MusculoskeletalMSk EATSNCT06829875
Are we Providing Timely Access to Musculoskeletal Outpatient Therapy Services? An Exploratory Study
An observational study of Musculoskeletal, run by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Waiting times for NHS services are of growing public interest. This is because accessing some services is getting more difficult, and investigators know that longer waits can result in negative impacts for those waiting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Musculoskeletal
- What is being tested?
- wait for outpatient appointment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 4 Feb 2025to 25 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: people residing in the remit of Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, entering the waiting list of Outpatient Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Occupational therapy or Podiatry
Who may be able to join
- aged 18 years or over
- have entered a waiting list for outpatient podiatry, occupational therapy or physiotherapy with a musculoskeletal complaint
- able to provide informed consent
- be able to read and write english
Who cannot join
- are considered a vulnerable adult
- exhibit additional communication needs, to include but not limited to, language barrier
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Cardiff and Vale University Healthboard
Cardiff, Wales
About this study
Waiting times for NHS services are of growing public interest. This is because accessing some services is getting more difficult, and investigators know that longer waits can result in negative impacts for those waiting.
People in Wales waiting for care for their musculoskeletal problems are deemed to be cared for in good time if they get an appointment in less than 14 weeks. This target has been set by Welsh Government, for everyone who waits, no matter what condition they are waiting with and how that condition is affecting them. Investigators know that impact of wait for people with MSK problems can vary, from complete recovery, to worsening of their pain and function. The impact experienced seems to be influenced by factors such as their age and their mental health status. This suggests that setting one target for all may not be the right thing to do. However, investigators don't yet know whether waiting over 14 weeks has a big effect on impact. They also don't know about the lived experience of those waiting, while they wait, despite knowing that learning this is vital to informing change.
Investigators plan to study the impact of waiting for these services by asking those waiting to complete a survey that measures the impact of their msk problem, at the start and end of their wait, and then understanding how the scores correlate with length of time waited. They will also ask some of these people to document their experience as they wait. They hope that this will provide an understanding of how effective the current target is at measuring access to these services, and whether they need to think differently. Participants will be able to complete this work in their own home.
Read the detailed description
Access to NHS and social care services has been of increasing public interest for many years. Increasing waits to services has been long documented, and the COVID-19 pandemic saw waiting times soar to an all time high. This is not favourable because of the known negative impacts experienced by the waiter, when waiting longer for the services they need. Improving access to services is not only a National Driver featured throughout policy (A Healthier Wales, 2018) but a legal obligation (Duty of Quality, 2023).
Access to services in Wales has been studied by Welsh Government for decades. This is usually measured by the time taken in weeks from referral to treatment, and is supported to be necessary in some areas, whereby increased waiting time can result in morbidity, or mortality, for example, heart attacks and strokes. Literature exploring impact with wait is lacking when considering many areas of health, for example musculoskeletal conditions. However, such services are also duty bound to report their waiting times to Welsh Government.
Outpatient MSk Therapy Services, for example, report how long each person waits before an initial appointment is offered, in number of weeks. An appointment offered within 14 weeks of referral is considered 'timely' and people waiting over this time are considered to be 'breaching'. How this target became to be considered significant is not publicly justified. The impact of those waiting over 14 weeks on the person waiting, is not known.
Impact exploring those waiting for treatment for musuculoskeletal disorders is extremely limited. However, preliminary, retrospective study during COVID-19 suggests that those waiting for these services during this time, experienced a diversity of impact, from symptom recovery to deterioration of condition. The variables observed differed between individuals, as opposing to differing lengths of wait, and seemed to be influenced by personal factors such as socioeconomic and mental health status. This provides an insight that impact of wait is variable between individuals and does not align with current study of accessibility subjecting all people to the same arbitrary target without knowing what happens around this time. Investigators know that future health and social care services need to be sustainable for the NHS to survive. Investigators know that they need to look at things differently, considering the quality of the care that is provided rather than the quantity, and they are duty bound to explore how the NHS is doing with respect to quality, using both qualitative and quantitative information, involving all stakeholders. They know that this is vital to inform positive system change. However, there is no current exploration into the experience of waiting for MSk services, in the eyes of the waiter, as they wait. Understanding this may help investigators to understand what a future model of MSk Outpatient healthcare should look like with respect to accessibility, and implement a sustainable solution for future generations. This is assuming that their current understanding of wait is inadequate, or not appropriate, based on the information available communicating accessibility through use of an arbitrary, unjustified blanket target for all, which remains an unknown.
