Esophageal CancerNCT06829095
Personalized Nutrition Counseling and Nutritional Status of Esophageal Cancer and HNSCC Patients Undergoing CCRT
An observational study of Esophageal Cancer and Personalized Nutrition, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to improve the nutritional status of esophageal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy by the personalized nutrition counseling.Dietitians consult with participants which invited to be the experimental group and follow up weekly through communication software (Line) or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer, Personalized Nutrition
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 22 Aug 2023to 30 Jun 2025
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Who may be able to join
- pathologically and CT confirmed esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer
- CCRT therapy
- ECOG performance status grade≦2
- agree to participate the trial
- over 18 years
- no pregnant
Who cannot join
- have two or more cancers
- gastrointestinal tract cannot function
- NYHA class 4
- abnormal liver and kidney function
- Abnormal bone marrow hematopoiesis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
New Taipei City, 236
Hsuan-Chih Kuo, 0975366137, wisdom2000@gmail.com
Chia-Hsun Hsieh, 0975360665, hsuanchihkuo@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Personalized Nutrition Counseling to Improve the Nutritional Status of Esophageal Cancer or Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
The purpose of the study is to improve the nutritional status of esophageal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy by the personalized nutrition counseling.Dietitians consult with participants which invited to be the experimental group and follow up weekly through communication software (Line) or telephone remote methods. Dietitians provide the dietary advice base on the guidance of the cancer diet principles, and give on assessment and diet adjustments. At the same time, Under the same condition of nutritional supplements in both the experimental group and the control group, the investigators explore the changes in the quality of life and nutritional status of the subjects by evaluating with the nutrition Index (PG-SGA) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire Taiwan version) questionnaire evaluation and recode the basic physical data, including body weight, grip strength, body muscle fat composition. Therefore, investigators conducted this study to appoint dietitian to arrange personalized nutrition consultation for esophageal cancer patients to improve the nutritional status of these patients.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 60-85% of esophageal cancer patients present with malnutrition at diagnosis (1). Malnutrition, defined as body weight loss of more than 10% over the previous 6 months is associated with treatment response and survival (2). Around 38% of esophageal cancer patients are managed with curative intent in the form of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy (3). Individuals are at increased risk of malnutrition arising from disease related symptoms and neoadjuvant treatment. Nutritional status serves as an important risk factor for major complications after operation (4) Therefore, assessment of nutritional status should be undertaken for all esophageal cancer patients, especially for those who are planned to receive esophagectomy (5). The nutritional assessment includes hand grip for muscle mass (6), body composition for lean body mass and sarcopenia (7), body mass index- body weight loss grade (BMI-BWL grade) for generalized nutrition status (8). These tools are needed to be integrated and individualized to esophageal cancer patients to improve outcome. Therefore, investigators conducted this trial to appoint dietitian to arrange personalized nutrition consultation for esophageal cancer patients to improve the nutritional status of these patients.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer, Personalized Nutrition
- Keywords
- Personalized nutrition, Esophageal cancer, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control | Under the same condition of nutritional supplements in both the experimental group and the control group,the investigators explore the changes in the quality of life and nutritional status of the subjects by evaluating with the nutrition Index (PG-SGA) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire Taiwan version) questionnaire evaluation and recode the basic physical data, including body weight, grip strength, body muscle fat composition. | |
| experimental | Dietitians consult with participants which invited to be the experimental group and follow up weekly through communication software (Line) or telephone remote methods. Dietitians provide the dietary advice base on the guidance of the cancer diet principles, and give on assessment and diet adjustments.Under the same condition of nutritional supplements in both the experimental group and the control group,the investigators explore the changes in the quality of life and nutritional status of the subjects by evaluating with the nutrition Index (PG-SGA) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire Taiwan version) questionnaire evaluation and recode the basic physical data, including body weight, grip strength, body muscle fat composition. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
BMI in kg/m^2-W1
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: baseline
BMI in kg/m^2-W2
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 2nd week
BMI in kg/m^2-W3
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 3rd week
BMI in kg/m^2-W4
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 4th week
BMI in kg/m^2-W5
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 5th week
BMI in kg/m^2-W6
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 6th week
BMI in kg/m^2-W12
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 12th week
BMI in kg/m^2-W18
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 18th week
BMI in kg/m^2-W30
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 30th week
hand grip in kg-W1
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: baseline
hand grip in kg-W2
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 2nd week
