AzTrials
AzTrials

Posterior Fossa LesionNCT06831695

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Craniotomy and Craniectomy in Posterior Fossa Lesions

A study testing Craniotomy and Craniectomy in people with Posterior Fossa Lesion, run by University of Health Sciences Lahore.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the surgical outcomes of craniotomy and craniectomy among patients with posterior fossa lesions. The study aims to determine differences in post-operative complications, hospital stay duration, and patient recovery between the two surgical techniques. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 7 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Posterior Fossa Lesion
What is being tested?
Craniotomy and Craniectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
4 Mar 2025to Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 7 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with posterior fossa lesions
  • Age range: 7-70 years
  • Patients with cerebellar hematoma (traumatic or spontaneous)

Who cannot join

  • Previous posterior fossa surgery
  • Brainstem hematoma
  • Tumors involving the overlying dura or bone

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Dr. Birat Thapa Magar, Post Graduate Resident contact

+923057895437

biratjmagar.5@gmail.com

About this study

Official title: Comparison Between Surgical Outcomes of Craniotomy and Craniectomy Among Patients with Posterior Fossa Lesion

The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the surgical outcomes of craniotomy and craniectomy among patients with posterior fossa lesions. The study aims to determine differences in post-operative complications, hospital stay duration, and patient recovery between the two surgical techniques.

Read the detailed description

Patients diagnosed with posterior fossa lesions will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A will undergo craniotomy, where the bone flap is replaced after dural closure, while Group B will undergo craniectomy, where the bone is permanently removed. Outcomes will be assessed based on post-operative complications such as CSF leakage, pseudomeningocele formation, post-operative headache, and length of hospital stay. The study aims to provide evidence to determine the superior surgical approach in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare cost reduction.

Being tested
Craniotomy, Craniectomy
Keywords
Craniotomy, Craniectomy, Neurosurgery, Posterior Fossa, Brain Tumors
Medical subject headings
Brain Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CraniotomyProcedure or surgery

    Intervention: Bone flap replaced after dural closure Additional Information: This procedure involves creating a single free bone flap using high-speed drills. The bone is repositioned and secured using mini plates or sutures after the surgical intervention is completed. Post-operative monitoring will include assessment for CSF leakage, wound healing, and neurological recovery.

  • CraniectomyProcedure or surgery

    Intervention: Bone permanently removed Additional Information: In this approach, the bone is removed in pieces using rongeurs, leaving an open dural surface without replacement of the bone. The dura is closed with sutures, and dural augmentation may be performed as needed. Post-operative assessment will focus on complications such as pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, and extended hospital stays.

Study groups in NCT06831695
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: CraniotomyActive comparatorThis procedure involves creating a single free bone flap using high-speed drills. The bone is repositioned and secured using mini plates or sutures after the surgical intervention is completed. Post-operative monitoring will include assessment for CSF leakage, wound healing, and neurological recovery.
Receives: Procedure: Craniotomy
Group B: CraniectomyActive comparatorIn this approach, the bone is removed in pieces using rongeurs, leaving an open dural surface without replacement of the bone. The dura is closed with sutures, and dural augmentation may be performed as needed. Post-operative assessment will focus on complications such as pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, and extended hospital stays.
Receives: Procedure: Craniectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of CSF leakage

    Definition: CSF leakage is defined as the presence of clear fluid discharge from the surgical site, confirmed via clinical examination and biochemical analysis of β-2 transferrin.

    Measurement: Evaluated by clinical assessment at routine follow-ups and imaging studies when indicated.

    Measured: Up to 6 months post-surgery

  2. Occurrence of pseudomeningocele

    Definition: Pseudomeningocele is defined as an abnormal collection of cerebrospinal fluid in the surgical site, detected through physical examination and confirmed by imaging techniques such as MRI or CT scan.

    Measurement: Follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery.

    Measured: Up to 6 months post-surgery

  3. Severity of post-operative headache

    Definition: Post-operative headache will be assessed using the Catalano grading system, categorizing severity from 0 (no headache) to 4 (severe, refractory to medication).

    Measurement: Self-reported patient evaluations at each follow-up visit.

    Measured: Immediately post-surgery, at 3 months, and at 6 months post-surgery

  4. Length of hospital stay

    Definition: The total number of days a patient remains hospitalized post-surgery, including any extended stay due to complications.

    Measurement: Recorded from hospital admission to discharge.

    Measured: From immediate post-surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2025
  2. Study start4 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06831695
Sponsor's protocol ID
Exp128
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
10 Feb 2025
Last updated
18 Feb 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in