measured: 6, 12, and 60 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Radiographic
Imaging MRI of operative joint assessing the implant by MOCART 2.0 (modified), implant placement, joint effusion, and osteophytosis
Measured: 6, 12, and 60 months
Kaplan Meier survivorship
Kaplan Meier survivorship of the ReNew Hip Implant in terms of revision and / or radiological migration
Measured: 12, 24, and 60 months post-surgery
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Difference demonstrated between pre-op and the post-op of all PROMs (mHHS, UCLA, PROMIS)
Measured: 6, 12, 24, and 60 months post-surgery
Health economic outcomes
Surgical blood loss; Measured in ml blood
Measured: Time Frame: Intra-operative
Health economic outcomes
Length of hospital stay; Measure of days spent in hospital
Measured: Time Frame: Hospital admission to discharge
Health economic outcomes
Operative time - first incision into skin to time when last suture is applied
Measured: Intra-operative
Health economic outcomes
Re-hospitalizations for hip issues; Re-hospitalizations number of re-admissions to hospital
Measured: Time Frame: Up to 60 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Feb 2025
- Study start6 Nov 2025
- Primary completionOct 2031 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, clinical study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cytex Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- MCRA
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06823089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CIP-0001
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: To be determined
Publications
Roemer FW, Hunter DJ, Winterstein A, Li L, Kim YJ, Cibere J, Mamisch TC, Guermazi A. Hip Osteoarthritis MRI Scoring System (HOAMS): reliability and associations with radiographic and clinical findings. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Aug;19(8):946-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
PubMed 21550411Gold SL, Burge AJ, Potter HG. MRI of hip cartilage: joint morphology, structure, and composition. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3321-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2403-7.
PubMed 22723242
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Feasibility Study of Cartilage Defect Repair
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06823089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CIP-0001
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Femoroacetabular Impingement, Osteonecrosis, Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease, Osteochondral Lesion, Hip Dysplasia
- Keywords
- articular cartilage, hip resurfacing, residual Perthes disease, post-Perthes deformity, femoral head deformity, secondary hip osteoarthritis, hip preservation surgery, adolescent hip deformity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cytex Therapeutics, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- MCRA
- Study start
- 6 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Any patient aged 14 or older up to 64 years of age with hip disease, resulting in loss of articular cartilage integrity on the femoral head (e.g., femoroacetabular impingement or other structural deformity), has failed conservative care, and is a candidate for surgical intervention to treat.
Detailed description
When patients suffer from arthritis in the hip joint and fail conservative treatment, the standard surgical approach is total joint arthroplasty, where the joint is entirely removed and replaced with artificial materials. While this procedure is suitable for less active or older individuals, it is not ideal for younger, more active patients. Despite this, the number of total hip replacements in younger patients is increasing, requiring significant lifestyle adjustments to extend the implant's lifespan. Even with these efforts, most patients will face at least one total joint revision in their lifetime, each carrying an increased risk of complications and decreased patient satisfaction. As a result, total hip replacements are generally not recommended for patients aged 40 to 65 who experience activity-limiting symptoms and have exhausted conservative treatments.
The Cytex device offers an alternative treatment option for this patient population - those suffering from hip osteoarthritis (OA), unresponsive to conservative care, yet considered too young or active for total joint replacement. Notably, the Cytex implant preserves all pre-existing healthy bone stock, unlike traditional total hip resurfacing or arthroplasty procedures, allowing for future revision to conventional resurfacing or arthroplasty if needed.
The investigational device for this study, the ReNew Hip Implant, is a bioabsorbable, highly porous implant designed with mechanical properties that closely mimic those of healthy articular cartilage. The implant features a bicomponent structure, combining a biomimetic 3D woven textile with a porous 3D-printed framework.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, single-arm, open-label, multicenter, clinical study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Investigational Arm | Experimental | Device: ReNew Hip ImplantThe investigation device for this study will be the ReNew Hip Implant. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- At least 14 years of age to no older than 64 years of age Subjects 14-21 years of age must have radiographic evidence of epiphyseal closure in the hip joint
- BMI < 35
- Failed at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment (e.g., anti-inflammatory pain medications, physical therapy, injections)
- Duration of symptoms consistent with intra-articular disease (i.e., groin, lateral and/or posterior hip pain) that have persisted for at least 3 months)
- Loss of articular cartilage integrity (~1 - 6 cm^2 in area) on the femoral head (confirmed by MRI), without an opposing lesion, that can be treated with a single ReNew Hip Implant
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Current users of nicotine in any form (e.g., cigarettes, e- cigarettes/vaping, chewing tobacco, nicotine patches, gum, lozenges), or individuals who have discontinued nicotine use less than 30 days prior to screening.
- Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes
- Systemic steroid use in the 3 months prior to screening
- Coxa plana, coxa magna, or proximal femoral focal deficiency on the femoral head that would result in implant mismatch of the femoral head contour
- Any acute or chronic condition that would limit the ability of the patient to participate in the study (e.g., COPD, congestive heart failure),
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ReNew Hip ImplantSurgical Intervention | Device | Investigational Arm |
Primary outcome
To establish initial safety (adverse events and device related serious adverse events) and effectiveness (pain and function) of the ReNew Hip Implant
Time frame: 6, 12, and 60 months
Incidence rate of all adverse events including general adverse events, procedure related events and device related events. Incidence rate of device-related serious adverse events
The international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33)
Time frame: 6, 12, and 60 months
Difference demonstrated between pre-op and post-op iHOT-33
7 secondary outcomes
Radiographic
Time frame: 6, 12, and 60 months
Kaplan Meier survivorship
Time frame: 12, 24, and 60 months post-surgery
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, and 60 months post-surgery
Health economic outcomes
Time frame: Time Frame: Intra-operative
Health economic outcomes
Time frame: Time Frame: Hospital admission to discharge
Health economic outcomes
Time frame: Intra-operative
Health economic outcomes
Time frame: Time Frame: Up to 60 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 21550411Roemer FW, Hunter DJ, Winterstein A, Li L, Kim YJ, Cibere J, Mamisch TC, Guermazi A. Hip Osteoarthritis MRI Scoring System (HOAMS): reliability and associations with radiographic and clinical findings. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Aug;19(8):946-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
- Background: PubMed 22723242Gold SL, Burge AJ, Potter HG. MRI of hip cartilage: joint morphology, structure, and composition. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Dec;470(12):3321-31. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2403-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. To be determined
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Hip
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Intravenous Dexamethasone (0 vs 4 vs 8 mg) as an Adjunct to PENG Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis, Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Effects of EDUcation and EXercise Compared to Education Alone on Clinical and Physiological Outcomes in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis
Hip Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia With Intrathecal Morphine Versus PENG Block With or Without Dexamethasone in Hip Arthroplasty
Arthropathy of Hip, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
PENG vs L-ESPB With S-ESPB for Analgesia in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthropathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ReNew Hip Implant in people with Osteoarthritis, Hip and Femoroacetabular Impingement, run by Cytex Therapeutics, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To establish initial safety (adverse events and device related serious adverse events) and effectiveness (pain and function) of the ReNew Hip Implant (time frame: 6, 12, and 60 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06823089, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2026.