hand grip in kg-W3
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 3rd week
hand grip in kg-W4
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 4th week
hand grip in kg-W5
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 5th week
hand grip in kg-W6
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 6th week
hand grip in kg-W12
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 12th week
hand grip in kg-W18
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 18th week
hand grip in kg-W30
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 30th week
body fat in kg-W1
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: baseline
body fat in kg-W2
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 2nd week
body fat in kg-W3
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 3rd week
body fat in kg-W4
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 4th week
body fat in kg-W5
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 5th week
body fat in kg-W6
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 6th week
body fat in kg-W12
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 12th week
body fat in kg-W18
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 18th week
body fat in kg-W30
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 30th week
muscle weight in kg-W1
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: baseline
muscle weight in kg-W2
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 2nd week
muscle weight in kg-W3
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 3rd week
muscle weight in kg-W4
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 4th week
muscle weight in kg-W5
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 5th week
muscle weight in kg-W6
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 6th week
muscle weight in kg-W12
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 12th week
muscle weight in kg-W18
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 18th week
muscle weight in kg-W30
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 30th week
CTC cell number counting in number-W1
Document of participant's CTC cell number counting and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: baseline
CTC cell number counting in number-W6
Document of participant's CTC cell number counting and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 6th week
CTC cell number counting in number-W18
Document of participant's CTC cell number counting and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
Measured: 18th week
Secondary outcomes (5)
Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, aPG-SGA Questionnaire W1
nutrition consultation and do the SGA questionnaire(the minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 36. The higher scores mean a worse outcome) for recoding and improving the nutritional status of participants.
Measured: baseline
Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, aPG-SGA Questionnaire W3
nutrition consultation and do the SGA questionnaire(the minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 36. The higher scores mean a worse outcome) for recoding and improving the nutritional status of participants.
Measured: 3th week
Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, aPG-SGA Questionnaire W6
nutrition consultation and do the SGA questionnaire(the minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 36. The higher scores mean a worse outcome) for recoding and improving the nutritional status of participants.
Measured: 6th week
aPG SGA Questionnaire W18
nutrition consultation and do the SGA questionnaire(the minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 36. The higher scores mean a worse outcome) for recoding and improving the nutritional status of participants.
Measured: 18th week
SGA-Questionnaire W30
nutrition consultation and do the SGA questionnaire(the minimum value is 1 and the maximum value is 36. The higher scores mean a worse outcome) for recoding and improving the nutritional status of participants.
Measured: 30th week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2025
- Study start22 Aug 2023
- Primary completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chang Gung Memorial HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hsuan-Chih Kuo, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
- Investigators
- Hsuan-Chih Kuo, Study director, Division of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06829095
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202300755B0
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2023
- Last updated
- 17 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Personalized Nutrition Counseling to Improve the Nutritional Status of Esophageal Cancer or Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06829095
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202300755B0
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer, Personalized Nutrition
- Keywords
- Personalized nutrition, Esophageal cancer, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Chang Gung Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Aug 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to improve the nutritional status of esophageal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy by the personalized nutrition counseling.Dietitians consult with participants which invited to be the experimental group and follow up weekly through communication software (Line) or telephone remote methods. Dietitians provide the dietary advice base on the guidance of the cancer diet principles, and give on assessment and diet adjustments. At the same time, Under the same condition of nutritional supplements in both the experimental group and the control group, the investigators explore the changes in the quality of life and nutritional status of the subjects by evaluating with the nutrition Index (PG-SGA) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire Taiwan version) questionnaire evaluation and recode the basic physical data, including body weight, grip strength, body muscle fat composition. Therefore, investigators conducted this study to appoint dietitian to arrange personalized nutrition consultation for esophageal cancer patients to improve the nutritional status of these patients.