This research project aims to understand the impact of chronological wait for people waiting for Musculoskeletal Therapy Outpatient Services, with reference given to under and over 14 weeks, to understand if the current target is effective at communicating how services are doing in this domain. It will also explore the lived experience of waiting in the eyes of the waiter, and seeks to understand whether this understanding aligns with what is seen when studying impact of wait chronologically, with a view to provide a quality rich understanding of the impact of waiting for these services, and provide a direction of travel for future study.
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal
- Being tested
- wait for outpatient appointment
- Keywords
- access, waiting times, impact of wait, musculoskeletal pain, msk pain, musculoskeletal conditions, physiotherapy outpatients, podiatry outpatients, occupational therapy outpatients, musculoskeletal therapy services
- Medical subject headings
- Musculoskeletal Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
wait for outpatient appointmentProcedure or surgery
this is an observational study measuring impact of pain and function at start and end of wait for those waiting for care from outpatient physiotherapy occupations therapy and podiatry
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| service users entering waiting lists for outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy, podiatry and OY | Not described Receives: Procedure: wait for outpatient appointment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire
The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a short questionnaire that allows people with musculoskeletal conditions (such as arthritis or back pain) to report their symptoms and quality of life in a standardised way. It is comprised of holistic indicators that reflect how well services improve quality of life for people with musculoskeletal conditions, such as arthritis or back pain. The MSK-HQ instrument is designed to be used across different musculoskeletal care pathways in different healthcare settings. It has been derived by identifying impacts measured in other existing scores and understanding which are most important to patients. The result is a 14 question survey, with an option of one of five closed responses, each with an associated score. The result is derived by adding each of the scores obtained from the 14 questions to create a final score between 0-56, with a higher score indicating better MSk-HQ status.
Measured: from enrolment until the end of wait - currently up to 14 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2025
- Study start4 Feb 2025
- Primary completion25 Nov 2025
- Study completion25 Nov 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MusculoskeletalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Cardiff University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sara P James, MSc, Principal investigator, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06829875
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 8851
- Acronym
- MSk EATS
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: CI handling all participant information. Feasibility study
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Are we Providing Timely Access to Musculoskeletal Outpatient Therapy Services? An Exploratory Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06829875
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MSk EATS / 8851
- Conditions
- Musculoskeletal
- Keywords
- access, waiting times, impact of wait, musculoskeletal pain, msk pain, musculoskeletal conditions, physiotherapy outpatients, podiatry outpatients
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cardiff and Vale University Health BoardOther government
- Collaborators
- Cardiff University
- Study start
- 4 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Waiting times for NHS services are of growing public interest. This is because accessing some services is getting more difficult, and investigators know that longer waits can result in negative impacts for those waiting.
People in Wales waiting for care for their musculoskeletal problems are deemed to be cared for in good time if they get an appointment in less than 14 weeks. This target has been set by Welsh Government, for everyone who waits, no matter what condition they are waiting with and how that condition is affecting them. Investigators know that impact of wait for people with MSK problems can vary, from complete recovery, to worsening of their pain and function. The impact experienced seems to be influenced by factors such as their age and their mental health status. This suggests that setting one target for all may not be the right thing to do. However, investigators don't yet know whether waiting over 14 weeks has a big effect on impact. They also don't know about the lived experience of those waiting, while they wait, despite knowing that learning this is vital to informing change.
Investigators plan to study the impact of waiting for these services by asking those waiting to complete a survey that measures the impact of their msk problem, at the start and end of their wait, and then understanding how the scores correlate with length of time waited. They will also ask some of these people to document their experience as they wait. They hope that this will provide an understanding of how effective the current target is at measuring access to these services, and whether they need to think differently. Participants will be able to complete this work in their own home.
Detailed description
Access to NHS and social care services has been of increasing public interest for many years. Increasing waits to services has been long documented, and the COVID-19 pandemic saw waiting times soar to an all time high. This is not favourable because of the known negative impacts experienced by the waiter, when waiting longer for the services they need. Improving access to services is not only a National Driver featured throughout policy (A Healthier Wales, 2018) but a legal obligation (Duty of Quality, 2023).
