Posterior Fossa LesionNCT06831695
Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Craniotomy and Craniectomy in Posterior Fossa Lesions
A study testing Craniotomy and Craniectomy in people with Posterior Fossa Lesion, run by University of Health Sciences Lahore.
Trial summary
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the surgical outcomes of craniotomy and craniectomy among patients with posterior fossa lesions. The study aims to determine differences in post-operative complications, hospital stay duration, and patient recovery between the two surgical techniques. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Posterior Fossa Lesion
- What is being tested?
- Craniotomy and Craniectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 4 Mar 2025to Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with posterior fossa lesions
- Age range: 7-70 years
- Patients with cerebellar hematoma (traumatic or spontaneous)
Who cannot join
- Previous posterior fossa surgery
- Brainstem hematoma
- Tumors involving the overlying dura or bone
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Comparison Between Surgical Outcomes of Craniotomy and Craniectomy Among Patients with Posterior Fossa Lesion
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the surgical outcomes of craniotomy and craniectomy among patients with posterior fossa lesions. The study aims to determine differences in post-operative complications, hospital stay duration, and patient recovery between the two surgical techniques.
Read the detailed description
Patients diagnosed with posterior fossa lesions will be randomly assigned into two groups. Group A will undergo craniotomy, where the bone flap is replaced after dural closure, while Group B will undergo craniectomy, where the bone is permanently removed. Outcomes will be assessed based on post-operative complications such as CSF leakage, pseudomeningocele formation, post-operative headache, and length of hospital stay. The study aims to provide evidence to determine the superior surgical approach in terms of patient outcomes and healthcare cost reduction.
- Conditions
- Posterior Fossa Lesion
- Being tested
- Craniotomy, Craniectomy
- Keywords
- Craniotomy, Craniectomy, Neurosurgery, Posterior Fossa, Brain Tumors
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CraniotomyProcedure or surgery
Intervention: Bone flap replaced after dural closure Additional Information: This procedure involves creating a single free bone flap using high-speed drills. The bone is repositioned and secured using mini plates or sutures after the surgical intervention is completed. Post-operative monitoring will include assessment for CSF leakage, wound healing, and neurological recovery.
CraniectomyProcedure or surgery
Intervention: Bone permanently removed Additional Information: In this approach, the bone is removed in pieces using rongeurs, leaving an open dural surface without replacement of the bone. The dura is closed with sutures, and dural augmentation may be performed as needed. Post-operative assessment will focus on complications such as pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, and extended hospital stays.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Craniotomy | Active comparator | This procedure involves creating a single free bone flap using high-speed drills. The bone is repositioned and secured using mini plates or sutures after the surgical intervention is completed. Post-operative monitoring will include assessment for CSF leakage, wound healing, and neurological recovery. Receives: Procedure: Craniotomy |
| Group B: Craniectomy | Active comparator | In this approach, the bone is removed in pieces using rongeurs, leaving an open dural surface without replacement of the bone. The dura is closed with sutures, and dural augmentation may be performed as needed. Post-operative assessment will focus on complications such as pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, and extended hospital stays. Receives: Procedure: Craniectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of CSF leakage
Definition: CSF leakage is defined as the presence of clear fluid discharge from the surgical site, confirmed via clinical examination and biochemical analysis of β-2 transferrin.
Measurement: Evaluated by clinical assessment at routine follow-ups and imaging studies when indicated.
Measured: Up to 6 months post-surgery
Occurrence of pseudomeningocele
Definition: Pseudomeningocele is defined as an abnormal collection of cerebrospinal fluid in the surgical site, detected through physical examination and confirmed by imaging techniques such as MRI or CT scan.
Measurement: Follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months post-surgery.
Measured: Up to 6 months post-surgery
Severity of post-operative headache
Definition: Post-operative headache will be assessed using the Catalano grading system, categorizing severity from 0 (no headache) to 4 (severe, refractory to medication).
Measurement: Self-reported patient evaluations at each follow-up visit.
Measured: Immediately post-surgery, at 3 months, and at 6 months post-surgery
Length of hospital stay
Definition: The total number of days a patient remains hospitalized post-surgery, including any extended stay due to complications.
Measurement: Recorded from hospital admission to discharge.
Measured: From immediate post-surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2025
- Study start4 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Posterior Fossa LesionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Health Sciences Lahore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Birat Thapa Magar, University of Health Sciences Lahore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06831695
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Exp128
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided