AzTrials
AzTrials

Social Justice AdvocacyNCT06828146

A Quasi-Experimental Study on Developing Social Justice Advocacy in Nursing Education Through Critical Pedagogy and Freirean Dialogues

A study testing a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students. in people with Social Justice Advocacy and Nursing Education, run by Çankırı Karatekin University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Recognizing the critical significance of social and health inequalities as one of the foremost global challenges, the United Nations (UN) acknowledged the growing disparity as a key issue in the Millennium Development Goals (MDG). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Social Justice Advocacy, Nursing Education
What is being tested?
a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
85 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Oct 2024to 10 Jan 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Nursing students enrolled in nursing ethics courses. No prior formal training in social justice advocacy

Who cannot join

  • Students with previous participation in social justice-related workshops or courses.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Cankırı Karatekin University

    Çankırı, Çankırı, 18100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Recognizing the critical significance of social and health inequalities as one of the foremost global challenges, the United Nations (UN) acknowledged the growing disparity as a key issue in the Millennium Development Goals (MDG). Reducing global inequalities was established as one of the 17 MDG targets for the period 2015-2030. While certain health indicators have seen improvement in Turkey's healthcare system, notable factors continue to threaten the equitable provision of healthcare. In light of the profound societal transformations in Turkey, including a substantial influx of refugees and ongoing economic challenges, the pursuit of social justice has become essential (Makovsky, 2019). Therefore, it is crucial to position social justice as a central theme in nursing education (Einhellig et al., 2016; Hellman et al., 2018). Nevertheless, scholarly literature highlights the importance of exploring how nurse educators can foster this comprehension and motivate students towards the aim of advocacy. The literature underscores the dual significance of addressing this topic in nursing education (Hellman et al., 2018), while also emphasizing the need to broaden understanding of effective teaching and learning strategies. These methods are essential for equipping students with the knowledge and skills necessary to advocate for social justice, empowering them to critically examine existing systems, develop a sense of agency, and take responsibility for driving societal change in nursing practice (Elliott \& Sandberg, 2021).

Historically, nursing education has operated within a culture of silence, often neglecting issues of oppression, racism, and marginalization. This stands in contrast to Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed, which emphasizes dialogue as a fundamental element of teaching and learning (Iheduru-Anderson et al., 2021, 2022). By incorporating dialogical methods in nursing classrooms, educators can create inclusive spaces where students openly share their experiences, engage in meaningful discussions on social justice, and collaborate in knowledge creation. Such reciprocal dialogue is only possible in environments that value diverse perspectives and foster a sense of belonging (Kechi et al., 2024) Through dialogical education, students gain confidence, actively participate in their learning, and develop the critical thinking skills necessary to challenge inequities (Giroux, 2010; Paulo Freire et al., 2014). Integrating Freire's critical pedagogy into nursing education not only strengthens these skills but also prepares nurses to advocate for social change, ultimately contributing to a more just and equitable healthcare system (Kechi et al., 2024). The current study applies Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy, highlighting education as a means of empowerment and encouraging learners to critically analyze societal structures while engaging in transformative action. Integrating Freirean principles can cultivate critical consciousness among students, equipping them to identify and address systemic inequalities in healthcare.

This study employs a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.

Read the detailed description

Social justice, deeply rooted in nursing history, is best understood as both a process and an outcome, encompassing attributes such as fairness, justness, equity, and well-being (Thurman \& Pfitzinger-Lippe, 2017). There is a global consensus that social justice is intrinsically linked to health and health equity, making it highly pertinent for nursing education.

From the perspective of nursing care, There is pre-pandemic evidence on the barriers to this important contribution to global health, including being a female predominant workforce and has long faced barriers to effective advocacy, based on the gendered identity (Madigan et al., 2023) The COVID-19 pandemic underscored nurses are important advocates for the world's population. Numerous studies have highlighted that the pandemic has worsened health disparities, emphasizing the crucial role of nurses in conducting health promotion and disease prevention efforts for the global population After the pandemic, The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that the detrimental impacts of socioeconomic inequalities are increasingly evident in today's societies. In response to these findings, the International Council of Nurses (ICN) emphasizes strongly that nurses are professionally obligated to champion equity and social justice (ICN, 2023) They have a responsibility for initiating and backing actions aimed at addressing the health and social needs of the public, especially those belonging to vulnerable populations. The urgency for nurses to advocate for equity and social justice is intensifying with each day, as societal and healthcare disparities continue to evolve and become more apparent.

Despite the growing need to cultivate a healthcare workforce equipped to address social injustice in practical settings. There's a scarcity of research exploring the integration of social justice into undergraduate nursing education (Einhellig et al., 2016; Habibzadeh et al., 2021; Houston et al., 2023; Roy et al., 2022; Shahzad et al., 2022) A study conducted in Iran revealed that inadequate focus on social justice within educational settings hampers nurses' ability to contribute to the establishment of social justice within the healthcare system (Hosseinzadegan et al., 2021). Habibzadeh et al. (2021) demonstrated significant shortcomings in teaching the concept of social justice within nursing education and They underscored the imperative need to revise the content of nursing curricula and educational methodologies to effectively instill this fundamental value. Valderama-Wallace and Apesoa-Varano (2019) noted that nurse educators express concerns regarding their limited endeavors to enhance this foundational value. Additionally, they highlighted a lack of structural and institutional support for such efforts. Two reviews conducted in 2022 and 2023 uncovered a deficiency in research dedicated to improving social justice within nursing education, with a significant portion of the studies originating from the USA (Abu \& Moorley, 2023; Shahzad et al., 2022). This underscores the importance of nursing schools in the European region and other countries facing challenges such as hosting refugees and grappling with social and economic issues, need to prioritize the integration of social justice into undergraduate nursing education (Abu \& Moorley, 2023; Valderama-Wallace \& Apesoa-Varano, 2019)