Access to services in Wales has been studied by Welsh Government for decades. This is usually measured by the time taken in weeks from referral to treatment, and is supported to be necessary in some areas, whereby increased waiting time can result in morbidity, or mortality, for example, heart attacks and strokes. Literature exploring impact with wait is lacking when considering many areas of health, for example musculoskeletal conditions. However, such services are also duty bound to report their waiting times to Welsh Government.
Outpatient MSk Therapy Services, for example, report how long each person waits before an initial appointment is offered, in number of weeks. An appointment offered within 14 weeks of referral is considered 'timely' and people waiting over this time are considered to be 'breaching'. How this target became to be considered significant is not publicly justified. The impact of those waiting over 14 weeks on the person waiting, is not known.
Impact exploring those waiting for treatment for musuculoskeletal disorders is extremely limited. However, preliminary, retrospective study during COVID-19 suggests that those waiting for these services during this time, experienced a diversity of impact, from symptom recovery to deterioration of condition. The variables observed differed between individuals, as opposing to differing lengths of wait, and seemed to be influenced by personal factors such as socioeconomic and mental health status. This provides an insight that impact of wait is variable between individuals and does not align with current study of accessibility subjecting all people to the same arbitrary target without knowing what happens around this time. Investigators know that future health and social care services need to be sustainable for the NHS to survive. Investigators know that they need to look at things differently, considering the quality of the care that is provided rather than the quantity, and they are duty bound to explore how the NHS is doing with respect to quality, using both qualitative and quantitative information, involving all stakeholders. They know that this is vital to inform positive system change. However, there is no current exploration into the experience of waiting for MSk services, in the eyes of the waiter, as they wait. Understanding this may help investigators to understand what a future model of MSk Outpatient healthcare should look like with respect to accessibility, and implement a sustainable solution for future generations. This is assuming that their current understanding of wait is inadequate, or not appropriate, based on the information available communicating accessibility through use of an arbitrary, unjustified blanket target for all, which remains an unknown.
This research project aims to understand the impact of chronological wait for people waiting for Musculoskeletal Therapy Outpatient Services, with reference given to under and over 14 weeks, to understand if the current target is effective at communicating how services are doing in this domain. It will also explore the lived experience of waiting in the eyes of the waiter, and seeks to understand whether this understanding aligns with what is seen when studying impact of wait chronologically, with a view to provide a quality rich understanding of the impact of waiting for these services, and provide a direction of travel for future study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| service users entering waiting lists for outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy, podiatry and OY | – | Procedure: wait for outpatient appointment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- people residing in the remit of Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, entering the waiting list of Outpatient Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy, Occupational therapy or Podiatry
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- aged 18 years or over
- have entered a waiting list for outpatient podiatry, occupational therapy or physiotherapy with a musculoskeletal complaint
- able to provide informed consent
- be able to read and write english
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- are considered a vulnerable adult
- exhibit additional communication needs, to include but not limited to, language barrier
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| wait for outpatient appointmentthis is an observational study measuring impact of pain and function at start and end of wait for those waiting for care from outpatient physiotherapy occupations therapy and podiatry | Procedure or surgery | service users entering waiting lists for outpatient musculoskeletal physiotherapy, podiatry and OY |
Primary outcome
Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire
Time frame: from enrolment until the end of wait - currently up to 14 weeks
The Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ) is a short questionnaire that allows people with musculoskeletal conditions (such as arthritis or back pain) to report their symptoms and quality of life in a standardised way. It is comprised of holistic indicators that reflect how well services improve quality of life for people with musculoskeletal conditions, such as arthritis or back pain. The MSK-HQ instrument is designed to be used across different musculoskeletal care pathways in different healthcare settings. It has been derived by identifying impacts measured in other existing scores and understanding which are most important to patients. The result is a 14 question survey, with an option of one of five closed responses, each with an associated score. The result is derived by adding each of the scores obtained from the 14 questions to create a final score between 0-56, with a higher score indicating better MSk-HQ status.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. CI handling all participant information. Feasibility study
Related trials for Musculoskeletal
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 2
Study of PTC844 in Participants With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A First-in-human Study of KK8123 in Adults With X-linked Hypophosphatemia
X-linked Hypophosphatemia
Recruiting
Effects of Cervicothoracic Mobilization in Patients With Supraspinatus Tendinitis
Rotator Cuff Tendonitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sara P James, MSc principal investigator
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Musculoskeletal, run by Cardiff and Vale University Health Board at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (time frame: from enrolment until the end of wait - currently up to 14 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.