AzTrials
AzTrials

ARDSNCT06823804

Electrical Impedance Tomography-Derived Dorsal Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio Identifies PEEP Responsiveness and Risk Phenotypes in ARDS

An observational study of ARDS, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In the treatment of critically ill patients, mechanical ventilation is a key link, and appropriate mechanical ventilation strategies can open the alveoli and improve oxygenation, while inappropriate mechanical ventilation can increase lung injury and seriously affect the prognosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
ARDS
What is being tested?
Electrical Impedance tomography Monitoring
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Dec 2022to 31 Dec 2024
How long will I take part?
30 Days
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: This study included adult patients (≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who were receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Ruijin Hospital. All enrolled patients met the Berlin definition of ARDS and had a PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio ≤200 mmHg within 6 hours of screening. A total of 120 patients were consecutively enrolled from December 2022 to December 2024. Patients were stratified by airway closure status for subgroup analyses.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who meet the Berlin definition of ARDS and have been treated with mechanical ventilation (clinical diagnosis of ARDS by the attending ICU physician)
  • PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤200 mmHg

Who cannot join

  • Age< 18 or >90 years
  • Pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum
  • Hemodynamic instability (rising vasopressor need in <6h)
  • Contraindications to RM or EIT

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Department of Critical Care Medicine,Ruijin Hospital,Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,Shanghai,China.

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025

Other trials in China

About this study

In the treatment of critically ill patients, mechanical ventilation is a key link, and appropriate mechanical ventilation strategies can open the alveoli and improve oxygenation, while inappropriate mechanical ventilation can increase lung injury and seriously affect the prognosis. Ventilator-related lung injury is mainly concentrated in barotrauma, volumetric injury, shear injury, and biological injury, and the monitoring of respiratory ventilation to the level of local ventilation can help to better assess the state of alveolar opening and alveolar collapse, and help to understand the uniformity of gas distribution in the lungs, which is closely related to lung injury. However, how to achieve simple, bedside and real-time lung ventilation and lung volume assessment in clinical work has always been a difficult problem to be overcome. This study intends to explore the changes of local ventilation and blood flow in the lungs during PEEP trail in patients with ARDS monitored by EIT.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background and Rationale ARDS is associated with heterogeneous lung collapse. The recruitment-to inflation (R/I) ratio has emerged as an index of recruitability, but is usually assessed globally. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables regional assessment of ventilation and may provide more precise determinations of recruitable lung regions, particularly dorsal areas.
  2. Objectives Primary objective: To compare the predictive value of regional (dorsal and ventral) versus global R/I for recruitment success in moderate-severe ARDS. Secondary objectives: To classify recruitment phenotypes and evaluate associations with oxygenation, compliance improvement, ventilator-free days, ICU length of stay, and 28-day mortality.
  3. Study Design Prospective, single-centre observational cohort study in ICU patients with moderate-severe ARDS. All eligible patients undergo standardised recruitment maneuver and EIT monitoring.
  4. Study Setting Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine ICU, December 2022 - December 2024.
  5. Intervention Standardized PEEP step maneuver from 5 → 15 cmH₂O, maintained for 3 minutes. Continuous EIT monitoring of regional compliance, oxygenation, hemodynamics. Dynamic strain cutoff (>0.6) or adverse events terminate the maneuver. Ventilation mode: volume control, tidal volume 4-6 mL/kg predicted body weight, plateau ≤28-30 cmH₂O, FiO₂ titrated for SpO₂ 88-92%.
  6. Measurements EIT-derived ΔEELI in dorsal and ventral regions Regional and global compliance (Crec and Crs) R/I calculated: Crec/Crs at baseline PEEP Airway opening pressure by low-flow inflation method Primary outcome: recruitment success (≥10% compliance improvement + ≥20 mmHg PaO₂/FiO₂ increase) Secondary: ventilator-free days, ICU LOS, 28-day mortality, dynamic strain
  7. Statistical Analysis Plan Distribution check by Shapiro-Wilk. Paired tests for within-patient comparisons. ROC curves and Youden index for cut-off selection. Multivariate regression for mortality risk factors. Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.
  8. Safety Monitoring Terminate RM if: MAP <65 mmHg, SpO₂ <88%, arrhythmia onset, dynamic strain >0.6.
Conditions
ARDS
Being tested
Electrical Impedance tomography Monitoring
Keywords
ventilation/perfusion ratio, Electrical impedance tomography, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Aspiration, Respiratory Distress Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electrical Impedance tomography MonitoringDiagnostic test

    Standardized PEEP step maneuver from 5 → 15 cmH₂O, maintained for 3 minutes. Continuous EIT monitoring of regional compliance, oxygenation, hemodynamics. Dynamic strain cutoff (>0.6) or adverse events terminate the maneuver.

    Ventilation mode: volume control, tidal volume 4-6 mL/kg predicted body weight, plateau ≤28-30 cmH₂O, FiO₂ titrated for SpO₂ 88-92%.

Study groups in NCT06823804
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
evaluate the feasibility of using EIT to calculate regional recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratiosRegional R/I ratios were computed for the global lung, dorsal (dependent), and ventral (non-dependent) regions of interest (ROIs), which were defined as 50% of the ventro-dorsal lung diameter based on EIT imaging.compare the predictive value of regional (dorsal and ventral) versus global R/I for recruitment success in moderate-severe ARDS.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Electrical Impedance tomography Monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. recruitment success percent

    recruitment( ≥10% compliance improvement ) and Re-check the blood gas ≥20 mmHg PaO₂/FiO₂ increase mean success

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. 28-day mortality

    Statistical analysis of 28-day mortality

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days

  2. Ventilator-free days at Day 28

    Number of days alive and free from mechanical Ventilation with in the first days after enrollment

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 28 days

  3. Length of ICU stay

    Length of ICU stay in days

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 days

  4. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 7

    Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 7

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2025
  2. Study start1 Dec 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
Target duration
30 Days
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06823804
Sponsor's protocol ID
2022325
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
25 Dec 2024
Last updated
23 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of ARDS, run by Ruijin Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

recruitment success percent (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in