AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetic Foot UlcerNCT06832787

Evaluation of Combinational Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for Diabetic Foot Wounds

A study testing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Kerecis and Delayed primary closure with local flap in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Singapore General Hospital at 2 sites in Singapore.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Singapore has one of the world's highest diabetes-related lower limb amputation rates in the world. Between 2008 - 2017, 4724/5306 (89.0%) of all major amputations and 6656/7227 (92.1%) of all toe/ray amputations performed in Singapore were for diabetic patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
What is being tested?
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Kerecis and Delayed primary closure with local flap
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
75 participants
Where
2 sitesSingapore
Study dates
22 Jul 2025to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 21-100
  • First or last toe ray amputation
  • Adequate perfusion (either >50% stenosis on duplex ultrasound or undergone successful revascularization with <30% residual stenosis)

Who cannot join

  • Amputations not at first or last toe
  • Venous ulcers
  • Heel ulcers
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Active Infection
  • Patients on imunosuppressant
  • Patients with known allergy to fish
  • Patients unable to give informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Singapore2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Singapore General Hospital

    Singapore, 169856

    Charyl Yap, +65 65797986, charyl.yap.j.q@sgh.com.sg

    Jack Kian Ch'ng

    Recruiting
  • Sengkang General Hospital

    Singapore

    Michelle Mo, +65 6930 5333, michelle.m.j@skh.com.sg

    Jiajun Feng

    Recruiting

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Prospective, Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial for the Combinational Use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for the Treatment of Diabetic Wounds

Singapore has one of the world's highest diabetes-related lower limb amputation rates in the world. Between 2008 - 2017, 4724/5306 (89.0%) of all major amputations and 6656/7227 (92.1%) of all toe/ray amputations performed in Singapore were for diabetic patients. Diabetic foot ulcers are generally slow to heal and poor wound management may lead to infection and subsequently major amputations. Hence, adequate wound care to achieve wound healing efficiently and effectively is of utmost importance.

In the investigators' clinical practice, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy has been the dressing of choice to aid wound closure and prevent infective complications. Drainage of wound exudates helps to reduce and prevent infection, promote granulation tissue proliferation and induce cell growth. When used in combination with dermal substitutes, graft uptake is improved by further promoting proliferation and encouraging tissue regeneration.

Read more

Wounds can also be closed surgically though primary closure, where the skin is closed and serves as a physical barrier against infection. The technique is not without its pros and cons. Primary closure may decrease healing time and reduce need for additional surgery, but these patients are also at risk of recurrent infection and may require more proximal amputation. These may be circumvented with delayed primary closure, which is the surgical closure of the amputation wound at a delayed timing after amputation. This gives the clinical team time to optimize the wound and ensure that there is no underlying infection prior to closure.

The experience of NPWT + Kerecis Omega 3 and delayed primary closure have been positive. To the investigators' current knowledge, there is only one case series reported for the use of fish skin graft in combination with NPWT for the treatment of acute pediatric wounds and two case series for the use of NPWT in diabetic foot wound that has undergone surgical closure. The proposed study would be the first RCT to evaluate effects of combination therapy in both open and closed diabetic foot ulcers.

Being tested
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Kerecis, Delayed primary closure with local flap
Keywords
Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Dermal Substitute, Delayed wound closure
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Foot

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Negative Pressure Wound TherapyDevice

    NPWT applied over wound without any adjuncts

  • KerecisDevice

    Kerecis Omega3 Wound Dressing is derived from fish skin and is used as a dermal substitute.

  • Delayed primary closure with local flapDevice

    Delayed primary closure with local flap to close wound

Study groups in NCT06832787
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NPWT OnlyOtherControl: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy only
Receives: Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
NPWT + KerecisActive comparatorCombinational Therapy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy + application of Kerecis Omega 3 Wound Matrix
Receives: Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy; Device: Kerecis
NPWT + Delayed Primary Closure with Local FlapActive comparatorCombinational Therapy of Delayed Primary Closure with Local Flap and Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Receives: Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy; Device: Delayed primary closure with local flap

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of 100% Wound Closure at 12 weeks

    100% Wound Closure defined as re-epithelization without any need for dressing

    Measured: 12 weeks post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Time in days taken to achieve complete wound closure

    Time (in days) taken from intervention to 100% wound closure

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

  2. Change in Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale Score from Baseline to 12 weeks

    Pain score is measured using the Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. Participants will be asked at baseline, and at 4, 8 and 12 weeks subsequently. 0 corresponds to "no pain", and 10 corresponds to "worst pain imaginable".

    Measured: From time of intervention to 12 weeks post-intervention

  3. Occurrence of infection during study period

    Occurrence of any infection at index wound during follow-up period is recorded

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

  4. Occurrence of further minor amputation during study period

    Occurrence of further minor amputation at index wound during follow-up period is recorded

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

  5. Occurrence of major amputation during study period

    Occurrence of major amputation at index limb during follow-up period is recorded

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

  6. Occurrence of death during study period

    Occurrence of death during follow-up period is recorded

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Feb 2025
  2. Study start22 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
75 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06832787
Sponsor's protocol ID
2024/2226
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
11 Feb 2025
Last updated
25 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Due to Personal Data Protection Act.

Publications

  • Ciprandi G, Kjartansson H, Grussu F, Baldursson BT, Frattaroli J, Urbani U, Zama M. Use of acellular intact fish skin grafts in treating acute paediatric wounds during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case series. J Wound Care. 2022 Oct 2;31(10):824-831. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2022.31.10.824.

    PubMed 36240798
  • Aerden D, Vanmierlo B, Denecker N, Brasseur L, Keymeulen B, Van den Brande P. Primary closure with a filleted hallux flap after transmetatarsal amputation of the big toe for osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: a short series of four cases. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2012 Jun;11(2):80-4. doi: 10.1177/1534734612446640. Epub 2012 May 4.

    PubMed 22561521
  • Blume PA, Paragas LK, Sumpio BE, Attinger CE. Single-stage surgical treatment of noninfected diabetic foot ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Feb;109(2):601-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00029.

    PubMed 11818842
  • Berceli SA, Brown JE, Irwin PB, Ozaki CK. Clinical outcomes after closed, staged, and open forefoot amputations. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):347-351; discussion 352. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.04.043.

    PubMed 16890866
  • Zhang L, Weng T, Wu P, Li Q, Han C, Wang X. The Combined Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy and Dermal Substitutes for Tissue Repair and Regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 4;2020:8824737. doi: 10.1155/2020/8824737. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 33344649
  • Normandin S, Safran T, Winocour S, Chu CK, Vorstenbosch J, Murphy AM, Davison PG. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Mechanism of Action and Clinical Applications. Semin Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;35(3):164-170. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731792. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

    PubMed 34526864
  • Riandini T, Pang D, Toh MPHS, Tan CS, Choong AMTL, Lo ZJ, Chandrasekar S, Tai ES, Tan KB, Venkataraman K. National Rates of Lower Extremity Amputation in People With and Without Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population: a Ten Year Study in Singapore. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022 Jan;63(1):147-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.09.041. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

    PubMed 34916107

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, Kerecis and Delayed primary closure with local flap in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer, run by Singapore General Hospital at 2 sites in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Charyl Yap, B.Sc (+65 6576 7986, charyl.yap.j.q@sgh.com.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of 100% Wound Closure at 12 weeks (time frame: 12 weeks post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06832787, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in