Turkey is among the notable countries experiencing recent societal changes. As is widely recognized, the root of health disparities often lies in challenging socioeconomic circumstances, causing the most marginalized communities to consistently experience inferior health outcomes. In Turkey, societal shifts such as significant migration influxes and deteriorating socioeconomic conditions can serve as significant contributors to social injustice. Despite these concerns, regrettably, there remains a substantial gap concerning social justice issues within the Turkish nursing education system. Only one study has utilized the nursing education curriculum to enhance social justice advocacy among nursing students. Nonetheless, Turkish educators must enhance social justice in nursing education by employing various methods.

Traditional lecture formats offer limited advantages in conveying abstract concepts like social justice. Given the demands of nursing professional roles, students must start evaluating their moral framework, equipping them to effectively care for and advocate for diverse patient populations. To effectively convey this crucial concept to nursing students, nursing faculty must employ diverse pedagogical strategies (Einhellig et al., 2016). These strategies may deepen their awareness of social inequality from alternative perspectives, thereby framing the significance of taking action in the face of social injustice within healthcare settings.

Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy is an educational approach that emphasizes the transformative power of education in challenging and dismantling oppressive societal structures (Paulo Freire et al., 2014) At its core, this pedagogy prioritizes dialogue, framing education as a means of liberation by encouraging learners to critically examine their realities and take action for change (Giroux, 2010; Paulo Freire et al., 2014).

Applying Freire's principles in education involves fostering a learning environment that promotes critical reflection, open dialogue, and active engagement. This approach empowers students to question existing systems, cultivate a sense of agency, and take responsibility for societal transformation (Rozendo et al., 2017).

Historically, nursing education has operated within a culture of silence, often neglecting issues of oppression, racism, and marginalization. This stands in contrast to Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed, which emphasizes dialogue as a fundamental element of teaching and learning (Iheduru-Anderson et al., 2021, 2022). By incorporating dialogical methods in nursing classrooms, educators can create inclusive spaces where students openly share their experiences, engage in meaningful discussions on social justice, and collaborate in knowledge creation. Such reciprocal dialogue is only possible in environments that value diverse perspectives and foster a sense of belonging (Kechi et al., 2024) Through dialogical education, students gain confidence, actively participate in their learning, and develop the critical thinking skills necessary to challenge inequities (Giroux, 2010; Paulo Freire et al., 2014). Integrating Freire's critical pedagogy into nursing education not only strengthens these skills but also prepares nurses to advocate for social change, ultimately contributing to a more just and equitable healthcare system (Kechi et al., 2024). The current study applies Paulo Freire's critical pedagogy, highlighting education as a means of empowerment and encouraging learners to critically analyze societal structures while engaging in transformative action. Integrating Freirean principles can cultivate critical consciousness among students, equipping them to identify and address systemic inequalities in healthcare.

Method This study employs a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.

Participants Population: Undergraduate nursing students from a Turkish nursing school. Sample Size: 85 students were recruited through purposive sampling.

Procedure

The six-week intervention consisted of:

Critical Reflection Sessions: Students engaged in structured discussions on healthcare inequities.

Problem-Posing Learning: case studies on marginalized populations and healthcare discrimination.

Freirean Dialogues: Student-led discussions focusing on social determinants of health

Being tested
a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.Other

    a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.

Study groups in NCT06828146
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean diaExperimentala quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.
Receives: Other: a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pirmary outcome

    • Higher posttest scores compared to pretest, indicating improved advocacy knowledge, confidence, and engagement

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Feb 2025
  2. Study start10 Oct 2024
  3. Primary completion10 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion10 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
This study employs a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
85 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06828146
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAKU-01-10-2024
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
9 Feb 2025
Last updated
14 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Paulo Freire, Myra Bergman Ramos, & Myra Bergman Ramos. (2014). Pedagogy_of_the_Oppressed_30th_Anniversary_Edition_----_(Chapter_4). In Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition (pp. 125-185).

  • Kechi IA, Waite R, Murray TA. Examining and mitigating racism in nursing using the socio-ecological model. Nurs Inq. 2024 Jul;31(3):e12639. doi: 10.1111/nin.12639. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

    PubMed 38567694
  • Iheduru-Anderson K, Okoro FO, Moore SS. Diversity and Inclusion or Tokens? A Qualitative Study of Black Women Academic Nurse Leaders in the United States. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2022 Jan 18;9:23333936211073116. doi: 10.1177/23333936211073116. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

    PubMed 35097160
  • Giroux, H. A. (2010). Rethinking education as the practice of freedom: Paulo Freire and the promise of critical pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 8(6), 715-721. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2010.8.6.715

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing a quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effectiveness of Freirean dialogue-based critical pedagogy in fostering social justice advocacy among nursing students. in people with Social Justice Advocacy and Nursing Education, run by Çankırı Karatekin University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pirmary outcome (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06828146, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Feb 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in