Detailed description
Approximately 60-85% of esophageal cancer patients present with malnutrition at diagnosis (1). Malnutrition, defined as body weight loss of more than 10% over the previous 6 months is associated with treatment response and survival (2). Around 38% of esophageal cancer patients are managed with curative intent in the form of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy (3). Individuals are at increased risk of malnutrition arising from disease related symptoms and neoadjuvant treatment. Nutritional status serves as an important risk factor for major complications after operation (4) Therefore, assessment of nutritional status should be undertaken for all esophageal cancer patients, especially for those who are planned to receive esophagectomy (5). The nutritional assessment includes hand grip for muscle mass (6), body composition for lean body mass and sarcopenia (7), body mass index- body weight loss grade (BMI-BWL grade) for generalized nutrition status (8). These tools are needed to be integrated and individualized to esophageal cancer patients to improve outcome. Therefore, investigators conducted this trial to appoint dietitian to arrange personalized nutrition consultation for esophageal cancer patients to improve the nutritional status of these patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case crossover
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control | – | –Under the same condition of nutritional supplements in both the experimental group and the control group,the investigators explore the changes in the quality of life and nutritional status of the subjects by evaluating with the nutrition Index (PG-SGA) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire Taiwan version) questionnaire evaluation and recode the basic physical data, including body weight, grip strength, body muscle fat composition. |
| experimental | – | –Dietitians consult with participants which invited to be the experimental group and follow up weekly through communication software (Line) or telephone remote methods. Dietitians provide the dietary advice base on the guidance of the cancer diet principles, and give on assessment and diet adjustments.Under the same condition of nutritional supplements in both the experimental group and the control group,the investigators explore the changes in the quality of life and nutritional status of the subjects by evaluating with the nutrition Index (PG-SGA) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire Taiwan version) questionnaire evaluation and recode the basic physical data, including body weight, grip strength, body muscle fat composition. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- pathologically and CT confirmed esophageal cancer or head and neck cancer
- CCRT therapy
- ECOG performance status grade≦2
- agree to participate the trial
- over 18 years
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- have two or more cancers
- gastrointestinal tract cannot function
- NYHA class 4
- abnormal liver and kidney function
- Abnormal bone marrow hematopoiesis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
BMI in kg/m^2-W1
Time frame: baseline
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W2
Time frame: 2nd week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W3
Time frame: 3rd week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W4
Time frame: 4th week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W5
Time frame: 5th week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W6
Time frame: 6th week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W12
Time frame: 12th week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W18
Time frame: 18th week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
BMI in kg/m^2-W30
Time frame: 30th week
Document of participant's BMI and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W1
Time frame: baseline
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W2
Time frame: 2nd week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W3
Time frame: 3rd week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W4
Time frame: 4th week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W5
Time frame: 5th week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W6
Time frame: 6th week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W12
Time frame: 12th week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W18
Time frame: 18th week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
hand grip in kg-W30
Time frame: 30th week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W1
Time frame: baseline
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W2
Time frame: 2nd week
Document of participant's hand grip and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W3
Time frame: 3rd week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W4
Time frame: 4th week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W5
Time frame: 5th week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W6
Time frame: 6th week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W12
Time frame: 12th week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W18
Time frame: 18th week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
body fat in kg-W30
Time frame: 30th week
Document of participant's body fat and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W1
Time frame: baseline
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W2
Time frame: 2nd week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W3
Time frame: 3rd week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W4
Time frame: 4th week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W5
Time frame: 5th week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W6
Time frame: 6th week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W12
Time frame: 12th week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W18
Time frame: 18th week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
muscle weight in kg-W30
Time frame: 30th week
Document of participant's muscle weight and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
CTC cell number counting in number-W1
Time frame: baseline
Document of participant's CTC cell number counting and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
CTC cell number counting in number-W6
Time frame: 6th week
Document of participant's CTC cell number counting and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
CTC cell number counting in number-W18
Time frame: 18th week
Document of participant's CTC cell number counting and evaluating the effectiveness of nutritionist health education nutritional status
5 secondary outcomes
Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, aPG-SGA Questionnaire W1
Time frame: baseline
Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, aPG-SGA Questionnaire W3
Time frame: 3th week
Abridged Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, aPG-SGA Questionnaire W6
Time frame: 6th week
aPG SGA Questionnaire W18
Time frame: 18th week
SGA-Questionnaire W30
Time frame: 30th week
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Feb 2025.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hsuan-Chih Kuo study director
Division of Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Esophageal Cancer and Personalized Nutrition, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chia-Hsun Hsieh (0975366137, wisdom5000@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
BMI in kg/m^2-W1 (time frame: baseline). The study lists 39 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Feb 2025.