AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic DissectionARISE IIINCT06827990

GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of De Novo Type A Aortic Dissections

A study testing GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device) in people with Aortic Dissection, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 22 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the ASG device in the treatment of de novo Type A aortic dissections. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Dissection
What is being tested?
GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
112 participants
Where
22 sitesUnited States
Study dates
22 Sep 2025to 1 Sep 2031
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The subject is/has:
  • De novo Type A aortic dissection (≤30 days from symptom onset to index endovascular procedure) compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device.
  • Primarily intended to be treated by placement of the ASG device in the ascending aorta. Distal adjunctive procedures not in contact with the ASG device may be performed during the index endovascular procedure at the discretion of the Investigator.
  • Anatomic compatibility of the ascending aorta required for implanting the ASG device:
  • Proximal Aortic Landing Zone: i. Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium.
  • Total aortic diameter between 27mm - 48mm iii. Landing zone cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed. b) Distal Aortic Landing Zone: i. Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm proximal to BCA ostium.
Show all 61Show fewer
  • Adequate aortic length
  • The Aortic Treatment Team (as defined by the protocol) attest endovascular repair is in the best interest of the patient AND considers the patient to be high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting at least one of the following criteria:
  • ≥80 years of age
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2
  • History of Respiratory Insufficiency (defined by home O2 usage, exertional dyspnea, imaging evidence of COPD, previous evidence of compromised pulmonary function tests (PFT) on spirometry or other factors as determined by the Investigator)
  • Prior Cardiac Surgery
  • Hostile Chest (VARC-2 Definition)
  • Clinical Frailty Scale 3-7
  • Clinical malperfusion (head, gut, lower extremity)
  • Transfusion is not possible (e.g., Jehovah's Witness)
  • Renal Dialysis prior to aortic dissection
  • Chronic renal insufficiency (eGFR<60 without dialysis or other documented history of chronic kidney disease prior to dissection)
  • Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature.
  • Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach.
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative.
  • Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up, as the subject's condition allows.
  • The subject is/has:
  • De novo Type A aortic dissection (≤90 days from symptom onset until first study procedure) compatible with the treatment requirements of the ASG device alone or the ASG device in combination with the TBE device in the Zone 0 position.
  • Primarily intended to be treated by placement of the ASG device in the ascending aorta or ASG device in combination with the TBE device in the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Distal adjunctive procedures not in contact with the ASG device may be performed during the index endovascular procedure at the discretion of the Investigator.
  • Anatomic requirements for intended treatment with the ASG device alone or in combination with the TBE device.
  • Anatomic compatibility required for implanting the ASG device (Intended treatment with ASG device alone) i. Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:
  • Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium.
  • Total aortic diameter between 27mm - 48mm.
  • Landing zone cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed. ii. Distal Aortic Landing Zone:
  • <!-- -->
  • Primary entry tear must be in the ascending aorta and ≥ 2 cm proximal to BCA ostium.
  • Adequate aortic length
  • Anatomic compatibility required for implanting the ASG device (Intended treatment with ASG device and TBE device) i. Proximal Aortic Landing Zone:
  • <!-- -->
  • Primary entry tear must be identified in Zone 0-5.
  • Landing zone is native aorta.
  • Primary entry tear location is ≥2cm distal to the most distal coronary artery ostium.
  • Proximal landing zone must be ≥2cm in the ascending aorta.
  • Landing zone cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed.
  • Total aortic landing zone diameter 27mm - 48mm. ii. Branch Vessel Landing Zone:
  • <!-- -->
  • Length of ≥2.5 cm proximal to first major branch vessel.
  • Target branch vessel inner diameters of 11-18 mm.
  • Target branch vessel landing zone must be in native vessel that cannot be heavily calcified or thrombosed.
  • The distal 15mm landing zone cannot be dissected.
  • The Aortic Treatment Team (as defined by the protocol) attest endovascular repair is in the best interest of the patient AND considers the patient to be high-risk for open surgical repair by meeting at least one of the following criteria:
  • ≥80 years of age
  • BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2
  • History of Respiratory Insufficiency (defined by home O2 usage, exertional dyspnea, imaging evidence of COPD, previous evidence of compromised PFTs on spirometry or other factors as determined by the Investigator)
  • Prior Cardiac Surgery
  • Hostile Chest (VARC-2 Definition)
  • Clinical Frailty Scale 3-9
  • Clinical malperfusion (head, gut, lower extremity)
  • Transfusion is not possible (e.g., Jehovah's Witness)
  • Renal Dialysis prior to aortic dissection
  • Chronic renal insufficiency (eGFR<60 without dialysis or other documented history of chronic kidney disease prior to dissection)
  • Age ≥18 years at time of informed consent signature.
  • Adequate vascular access via transfemoral or retroperitoneal approach.
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF) signed by the subject or legally authorized representative.
  • Agrees to comply with protocol requirements, including imaging and 5-year follow-up, as the subject's condition allows.

Who cannot join

  • The subject is/has:
  • Mechanical heart valve in the aortic position.
  • Aortic insufficiency grade 3 or greater confirmed during TEE pre-implant.
  • Indwelling intravascular device that would interfere with or result in contact with planned repair (e.g., contiguous arch graft, LVAD, TAVR device in continuity with aortic tear).
  • Known degenerative connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler-Danlos Syndrome).
  • Participation in investigational drug or medical device study within one year of enrollment unless approved by the Sponsor.
Show all 26Show fewer
  • Known history of drug abuse within one year of treatment which would affect the ability to obtain follow-up.
  • Pregnant at time of procedure.
  • Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm.
  • Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication).
  • Life expectancy <12 months due to presence of another comorbid condition.
  • Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 [HIT-2], known hypersensitivity to heparin, or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state should be considered exclusion if treatment plan includes implant of a TBE device).
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.
  • Coronary malperfusion.
  • Catastrophic neurological complications in the 30 days prior to the dissection diagnosis (e.g., progressively worsening symptoms, coma, Glasgow Coma Scale <=8).
  • Aortic fistula.
  • In circulatory shock (e.g., systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg without inotropes, base deficit > -10 mmol/L or -10 mEq/L) at any time prior to the initiation of the index endovascular procedure.
  • In extreme hemodynamic compromise requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation at any time prior to the initiation of the index endovascular procedure.
  • Clinical or radiographic signs of bowel infarction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or bowel necrosis (as determined by the implanting physician based on imaging observations, peritoneal signs, surgical exploration, elevated serum lactate levels, low pH, and/or acidosis) at any time prior to the initiation of the index endovascular procedure.
  • The subject is/has:
  • Mechanical heart valve in the aortic position.
  • Pregnant at time of procedure.
  • Active infected aorta, mycotic aneurysm.
  • Active systemic infection (e.g., infection requiring treatment with parenteral anti-infective medication).
  • Known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (Previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 [HIT-2], known hypersensitivity to heparin, or a history of a hypercoagulability disorder and/or state should be considered exclusion if treatment plan includes implant of a TBE device).
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 1 country.

22 sites in 1 country

United States22 sites
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Emory University School of Medicine

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Northwestern Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Ohio Health Research Institute

    Columbus, Ohio, 43214

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

  • Corewell Health System

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503

  • Hackensack Medical Center

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • The Methodist Hospital Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana University

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Medical College of Wisconsin

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • WVU Medicine

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506

  • The Stanford Hospital

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 18104

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Baylor Research Institute

    Plano, Texas, 75093

  • Washington University School of Medicine - St. Louis

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • Westchester Medical Center

    Westchester, New York, 10595

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft in the Treatment of De Novo Type A Aortic Dissections

To assess the safety and effectiveness of the ASG device in the treatment of de novo Type A aortic dissections.

Read the detailed description

This pivotal investigation is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the ASG device for the treatment of de novo Type A aortic dissections in patients considered to be high-risk for open surgical repair.

Being tested
GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)
Medical subject headings
Aortic Dissection

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)Device

    Endovascular aortic repair of the ascending aorta

Study groups in NCT06827990
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PrimaryExperimentalA hypothesis driven analysis of the safety and effectiveness of the GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG) device alone in the ascending aorta. Dissection chronicity in the primary arm must be 30 days or less from symptom onset to index endovascular procedure.
Receives: Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)
SecondaryExperimentalDescriptive analysis of use of the ASG device in patients who are not eligible for treatment in the primary arm. Dissection chronicity up to 90 days from symptom onset until the first study procedure is allowed in the secondary arm.
Receives: Device: GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint

    Composite of the following events:

    Death ≤30 days of the index endovascular procedure, or during initial hospitalization, whichever is later

    Disabling Stroke ≤30 days following the index endovascular procedure

    Measured: 30 Days

  2. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint

    Clinical Success, a composite of:

    Assisted Technical Success (at end of index endovascular procedure)

    Absence of the following (cumulative through 30-days, except as specified):

    Aortic rupture

    Death ≤30days of the index endovascular procedure, or during initial hospitalization, whichever is later

    Study Device Reintervention

    Conversion to open surgical repair

    Measured: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary Endpoint

    Procedural Success

    Treatment Success

    Primary Technical Success (Unassisted)

    SF-36® Physical Component Summary measured at one year follow-up

    Measured: 1 Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2025
  2. Study start22 Sep 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2031 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
112 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06827990
Sponsor's protocol ID
ASG 24-02
Acronym
ARISE III
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
10 Feb 2025
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be available to other researchers.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing GORE® Ascending Stent Graft (ASG device) in people with Aortic Dissection, run by W.L.Gore & Associates at 22 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 61 inclusion and 26 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Safety Endpoint (time frame: 30 Days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in